United Nations Environment Programme

Transcription

1 UNITED NATIONS EP United Nations Environment Programme Distr. LIMITED UNEP(DEPI)/CAR WG.34/INF.5 14 October 2012 Original: ENGLISH Fifth Meeting of the Scientific Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) to the Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW) in the Wider Caribbean Region Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 22 October 2012 UPDATE ON THE CARIBBEAN MARINE PROTECTED AREAS MANAGEMENT NETWORK AND FORUM (CaMPAM) AND ITS MAJOR ACTIVITIES (INCLUDES SUPPLEMENT ON THE CARIBBEAN CHALLENGE PROJECT) I. INTRODUCTION 1. During the biennium, the Caribbean Marine Protected Areas Management (CaMPAM) Network and Forum developed and implemented several activities, primarily funded by the Directorate General for Development Cooperation of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs through the project "Regional Support for the Caribbean Challenge Initiative: Networking, Consolidation and Regional Coordination of MPA Management implemented by UNEP-CEP. Additional funding was provided by NOAA s Coral Reef Conservation Programme (for CaMPAM coordination) and the Ministry of Environment of Spain (for local follow-up courses in the Spanish-speaking courses), as well as other in-kind sources. 2. Listed below is a summary of CaMPAM activities implemented during the biennium : II. TRAINING OF TRAINERS (ToT) PROGRAMME ON MPA MANAGEMENT 3. Two regional 2-week long ToT courses for MPA managers were implemented, namely at the Hol Chan Marine Reserve (sponsored by the Government of Italy through the above-mentioned project) and the Guadeloupe National Park (sponsored by France through SPAW-RAC). A summary of these courses is provided: II. 1 Regional Course on MPA Management 4. This course aimed at English-speaking countries and was held at the Hol Chan Marine Reserve in Belize from September It was attended by 21 marine environmental/protected Area Managers from 7 English-speaking countries associated with the Caribbean Challenge Initiative (The Bahamas, Jamaica, Antigua and Barbuda, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, Grenada, St. Vincent and the Grenadines), as well as the host country, Belize. It was mostly funded by the Directorate General for Development Cooperation of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (through the project supporting the Caribbean Challenge Initiative) and with the contribution of several organizations and experts from Belize, such as the Belize Fisheries Department, the Protected Area Conservation Trust, Belize Audoubon Society, Healthy Reefs for Healthy People Initiative, Hol Chan Marine Reserve, World Resources Institute, Wildlife Conservation Society, San Pedro Tour Guide Association, Coral Reef Alliance and Seatone Consulting. (Visit # to download report 2011_CaMPAM_TOT_REPORT.pdf and for local TV News on the

2 Page 2 regional and local follow-up course see and 5. The regional course included topics taught via lectures by regional and Belizean experts and included exercises, discussions and a field trip to the Hol Chan Marine Reserve. Lectures and discussions involved areas such as: (i) the biophysical features and biological connectivity patterns of the Tropical Northwest Atlantic Coastal Biogeographic Region; (ii) the uses, threats and economic value of the marine habitats and coastal capital; (iii) an overview of the marine programmes and regional policy; (iv) design, participatory planning, management research and monitoring of MPAs; (v) the use of media and communication; (vi) the structure and function of a national MPA system (Belize); (vii) the management framework of a marine reserve (Hol Chan); (viii) the history, structure and operation of a national PA conservation trust (Belize); (ix) collaborative efforts between governmental and non-governmental associations for MPA management; (x) operations of a national association of protected areas management by private organizations; and (xi) how to write a good proposal, the work of CaMPAM and the SPAW Protocol and Subprogramme, as well as other important subjects for MPA managers. The trainees developed a collectively discussed and enriched preliminary draft of the proposal with a view to carrying out local follow-up training activities. Trainees were mostly Site Managers and national MPA Coordinators. II. 2 Training Course on Marine Protected Area Management for Managers of the French and Dutch Caribbean Departments and Haiti, held in Guadeloupe from December It was hosted by the Guadeloupe National Park, and SPAW-RAC. The one-week course was attended by 18 MPA Managers from the French and Dutch Caribbean Departments, as well as Haiti, and funded by the French MPA Agency, TEMEUM (Terres et Mers Ultramarines) and SPAW-RAC. The participants came from Martinique, Guadeloupe, St. Martin and St. Barthélemy; the ones from the Dutch islands from St. Maarten, Saba and St. Eustatius. Interpretation to and from English and French was provided during the entire week. 7. The course included various topics taught by Dr. Bustamante, Rich Wilson (Seatone Consulting), Kalli De Meyer (Dutch Caribbean Nature Alliance) and Caroline Vieux (French MPA Agency). Lectures were combined with discussion sessions amongst participants, during which they shared their personal experiences and challenges. A site visit was also organized in one of the core marine areas of the National Park of Guadeloupe, where participants were given the opportunity to learn about the Park, its regulations and its functioning, and to apply some of the lectures to analyze socio-economic characteristics of the area and to interact with important stakeholders. It was the first time ever that a CaMPAM training course was organized specifically for French-speaking managers, and all participants expressed their hope that this training would be of benefit. 8. In both regional courses, the biophysical setting, contact with the management tools and problems in well established protected areas, as well as the contribution of local organizations and experts were highlighted as being critical to the success of the training activity. The benefits included not only the knowledge acquired through lectures, and trainees active discussions, but also the interaction with the local MPA managers, fishermen and tour operators. Furthermore, the courses, co-sponsored by local and international organizations, proved to be beneficial in various ways, namely, optimizing resources (no duplications of similar trainings in the region), establishing long-term relationships among organizations, promoting MPA capacity building within the country and building synergy and buy-in from institutions and programmes with the same goals. We expect this partnership modality to continue in future courses as a way of bringing additional resources and building synergy with organizations that have similar conservation agendas. 9. The regional courses included some pre-activities such as: i) completing a spreadsheet with data for the CaMPAM Regional MPA Database 1 ; ii) completing a questionnaire on their training needs; and iii) and building presentations on their own MPAs. The reports can be downloaded from the website at II. 3 Local follow-up training activities 10. Following the principle of the Training the Trainers concept, the trainees and their institutions committed to implementing a local training activity, with partial funding from UNEP, as a way of expanding the knowledge received by the trainees who attended the regional course and a way of sharing their learning experiences with other MPA managers and stakeholders. The implemented followup training activities organized by graduates of the 2010 ToT s regional course for Spanish-speaking countries (held in Bayahibe, Dominican Republic, on June 2010, funded by the Government of Spain and reported at COP6) and the 2011 ToT regional course (held in Belize in September), are listed below (Table 1). However, all trainees and institutions did not fully meet their commitments, due mainly to the lack of institutional support. Countries that were unable to organize a local training session were Costa Rica, Panama, Jamaica, and St. Kitts and Nevis. All trainees received assistance from the CaMPAM Coordinator and the Director of the 2011 Regional Course with respect to training design and proposal writing. 1

