Meeting Ref: Project Title/No:
|
|
- Olivia Taylor
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Project Title/No: Glasgow Airport SIDs ACP Meeting Ref: CL-5170-MIN-050-V1.0 Purpose: Framework Briefing Date: 10 Feb 16 Venue: CAA House, K4 Apollo Time: Attendees: CAA SARG Representatives '''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''' Airspace Regulator ''''''''' '''''''''''' ''''''''' Airspace Regulator '''''''''''''' ''''''''''' '''''''' Policy and Programmes (Environment) '''''''''' '''''''''''''''' ''''''''' IFP Regulator ''''''''' ''''''''' ''''''''' ATS Inspector ''''''''''' ''''''''''' '''''''' Airspace Regulator ''''''''''' ''''''''''' ''''''' ATS Inspector ''''''''' '''''''''''''''' '''''''''' Airspace Regulator (ACP Policy) '''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''' IFP Regulator '''''''''' ''''''''''''' ''''''''' Airspace Regulator (ACP Policy) ACP Sponsor Team ''''''''''' '''''''''''' ''''''' Glasgow Airport Limited (Head of Airside) ''''''''' '''''''''' ''''''''' NATS General Manager ATS Glasgow ''''''''' ''''''''''''''''' ''''''''' Cyrrus Ltd Project Manager '''''''''' ''''''''''''' ''''''' Cyrrus Ltd IFP Designer '''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''' '''''''' Cyrrus Ltd ATM Consultant Apologies: '''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''' CAA SARG Distribution: Attendees Cyrrus File Notes ITEM N01 INTRODUCTION '''''' welcomed the ACP Sponsor Team and invited those present to explain their role and responsibility in regards to the change process. '''' thanked the CAA for arranging the Framework Briefing and provided a brief overview of why the introduction of RNAV-1 SIDs was necessary. She explained that last year Glasgow had initiated a Feasibility Study to understand the options available to introduce appropriate PBN procedures to replace the conventional SIDs which were predicated upon the availability of the GOW VOR. The VOR was to be withdrawn as part of the rationalisation of the UK VOR infrastructure under the auspices of the NATS VOR Replacement Programme (approved by the CAA in 2014).
2 N02 ITEM N N N05 It was recognised that any change would necessitate an ACP, but it was clear that various external CNS/ATM initiatives would influence what change could be implemented. Consequently, it was confirmed that in the event that any innovative solution was to be considered, this would be as part of a separate ACP project which would be applied for as a separate project but the immediate demand was to ensure that business continuity could be sustained when the GOW VOR was withdrawn from use in May The focus of the replication ACP would be RNAV-1 Replication as completion of the change process (although challenging) was deemed achievable in the timetable set by the withdrawal of the VOR from operational use. ''''' remarked that a second phase could follow although this is not confirmed at present and there was no timetable attached to this aspirational change as the objectives were not yet clear. '''''' added that the objectives of the Glasgow replication ACP were compatible with the objectives set for the Scottish TMA re-design programme. '''''' acknowledged the rationale for separating the replication project from any future plan and that SARG recognised the need to adopt the RNAV-1 Replication for the planned ACP. ''''' invited '''''' to make a presentation about the proposed replication ACP. SPONSOR BRIEFING ''''' provided an overview of the presentation stating the: Objectives; Assumptions upon which the ACP would be executed; Proposed schedule; Options considered for replicating the departures; The project risks and opportunities that this change proposal posed; Environmental considerations to be applied to the ACP. A copy of the presentation was requested by ''''' and ''''' agreed that this would be sent with the minutes of the meeting. ''''' added that the presentation and the official notes taken at the meeting would become part of the public record for the ACP. ''''' acknowledged this requirement. The outline schedule presented was challenging and '''''' advised that some of the stages within the process would be run in parallel in order to achieve key milestone dates. The schedule was discussed in greater detail to examine what activities lay on the critical path and the potential effect on the SARG outline schedule. '''' advised that the feasibility study in summer 2015 revealed that the RNAV-1 designs could be based on TF with some CF in the mix. Although a survey about aircraft avionics and crew capability to use the various facets of PBN technology had been issued, the results received thus far had been inconclusive about the potential use of RF design. It was expected that responses from each of the base airlines contacted would be received before the Focus Group work commenced at the end of Feb ''''' suggested that the results might indicate that retention of a single conventional procedure for each runway may be a necessary contingency and sought guidance on the possible designs that might be employed including omni-directional departures (ODD).