3 Page 3 Table 1: Local Follow-up Training Activities of the Training of Trainers Programme on MPA Management in TRAINING ACTIVITY Management tools on marine protected areas and the strengthening of institutional capacity for the implementation of the MPA Subsystem in Colombia. Training MPA Staff of the Dominican Republic towards sustainable management of marine species and areas Participatory planning on MPAs of the Special Municipality of the Isla de la Juventud (Isle of Youth), Cuba. Management strengthening of national marine and coastal parks in Venezuela. Sensitization of Judiciary and Key Enforcement Partners on the Legislative Environment for MPA Management in Antigua and Barbuda MPA Enforcement Training in Grenada Understanding threats, resolving conflicts and building collaborative solutions, in the Soufrière Marine Management Area (SMMA) and the Canaries & Anse La Raye Marine Management VENUE, RESPONSIBLE INSTITUTION/CO-SPONSOR Santa Marta, Colombia - Corporation for the Sustainable Development of the Archipelago of San Andrés, Providence and Santa Catalina CORALINA; Institute for Marine Research of Punta Betín, Colombia (INVEMAR); Tayrona National Nature Park, Special Administrative Unit, National Nature Parks Systems, Caribbean Territorial Department of the Ministry of the Environment (UAESPNN-DTC) (Unidad Administrativa Especial del Sistema de Parques Nacionales Naturales - Dirección Territorial Caribe del Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, UAESPNN-DTC). Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, Reef Check Punta Francés National Park, Isle of Youth (Island de la Juventud), Cuba; Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment (CITMA); Centre for Management, Environment and Technological Services (CGSAT), Isle of Youth, as well as fishing cooperatives. National Parks Institute (INPARQUES, Instituto Nacional de Parques) Fisheries Division/Codrington Lagoon National Park Fisheries Department; Sustainable Grenadines, Inc.; and the Environmental Law Institute (ELI). Soufrière Marine Management Association, Seatone Consulting PARTICIPANTS 27 persons from several local agencies (regional environmental corporations), National Parks staff, the Navy and Coastguard, Ministry of Environment, Housing and Territorial Development, the Fisheries Authority and research centres. 30 MPA managers, conservation professionals and fishermen. 30 marine environmental managers, fishermen and researchers 25 MPA staff from the National Parks of San Esteban, Los Roques Archipelago, Restinga, Médanos de Coro, Morrocoy, Laguna de Tacarigua, Henri Pittier, Mochima and Laguna de las Marites persons from Antigua and Barbuda Defense Coast Guard, the Royal Police Force of Barbuda, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Development Control Authority, National Parks Authority, Environmental Awareness Group, the Fisheries Division of Antigua, Fisheries Office of Barbuda and the Codrington Lagoon National Park (Barbuda). 20 persons: MPA wardens and rangers, national parks officers, MPA managers, fisheries officers, police and coast guard officers. Representatives from the Saint Lucia Air & Sea Ports Authority and the Department of Fisheries, tour operators, dive operators,

4 Page 4 TRAINING ACTIVITY VENUE, RESPONSIBLE INSTITUTION/CO-SPONSOR PARTICIPANTS Area (CAMMA) in St. Lucia, West Indies. Maritime Affairs, Heritage Tourism water taxi and monohull boat operators, marine police. Getting to know your MPA Bahamas National Trust 30 representatives of the Royal Bahamas Defense Force, The Royal Bahamas Police Force, The Bahamas Marine Mammal Research Organization, the Port Department, the Ministry of Tourism, The Bahamas Customs Department and The Bahamas Immigration Department. Training of staff of the marine sanctuaries of South West Cay (Pedro Bank) and Galleon Beach (St. Elizabeth) Jamaica, organized and hosted by The Nature Conservancy, Breds Treasure Beach Foundation, the National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA), the Fisheries Division and the Coast Guard. 10 persons from the marine sanctuaries of South West Cay and Galleon Beach. Dr. Álida Ortiz lecturing on training and communication skills to MPA managers at the 2010 Training of Trainers Regional Course in Bayahibe, Dominican Republic National MPA Course in Colombia in 2010 Regional Course trainer, Bianca Green discusses the importance of coral reef systems in The Bahamas local training in 2012 Training course in Antigua and Barbuda, organized by Tricia Lovell

5 Page 5 II. 4 National MPA Courses 11. In May 2012, a national training course on MPA management for representatives on marine environmental management, law enforcement, fisheries authorities and research communities in Colombia 2 was implemented with the collaboration of CaMPAM. The CaMPAM Coordinator assisted INVEMAR 3 in the design and direction of this course. The activity is part of the GEF-UNDP project Design and Implementation of the National Subsystem of Marine Protected Areas in Colombia led by INVEMAR and Parques Nacionales de Colombia, the country s park authority. The course was very productive and contributed not only to increasing the knowledge of the trainees on MPA management but also to their incorporation in the MPA Caribbean management community network with their inclusion in the CaMPAM List and participation in the next GCFI Annual Meeting 4, the most important marine science forum of the Caribbean, which will take place this year in Santa Marta, Colombia. II. 5 The Nature Conservancy Caribbean Training Programme on Protected Areas Financial Sustainability for Island Nations of the Caribbean Challenge Initiative under the UNEP-CEP Project on MPA Strengthening with Italian funding 12. A total of seven courses were held in Grenada, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, St. Lucia, Antigua and Barbuda, Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis, and The Bahamas (the one planned for the Dominican Republic was postponed). The workshops included the following: the review and revision of draft legislation and by-laws for each respective National Protected Area Trust Fund (NPATF), the board composition of the NPATFs and an action plan to pass and operationalize the trust fund drafted by participants. Case study examples for a variety of sustainable finance mechanisms were presented. Participants discussed various mechanisms and ranked them in order of priority. An action plan to implement the top mechanism(s) was than created by the participants. One hundred and seventy-six participants attended the workshops. Many of them are part of CaMPAM network and have been beneficiaries of the MPA management training and networking activities coordinated by UNEP-CEP directly through CaMPAM and partners. All workshop materials were disseminated by way of the CaMPAM Listing to the Caribbean Challenge partners and the region at large, along with members of the CaMPAM network. They were all posted by TNC on Additionally, UNEP-CEP with Italian funding through CaMPAM sponsored the participation of MPA managers at the following: o NOAA/TNC Training Workshop on MPA Sustainable Financing at the 2011 GCFI Conference (Puerto Morelos, Mexico, November 2011); o NOAA/GCFI Training Workshop on MPA Enforcement. UNEP-CEP through CaMPAM funded 4 participants from Caribbean Challenge countries (held in the Florida Keys, August 2012). III. SMALL GRANT PROGRAMME FOR LEARNING EXCHANGES 14. It is customary for UNEP-CEP to award grants (US$ ,000) under CaMPAM and SPAW-RAC to implement projects that can assist the marine resources management community of the Caribbean (MPA managers, as well as stakeholders) and promote Responsible/Sustainable Marine Resources Management Practices including Economic Alternatives for Fishermen and Effective Marine Managed Areas. The process includes the identification and procurement of funding (from different sources), the announcement of the Call for Proposals, the review of all proposals, the assistance to proponents of the pre-selected projects (to improve proposals and find partners to better execute their activities), the administration of the Memoranda of Understanding and funding disbursements, the supervision of projects implementation, and the dissemination of results via CaMPAM and other Internet Lists, as well as their posting on the CaMPAM website. This process, coordinated by CaMPAM, is assisted by the SPAW Regional Activity Centre (SPAW-RAC) and UNEP-CEP partner institutions such as GCFI and NOAA. They are represented on the CaMPAM Executive Team. In addition, other experts and members of CaMPAM s Leadership and Resources Team from other organizations (TNC, etc.) also provide review, as needed. The process ensures scientific rigor and transparency of the selection, and the possibility of building synergy through the identification of potential collaborators and the provision of contacts. The grants during this biennium were awarded mostly to government agencies, but also to a few conservation organizations. They all addressed the priority capacity needs of MPAs and each involved dozens of participants. Most of them were funded by the Directorate General for Development Cooperation of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the above project entitled: "Regional Support for the Caribbean Challenge Initiative: Networking, Consolidation and Regional Coordination of MPA Management" to the countries associated with the Caribbean Challenge. See for project summaries. III. 1 Grants Awarded in 2011(funded directly by UNEP-CEP) 1) La Caleta Marine Conservation Training Centre Workshop on Sustainable Practices to Support MPA conservation (to Reef Check Dominican Republic); 2) Conservation and Culture Find Compromise on St. Kitts;