3 N N N N09 '''''' raised a point for discussion that if a conventional procedure was retained then that will not be defined as a RNAV-1 Replication of the existing SIDs; there would have to be a new conventional procedure. '''''' acknowledged the distinction but advised that the nominal track would be the same as that flown today but potentially using a different type of navigational aid. ''''''' remarked that that was understood but the Sponsor needed to ensure that the extent of the replication and the potential introduction of a new conventional procedure was made clear in the Sponsor Consultation document. '''''' advised that if the conventional procedures were being developed, for example to sustain the public service obligation air routes and for those aircraft responding to air ambulance requirements then this must be articulated and explained in the Sponsor Consultation document. The need for a conventional procedure would be examined further after the planned Focus Group meetings. ''''' asked to be kept informed. ''''' suggested that each SID needs to be identified and the usage by the aircraft operators determined as this data would justify the changes proposed. The potential for any non-rnav 1 equipped aircraft operations could then be identified, and appropriate alternative designs for conventional departures be considered. As this may have the potential to result in a different track over the ground, the impacts of such proposals would have to be made clear in consultation material, as the ACP could become a mix of SID replications and new conventional departures depending on the final solutions determined by the sponsor. It was also important to show existing track dispersion plots for all existing departures, and that this data should be provided to the CAA so that precise consultation requirements can be ratified prior to commencement of consultation. '''' was pleased that there is a willingness to explore options and reiterated Glasgow s unique air operation due to fleet mix and the air services to the outer reaches of Scotland. '''' also noted that the preferred option for Glasgow Airport would not be to undertake the ACP at present and to wait until any future plans for change were understood fully, however, timescales driven by the target date for GOW DVOR switch off would not allow for this approach. ''''' explained that the Sponsor was aware of the design process to be followed and advised that the RNAV-1 design parameters to be applied to the replication of the conventional SIDs would be based upon the results of the airline survey. ''''' asked to what extent there had been consultation with Prestwick Centre (PC) about the proposed changes. ''''''' advised that the Sponsor had been fully engaged with the PC staff through the auspices of the SDDG which was addressing TMA changes. '''' asked if there would be a trial of the new RNAV-1 procedures. '''''' advised that the process for change was clearly defined and that the safety assessment activity undertaken by the ANSP would determine training/trial requirements. ''''' remarked that it would be beneficial to have a further meeting (or a conference call) when the results of the survey and the output from the Focus Groups was available. This was agreed and nominally set for the beginning of March. '''''' advised that CAA would suggest dates so that key personnel in SARG and the Sponsor s team could find a mutually convenient time to conclude discussion on design/consultation matters. ''''''''' was asked to send '''''' the planned schedule for the Focus Group activities.
4 ITEM N N N N13 ITEM 4 ACP REQUIREMENTS ''''''' confirmed that the SARG Policy Statement on Replication (dated 19 August 2013) was current and '''''' advised that the Sponsor should follow the guidance provided within the Statement. '''''' also confirmed that the current CAP 725 (Third Edition [corrected] April 2007) remained extant and should be used by the Sponsor. He advised that the on-going review of the CAP 725 process would culminate in a consultation on the proposed amendment and was due to be launched in the near future, but its outcome would not affect how Glasgow should undertake its consultation on the subject airspace change proposal. It was confirmed that a double-airac would be appropriate for the changes proposed. The CAA would need to confirm that it was satisfied that any RNAV SIDs represent replications of the existing conventional SIDs, as defined in the CAA s Replication Policy. ''''''' suggested that the Airport Consultative Committee (ACC) would be the main non-aviation stakeholders in the ACP. Notwithstanding, the Sponsor was encouraged to consider other bodies/stakeholders not represented on the ACC to ensure there was opportunity for those who wished to be consulted to participate in the process. It was recommended that the Sponsor brief the ACC on: what the consultation was about, who to cascade the information to and seek confirmation that the information would be disseminated appropriately. Although reliance may be placed on ACC members to disseminate the information about the change effectively, it remained the responsibility of the Sponsor to ensure that the process was managed correctly and kept on track. The Sponsor needed to ensure that the consultation included Community Councils. ''''' advised that they were aware of the communities who would be interested in the consultation process and she confirmed that work had commenced on compiling the consultee list. '''''' offered to review the stakeholder list and draft Sponsor Consultation document. '''' thanked him for the offer which would be taken up when the activities were completed. ''''' advised the sponsor that a comprehensive CAA Post Implementation Review for the Gatwick RNAV SIDs implemented in November 2013 had been published in late 2015 on the CAA website. This included the provision of track data plots to show dispersion and vertical profiles. '''''' suggested that it may be helpful for the sponsor to view this data to see how track plots had been portrayed, then the sponsor could determine how to portray the expected potential impacts for the Glasgow replications.''''' noted the comment and advised that the draft Sponsor Consultation document would be shared with SARG staff before distribution. ''''' asked if any of the current operational practices removed aircraft from the SIDs for tactical operational reasons. '''''' advised that this was the case with all departures depending on the tactical situation. In particular, when airborne and the weather permitted, captains of the non-jet aircraft often elected for VFR flight to get more direct routing to their destination; this had been custom and practice for many years and would continue. '''''' advised that if aircraft are vectored in this way, then it should be mentioned in the Sponsor Consultation document. ''''' asked if there were any difference expected in the inter-airfield procedures to which '''''' replied that there would not. CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS
5 N14 ITEM N N16 ITEM 6 '''''' advised that the process set out in CAP 725 be followed and asked if the Sponsor understood how the process worked. ''''' acknowledged the requirement and assured SARG that the technical consultants were conversant with the process and was sure that it would be followed assiduously. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS '''''' advised that as there was no change in the profile to be flown by aircraft using the RNAV-1 procedures, there would be no requirement to complete a CO2 assessment because it was implicit in replication that there would be minimal change. The Sponsor was advised that if there was any intention to remove redundant or little used SIDs, appropriate data would be required as part of the submission to CAA and in the Sponsor Consultation documentation to ensure explanation is provided on knock on effect of increase to traffic utilising remaining routes. ''''' stated that he would like to see track dispersion plots as part of the Sponsor Consultation document and formal submission. '''''' suggested that it might be helpful to show the current track plots for each SID and then overlay these on the RNAV-1 design to demonstrate the replication. It is understood that RNAV-1 design should result in greater concentration of traffic along the nominal track, so the depiction will aid understanding of the intent and expected outcome. '''''' advised the Sponsor to follow the DFT guidance on how to address potential noise issues up to 7000ft. SARG advised that it was key for the sponsor to demonstrate that they have considered what changes there might be in noise impacts up to at least 7000ft and portrayed any impacts as best they can. If the sponsor ultimately believes there will be no change in noise impacts, this needs to be conveyed and explained in the consultation and proposal. The sponsor should be mindful of any changes that might arise due to a concentration of traffic, or any change in traffic patterns arising from tactical vectoring. Although, noise contours would not be required to support the change proposal, it might be helpful to present typical noises levels at particular heights and explain how many aircraft use the route routinely. ''''' noted that the AIP entry for Glasgow mentioned NPR; however, the Sponsor had stated that there were only Noise Abatement Procedures in place. ''''' advised that this error had been noted recently and that remedial action would be taken to correct the statement. '''''' asked for a copy of the change for the AIRAC which '''' offered to send in due course. The environmental impacts from any new/redesigned conventional SIDs (for those aircraft that are not RNAV-equipped) would have to be considered and explained/portrayed in both the consultation material and the formal submission to the CAA. VALIDATION OF IFPS
6 N N N19 ''''''' remarked that the Validation Plan was an important aspect of the flight procedure design process and he expected each of the SIDs to be stress tested e.g. to include adverse meteorological conditions in any simulation. There was an expectation that the replication be generally benign as the initial part of many of the SIDs was a straight ahead climb for 5NM. '''''' suggested that the Sponsor should consult the base airlines to establish how the current RNAV-overlay procedures had been compiled as this would aid the design process. '''''' remarked that the Plan must be representative of the fleet mix at Glasgow (i.e. to include Airbus, Boeing and Non-Jet types). '''' advised that Glasgow management had preempted the ACP with their customers and emphasised that replication only would form the basis of this change proposal. '''' agreed to engage further with the airline representatives and work collaboratively on the design solution to be consulted upon. ''''' noted that obtaining speedy and timely responses from the data-base coding houses was a challenge. Although the CAP 778 process would be followed by the appointed procedure design house (ASAP sro), he suggested that, in order to preserve the desired in-service date, further discussion take place to optimise the inter-action between designer and regulator. ''''' and '''''''' agreed to consider the request. ''''' asked if the design would be based on GNSS or DME/DME. If the former, then '''''' asked how satellite outages would be accounted for. ''''' advised that the outage issue would be discussed during the Focus Group sessions and analysed during the HAZID that followed in the same week. '''''' remarked that he understood that the DME coverage within the Scottish TMA was inadequate to support DME/DME RNAV procedures and that this situation prevailed for all of the Scottish airports. ''''' remarked that this was an outstanding action of the working group looking at the VOR/DME rationalisation programme. ITEM N20 TIMESCALES The Sponsor set out the timeline it wished to follow in order that the proper process could be followed. ''''' advised that SARG needed sufficient time in the process to allow the SARG executive to consider the documentation and advised that the proposal be submitted no later than 29 Aug 2016 in order to meet the target implementation date of 25 May '''''' advised that this was an unrealistic deadline as it would impede upon the minimum consultation timeframe. '''' advised that this ACP was aligned to the Scottish TMA programme and NATS was keen not to accommodate any schedule slippage as it would impact the strategic plans for Scottish TMA. Moreover, Glasgow did not anticipate that NATS would continue to maintain the equipment after May Note: Post FB, the CAA has determined that this date may be slipped to Mon 12 September 2016.
7 N21 ITEM N22 ITEM N N24 Notwithstanding, the Sponsor s position on the schedule and the rationale for sustaining the planned introduction of the RNAV-1 procedures in May 2017, '''''' queried what contingency would be in place in the event that slippage/delay occurred. '''' stated that the project team was planning out issues to the maximum extent possible and had built contingency to the various activities over which the Sponsor could exercise control. Consequently, the Sponsor would react to the unforeseen as and when it occurred with a suitable mitigation strategy to minimise any disruption to the programme. It was agreed that ''''' would provide a time schedule to allow the Sponsor to map the SARG thinking on timescales. CAA FORMS AND ADMIN ''''' acknowledged the need to use the appropriate forms when submitting the designs to SARG and to ensure that the requisite fees were paid to the CAA. AOB '''''' asked if there was any requirement for 5LNC to be set aside for the SID designs. ''''' advised that the procedure designers would be using the standard SID naming conventions and significant waypoints are expected to be given 5LNC names. '''' was aware of the process to apply for any 5LNC required. ''''' expressed surprise that there was no representation from PC at this Briefing. ''''' advised ''''' that SARG expected that PC would be a key stakeholder in the process and be consulted in an appropriate manner in accordance with the CAP 725 process. For the purposes of the meeting, '''''' confirmed that he was acting on behalf of NATS and would ensure that any feedback required to take to PC would be relayed. Decisions Subject D D D D04 Closed Actions Framework Briefing - Further Meeting Regulatory Framework Sponsor Consultation Sponsor Consultation There should be another meeting (probably via conference call) at the beginning of March, once the results of the survey and the output from the Focus Groups was available. [ N09] The current CAP 725 (Third Edition [corrected] April 2007) remained extant and should be used by the Sponsor. [ N10] The stakeholder consultee list would be reviewed by SARG once compiled. [ N11] The draft Sponsor Consultation document would be shared with SARG staff before distribution. [ N012] Owner Due Date
8 Outstanding Actions Owner Due Date New Actions Owner Due Date A A A A A A A A08 A copy of the presentation to be sent to ''''' along with the draft minutes of the meeting. [ N03] Send '''''' the planned schedule for the Focus Group activities. [ N09] Send '''''' a copy of the change request to correct the statement in the AIP relating to NPR. [ N16] Sponsor to consult the base airlines to establish how the current RNAV-overlay procedures had been compiled. [ N17] Further discussion to take place to ensure CAP 778 process is optimised to facilitate the desired in-service date. [ N18] Provide a time schedule to allow the Sponsor to map the SARG thinking on timescales. [ N21] Sponsor to provide the CAA with track dispersion plots together with altitude attainment points (ideally at 1000ft intervals up to 7000ft). CAA to confirm consultation requirements to the sponsor for any new conventional departures which are non- RNAV 1 SID replications prior to commencement of consultation. '''''''' 15 Feb 16 ''''''''' 12 Feb 16 ''''' 4 Mar 16 '''' 4 Mar 16 '''''' ''''' ' '''''''''' 4 Mar 16 ''''' 4 Mar 16 '''' 15 Apr 16 '''''' 1 Apr 16
9 Next meeting Date: TBC Time: TBC Venue: TBC
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group. 31 May Policy Statement STANDARD INSTRUMENT DEPARTURE TRUNCATION POLICY.