6 Page 6 3) MPAs: tool for the integration of conservation, the productive sector and communities on sustainable development and people s welfare of Cuba (to the Cuban National Centre for Protected Areas), Sandy Island Oyster Bed MPA and the Fisheries Division of Dominica to learn about Fish Aggregating Devices (to Grenada); 4) Capacity Building between MPAs of the northern islands of the Lesser Antilles: Exchange meeting for MPA managers and staff of Saint-Martin/Sint-Maarten, Saint-Barthélémy, Anguilla, Saba and St. Eustachius. III. 2 Grants Awarded in This year, all projects were funded by the Directorate General for Development Cooperation of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs entitled: "Regional Support for the Caribbean Challenge Initiative: Networking, Consolidation and Regional Coordination of MPA Management" to the countries associated with the Caribbean Challenge. Jamaica did not submit a proposal, nor was the proposal presented by The Bahamas approved or modified in keeping with the recommendations of the review committee. A list of projects awarded is outlined below. Summaries and reports can be found on 1) Antigua Barbuda - Dutch Antilles Marine Protected Area Learning Exchange; 2) Dominican Republic - Cuba Marine Protected Area Managers Exchange; 3) Exchange visit to Seaflower Biosphere Reserve on San Andrés Island, Colombia by Grenada MPA staff; 4) Exchange Visit to Puerto Morelos, Mexico by three fishermen from Nevis; 5) St. Lucia Mexico Marine Protected Area Learning Exchange; and 6) St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Park Rangers Field Training Camp at Biscayne National Park and Everglades National Park, Florida. 16. Two grants were approved for funding by UNEP s Caribbean Environment Programme through a specific call for proposals that was opened to all SPAW Parties in June 2012, namely: 1) Lionfish Education/Awareness Workshop and Early Detection/Rapid Response Training: Exchange between St. Eustatius, Dutch Caribbean and Nevis; 2) Enhancement of community participation to improve coral reef management effectiveness in Capurgana/Sapzurro, Caribbean Sea, Colombia. IV. MID-SIZE GRANTS FOR THE EIGHT COUNTRIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CARIBBEAN CHALLENGE INITIATIVE 17. In 2011, eight grants each totalling USD 45,000 were awarded to each Caribbean Challenge participating countries to implement projects that address the MPA priority needs and funded by the Italian Ministry of Foreign affairs. The process was similar to the Small Grants Programme, except for the selection. Proposals were requested of country partners and assistance was provided in developing the proposals. Table 2 provides a summary of each project. 18. Major outcomes include: >50,000km 2 of MPAs designated through the MPA strengthening project funded by Italy; 15 MPA management plans under development or enhanced; Sustainable fisheries practices promoted in Dominican Republic, Grenada, St. Lucia and St. Kitts and Nevis; Mooring buoys and other equipment provided to a number of MPAs. V. MEETINGS AND FORA 19. Regional meetings of the Caribbean Challenge countries. In 2010 and 2011, Caribbean MPA managers were sponsored to participate in the annual Conferences of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute (GCFI) by UNEP-CEP through CaMPAM and funded by the Caribbean Challenge project. They were invited to attend the Caribbean Challenge update meetings and participate in the rest of the scientific sessions of the GCFI Conference such as the MPA Science and Practice (coordinated by CaMPAM), the Lionfish Science and Management (coordinated by SPAW-RAC and collaborators) and others related to marine resources science and management (see Networking among meeting participants was an important benefit with nearly 200 participants attending the Conference. 21. Both 2010 and 2011 Caribbean Challenge Update Meetings were attended by approximately 30 experts, namely two representatives of each of the 8 countries involved in the Initiative, plus representatives from programme and partners organizations (TNC, NOAA, GCFI, UWI-CERMES, GEF-UNEP, CARIBSAVE, etc.). In 2010, the country partners presented the status of implementation of the national system of marine protected area and the training priority needs, and the invitees presented information on their programmes relevant to MPA capacity building. Discussions allowed participants to become better acquainted with the UNEP-CEP project objectives and activities and the potential benefits for the countries involved. This allowed the coordinating team to strengthen the working relationship with partners and improve communication and actions.

7 Page At the 2011 meeting, the country partners presented the status of implementation and impact of the ongoing activities and the expected results. The meeting allowed for better strategizing of the implementation of the remaining activities, mostly the Learning Exchanges and the Training of Trainers local follow-up training activities. The meeting reports can be found at GCFI Annual Conferences. As in previous years (since 2004), CaMPAM contributed to the 2010, 2011 and 2012 GCFI Annual Meetings and particularly the coordination of its MPA Science and Practice session at these meetings. The process included the selection of papers to be presented orally and in the poster modality, the facilitation of the session and provided funding for the participation of participants from SPAW Parties.

8 Page 8 Table 2. Mid-size Projects Funded by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Support of Training, Communication and Regional Coordination of the Caribbean Challenge Initiative COUNTRY TITLE INSTITUTION OBJECTIVES TARGET GROUPS Dominican Republic (DR) Standardization and Optimization (Stand- Op) of Existing Marine Protected Areas in the Dominican Republic. Focused on Increasing the Effectiveness of Management The Bahamas Development and Effective Management of Marine Protected Areas in the Abacos. St. Vincent and the Grenadines Marine Park Planning for the Proposed South Coast Marine Park Reef Check Dominican Republic (RCDR) Bahamas National Trust Fisheries Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Transformation, Forestry and Fisheries and National Parks, Rivers and Beaches Promote and communicate a standard management structure for MPAs/MMAs in the DR integrating concepts related to size, location and sustainable multi-use of MPAs, and also sustainable use practices to support their conservation. Increase the capacity of MPA personnel and stakeholders in more effective MPA management, conservation and monitoring of existing MPAs in the DR, ensuring long-term sustainable use of resources, and supporting conservation goals Consolidate, update and incorporate to the CaMPAM Regional MPA Database ( eanmpa/caribbeanmpa.php) the information on all MPAs/MMAs in the DR. Develop a management plan that can be implemented within the Abaco marine protected areas. Build capacity for utilization of GIS and its layers. Improve community involvement and stakeholder opinion. Increase the local capacity to assist with evaluation and monitoring. Develop an effective management and administrative structure for the proposed South Coast Marine Park. Educate relevant stakeholders on the importance of managing Ministry of Environment, regional directors, MPA managers, park rangers, coastal community members and NGO staff. The Bahamas National Trust (BNT), Friends of the Environment (Friends), scientists, Consultant/ writer, the Abaco community, decision-makers, PA Managers, Department of Marine Resources Department of Lands and Surveys, College of The Bahamas (COB). Fisheries, National Parks, Rivers and Beach Authority (NPRBA), the Environmental Services Unit, Ministry of Finance, Physical Planning Department, TCMP, National Trust, Coast Guard, Central Water and Sewage Authority (CWSA), fisheries cooperatives and community groups, tourism entities and community

9 COUNTRY TITLE INSTITUTION OBJECTIVES TARGET GROUPS Authority marine resources sustainably. organizations. Work towards gazetting a new marine park - South Coast Marine Park - in keeping with the National Parks, Rivers and Beach Authority System Plan and management objectives of the Fisheries Division. UNEP(DEPI)/CAR WG.34/INF.5 Page 9 Antigua and Barbuda Strengthening the management of the MPA Network in Antigua and Barbuda Fisheries Division Update the draft management plan of the Cades Bay Marine Reserve (CBMR) to allow for effective management of the area. Analysis of existing baseline data and guidance on recommended ecological and socio-economic monitoring for the CBMR, the frequency of monitoring, and training and associated equipment needs. Develop a zoning plan for the CBMR through a consultative process and based on recently acquired data. Involve communities and other stakeholders in developing a management framework for the CBMR. Ensure inclusion of other important information and recommendations in the management plan, such as advice on ongoing stakeholder communications. Determine the feasibility of and any recommended approach for instituting a single board charged with the responsibility of overseeing the management of all fisheries-administered MPAs and make recommendations for its Environment Division, Coast Guard, Ministry of Tourism and other tourism interests, fishermen s organizations, the Environmental Awareness Group and other relevant stakeholders.

10 Page 10 COUNTRY TITLE INSTITUTION OBJECTIVES TARGET GROUPS establishment, taking into consideration recommendations within the North East Marine Management Area (NEMMA) Management Plan. St. Lucia A Teacher s Guide to Marine Environmental Education in Saint Lucia Saint Lucia National Trust Produce a Manual on marine environmental for school teachers in St. Lucia. School teachers Grenada Supporting the development of an effective National MPA structure in Grenada: from training MPA wardens, managers, and Board members, to raising community awareness and developing alternative livelihood skills. Fisheries MPA coordination, authorities. Division, national MPA Build MPA management effectiveness. Enhance MPA stakeholder communications. Ensure basic essential equipment for MPA management. MPA managers at site and national level, as well as stakeholders. St. Kitts and Nevis Building Infrastructure and Development of a Framework for the Management of Marine Protected Areas in St. Kitts and Nevis. Jamaica Training for the installation and maintenance of mooring buoys at the Palisadoes-Port Royal Department of Physical Planning and Environment, Ministry of Sustainable Development, Department of Fisheries (St. Kitts), Ministry of Marine Resources, Ministry of Tourism, and The Nature Conservancy. National Environment & Planning Agency and the Fisheries Division Implement immediate actions to prevent continuing physical damage to the remaining coral reef areas from anchor damage by installing moorings at key sites. Establish a framework for the management of Marine Protected Areas by building on the foundation of work recently completed under the PA Systems Plan and the Marine Zoning design. Train field staff in the installation and maintenance of mooring buoys. Install mooring buoys at offshore cays within the MPA Marine environmental managers and stakeholders. National Environment and Planning Agency; Fisheries Division; Jamaica National Heritage Trust; Montego Bay Marine Park Trust; and the Caribbean Coastal Area Management Foundation.

11 COUNTRY TITLE INSTITUTION OBJECTIVES TARGET GROUPS Protected Area to (Lime Cay and Maiden Cay). increase the Increase awareness of the management efficiency. users on the need for and proper use of the mooring buoys. Develop a maintenance programme for the installed buoys. UNEP(DEPI)/CAR WG.34/INF.5 Page 11

12 Page 12 VI. BUILDING A NETWORK OF MPA MANGERS, MENTORS AND CONSERVATION LEADERS 24. In , the CaMPAM Network (defined by its Internet membership list and the participation in discussions, fora, projects and exchanges) expanded significantly. 25. CaMPAM s membership list has reached 630 members -220 more than in September and counting. The forum not only provides information on a variety of subjects related to marine resources research and management (publications, initiatives, meetings, vacancies, grant opportunities, projects, MPA issues and achievements, newsletters, etc.), but has also served as a platform for information requests and discussion, as well as to disseminate messages from other relevant Internet Lists (GLISPA-Discuss, WCPAmarine, GCFI net, Coral List, Caribbean Biodiversity, among others). Its increasing use by conservation organizations with strong involvement in MPA issues in the Caribbean is an indication of its increasing reputation by the marine conservation research and management community. 26. The members represent not only MPA managers and other staff but also governmental and non-governmental institutions and organizations involved and/or interested in issues relevant to marine conservation science, education and practice. 27. The increasing participation of MPA managers in CaMPAM activities, as well as their involvement in the establishment of national MPA networks, and their participation in regional exchanges and fora have all contributed to the development of a group of conservation leaders and potential mentors on MPA management for sites and countries with less capacity. 28. On the other hand, the response of the CaMPAM Leadership and Resources Team (created in 2009), to provide review, advice, information and resources to CaMPAM activities has been weak. This may be attributed to the fact that many of the members are experts with high responsibilities and little incentive in devoting time to CaMPAM. The last three (3) years of intense CaMPAM training activities and networking, and the poor response of the current CLRT indicate that an Expert Team composed of MPA managers and on-site conservation practitioners may prove to be a better platform to assist the CaMPAM coordinating team. This will not only rationalize CaMPAM coordinating activities, but also provide further opportunities to assist MPA managers and marine resources management leaders to play a more significant role in the CaMPAM programme and assist with career development and mentors in diverse management practices, but also recognize and stimulate their contribution to the regional efforts (beyond their countries boundaries). The reactivation of the Leadership and Resources team is underway and new Terms of Reference are being developed by the CaMPAM Executive Team. 29. CaMPAM website ( - CaMPAM website, hosted and managed by GCFI, has expanded and improved, and more information has been posted, including the activities of the Caribbean Challenge project, the Training of Trainers reports, the Small Grant and Exchanges summaries, etc. 30. Contribution to national and international marine conservation initiatives. CaMPAM has contributed to several national and international MPA initiatives, in different capacities, namely: o Two new countries of the region became SPAW Protocol Contracting Parties: Grenada and The Bahamas; o Training Workshop for the Insular Caribbean on the CBD Program of Work on Protected Areas (Barbados, April 2012); o CBD Expert Workshop for Defining Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas (EBSA) of the Tropical Atlantic (Brazil, February 2012); o XVI Meeting of the CBD Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) Oceans, Coasts, Islands: Achieving the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (Montreal, May 2012); o The two European regional MPA networks and training programmes similar to CaMPAM: the Mediterranean MPA Network (MedPAN) and the MPA Network of the Atlantic Arc (MAIA) (presentation at two workshops in December 2010, and June 2012 with follow-up and discussions on transoceanic collaboration); o Lessons Learnt Workshop of the Caribbean Large Marine Ecosystem Reef Biodiversity and Fisheries Project (San Andrés Island, Colombia, May, 2012); o The Global Island Partnership (GLISPA) initiative; o The Rio +20 CBD Summit (poster, presentation, video, banner, representation): The Caribbean Challenge UNEP-CEP project was highlighted at the Rio +20 Summit with the presentation of a video (featuring the latest marine conservation and MPA developments in Grenada and other island nations), a banner and a poster. Several Caribbean officials and conservation leaders attended the event, namely the Hon. Senator George Prime, Minister of Carriacou and Petite Martinique Affairs (Grenada), Roland Baldeo (Grenada National MPA Coordinator), Rob Weary (The Nature Conservancy), Nadia Henry (Ministry of Finance of Antigua and Barbuda), Nicole Glineur (Global Environment Facility, GEF), Peter Kristensen (World Bank), Nelson Andrade (UNEP-CEP Coordinator), as well as Dr. Alfredo Guillet (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Italy), the project donor; o Mr. Baldeo represented the project at this event and talked about its objectives and outcomes for his country and the region. Mr. George Prime, Minister of Carriacou and Petite Martinique Affairs, Grenada, highlighted in his speech the contribution of UNEP-CEP, CaMPAM and this project to the country s efforts to increase MPA capacity ( The video ( was produced by Media