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 31 May 2018 Policy Statement STANDARD INSTRUMENT DEPARTURE TRUNCATION POLICY 1 Introduction 1.1 This Policy Statement (PS) presents CAA policy and guidance to Air Navigation
More information4.1 This document outlines when a proposal for a SID Truncation may be submitted and details the submission requirements.
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 13 May 2014 Policy Statement STANDARD INSTRUMENT DEPARTURE TRUNCATION POLICY 1 Introduction 1.1 This Policy Statement (PS) is intended to provide guidance to ANSPs
More informationSafety and Airspace Regulation Group
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group All NATMAC Representatives 18 August 2014 CAA DECISION LETTER 1. INTRODUCTION BRISTOL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BIA) RNAV STARS 1.1 During January 2014, the Civil Aviation
More informationAIRSPACE. Aviation Consultancy at its best. Specialist aviation support to help solve problems for airports and airport developers
AIRSPACE Enabling Excellence in Aviation Aviation Consultancy at its best. Specialist aviation support to help solve problems for airports and airport developers www.cyrrus.co.uk AIRSPACE Airspace is a
More informationCAA DECISION LETTER. LUTON RUNWAY 26 BROOKMANS PARK RNAV1 SIDs AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group All NATMAC Representatives 13 August 2015 CAA DECISION LETTER LUTON RUNWAY 26 BROOKMANS PARK RNAV1 SIDs AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 For over 10 years
More informationUK Implementation of PBN
UK Implementation of PBN Geoff Burtenshaw Directorate of Airspace Policy UK Civil Aviation Authority 1 UK airspace context Presentation Overview Future Airspace Strategy (FAS) (FAS) Industry Implementation
More informationLAMP 2 - FASI(S) Network
Future Airspace Strategy Implementation South: ATS Route Network managed by NERL under London Airspace Management Programme 2 LAMP 2 - FASI(S) Network Stage 1 Assessment Meeting Friday 23 rd February 2018
More informationFramework Brief. Edinburgh SIDs
Framework Brief 11-Nov-2015 CAA House Edinburgh SIDs 2 Security Statement Unclassified This presentation has been approved for public distribution and publication on the CAA website. Copyright 2015 NATS/
More informationUK Performance-based Navigation (PBN) Implementation Status
UK Performance-based Navigation (PBN) Implementation Status Geoff Burtenshaw Technical Advisor, Navigation Systems Directorate of Airspace Policy 1 Current Implementation of PBN in UK Airspace 2 Current
More informationCAA DECISION LETTER MANSTON KENT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (KIA) RNAV (GNSS) HOLD AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL
Directorate of Airspace Policy NATMAC Representatives 13 July 2012 CAA DECISION LETTER MANSTON KENT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (KIA) RNAV (GNSS) HOLD AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 During late
More informationFASI(N) IoM/Antrim Systemisation Airspace Change Decision
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group FASI(N) IoM/Antrim Systemisation Airspace Change Decision CAP 1584 Contents Published by the Civil Aviation Authority, August 2017 Civil Aviation Authority, Aviation
More informationFUTURE AIRSPACE CHANGE
HEATHROW EXPANSION FUTURE AIRSPACE CHANGE UPDATE SEPTEMBER 2018 On 25 June 2018, Parliament formally backed Heathrow expansion, with MPs voting in support of the Government s Airports National Policy Statement
More informationDVOR Rationalisation and NDB Withdrawal. NATS Update SAM, OCK, LON. NATMAC 83 1 st June NATS Project Manager NATS Airspace Change Specialist
DVOR Rationalisation and NDB Withdrawal NATS Update SAM, OCK, LON NATMAC 83 1 st June 2018 NATS Project Manager NATS Airspace Change Specialist Brief history NATMAC consultation (CAA, August 2009) Reduce
More informationCONTROLLED AIRSPACE CONTAINMENT POLICY
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group (SARG) 17 January 2014 Policy Statement 1 Overview CONTROLLED AIRSPACE CONTAINMENT POLICY 1.1 UK airspace design policy for ATS Routes, SIDs and STARs is based upon
More informationDoncaster Sheffield Airport Airspace Change Proposal for the Introduction of RNAV (GNSS) Departure and Approach Procedures ANNEX B TO PART B
Doncaster Sheffield Airport Airspace Change Proposal for the Introduction of RNAV (GNSS) Departure and Approach Procedures ANNEX B TO PART B ANNEX B TO PART B: Runway 20 Westerly Departure UPTON 2B 2 Contents
More informationGATWICK RNAV-1 SIDS CAA PIR ROUTE ANALYSIS REPORT
GATWICK RNAV-1 SIDS GATWICK RNAV-1 SIDS CAA PIR ROUTE ANALYSIS REPORT ROUTE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR GATWICK This section explains the track distribution of conventional SIDs and the RNAV SID replications using
More informationNATMAC INFORMATIVE INTRODUCTION OF STANSTED TRANSPONDER MANDATORY ZONE (TMZ)
Directorate of Airspace Policy NATMAC Representatives DAP/STNTMZ 23 July 2009 NATMAC INFORMATIVE Dear Colleagues INTRODUCTION OF STANSTED TRANSPONDER MANDATORY ZONE (TMZ) INTRODUCTION 1.1 NATS issued a
More informationCAA MINDED TO REJECT EDINBURGH AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL
Safety & Airspace Regulation Group Airspace, Air Traffic Management and Aerodrome Division Edinburgh Airport Limited Scotland EH12 9DN 29 October 2018 CAA MINDED TO REJECT EDINBURGH AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL
More informationEuropean Aviation Safety Agency