13 Page 13 Impact with the contribution of GLISPA Communication Experts. Its design and production was a product of the collaboration between GLISPA and UNEP-CEP/CaMPAM; o Workshops of the SPAW Action Plan for the Conservation of Marine Mammals in the Wider Caribbean (October 2011, May 2012); o The CERMES-UWI SocMon training project for three Caribbean Challenge countries ( ). VII. REGIONAL MPA DATABASE 31. The population of the regional MPA database (hosted by GCFI and coordinated by CaMPAM) has been slow and difficult ( Some countries (Colombia, Costa Rica) have completed the data for their MPAs, but many others are still lacking in data. The poor response of managers to the request to provide data can be explained by the inadequacy of available data and the apparent insufficient incentive to provide them. Other MPA databases have the same problem and have little Caribbean data. 32. Some additional resources have been allotted to this task and it is expected that this will speed up the data entered in the next few months. It is evident that such an endeavour can only be well developed if there is permanent technical staff that can work on the data acquisition and its quality control, as well as providing technical support for database maintenance. The GCFI is committed to providing technical support as resources become available, but the assistance of the SPAW parties focal points in facilitating the provision of data is critical to advancing this activity. A committed focal point for each country, dedicated to supplying data for the MPA database is highly desirable. VIII. COORDINATION AND INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS 33. Coordination of the programme included the following activities and tasks: Identify opportunities for MPA manager training resources (courses, workshops, exchange visits, mentorships) organized by relevant organizations and build upon these efforts; Coordinate special partnerships with organizations and programmes; Moderate CaMPAM List and Forum ultimately resulting in increased membership (MPA scientists, practitioners and stakeholders); Enhance information resources and promote discussion within the membership via CaMPAM list and Forum (grant opportunities, papers, emergent issues, events, lessons learned, best practices, education programmes, etc.); Liaise with other networks and relevant list serves (MedPAN, MAIA, Coral list, GCFI Net, GLISPA, Caribbean Biodiversity, WCPA-Marine, Latin American Wardens Network, etc.); Promote communication between the English and Spanish speaking sectors of the Caribbean marine resources community by translating important messages and news; Provide assistance to the membership on grant proposal opportunities and development, as well as sources of information for enhancing MPA management effectiveness; Supervise the updating of the Caribbean MPA database and share data; Fundraising to develop and support CaMPAM and MPA strengthening related activities in the region; Design, coordinate and supervise the Trainers of Trainers and the Small Grant programmes, etc.; Actively engage other institutions as partners in different activities; Coordination and consultation with CaMPAM s Executive Committee and Resources and Leadership Team. 34. GCFI is the most renowned forum in the wider Caribbean for fisheries managers and scientists, as well as conservation scientists and practitioners. The CaMPAM partnership, revamped in 2004 during the White Water to Blue Water Conference, has evolved into a long-lasting relationship in which GCFI plays a technical and managerial role in CaMPAM programme implementation. As a result of this work, the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute has also implemented projects related to MPA issues, in particular, some regional projects funded by the US NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Programme. 35. In the last years, the SPAW Regional Activity Centre s (SPAW-RAC) involvement in CaMPAM activities has grown, in particular the technical supervision and management of project grants and training activities. The implementation of the training course for French, Dutch and Haitians MPA managers in Guadeloupe was also a demonstration of the increasing role of SPAW-RAC and the French MPA community and agencies in CaMPAM.

14 Page 14 Annex 1: Caribbean Challenge Supplement DETAILS OF THE WORKSHOPS Sustainable Finance Workshops have been held in all of the eight expected countries except for the Dominican Republic, which has been postponed. 176 participants participated in the seven concluded Sustainable Finance Workshops. Details of each Workshop, including the number of participants, financing mechanisms chosen and who has been chosen as the National Project Coordinator (NPC) for each country are as follows: The Workshop in Grenada took place from November The top priority financing mechanisms chosen were: 1) Conservation Site Fees; 2) Tourism Fees; and 3) a Debt Swap for Adaptation to Climate Change Swap. There were 28 participants in attendance. Spencer Thomas has been chosen to be the NPC. The Workshop in St. Vincent and the Grenadines was held from February The top priority financing mechanisms chosen were: 1) Tourism Fees; 2) Debt for Adaptation to Climate Change Swap; and 3) Water Funds. There were 25 participants in attendance. Candice Ramessar has been chosen to be the NPC. The Workshop in St. Lucia was held from April The top priority financing mechanisms chosen were: 1) Debt for Adaptation to Climate Change Swap; 2) Water Funds; and 3) Conservation Site Fees. There were 27 participants in attendance. Vasantha Chase has been chosen to be the NPC. The Workshop in Antigua and Barbuda was held from May The top priority financing mechanism chosen was a Debt for Adaptation to Climate Change Swap. There were 25 participants in attendance. We are in the process of reviewing applications for the NPC. The Workshop in Jamaica was held from June The top priority financing mechanisms chosen were: 1) Debt for Adaptation to Climate Change Swap; 2) Tourism Fees; and 3) Conservation Site Fees. There were 27 participants in attendance. Roxanne Valentine, of the National Environment and Planning Agency, is the NPC for the GEF Protected Areas project in Jamaica. The Workshop in St. Kitts and Nevis was held from July, The top priority financing mechanisms chosen were: 1) a Debt for Nature Swap; and 2) Development Fees. There were 14 participants in attendance. Janice Hodge has been chosen to be the NPC. The Workshop in The Bahamas was held from September The top priority financing mechanisms chosen were: 1) Natural resource extraction user fee; 2) National Lottery Tax; and 3) Percentage of VAT. There were 31 participants in attendance. Rochelle Newbold is the NPC for the GEF Protected Areas Project in The Bahamas. MAIN SUBJECTS COVERED Each workshop in the Eastern Caribbean started with an overview of the Caribbean Challenge Initiative and of the Sustainable Financing and Management of Eastern Caribbean Marine Ecosystem Project. Updates regarding the Caribbean Biodiversity Fund (CFB) were provided to stakeholders and the draft legislation and by-laws for each respective National Protected Area Trust Fund (NPATF) were reviewed and revised. Board composition of the NPATF was then decided upon. An action plan to pass and operationalize the trust fund was then drafted by participants. Afterwards, case study examples for a variety of sustainable finance mechanisms were presented. Participants discussed the different mechanisms and ranked the mechanisms to be pursued in order of priority. An action plan for implementing the top mechanism(s) was than created by the participants. The number of plans that were created per country depended on the amount of time left during the workshop and the desire of the participants to pursue more than one mechanism. The Bahamas and Jamaican workshops were conducted in a similar manner. Stakeholders were first given an overview of the Caribbean Challenge and the respective GEF Protected Areas projects, and then updated on the status of the Caribbean Biodiversity Fund. Regarding the national trust fund for each country, Jamaica is merging two existing trust funds to create a fund that is CBF eligible and The Bahamas already has draft legislation for its CBF eligible trust fund in place (but which still requires Parliament s approval). Similar to the Eastern Caribbean workshops, sustainable finance mechanism case studies were presented and based on discussions on how each mechanism would fit the needs of the country, priority mechanisms were chosen to pursue. Action plans to implement the chosen mechanism(s) were then developed by the participants. FOLLOW-UP Following each workshop, the actions needed regarding operationalizing and implementing the NPATF, as well as implementing each financing mechanism, were documented in an organized action plan. Each action plan includes the person responsible for each action item, partners that will be involved, a timeline for each item and indications of progress for each item. The documents and action plans that came out of each workshop were ed to participants. The documents are also being uploaded to a website (which is

15 Page 15 currently under construction). In addition to the action plans, the actions below were noted as items to be accomplished following the conclusion of the workshops. The responsible party is in parentheses. Grenada: 1) A small group of participants will act as the Interim Working Group to assist in start-up following the workshop (Roland Baldeo, Ricky Morain, Alan Joseph, Jennifer Alexis, Brian Whyte). St. Vincent and the Grenadines: 1) A Steering Committee will carry on activities beyond the workshop (Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning Member (coordinator), National Parks Agency (coordinator), Environmental Management Division, St. Vincent and the Grenadines National Trust, MAF) 2) The GEF Project Coordinator is to be hired (Steering Committee). St. Lucia: 1) Establishment of the Project Steering Committee (PSC), which is expected to carry on activities beyond the workshop. 2) The GEF Project National Coordinator is to be hired (with the assistance of the PSC) 3) The Terms of Reference for the NPC will be circulated to participants (NIE) 4) A team will meet with the VAT Office 5) A model flyer developed to be used in countries (TNC) 6) Follow-up on Cooperation Agreement (Ministry of Finance) 7) Brief prepared for Minister(s) by the 2 nd half of May (NPC, Ministry of Finance and NIE) Antigua and Barbuda: 1) Provide update on the status of the Cooperation Agreement (National Implementing Agency (NIE)) 2) ToRs for the Project Coordinator (Robbie Bovino) 3) Work plan and proceedings complete (NPC) 4) Project brief to MOF (Rob Weary) 5) National Coordinating Committee established ( NIE, NPC, Ministry of Finance) Jamaica: 1) More information regarding the willingness to pay for surveys that have been previously conducted in the region will be provided to the National Environment and Planning Agency. Furthermore, a willingness to pay for surveys will be conducted in Jamaica (Rob Weary). St. Kitts and Nevis: 1) Send out ads for NPC (Robbie Bovino) 2) Establish NC (NIE, TNC) 3) Documents and presentations to be uploaded and circulated (Brittany Isabelle) 4) Naming of St. Kitts and Nevis observer to Caribbean Biodiversity Fund 5) Presentation of Debt for Adaptation Swap to Ministry of Finance (Rob Weary, TNC) The Bahamas 1. Documents and presentations to be uploaded and circulated (Brittany Isabelle) 2. A letter signed by all Non-Governmental Organizations present will be sent along with a briefing package to the Minister. A draft text of the letter was shared with participants 3. A conservation group will be formed from participants that will allow for further meetings and to develop a stronger voice on environmental issues

16 Page 16 Annex 2: Caribbean Challenge Initiative Brochure utilized at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Rio+20, in Rio de Janiero, Brazil

17 S u p p o r t i n g t h e Caribbean Challenge Initiative G o v e r n m e n t l e a d e r s h i p a n d p e o p l e e q u i p p e d t o s a f e g u a r d t h e I n s u l a r C a r i b b e a n s m a r i n e a n d c o a s t a l e n v i r o n m e n t f o r f u t u r e g e n e r a t i o n s