Annexes I and II to ED Decision 2018/013/R European Aviation Safety Agency Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011 and Commission Implementing Regulation
More informationSafety and Airspace Regulation Group
Page 1 of 11 Airspace Change Proposal - Environmental Assessment Version: 1.0/ 2016 Title of Airspace Change Proposal Change Sponsor Isle of Man/Antrim Systemisation (Revised ATS route structure over the
More informationFLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP)
International Civil Aviation Organization FLTOPSP/1-WP/3 7/10/14 WORKING PAPER FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP) FIRST MEETING Montréal, 27 to 31 October 2014 Agenda Item 4: Active work programme items
More informationARRIVALS REVIEW GATWICK
ARRIVALS REVIEW GATWICK BO REDEBORN GRAHAM LAKE bo@redeborn.com gc_lake@yahoo.co.uk 16-12-2015 2 THE TASK Has everything been done that is reasonably possible to alleviate the noise problems from arriving
More informationAIRSPACE PRINCIPLES CONSULTATION DOCUMENT JANUARY 2018
AIRSPACE PRINCIPLES CONSULTATION DOCUMENT JANUARY 2018 Page 2 Contents Contents 1. Introduction 2. Airspace change process 3. Redesigning our airspace 4. Airspace design principles 5. Have your say Page
More informationPBN Performance. Based Navigation. Days 1, 2 & 3. ICAO PBN Seminar Seminar Case Studies Days 1,2,3. Seminar Case Studies
PBN Performance Based Navigation Seminar Case Studies Days 1, 2 & 3 1 Overview 2 Case Study - Day 1 Case Study - Day 2 Case Study - Day 3 3 Case Study - Day 1 Learning Objectives Identify navigation performance
More informationGATWICK RNAV-1 SIDS CAA PIR ROUTE ANALYSIS REPORT
GATWICK RNAV-1 SIDS GATWICK RNAV-1 SIDS CAA PIR ROUTE ANALYSIS REPORT ROUTE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR GATWICK This section explains the track distribution of conventional SIDs and the RNAV SID replications using
More informationDraft airspace design guidance consultation
Draft airspace design guidance consultation Annex 2: CAP 1522 Published by the Civil Aviation Authority, 2017 Civil Aviation Authority Aviation House Gatwick Airport South West Sussex RH6 0YR You can copy
More informationAERONAUTICAL SERVICES ADVISORY MEMORANDUM (ASAM) Focal Point : Gen
Page 1 of 8 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. This material has been prepared to provide step-by-step guidance on the application of performance-based navigation (PBN) in developing an Airspace Change Proposal (ACP).
More informationTAG Guidance Notes on responding to the Civil Aviation Authority s consultation on its Five Year Strategy
TAG Guidance Notes on responding to the Civil Aviation Authority s consultation on its Five Year Strategy 1. Introduction (Deadline for consultation responses is 19 February 2016) The CAA is currently
More informationNATIONAL AIRSPACE POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND
NATIONAL AIRSPACE POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND APRIL 2012 FOREWORD TO NATIONAL AIRSPACE POLICY STATEMENT When the government issued Connecting New Zealand, its policy direction for transport in August 2011, one
More informationLondon Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal. Annex B to Part B of the Consultation Document Runway 23 Departures via CLN
London Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal Introduction of Standard Instrument Departure Procedures to Routes in the London Terminal Control Area Sponsor Consultation - 2016 Annex B to Part B of
More informationBirmingham Airport Airspace Change Proposal
Birmingham Airport Airspace Change Proposal Deciding between Option 5 and Option 6 Ratified Version 1. Introduction Birmingham Airport Limited (BAL) launched the Runway 15 departures Airspace Change Consultation
More informationBirmingham International Airport Standard Instrument Departures from Runway 15: CAA decision CAP 1398
Birmingham International Airport Standard Instrument Departures from Runway 15: CAA decision CAP 1398 Contents Published by the Civil Aviation Authority, 2016 Civil Aviation Authority, Aviation House,
More informationLondon Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal. Annex E to Part B of the Consultation Document Runway 05 Departures via CLN
London Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal Introduction of Standard Instrument Departure Procedures to Routes in the London Terminal Control Area Sponsor Consultation - 2016 Annex E to Part B of
More informationPBN Implementation in the UK
PBN Implementation in the UK Geoff Burtenshaw Technical Advisor, Navigation Systems Directorate of Airspace Policy UK Civil Aviation Authority 06 October 06 October PBN TF/3 1 Presentation Overview UK
More informationModernising UK Airspace 2025 Vision for Airspace Tools and Procedures. Controller Pilot Symposium 24 October 2018
Modernising UK Airspace 2025 Vision for Airspace Tools and Procedures Controller Pilot Symposium 24 October 2018 Our airspace Flight Information Regions London & Scottish FIRs: 1m km 2 11% of Europe s
More informationProposed Changes to Inverness Airport s Airspace The Introduction of Controlled Airspace and Optimisation of Instrument Flight Procedures
Proposed Changes to Inverness Airport s Airspace The Introduction of Controlled Airspace and Optimisation of Instrument Flight Procedures What is an Airspace Change Proposal? It is a formal UK Civil Aviation
More informationNATS. SAIP AD3 Jersey Interface Change Stage 1 Assessment Meeting. Friday 2 nd February x NATS presenters.
NATS SAIP AD3 Jersey Interface Change Stage 1 Assessment Meeting Friday 2 nd February 2018 3x NATS presenters Agenda Revised Statement of need Background Issues and benefits arising from proposed change
More informationDesign Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation
Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7 European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation Design in Context TFC Where does the traffic come from? And when? RWY Which
More informationLearning Objectives. By the end of this presentation you should understand:
Designing Routes 1 Learning Objectives By the end of this presentation you should understand: Benefits of RNAV Considerations when designing airspace routes The basic principles behind route spacing The
More informationTWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE
International Civil Aviation Organization AN-Conf/12-WP/6 7/5/12 WORKING PAPER TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Agenda Item 2: Aerodrome operations improving airport performance 2.2: Performance-based
More informationAPV Implementation in the UK Initiative
APV Implementation in the UK Initiative ICAO APV Workshop 25 May 2011 Geoff Burtenshaw Directorate of Airspace Policy UK CAA The UK APV Implementation Initiative»A Joint CAA and NATS Group, comprising:»
More informationLondon Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal
London Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal Introduction of Standard Instrument Departure Procedures to Routes in the London Terminal Control Area Sponsor Consultation - 2016 Annex A to Part B of
More informationNav Specs and Procedure Design Module 12 Activities 8 and 10. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation
Nav Specs and Procedure Design Module 12 Activities 8 and 10 European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation Learning Objectives By the end of this presentation you should understand: The different
More informationAirports Commission s Senior Delivery Group - Technical Report Number 01
Airports Commission s Senior Delivery Group - Technical Report Number 01 Implementation of Performance-Based Navigation in the UK Summary The UK Future Airspace Strategy (FAS) is a programme designed to
More informationTANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 8 1. PURPOSE 1.1. This Advisory Circular provides guidance to personnel involved in construction of instrument and visual flight procedures for publication in the Aeronautical Information Publication.
More informationIATA User Requirements for Air Traffic Services (URATS) NAVIGATION. MIDANPIRG PBN SG/3 Meeting Cairo, Egypt, February 2018
IATA User Requirements for Air Traffic Services (URATS) NAVIGATION MIDANPIRG PBN SG/3 Meeting Cairo, Egypt, 11 13 February 2018 IATA at 30,000 ft Mission to represent, lead and serve the airline industry
More informationCAA AIRSPACE CHANGE DECISION
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group All NATMAC Representatives 14 April 2016 CAA AIRSPACE CHANGE DECISION RECLASSIFICATION OF THE BELFAST TERMINAL CONTROL AREA AIRSPACE Organisation proposing the change:
More informationPBN ROUTE SPACING AND CNS REQUIREMENTS (Presented by Secretariat)
International Civil Aviation Organization The First Meeting of South China Sea Major Traffic Flow Review Group (SCS-MTFRG/1) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 19-20 January 2015 Agenda Item 5: Discuss strategy for
More informationAssessment of Flight and Duty Time Schemes Procedure
Assessment of Flight and Duty Time Schemes Procedure Purpose Fatigue is a major human factors hazard because it affects a crew member s ability to perform their tasks safely. Operator fatigue management
More informationEdinburgh Airport TUTUR1C Trial Findings Report
Edinburgh Airport TUTUR1C Trial Findings Report Trial period: 25 June 28 October 2015 Report published: 26 January 2016 Produced by Edinburgh Airport 2016 1 Contents Executive summary... 3 Summary of trial
More informationAir Operator Certification
Civil Aviation Rules Part 119, Amendment 15 Docket 8/CAR/1 Contents Rule objective... 4 Extent of consultation Safety Management project... 4 Summary of submissions... 5 Extent of consultation Maintenance
More informationGATWICK ARRIVALS REVIEW REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
GATWICK ARRIVALS REVIEW REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 28.1.2016 Independent Arrivals Review The review has been asked to determine whether: a) Everything that can reasonably be done to alleviate the problems
More informationAERONAUTICAL SERVICES ADVISORY MEMORANDUM (ASAM) Focal Point: Gen
Page 1 of 6 1 INTRODUCTION Each route shall be assigned a designator that is unique for that aerodrome. The designator shall be defined in accordance with Annex 11, Appendix 3. In addition, the first 4
More informationTerms of Reference: Introduction
Terms of Reference: Assessment of airport-airline engagement on the appropriate scope, design and cost of new runway capacity; and Support in analysing technical responses to the Government s draft NPS
More informationPBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP. SIDs/STARs/HOLDS. Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931
International Civil Aviation Organization PBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP SIDs/STARs/HOLDS Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931 Design in context Methodology STEPS TFC Where does the traffic
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT DIRECTORATE E - Air Transport E.2 - Single sky & modernisation of air traffic control Brussels, 6 April 2011 MOVE E2/EMM D(2011) 1. TITLE
More informationIntroducing RNP1 (RF) SIDs Airspace Change Proposal
Introducing RNP1 (RF) SIDs Airspace Change Proposal London Stansted Airport February 2016 Executive Summary For over two years London Stansted Airport ( Stansted ) has been trialling RNP1 technology in
More informationAirspace change process: Information pack. CAP 1465b
Airspace change process: Information pack CAP 1465b Published by the Civil Aviation Authority, 2016 Civil Aviation Authority, Aviation House, Gatwick Airport South, West Sussex, RH6 0YR. You can copy and
More informationPBN Implementation Plan Tonga
PBN Implementation Plan Tonga Version: 2 Date: January 2013 Executive Summary Performance Based Navigation (PBN) is a change from aircraft navigating/flying using ground based navigation aids to using
More informationA1/3 Page D - 3 Issue 7 AL19 30/03/2007
SARG Management System ANNEX D to A1/3 ASSESSMENT 1. The proposal was initiated by Framework Briefing in June 2012 and was developed over a considerable period. The initial consultation took place between
More informationCIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS
CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN Air Navigation Order No. : 91-0004 Date : 7 th April, 2010 Issue : Two OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS SECTIONS 1. Authority 2. Purpose 3. Scope 4. Operational Control
More informationEuropean Joint Industry CDA Action Plan
Foreword In September 2008, CANSO, IATA and EUROCONTROL signed up to a Flight Efficiency Plan that includes a specific target to increase European CDA performance and achievement. This was followed in
More informationGlasgow Prestwick Airport RNAV1 Routes
Glasgow Prestwick Airport RNAV1 Routes Airspace Change Proposal NATS Airspace Change Assurance Team Issue 2.0 Redacted Submission October 2017 Table of contents Table of contents 2 References 4 1 Introduction
More informationPerformance Based Navigation (PBN) Implementation Plan. The Gambia
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Implementation Plan The Gambia Version 1.0 Table of contents 1. Executive summary.. 2 2. Introduction. 2 3. The need for PBN implementation 2 4. Benifit of PBN implementation
More informationTitle: Airway Q41: Reclassify to Class G below Flight level 55. Subject Release of Controlled and Segregated Airspace
Title: Airway Q41: Reclassify to Class G below Flight level 55 Subject Release of Controlled and Segregated Airspace Version: V3.0 Status: Final Reference FASVIG 20161026 V3.0 Author: Publication Date:
More informationTWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE
International Civil Aviation Organization 14/5/12 WORKING PAPER TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montréal, 19 to 30 November 2012 Agenda Item 4: Optimum Capacity and Efficiency through global collaborative
More informationPBN and airspace concept
PBN and airspace concept 07 10 April 2015 Global Concepts Global ATM Operational Concept Provides the ICAO vision of seamless, global ATM system Endorsed by AN Conf 11 Aircraft operate as close as possible
More informationAny queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:
Serial Number: 2018_005 Subject: Special Procedures For In-Flight Contingencies in Oceanic Airspace Originator: NAT SPG Issued: 17 DEC 2018 Effective:28 MAR 2019 The purpose of this North Atlantic Operations
More informationGuidance for Complexity and Density Considerations - in the New Zealand Flight Information Region (NZZC FIR)
Guidance for Complexity and Density Considerations - in the New Zealand Flight Information Region (NZZC FIR) Version 1.0 Director NSS 14 February 2018 Guidance for Complexity and Density Considerations
More informationAN-Conf/12-WP/162 TWELFTH THE CONFERENCE. The attached report
29/11/12 TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montréal, 19 to 30 November 2012 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE TO THE CONFERENCE ON AGENDA ITEM 2 The attached report has been approved by thee Committee for submission
More informationResponse to the London Heathrow Airport Expansion Public Consultation
Response to the London Heathrow Airport Expansion Public Consultation Summary This report sets out the response to the Heathrow Airport s consultation on airport expansion and airspace change. The consultation
More informationNATS TMA Programmes. #120_AF1 LAMP Phase 1A and #119_AF1 Manchester TMA. Mark McLaren
NATS TMA Programmes #120_AF1 LAMP Phase 1A and #119_AF1 Manchester TMA Mark McLaren Pilot Common Projects (PCP) IR 716/ 2014 PCP identifies two UK TMAs and includes four airports Heathrow Gatwick Stansted
More informationTHIS BULLETIN REPLACES BULLETIN WHICH IS NO LONGER CURRENT AND HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.
IBAC Bulletin 16-03 THIS BULLETIN REPLACES BULLETIN 16-01 WHICH IS NO LONGER CURRENT AND HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. Subject: Performance-based Navigation in Australian airspace - General guidance on the GNSS
More informationDirectorate of Airspace Policy
Directorate of Airspace Policy All NATMAC Representatives 17 February 2012 CAA DECISION LETTER RECLASSIFICATION OF THE GLASGOW CONTROL AREA (CTA) 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Glasgow CTA was formed on 28 September
More informationSOUTH AFRICA PBN NEAR TERM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PROJECT
PRE-PLANNING PHASE Nomination of the State Focal Point of Contact Appointment of the South Africa PBN Project Manager and Team Define the goals and objectives of Project Define the Terms of Reference for
More informationATC PROCEDURES WORKING GROUP. Transition Level
SAFETY & AIRSPACE REGULATION GROUP ATC PROCEDURES WORKING GROUP Transition Introduction 1 In 2013, ICAO adopted a proposal by the European Air Navigation Planning Group to amend the method of determining
More informationNOISE MANAGEMENT BOARD - GATWICK AIRPORT. Review of NMB/ th April 2018
NOISE MANAGEMENT BOARD - GATWICK AIRPORT Review of NMB/10 11 th April 2018 Synopsis This paper provides a brief review of the issues discussed at the NMB/10 meeting, which was held on 11 th April. Introduction
More informationQ: How many flights arrived and departed in 2017? A: In 2017 the airport saw 39,300 air transport movements.
Southampton Airport Masterplan FAQ 4 October 2018 Background Southampton Airport Today Q: How many passengers currently use Southampton Airport and how has this changed over the last 5 years? A: Over the
More informationCommunication and consultation protocol
Communication and consultation protocol Airservices Australia 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without
More informationPOST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW
POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW RNAV STAR updates and RNP AR approaches at Edmonton International Airport NAV CANADA 77 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5L6 January 2018 The information
More informationTWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE
International Civil Aviation Organization 17/5/12 WORKING PAPER TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montréal, 19 to 30 November 2012 Agenda Item 4: Optimum Capacity and Efficiency through global collaborative
More informationTWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE
International Civil Aviation Organization AN-Conf/12-WP/8 7/5/12 WORKING PAPER TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montréal, 19 to 30 November 2012 Agenda Item 3: Interoperability and data through globally
More informationPBN/TF/7 DRAFT Appendix D to the Report D-1
DRAFT STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION TASKS LIST PBN Task Force C4/1 The APAC PBN TF encourages States to consider the GO Team visit. On-going. States are encouraged to consider the GO Team visit as required.
More informationCAP 1616: Airspace Design: Guidance on the regulatory process for changing airspace design including community engagement requirements
CAP 1616: Airspace Design: Guidance on the regulatory process for changing airspace design including community engagement requirements Heathrow Community Noise Forum Wednesday 14 th March 2018 1 1 What
More informationSafety / Performance Criteria Agreeing Assumptions Module 10 - Activities 5 & 6
Safety / Performance Criteria Agreeing Assumptions Module 10 - Activities 5 & 6 European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation Why have safety and performance criteria? Measure performance
More informationFeasibility Study into increasing the altitude of the Noise Preferential Routes (NPRs) from 3000 to 4000 feet
Feasibility Study into increasing the altitude of the Noise Preferential Routes (NPRs) from 3000 to 4000 feet Presented by: Tom Redfern Environmental Specialist 20 th January 2016 Agenda What is a Noise
More informationFrench DSNA approach to CNS rationalization & evolution
French DSNA approach to CNS rationalization & evolution Jean-Marc LOSCOS Senior expert on European Programs DSNA Toulouse CONTEXT: EUROPEAN ATM MASTER PLAN 2015 AND SINGLE EUROPEAN SKY (SES) The Single
More informationPBN Operational Approval Continental En Route Navigation Specifications
PBN Operational Approval Continental En Route Navigation Specifications Navigation Specifications Applicable to Continental En-route operations RNAV 5 RNAV 2 RNP 2 A-RNP RNP 0.3 2 RNAV 5 Flight Phase Navigation
More informationAgenda Item 1 9 May 2017
MINUTES OF THE HIGHLANDS & ISLANDS AIRPORTS LTD ( HIAL ) BOARD HELD AT SUMBURGH AIRPORT ON 7 TH MARCH 2017 AT 1:15PM Present Dr Mike Cantlay Chair Mr Inglis Lyon Managing Director Ms Gillian Bruton Finance
More informationEXETER AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL FAILURE OF ADHERENCE TO THE CONSULTATION PROCESS (CAP 725)
Airspace Regulator (Coordination) Devon and Somerset Gliding Club Ltd Airspace, ATM and Aerodromes North Hill Airfield Safety and Airspace Regulation Group Sheldon CAA House Honiton 45-59 Kingsway Devon
More informationStandards and procedures for the approval of performance-based navigation operations. (Presented by Colombia) SUMMARY
216 INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION SAM/IG/9-WP/15 South American Regional Office Regional Project RLA/06/901 12/04/12 Assistance for the implementation of a regional ATM system according to
More informationHOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN
HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN CARLTON COMMUNITY Airservices has undertaken a review of the Hobart Airport Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs) and Standard Instrument Arrivals (STARs) for Runway 12 and Runway
More informationNoise Action Plan Summary
2013-2018 Noise Action Plan Summary Introduction The EU Noise Directive 2002/49/EU and Environmental Noise (Scotland) Regulations 2006 requires airports with over 50,000 movements a year to produce a noise
More informationRNP OPERATIONS. We will now explain the key concepts that should not be mixed up and that are commonly not precisely understood.
RNP OPERATIONS 1. Introduction Planes were made as a means of transport. To successfully fly from a location A to a location B, pilots were first and foremost navigators. Originally relying on visual landmarks
More informationGENERAL INFO NOTICE 1. BACKGROUND
GENERAL INFO NOTICE 1. BACKGROUND Precision-RNAV (P-RNAV) is the natural progression from Basic RNAV (B-RNAV) which became mandatory in European Airspace in April 1998 for en-route operations. Initial
More informationPBN Performance. Based Navigation. - PBN & Airspace Concepts - ICAO PBN Seminar Introduction to PBN
PBN Performance Based Navigation - PBN & Airspace Concepts - Introduction to PBN 1 Learning Objectives PBN Concept within the context of an Airspace (Operational) Concept. Introduction to PBN 2/37 Components
More informationNovember 2015 Page 2
Report of the CAA's Post Implementation Review of the implementation of RNAV-1 Standard Instrument Departures at Gatwick Airport Annex 6: CAA IFP report Annex 6 to CAP 1346 Published by the Civil Aviation
More informationAPPLICATION FOR P-RNAV/RNAV 1 OPERATIONAL APPROVAL OR RENEWAL
SEYCHELLES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY APPLICATION FOR P-RNAV/RNAV 1 OPERATIONAL APPROVAL OR RENEWAL Applicants are strongly advised to read the 'P-RNAV Notes for Completion' before completing the form. Please
More informationGENERAL REPORT. Reduced Lateral Separation Minima RLatSM Phase 2. RLatSM Phase 3
IBAC TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY Subject: NAT Operations and Air Traffic Management Meeting: North Atlantic (NAT) Procedures and Operations Group Meeting 2 Reported by Tom Young POG2 took place at the ICAO
More informationEdinburgh Airport Airspace Change Proposal. What we have proposed and why
Edinburgh Airport Airspace Change Proposal What we have proposed and why Contents Page 01 Executive Summary 02 02 Welcome 10 03 Why do we need to change? 12 04 Current airspace 16 05 Proposed flight paths
More information