18 We aim to act responsibly as stewards of unique island biodiversity. The Honorable Anne David-Antoine, former Minister of Environment, Grenada Caribbean Challenge Initiative Conservation Commitment to protect at least 20% of the near-shore marine and coastal habitats by 2020 BAHAMAS DOMINICAN REPUBLIC ATLANTIC OCEAN ANTIGUA & BARBUDA Participating in Caribbean Biodiversity Fund that will provide sustainable financing for national protected areas JAMAICA ST. KITTS & NEVIS Parties to the Convention for the Protection and Development of the Marine Environment of the Wider Caribbean Region (Cartagena Convention) Parties to the Protocol on Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW) of the Cartagena Convention Caribbean Sea KM ST. LUCIA ST. VINCENT & THE GRENADINES GRENADA Importance of the Caribbean The Caribbean is home to one of the world s most complex mosaics of marine and coastal habitats. These rich ecosystems possess: H More than 10% of the world s coral reefs H As much as 33,000 square kilometers of seagrass beds H More than 22,000 square kilometers of mangrove H Over 1,400 species of fish and marine mammals H Six of the world s seven species of endangered sea turtles during their lifecycles H At least 85% of breeding humpback whales from the North Atlantic every winter Nature is the lifeblood underpinning the region s major economic engines. H Marine resource-based goods and services generate more than US$80 billion annually, largely through tourism and fisheries H Tourism attracts 60% of the world s divers and provides 6 million jobs. A healthy environment provides the natural infrastructure underpinning economic benefits necessary for the prosperity and security of the Caribbean. The region is one of the most densely populated globally, with most residents inhabiting the coastal zone and depending heavily on marine resources for their livelihoods. The natural heritage and vibrant cultures face imminent threats from unsustainable development, overfishing, land-based and marine pollution, climate change and other global challenges. The cultural and geographic similarities provide opportunity to work together to share and adapt solutions to overcome development challenges and safeguard the environment for future generations.

19 Inspired Leadership The Caribbean Challenge Initiative so far involves eight island nations -- The Bahamas, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saint Lucia, Grenada, Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Kitts and Nevis. Five countries have made formal commitments to protect at least 20% of the near-shore marine and coastal habitats by All eight countries are participating in the Caribbean Biodiversity Fund that will provide sustainable financing for their national protected areas. Inspired by the Micronesia Challenge, the Caribbean Challenge Initiative was officially launched in 2008 during a high-level event in Bonn, Germany sponsored by the Global Island Partnership. The Challenges are evidence of the bold strides being taken by island leaders to conserve and protect their precious natural resources to advance green and blue economies as a safeguard for their future. Working Together In support of the Caribbean Challenge Initiative, the Directorate General for Development Cooperation of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs funded a two year project through UNEP s Caribbean Environment Programme (CEP) to support the development of a biologically-representative, functional network of marine protected areas (MPAs) capable of adapting to climate change. This project improved the capacity of countries MPA practitioners by: H Providing training of trainer workshops focused around MPA planning, management, monitoring, valuation, communications and sustainable finance H Empowering MPA practitioners to influence national policy H Increasing knowledge, innovation and experience sharing, and stimulating the application of best practices among MPA practitioners, their stakeholders (fishers, tour operators, educators) and marine scientists H Allocating small and mid-size grants for exchange visits and national projects to address MPA needs in each of the countries H Promoting the regional UNEP s CEP Caribbean Marine Protected Areas Management Network and Forum (CaMPAM) training and communication platform to implement the project activities Impact On The Ground Action Highlight project activities have: H Equipped rangers and wardens with skills necessary to effectively enforce protective rules and regulations in Grenada, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, St. Kitts and Nevis, and Jamaica H Sensitized the judiciary and key enforcement partners on the legislative environment for MPA management in Antigua and Barbuda H Improved awareness of local and national protected area systems in The Bahamas H Built collaborative solutions in the Soufriere Marine Management Area (SMMA) and Canaries Marine Management Area (CAMMA) including educating stakeholders on sustainable marine resource use and management H Incorporated the marine environmental subject into the schools program in St. Lucia H Promoted sustainable fishing practices and alternative livelihoods for fishers in Dominican Republic, Grenada, St. Lucia, and St. Kitts and Nevis H Incorporated MPA practitioners of all countries into an Internetbased forum for promoting communication and information exchange H More than 280 MPA managers and stakeholders trained across the 8 countries with trained managers responsible for more than 100,000 square kilometers of protected areas H More than 50,000 square kilometers of protected areas with marine and coastal component designated since the project started H 15 protected area management plans in the process of preparation, completed, or enhanced H Two new countries signed and ratified the SPAW Protocol of the Cartagena Convention photos on cover, second, & third pages: Marjo Aho. Map: Jim mcmahon

20 Photo: Davon K.M. Baker How to participate To participate in project activities join CaMPAM network ( To learn more, go to or contact Training of trainers, Belize The Caribbean Challenge Initiative is a commitment promoted through the Global Island Partnership (GLISPA). The Partnership promotes actions for island conservation and sustainable livelihoods by inspiring leadership, catalyzing commitments and facilitating collaboration. To learn more, go to Supporting Government Leadership The Directorate General for Development Cooperation of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been a considerable supporter of island issues. This support has built institutional capacity, improved cross-sectoral management of natural resources, and promoted sharing at regional and global levels. The Caribbean Challenge Initiative and project have also been supported by: The Caribbean Challenge Initiative and project contributes to the United Nations Decade on Biodiversity More than anywhere else, cooperation efforts in the Caribbean islands reveal the direct effects of conservation of nature on human development. Minister Plenipotentiary Pier Francesco Zazo, Focal Point for Environment, Directorate General for Development Cooperation of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs