CENTRAL OREGON REGIONAL TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
|
|
- Augustine Underwood
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Central Oregon Regional Transit Master Plan Volume II: Surveys and Market Research CENTRAL OREGON REGIONAL TRANSIT MASTER PLAN Volume IV: Service Plan Appendices A-B July 213 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. i
2 Table of Contents Page APPENDIX A Transit Demand Estimates Methodology... A-1 APPENDIX B Service Planning Data...B-1 Overall Performance Data... B-1 Community Connector... B-2 Local Public Bus (General Public Dial-A-Ride)... B-14 Table of Figures Page Figure A-1 Data Sources... A-2 Figure A-2 Explanation of Adjustment Factors and Rating Methodology... A- Figure A-3 Local Adjustments... A-6 Figure A-4 Supporting Data for Local Adjustments and Projected 23 Baseline Ridership... A-6 Figure A- Regional Adjustments... A-7 Figure A-6 Supporting Quantitative Data for Regional Adjustments and Projected 23 Baseline Linked Transit Trips... A-8 Figure B-1 Regional Ridership Data, October B-1 Figure B-2 Regional Ridership Data, Average, October-March B-2 Figure B-3 Regional Vehicle Capacity... B-2 Figure B-4 Daily Boardings by Community Connector Route, October B-4 Figure B- Daily Boardings by Community Connector Route, January B-4 Figure B-6 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 24 -, October B- Figure B-7 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 24 -, January B- Figure B-8 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 26 -, October B-6 Figure B-9 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 26 -, January B-6 Figure B-1 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 26 -, October 212 (AM)... B-7 Figure B-11 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 26 -, January 213 (AM)... B-7 Figure B-12 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 26 -, October 212 (PM)... B-8 Figure B-13 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 26 -, January 213 (PM)... B-8 Figure B-14 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 3 -La Pine, October B-9 Figure B-1 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 3 -La Pine, January B-9 Figure B-16 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 22 -Madras, October B-1 Figure B-17 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 22 -Madras, January B-1 Figure B-18 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 22 -Madras, October B-11 Figure B-19 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 22 -Madras, January B-11 Figure B-2 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 28 -Sisters, October B-12 Figure B-21 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 28 -Sisters, January B-12 Figure B-22 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 28 -Sisters, October B-13 Figure B-23 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 28 -Sisters, January B-13 Figure B-24 Local Public Bus Vehicles by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/ B-14 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. i
3 Figure B-2 Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Table)... B-1 Figure B-26 Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Chart)... B-1 Figure B-27 La Pine Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Table)... B-16 Figure B-28 La Pine Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Chart)... B-16 Figure B-29 Madras-Culver-Metolius Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Table)... B-17 Figure B-3 Madras-Culver-Metolius Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Chart)... B-17 Figure B-31 Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Table)... B-18 Figure B-32 Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Chart)... B-18 Figure B-33 Sisters Local Public Bus Rides by Time, 11/6/212 (Table)... B-19 Figure B-34 Sisters Local Public Bus Rides by Time, 11/6/212 (Chart)... B-19 Figure B-3 Terrebonne Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Table)... B-2 Figure B-36 Terrebonne Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Chart)... B-2 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. ii
4 APPENDIX A TRANSIT DEMAND ESTIMATES METHODOLOGY This appendix describes the approach taken to assess future transit market potential for both local intra-community trips and regional inter-city trips. The purpose of this assessment was to identify those transit markets in the CET service area that have strong potential for future service enhancements. Based on the results of the assessment, potential service types were identified that are appropriate for serving intra-community and inter-community trips in these transit markets and service concepts were developed. Methodology Demand/Ridership Estimation Approach The project team used the following approach 1 to develop estimates of future transit demand in and between the communities in the CET service area: The regional travel demand model provided the number of daily trips within and between cities in both current and future years. The 23 base year for the model was adjusted to the current year (212), assuming constant annual growth. Other sources were be used to validate/supplement the model, e.g., work trips (U.S. Census LEHD). Existing ridership data (212) was used to determine the existing transit mode split (the travel demand model does not address transit). Market potential was evaluated qualitatively based on a series of adjustment factors (see below). The existing mode split was adjusted and used to estimate future (23) transit market potential. Total Trips (Travel Demand Model) Actual Transit Mode Split Assess Market Potential Adjust Mode Split Potential Transit Trips (including latent demand) Transit Trips (CET Ridership Data) Assign Low, Medium, or High rating 1 In the initial version of this memo, a population segmentation method was planned for the intra-community demand estimates, anticipating that travel demand model data would not be available for intra-community trips. This method utilizes population data from the U.S. Census, broken out by age, and per-capita transit trip rates from the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). These broad average trip rates would then need to be adjusted for local conditions. However, regional travel demand model data was available for all local communities and this alternative method was not required. COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. A-1
5 Data Inputs Figure A-1 summarizes the key data inputs and identifies whether they were used to estimate local and/or regional transit demand. Figure A-1 Data Sources Data Source Local Regional Travel demand model, current (23) and future (23) years, by trip purpose X X Work-based travel flows, LEHD, 21 X X Existing transit ridership (Community Connector and Local Public Bus), CET, 212 X X Community preferences survey (conducted region-wide) in 212 X X On-board passenger surveys (Community Connector and Local Public Bus) trip purpose, origin-destination, transfer patterns, etc.) Population, 21 Census, by age X X X Mode Split Adjustments When people choose to use transit they must weigh a number of complex and inter-related factors before deciding it is the right mode for them. For example, people must consider the cost, time, and convenience of all of their travel options before making a decision. While people are adept at making these complex decisions, and can do so with relative ease, it is much more difficult to predict future transit travel behavior based solely on model data. Still, model data is the best place to start and provides planners with a basis from which to estimate how many of those trips could potentially be made on transit. To help refine the demand estimation process, a number of adjustment factors (first column of Figure A-2) were used to make an assessment of the future market potential for transit. Each factor was assessed on a Low-Medium-High rating scale, based on data and/or local knowledge, and each local community or regional travel corridor was assessed as having either a Low, Medium or High potential for future transit enhancements. A rating of Low does not necessarily mean that transit demand is low, but rather that the potential for enhancements over what is currently being provided is low. Figure A-2 identifies the data source for each adjustment factor and describes how these factors were evaluated within each community and for each regional connection (origin-destination pair). The project team developed an initial assessment, requested that TAC members provide input and/or modify/refine the initial assessment based on their knowledge and understanding of each community and the region, and revised the assessment based on feedback received. Figure A-3 provides an assessment table for local communities; Figure A-4 provides supporting quantitative data for intra-community travel that can be used as reference for the adjustments in Figure A-3. Figure A- provides an assessment table for regional connections; Figure A-6 provides supporting quantitative data for inter-community travel that can be used as reference for the adjustments in Figure A- COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. A-2
6 212 Estimated Transit Mode Split and 23 Baseline Transit Ridership Figure A-4 (intra-community) and Figure A-6 (inter-community) include the following estimates. Existing (212) ridership and mode split 2. For inter-community trips, it should be emphasized that transit ridership represents linked trips, i.e., a trip from to is counted as a single linked trip, but represents two unlinked trips one on the and one on the Community Connector routes. 3 For each transit market (origin-destination for the linked transit trip), the 212 mode split was calculated as 212 linked transit trips divided by the 212 number of total trips, from the travel demand model. 4 The Existing Conditions Volume and Appendix B of this volume provide additional background on existing use of the Community Connector service, including unlinked trips, productivity, and existing vehicle capacity. Unadjusted baseline 23 transit ridership estimate. This represents projected 23 travel demand assuming the estimated 212 mode split. It does not reflect response to potential service changes, which could help attract unmet demand. Although this estimate is a useful data point, it reflects a degree of uncertainty in existing linked transit trips and total trips, as described in footnotes. Its primary use is for comparing ridership estimates for specific service enhancements to the baseline level (no enhancements) in each transit market, i.e., on a relative rather than absolute basis. 2 Mode split is the share of all trips for a particular travel mode. It is differentiated from mode share, which typically describes use of a particular mode for work trips, such as in the American Community Survey. The transit mode split is typically lower than the transit mode share. 3 The number of linked trips was estimated based on the on-board survey conducted on Community Connector routes, which provided a sample of passenger origin-destination patterns over an approximately week-long period. A more comprehensive survey that captures origin-destination patterns of all Community Connector riders on a given day would allow a more accurate estimate of linked trips to be developed. 4 The number of total trips in 212 was a straight-line estimate assuming a constant rate of growth between 23 and 23 (the base and future years for the model). Due to the economic downturn, this likely overstates actual 212 travel demand (particularly for work trips), and therefore results in a lower mode split. COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. A-3
7 Summary In summary, for each community or travel corridor, the travel demand model and existing ridership data were used identify the number of overall trips, projected growth in overall travel demand, the number of transit trips, the existing transit mode split (transit s share of each travel market). Based on this data, an assessment of individual transit market factors and overall transit market potential was developed. The overall assessment of future market potential was primarily used to:. Identify the transit markets with the greatest future potential. Identify potential future service types for each community or travel corridor. Serve as the basis for developing local and regional service options. COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. A-4
8 Figure A-2 Explanation of Adjustment Factors and Rating Methodology Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan Method for Adjustments - Relative Rating Scale Adjustment Factor Data Source Local Community Regional (O-D Pair) Explanation of Low-Medium-High Rating Scale Existing Transit Ridership (Regional) or Utilization (Local) Growth in Travel Demand (212-23) Worker flows Presence of major regional activity centers and non-work generators Travel distance and/or congestion (monetary cost and time constraints) Parking constraints, e.g., availability, time limits, monetary cost, etc. Local transit connections Community support Overall assessment of future market potential CET ridership data and 21 Census Travel demand model U.S. Census Bureau Longitudinal Employer- Household Dynamics (LEHD) commute patterns data and/or local knowledge Activity centers map and local knowledge Local knowledge and/or travel demand model Local knowledge Existing transit service Local knowledge and community preferences survey data Quantitative - relative ranking of intra-community transit ridership Quantitative - relative ranking of intra-community travel demand growth Quantitative - relative ranking of intra-community work flows Can be adjusted qualitatively based on future expectations for 23 Qualitative assessment for each community Qualitative assessment for each community Qualitative assessment for each community may include future (23) expectations Qualitative assessment for each community may include future (23) expectations Qualitative assessment for each community - Qualitative assessment for each community Quantitative - relative ranking of inter-community transit ridership Quantitative - relative ranking of inter-community travel demand growth Quantitative - relative ranking of inter-community work flows Can be adjusted qualitatively based on adjustments to the local community rating Assigned based on the local rating for the destination community Qualitative assessment for each O-D pair Assigned based on the local rating for the destination community Assigned based on the local rating for the destination community Assigned based on the local rating for the destination community Qualitative assessment for each O-D pair A high rating indicates the presence of existing transit demand. For local communities this is considered relative to population. A high rating is related to the projected rate of future travel growth in a local or inter-community travel market. It also requires the presence of a minimum level of overall travel demand. A high rating indicates the presence of a large number of workers (i.e., potential transit riders) in a local or regional travel market. A high rating indicates that a local community has activity centers that would attract non-work trips, such as medical facilities, community college, social service agency, etc. A high rating implies long travel distances and therefore a higher cost of driving (e.g., cost of gas). It is assumed based on the travel demand model that no significant congestion constraints will develop on intercity travel corridors. A moderate rating indicates that parking constraints are present today (e.g., time limited parking in downtown or constrained availability at COCCC), or are expected to develop by 23. High parking constraints are not anticipated in any community by 23. A high rating is related to the quality and availability of transit service, e.g., fixed-route service six days per week in vs. local Dial-A-Ride only one day per week in Sisters. A high rating reflects perceived community support for service within a community or on a particular connection. A high rating indicates strong overall potential for future growth in a local or regional travel market. COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. A-
9 Figure A-3 Local Adjustments Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan Adjustment Factors for Transit Mode Share (Current and/or Future Conditions) Relative to Region Communities Transit Utilization Growth in Travel Demand (212-3) Work Flows Activity Centers & Non-Work Generators Travel Time and Cost Parking Constraints Local Transit Connections Community Support Future Market Potential Rating Method / Data Source Quantitative (CET) J-L Quantitative (Travel Model) F Quantitative (Model/LEHD) H-I Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative Assessment H H H H L M H M High M H M M L L M H High L M M L L L M M Medium Madras L L M L L L M M Medium Culver/Metolius L N/A L L L L L M Low Sisters L H L L L L L M Low La Pine M M L L L L M M Low Notes: Letters for quantitative data sources refer to columns in Figure A-4. Figure A-4 Supporting Data for Local Adjustments and Projected 23 Baseline Ridership A B C D E F G H I J K L M Census Travel Demand Model - All Trips HBW Trips Work Trips Transit Trips Population Baseline Model Average Model LEHD Live & Daily Trips Density Model Model CET Daily Transit Projected Population Intermediate Total Change Annual % Intermediate Work in per 1 (Per Sq. Base Year Future Year Ridership Mode Split Daily Transit Estimate Change Estimate Community People Mi.) Ridership Communities / ,639 2,34 196,14 227, , % 1.8% 38,341 33,92 1, % 2,177 26,21 1,61 44,218 7, , % 7.9% 1,26 4, % 42 9, ,832 31,847, %.1% 6,1 2, % 17 Madras 6,46 1,24 3,132 38,646 4, % 3.1% 7,2 1, % Culver/Metolius 2,67 1,767 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 21 Sisters 2,38 1,9 3,11,363 9, % 8.1% % 3 La Pine 1, ,772 2,4 3, % 4.6% % 8 OVERALL (excl. ) 47,272-11, 13,843 23,2 1.9%.8% 24,32 8, % 696 OVERALL (with ) 123, ,69 381,66 4, % 3.1% 62,661 42,367 2, % 2,873 Notes: (A/B) For city. CET local service area may extend beyond city limits, e.g., La Pine. (D) Extrapolated based on average growth rate. (H) Limited to Home-Based Work (HBW) trips, extrapolated to 21 based on the change in LEHD primary jobs between (I) Represents twice the number of LEHD primary jobs in 21 (for comparison to model data, which represents one-way trips). (M) Assumes 212 mode split in 23. COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. A-6
10 Figure A- Regional Adjustments From To Existing Transit Ridership Adjustment Factors for Transit Mode Share (Current and/or Future Conditions) Growth in Travel Demand (212-3) Work Flows Activity Centers & Non-Work Generators Travel Time and Cost Parking Constraints Local Community Transit Support Connections Future Market Potential Rating Method Quantitative Quantitative Quantitative Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative /Data Source (CET) H (Model) D (LEHD) G see local table - H M H H M M H H High M M M M M L M M High Madras Area M M M L M L M M Medium Sisters L H M L M L L L Low La Pine L - L M - - H M H M M L M M High see local table - M L H M M L M M High Madras Area M L M L H L M L Low Sisters L L M L M L L L Medium La Pine M H M L M L M L Medium M M M M M L M M High M L H H M M H M High see local table - Madras Area - M L L M L M - Low Sisters L - - L H L L L - La Pine L H L M - - Madras Area M M M M M L M M Medium M L M H H M H M Low - M L M M L M - Low Madras Area see local table Medium Sisters L - - L H L L L - La Pine L H L M - - Warm Springs L N/A M M M L L? Medium Sisters L H L M M L M M Low L L M H M M H M Low L L L M H L M L - Madras Area L L L L H L M L - Sisters see local table - La Pine - M L L H L M - - La Pine - H L M H L M - - M H L H M M H H Medium - H L M H L M - - Madras Area - H L L H L M - - Sisters - M L L H L L - - La Pine see local table - COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. A-7
11 Figure A-6 Supporting Quantitative Data for Regional Adjustments and Projected 23 Baseline Linked Transit Trips A B C D E F G H I J Model Base Year Travel Demand Model - All Trips Intermediate Estimate Model Total Change Future Year Average Annual % Change HBW Trips Model Intermediate Estimate Work Trips LEHD Commute Flows CET Daily Ridership (Linked Trips) Transit Trips Transit Mode Split Baseline Projected Transit Ridership From To ,92 6,96 1, % 2.1% 2,111 2, % , % 2.2% % 27 Madras Area , % 2.% % 26 Sisters % 3.% % 6 La Pine % 3.2% 1 16.% - 4,92 6,96 1, % 2.1% 2,111 1, % % -.2% % 1 Madras Area %.1% % 13 Sisters % 1.9% % 1 La Pine % 2.7% % , % 2.2% % % -.2% % 1 Madras Area % 2.% % - Sisters % 1.3% % 2 La Pine 23.6% 3.2% 9.% - Madras Area , % 2.% % %.1% % % 2.% % - Madras Area Sisters % 1.4% % 1 La Pine 22.3% 3.4% 2.% - Warm Spring N/A N/A Sisters % 3.% % % 1.9% % % 1.3% % 3 Madras Area % 1.4% % 1 Sisters La Pine 16.4% 2.6% 2.% - La Pine % 3.2% 1 7.% % 2.7% % % 3.2% 3.% - Madras Area 22.3% 3.4% 1.% - Sisters 16.4% 2.6% 1.% - La Pine OVERALL 1,699 21,693 33, % 2.%,997 6, % 43 COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. A-8
12 APPENDIX B SERVICE PLANNING DATA This appendix provides CET performance data that was used in developing the service concepts for the RTMP. It supplements the Existing Conditions report (Volume 1) with more recent data (for October 212, following CET service changes; January 213; and October 212 March 213 averages) and/or data for individual trips. OVERALL PERFORMANCE DATA Figure B-1 Regional Ridership Data, October 212 Community Connector # Service Days Monthly Unlinked Trips Monthly Service Hours Daily Service Hours Productivity (24) 23 3, (26) 23 1, Madras (22) Sisters (28) La Pine (3) Madras Culver Metolius (21) Madras Warm Springs (2) Local Public Bus (DAR) 23 7,22 1, , Madras 23 1, Sisters La Pine 23 1, COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-1
13 Figure B-2 Regional Ridership Data, Average, October-March 213 Community Connector Service Hours per Day Miles/Ride Hours/Ride Rides/Hour (24) (26) Madras (22) Sisters (28) La Pine (3) Madras Culver Metolius (21) Madras Warm Springs (2) Local Public Bus (DAR) Madras Sisters La Pine COMMUNITY CONNECTOR Figure B-3 Regional Vehicle Capacity Regional Route (Route #) (24) (26) Madras (22) Sisters (28) La Pine (3) Representative Bus # Typical Vehicle Capacity 827 or ( WC) or 29 ( WC) 826/828 or ( WC) or 18 ( WC) Peak Riders by Trip Maximum % of Existing Capacity Utilized, October % 26 93% 831 / ( WC) 16 % ( WC) 8 42% 821 or ( WC) 17 61% COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-2
14 Interpreting Box Plot Graphics The charts below show data for individual Community Connector routes (summarized by route, by trip, or by stop) over two one month periods (October 212 and January 213). Each vertical bar represents the range of data over a month-long period: Top of vertical line = Maximum ridership Top of vertical box = 7 th percentile ridership Middle of vertical box = Median ridership Bottom of vertical box = 2 th percentile ridership Bottom of line = Minimum ridership Horizontal lines across some of the graphics represent the seated passenger capacity of typical vehicles used on the route (based on Figure B-3). The graphics were used to inform planning decisions about each route, particularly for the shortterm time frame. COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-3
15 Boardings Daily by Stop Boardings and Trip per Trip Boardings Daily by Stop Boardings and Trip per Trip Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan Summary by Route Figure B-4 Daily Boardings by Community Connector Route, October Madras- - La Pine- - Sisters- Figure B- Daily Boardings by Community Connector Route, January Madras- - La Pine- - Sisters- COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-4
16 Riders per Trip Riders per Trip Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan - Figure B-6 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 24 -, October (6:2) (6:4) (7:22) (8:2) (8:37) (9:27) (1:2) (1:42) (13:22) (14:2) (14:37) (1:17) (16:2) (16:37) (17:22) (18:2) Figure B-7 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 24 -, January (6:2) (6:4) (7:22) (8:2) (8:42) (9:27) (1:2) (1:42) (13:22) (14:2) (14:37) (1:17) (16:2) (16:37) (17:22) (18:2) COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-
17 Riders by Stop and Trip Riders by Stop and Trip Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan - Summarized Figure B-8 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 26 -, October (6:2) Stryker (6:36) (7:22) Stryker (7:6) (8:37) Stryker (9:11) (14:42) Stryker (1:18) (16:2) Stryker (16:38) (17:22) Stryker (17:8) Figure B-9 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 26 -, January (6:2) (Stryker) (6:36) (7:22) (Stryker) (7:6) (8:37) (Stryker) (9:11) (14:42) (Stryker) (1:18) (16:2) (Stryker) (16:38) (17:22) (Stryker) (17:8) Note: Bus returns to at end of day COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-6
18 Riders by Stop and Trip Riders by Stop and Trip Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan By Stop (AM) Figure B-1 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 26 -, October 212 (AM) (6:2) Stryker (6:36) Park & Ride (6:) Powell Butte (7:1) (7:22) Stryker (7:6) Park & Ride (8:) Powell Butte (8:16) (8:37) Stryker (9:11) Park & Ride (9:2) Powell Butte (9:33) Figure B-11 3 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 26 -, January 213 (AM) (6:2) (Stryker) (6:36) Park & Ride (6:) Powell Butte (7:1) (7:22) (Stryker) (7:6) Park & Ride (8:) Powell Butte (8:16) (8:37) (Stryker) (9:11) Park & Ride (9:2) Powell Butte (9:33) COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-7
19 Riders per Trip Riders per Trip Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan By Stop - PM Figure B-12 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 26 -, October 212 (PM) (14:42) Powell Butte (14:) Stryker (1:18) Park & Ride (1:27) (16:2) Powell Butte (16:1) Stryker (16:38) Park & Ride (16:47) (17:22) Powell Butte (17:3) Stryker (17:8) Park & Ride (18:8) Figure B-13 3 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 26 -, January 213 (PM) (14:42) Powell Butte (14:) (Stryker) (1:18) Park & Ride (1:27) (16:2) Powell Butte (16:1) (Stryker) (16:38) Park & Ride (16:47) (17:22) Powell Butte (17:3) (Stryker) (17:8) Park & Ride (18:8) COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-8
20 Riders per Trip Riders per Trip Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan -La Pine Figure B-14 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 3 -La Pine, October LaPine (6:) (7:4) LaPine (8:2) (1:42) LaPine (16:27) (17:2) Figure B-1 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 3 -La Pine, January LaPine (6:) DRW (8:23) (7:4) LaPine (8:2) DRW (8:3) (1:42) DRW (1:4) LaPine (16:27) (17:2) DRW (17:32) COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-9
21 Boardings by Stop and Trip Boardings by Stop and Trip Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan Madras Summarized Figure B-16 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 22 -Madras, October Madras (6:37) (7:17) Madras (7:) (8:37) Madras (1:1) (16:2) Madras (16:42) (17:22) Madras (18:2) (18:42) Figure B-17 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 22 -Madras, January Madras (6:37) (7:17) Madras (7:) (8:37) Madras (1:1) (16:2) Madras (16:42) (17:22) Madras (18:2) (18:42) COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-1
22 Boardings by Stop and Trip Boardings by Stop and Trip Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan By Trip Figure B-18 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 22 -Madras, October Figure B-19 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 22 -Madras, January COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-11
23 Boardings by Stop and Trip Boardings by Stop and Trip Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan Sisters By Trip Figure B-2 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 28 -Sisters, October (6:2) Ray's Food (6:32) (7:22) Ray's Food (7:2) (14:37) Ray's Food (1:12) Figure B-21 Daily Boardings by Trip, Route 28 -Sisters, January (6:2) Ray's Food (6:32) (7:22) Ray's Food (7:2) (14:37) Ray's Food (1:12) COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-12
24 Boardings by Stop and Trip Boardings by Stop and Trip Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan By Stop Figure B-22 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 28 -Sisters, October (6:2) Ray's Food (6:32) Park/Ride (6:42) (7:22) Ray's Food (7:2) Park/Ride (8:2) (14:37) Ray's Food (1:12) Park/Ride (1:22) Figure B-23 Daily Boardings by Stop, Route 28 -Sisters, January (6:2) Ray's Food (6:32) Park/Ride (6:42) (7:22) Ray's Food (7:2) Park/Ride (8:2) (14:37) Ray's Food (1:12) Park/Ride (1:22) COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-13
25 6: AM 7: AM 8: AM 9: AM 1: AM 11: AM 12: PM 1: PM 2: PM 3: PM 4: PM : PM 6: PM Regional Transit Master Plan Volume IV Service Plan LOCAL PUBLIC BUS (GENERAL PUBLIC DIAL-A-RIDE) The data presented in the section is based on analysis of local public bus origin-destination data for November -9, 212. Figure B-24 Local Public Bus Vehicles by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/ COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-14
26 Figure B-2 Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Table) Time Pickup Time Drop Off 6 AM AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM Total Figure B-26 Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Chart) AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 1 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM PM 6 PM Pickup Time Drop-Off Time N=214 COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-1
27 La Pine Figure B-27 La Pine Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Table) Time Pickup Time Drop-Off Time 6 AM AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM Total Figure B-28 La Pine Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Chart) 8 La Pine AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 1 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM PM 6 PM Pickup Time Drop-Off Time N=36 COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-16
28 Madras-Culver-Metolius Figure B-29 Madras-Culver-Metolius Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Table) Time Pickup Drop-Off Time Time 6 AM.6 7 AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM Total Figure B-3 Madras-Culver-Metolius Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Chart) 14 Madras - Culver - Metolius AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 1 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM PM 6 PM Pickup Time Drop-Off Time N= COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-17
29 Figure B-31 Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Table) Time Pickup Drop-Off Time Time 6 AM.2 7 AM.6 8 AM AM AM AM PM 8 1 PM PM PM PM PM PM Total Figure B-32 1 Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Chart) AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 1 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM PM 6 PM Pickup Time Drop-Off Time N=2 COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-18
30 Sisters Figure B-33 Sisters Local Public Bus Rides by Time, 11/6/212 (Table) Time Pickup Time Drop-Off Time 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM AM 11 AM 6 12 PM 6 1 PM 2 PM PM PM PM 6 PM Total Figure B-34 Sisters Local Public Bus Rides by Time, 11/6/212 (Chart) 7 Sisters AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 1 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM PM 6 PM Pickup Time Drop-Off Time N = 17 COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-19
31 Terrebonne Figure B-3 Terrebonne Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Table) Time Pickup Drop-Off Time Time 6 AM 7 AM AM AM 1 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM.6 2 PM PM PM.4 PM 6 PM Total Figure B-36 Terrebonne Local Public Bus Rides by Time, Daily Average 11/ - 11/9/212 (Chart) 4 Terrebonne AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 1 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM PM 6 PM Pickup Time Drop-Off Time N=7 COIC - Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. B-2
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council Regional Transit Master Plan (RTMP) Technical Advisory Committee March 8, 2013 Agenda Introductions (5 min) Project Update (5 min) Updated Demand Estimates (5 min)
More informationSAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES
SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES Adopted March 13, 2013 Federal Title VI requirements of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were recently updated by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and now require
More informationTransportation Improvement District (TID) Exercise New Castle County Unified Development Code
Transportation Improvement District (TID) Exercise New Castle County Unified Development Code Churchmans Crossing TID How should New Castle County deploy Transportation Improvement Districts (TIDs)? Site
More informationAPPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW
APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW The following pages are excerpts from a DRAFT-version Fare Analysis report conducted by Nelson\Nygaard
More informationSummary of Proposed NH 120 Service
Proposed NH 120 Bus Route Moody Building Etna Road Summary of Proposed NH 120 Service The Upper Valley Lake Sunapee Regional Planning Commission (UVLSRPC) working together with a Steering Committee comprised
More informationChapter 4. Ridecheck and Passenger Survey
Chapter 4. Ridecheck and Passenger Survey YOLOBUS operates a mix of local, intercity, commute and rural routes. Because there are limited roadways that intercity and rural routes can operate on, stop by
More information(This page intentionally left blank.)
Executive Summary (This page intentionally left blank.) Executive Summary INTRODUCTION The Cache Valley Transit District (CVTD) contracted with the team of Transportation Consultants, Inc. () and Fehr
More informationKingston Transportation Master Plan Draft Report Transit Forecasting 1
TRANSIT FORECASTING Transit Forecasting 1 INTRODUCTION A spreadsheet model was developed to identify existing transit deficiencies and additional transit service requirements. The model comprised transit
More informationPREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.
PREFACE The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has embarked upon a statewide evaluation of transit system performance. The outcome of this evaluation is a benchmark of transit performance that
More informationNAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report
Join Visit Napa Valley NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report Research prepared for Visit Napa Valley by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents SECTION 1 Introduction 2 SECTION
More informationNAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report
NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report Research prepared for Visit Napa Valley by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents SECTION 1 Introduction 2 SECTION 2 Executive Summary 5 SECTION
More informationNAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report
NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report Research prepared for Visit Napa Valley by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents S E C T I O N 1 Introduction 2 S E C T I O N 2 Executive
More informationPublic Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon
Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon Overview of Preferred Alternative April 12, 2011 Presentation Overview Study Goals Quick Review Methodology and Approach Key Findings Results of Public
More informationINNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES USED IN TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENTS OF DEVELOPMENTS IN CONGESTED NETWORKS
INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES USED IN TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENTS OF DEVELOPMENTS IN CONGESTED NETWORKS Andre Frieslaar Pr.Eng and John Jones Pr.Eng Abstract Hawkins Hawkins and Osborn (South) Pty Ltd 14 Bree Street,
More informationDevelopment of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level and BRT Route Pattern Alternatives
Development of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level and BRT Route Pattern Alternatives June 1, 2018 Development of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level
More information2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study
2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study November 4, 2009 Prepared by The District of Muskoka Planning and Economic Development Department BACKGROUND The Muskoka Airport is situated at the north end
More informationAssessment of Travel Trends
I - 2 0 E A S T T R A N S I T I N I T I A T I V E Assessment of Travel Trends Prepared for: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Prepared by: AECOM/JJG Joint Venture Atlanta, GA October 2011 General
More informationBOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
PLANNING ORGANIZATIO BOSTON REGION MPO NMETROPOLITAN BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary and CEO and MPO Chair Karl H. Quackenbush, Executive Director,
More informationTRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Transportation TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Data, Inventory, and Analysis Prepared by Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 1 2.1 Roadways... 1 2.1.1 Jurisdiction... 1 2.1.2 Functional Classification...
More informationOakland A s Gondola Economic Impact
January 2019 Oakland A s Gondola Economic Impact KEY FINDING: The proposed gondola system, which will connect the A s planned stadium to downtown Oakland, will generate $685 million in total economic benefit
More informationExisting Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018
Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report June 2018 Prepared for: Prepared by: Contents Overview of Existing Conditions... 1 Fixed Route Service... 1 Mobility Bus... 34 Market Analysis... 41 Identification/Description
More informationAppendix 4.1 J. May 17, 2010 Memorandum from CTPS to the Inter Agency Coordinating Group
Appendix 4.1 J May 17, 2010 Memorandum from CTPS to the Inter Agency Coordinating Group CTPS CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STAFF Staff to the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization MEMORANDUM
More informationAPPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum
APPENDIX B Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum Arlington County Appendix B December 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 OVERVIEW OF PEER ANALYSIS PROCESS... 2 1.1 National Transit Database...2 1.2
More informationMEMORANDUM. Open Section Background. I-66 Open Section Study Area. VDOT Northern Virginia District. I-66 Project Team. Date: November 5, 2015
MEMORANDUM To: VDOT Northern Virginia District From: I-66 Project Team Date: November 5, 2015 Subject: Open Section Background The purpose of this technical memorandum is to provide narrative and technical
More informationDISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, FloridaExpressLanes.com
DISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, 2017 FloridaExpressLanes.com This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures... ii List of Tables.... ii
More informationRACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:
RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN: 2013-2017 Recommended Transit Service Improvement Plan NEWSLETTER 3 SEPTEMBER 2013 This newsletter describes the final recommended public transit plan for the City of
More informationFederal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation December 2004
U.S. Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics Federal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation December 2004 Federal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation Executive Summary Recent
More informationCentral Coast Origin-Destination Survey
Central Coast Origin-Destination Survey July 2016 Central Coast Origin-Destination Survey Prepared for: Santa Barbara County Association of Governments San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Ventura County
More informationInterstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by
Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL 2017 Commissioned by Prepared by Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study Commissioned by: Sound Transit Prepared by: April 2017 Contents Section
More informationThe forecasts evaluated in this appendix are prepared for based aircraft, general aviation, military and overall activity.
Chapter 3: Forecast Introduction Forecasting provides an airport with a general idea of the magnitude of growth, as well as fluctuations in activity anticipated, over a 20-year forecast period. Forecasting
More informationList of Figures... 4 List of Maps... 6 Introduction... 7 Data Sources... 8
SERVICE EVALUATION APRIL 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures... 4 List of Maps... 6 Introduction... 7 Data Sources... 8 Service Overview and Service Fundamentals System Overview... 9 Service Area...
More informationCONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand
CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE 26 th Australasian Transport Research Forum Wellington New Zealand 1-3 October 2003 By, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand Abstract New Zealand
More informationFY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission
FY 18-19 Transit Needs Assessment Ventura County Transportation Commission Contents List of Figures and Appendices.. 2 Appendices... 1 Chapter 1: Introduction What is the Ventura County Transportation
More informationSample enumeration model for airport ground access
Sample enumeration model for airport ground access Surabhi Gupta, Peter Vovsha (WSP) Session 6B Cool model applications Sample enumeration model as example of data-driven approach Use model to predict
More informationAnalysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator
Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator Camille Shiotsuki Dr. Gene C. Lin Ed Hahn December 5, 2007 Outline Background Objective and Scope Study Approach
More information2013 Travel Survey. for the States of Guernsey Commerce & Employment Department RESEARCH REPORT ON Q1 2013
213 Travel Survey for the States of Guernsey Commerce & Employment Department RESEARCH REPORT ON Q1 213 May 21st 213 Table of Contents Page No. Summary of Results 1 Survey Results 2 Breakdown of departing
More information4. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING RIDERSHIP AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE
4. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING RIDERSHIP AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE Data Collection Metro Transit collects bus stop-level ridership data using Automatic Passenger Counter (APC) equipped vehicles on a routine basis.
More informationWashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study Maryland House Bill 300 Table of Contents Page 2 Executive Summary Slide 3 Notes Slide 4 Metro Systemwide Fact Sheet Slide 5 How
More informationMETROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES
METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES In the late 1990's when stabilization of bus service was accomplished between WMATA and the local jurisdictional bus systems, the need for service planning processes and procedures
More information2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry
2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, DePaul University June 25, 2015 This Intercity Bus Briefing summarizes the Chaddick Institute
More informationDEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Central Corridor light-rail transit (LRT) project will open in 2014 and operate between downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul, serving the University of Minnesota and University
More informationBroadband Provider Data Analysis Report
The State Broadband Initiative New Jersey Broadband Map Broadband Provider Data Analysis Report County Comparison Charts http://connectingnj.state.nj.us/map/about/ 1 Table of Contents Wireline Download
More informationBusiness Growth (as of mid 2002)
Page 1 of 6 Planning FHWA > HEP > Planning > Econ Dev < Previous Contents Next > Business Growth (as of mid 2002) Data from two business directories was used to analyze the change in the number of businesses
More informationATM Network Performance Report
ATM Network Performance Report 2019 Page 1 of 20 Table of contents Summary... 3 Network Wide Performance... 4 Airborne delay... 4 Sydney... 7 Airborne delay... 7 Notable events... 7 CTOT (Calculated take
More informationTPAC STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: November 7, 2013 AGENDA ITEM: 4
TPAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Park and Ride Plan Update MEETING DATE: November 7, 2013 AGENDA ITEM: 4 STAFF CONTACT: Julio Perucho, Peter Imhof RECOMMENDATION: Review project status and provide guidance on
More informationFixed-Route Operational and Financial Review
Chapter II CHAPTER II Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review Chapter II presents an overview of route operations and financial information for KeyLine Transit. This information will be used to develop
More informationSound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership
Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mode Aug-14 Aug-15 % YTD-14 YTD-15 % ST Express 1,534,241 1,553,492 1.3% 11,742,839 12,354,957 5.2% Sounder 275,403 326,015 18.4% 2,139,086 2,463,422 15.2% Tacoma Link
More information3. Aviation Activity Forecasts
3. Aviation Activity Forecasts This section presents forecasts of aviation activity for the Airport through 2029. Forecasts were developed for enplaned passengers, air carrier and regional/commuter airline
More informationMultimodal Planning Studies
Multimodal Planning Studies Commuter Park and Ride Study Steering Committee Meeting June 6, 2013 Agenda 1. Update on Project Schedule 2. Update on Online Interactive Mapping 3. Key Themes from the Open
More informationLA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California
LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California LA Metro Transportation planner/coordinator, designer, builder
More informationThe presentation was approximately 25 minutes The presentation is part of Working Group Meeting 3
This is the presentation for the third Master Plan Update Working Group Meeting being conducted for the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport Master Plan Update. It was given on Thursday March 7
More informationForegone Economic Benefits from Airport Capacity Constraints in EU 28 in 2035
Foregone Economic Benefits from Airport Capacity Constraints in EU 28 in 2035 Foregone Economic Benefits from Airport Capacity Constraints in EU 28 in 2035 George Anjaparidze IATA, February 2015 Version1.1
More informationCHAPTER 3 PARK AND RIDE DEMAND ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 3 PARK AND RIDE DEMAND ANALYSIS The TCI analysis was supplemented by a travel demand analysis that identified the relative magnitude of park-and-ride opportunities in the three-county Capital Area
More informationKING STREET TRANSIT PILOT
KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT Update toronto.ca/kingstreetpilot #kingstreetpilot HIGHLIGHTS TRANSIT RIDERSHIP TRANSIT CAPACITY To respond to this growth in ridership, the TTC has increased the capacity of
More informationChapel Hill Transit: Short Range Transit Plan. Preferred Alternative DRAFT
: Short Range Transit Plan Preferred Alternative August 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Preferred Alternative... 3 Best Practices for Route Design... 3 Project Goals... 4 Preferred Alternative...
More informationFINEST LINK WP2 Appendix 2. Passenger volume estimation
FINEST LINK WP2 Appendix 2. Passenger volume estimation Content Objectives and approach 3 9 Present situation 10 14 Preliminary train operating concept and land use projections 15 17 Trip type analysis
More informationWyoming Travel Impacts
Wyoming Travel Impacts 2000-2014 Wyoming Office of Tourism April 2015 Prepared for the Wyoming Office of Tourism Cheyenne, Wyoming The Economic Impact of Travel on Wyoming 2000-2014 Detailed State and
More informationQUALITY OF SERVICE INDEX Advanced
QUALITY OF SERVICE INDEX Advanced Presented by: D. Austin Horowitz ICF SH&E Technical Specialist 2014 Air Service Data Seminar January 26-28, 2014 0 Workshop Agenda Introduction QSI/CSI Overview QSI Uses
More informationMeasuring Productivity for Car Booking Solutions
Measuring Productivity for Car Booking Solutions Value Creation Study Rebecca Bartlett 20th January 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Method Productivity Analysis Scenario 1 Scenario
More information2nd Quarter. AEDC is pleased to present the Anchorage Quarterly Economic Indicators Report for the second quarter of 2010.
2010 AEDC is pleased to present the Anchorage Quarterly Economic Indicators Report for the second quarter of 2010. This report summarizes recently updated data from the Anchorage Economic Indicators Database,
More informationEstimating the Risk of a New Launch Vehicle Using Historical Design Element Data
International Journal of Performability Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 6, November 2013, pp. 599-608. RAMS Consultants Printed in India Estimating the Risk of a New Launch Vehicle Using Historical Design Element
More informationOctober REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
October 2018 2017 REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS The Council s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Alene Tchourumoff
More informationSan Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Travel Decision Survey 2012
Note: The weighting used in this report is not consistent with Travel Decision Surveys (TDS) 2013 and 2014, and findings from this report should not be compared with findings from TDS 2013 and TDS 2014.
More informationWhy we re here: For educational purposes only
Transportation 2050 Why we re here: For educational purposes only Transportation 2050 Bus Elements PUBLIC TRANSIT DEPARTMENT City of Phoenix Citizens Committee on the Future of Phoenix Transportation (CCFPT)
More informationDRAFT. Airport Master Plan Update Sensitivity Analysis
Dallas Love Field Sensitivity Analysis PREPARED FOR: The City of Dallas Department of Aviation PREPARED BY: RICONDO & ASSOCIATES, INC. August 201 Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (R&A) prepared this document
More informationHEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM
HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM 3Villages flight path analysis report January 216 1 Contents 1. Executive summary 2. Introduction 3. Evolution of traffic from 25 to 215 4. Easterly departures 5. Westerly
More informationEstimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism
Estimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism 2008-2013 Coverage: UK Date: 03 December 2014 Geographical Area: UK Theme: People and Places Theme: Economy Theme: Travel and Transport Key Points This article
More informationPresentation Outline
Presentation Outline Overview of Planning Process Initial Service and Fare Considerations RTC RIDE Fixed-route RTC ACCESS Paratransit Fares Next Steps Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County
More informationTravel Decision Survey Summary Report. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)
Note: The weighting used in this report is not consistent with Travel Decision Surveys (TDS) 2013 and 2014, and findings from this report should not be compared with findings from TDS 2013 and TDS 2014.
More informationTHE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NEW CONNECTIONS TO CHINA
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NEW CONNECTIONS TO CHINA A note prepared for Heathrow March 2018 Three Chinese airlines are currently in discussions with Heathrow about adding new direct connections between Heathrow
More informationPeculiarities in the demand forecast for an HSRL connecting two countries. Case of Kuala Lumpur Singapore HSRL
València, Universitat Politècnica de València, 2016 DOI: http://dxdoiorg/104995/cit201620163458 Peculiarities in the demand forecast for an HSRL connecting two countries Case of Kuala Lumpur Singapore
More informationATM Network Performance Report
ATM Network Performance Report 2018. Page 1 of 16 Table of contents Summary... 3 Network Wide Performance... 4 Airborne delay... 4 Sydney... 6 Airborne delay... 6 Notable events... 6 Melbourne... 9 Airborne
More informationTransit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)
Transit Performance Report FY 2006-2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) J ANUARY 2008 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) Transit Performance Report I SSUED: JANUARY 2008 The Transit Performance Report
More informationDRAFT Service Implementation Plan
2017 Service Implementation Plan October 2016 SECTION NAME 2017 Service Implementation Plan October 2016 2017 SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... I List of Tables... III
More informationOther Principle Arterials Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local
CHAPTER 10 TRANSPORTATION Introduction The system of public roads in East Pikeland Township is decidedly rural in character. Since the 1984, the road network has remained much the same, with the addition
More informationTable of Contents. List of Tables
Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Service Recommendations... 1 A. Extend Service on Fort Belvoir to New Post Exchange/Commissary Complex... 1 B. Improve Service Frequencies on Sunday from Current
More informationMount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus
Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! Study Overview and Timeline Phase 1: Collect and Analyze Data Project Kickoff, September 2017
More informationCHAPTER 1 TRANSIT MARKET AREAS AND EXISTING SERVICE
CHAPTER 1 TRANSIT MARKET AREAS AND EXISTING SERVICE Transit Market Areas While several factors influence the propensity to use transit, the primary predictors of transit productivity are the density of
More informationMethodology and coverage of the survey. Background
Methodology and coverage of the survey Background The International Passenger Survey (IPS) is a large multi-purpose survey that collects information from passengers as they enter or leave the United Kingdom.
More informationCity of Murfreesboro. Transit Service and Management Alternatives
City of Murfreesboro Transit Service and Management Alternatives May, 2005 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Transit Needs... 2 2.1 Demographics...2 2.2 Existing Transit Services...2 2.3 Focus
More informationEfficiency and Automation
Efficiency and Automation Towards higher levels of automation in Air Traffic Management HALA! Summer School Cursos de Verano Politécnica de Madrid La Granja, July 2011 Guest Lecturer: Rosa Arnaldo Universidad
More informationAirport Profile. St. Pete Clearwater International BY THE NUMBERS 818, ,754 $ Enplanements. Passengers. Average Fare. U.S.
Airport Profile St. Pete Clearwater International St. Pete-Clearwater International Airport (PIE) is located in Pinellas County, Florida about nine miles north of downwn St. Petersburg, seven miles southeast
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH
The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove 2013 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2
More informationMEMORANDUM. Lynn Hayes LSA Associates, Inc.
MEMORANDUM To: Lynn Hayes LSA Associates, Inc. Date: May 5, 217 From: Zawwar Saiyed, P.E., Senior Transportation Engineer Justin Tucker, Transportation Engineer I Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers LLG
More informationThe Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin. July 2013
The Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin July 2013 Key themes for 2012 The Walworth County, Wisconsin visitor economy continued its brisk growth in 2012. Visitor spending rose 11% after
More informationAN ANALYSIS OF CASUAL CARPOOL PASSENGER BEHAVIOR IN HOUSTON, TEXAS. A Thesis JUSTIN R. WINN
AN ANALYSIS OF CASUAL CARPOOL PASSENGER BEHAVIOR IN HOUSTON, TEXAS A Thesis by JUSTIN R. WINN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More information1999 Reservations Northwest Users Survey Methodology and Results November 1999
1999 Reservations Northwest Users Survey Methodology and Results November 1999 Oregon Survey Research Laboratory University of Oregon Eugene OR 97403-5245 541-346-0822 Fax: 541-346-5026 Internet: OSRL@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU
More informationDemand-Responsive Transportation in the TCQSM
Demand-Responsive Transportation in the TCQSM Buffy Ellis KFH Group, Inc. Presentation Overview Brief introduction to the project DRT in the TCQSM, 1st Edition DRT in the TCQSM, 2nd Edition Key Issues
More informationEstimating Tourism Expenditures for the Burlington Waterfront Path and the Island Line Trail
A report by the University of Vermont Transportation Research Center Estimating Tourism Expenditures for the Burlington Waterfront Path and the Island Line Trail Report # 10-003 February 2010 Estimating
More informationII. Terminology and Basic
II. Terminology and Basic Relationships Public Transport Planning and Regulation: An Introduction II-1 Planning and Analysis Building Blocks Schedule Building Cost Analysis and Financial Planning Performance
More information2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report
2017/2018 - Q1 Performance Measures Report Contents Ridership & Revenue... 1 Historical Revenue & Ridership... 1 Revenue Actual vs. Planned... 3 Mean Distance Between Failures... 5 Maintenance Cost Quarter
More informationForecast and Overview
Forecast and Overview DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Overall goals of the (MPR): Work with DEN to refine the preferred airport development plan to guide the development over an approximate 25-year planning
More informationTime-series methodologies Market share methodologies Socioeconomic methodologies
This Chapter features aviation activity forecasts for the Asheville Regional Airport (Airport) over a next 20- year planning horizon. Aviation demand forecasts are an important step in the master planning
More informationMUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018
MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018 The Muskegon Area Transit System is proposing a series of System Adjustments to be implemented
More informationApproval of August 2019 Service Changes
Approval of August 2019 Service Changes Operations, Safety & Security Committee April 9, 2019 Rob Smith AVP Service Planning and Scheduling 1 Today s Consideration Approve proposed August 2019 service
More information1.2 Corridor History and Current Characteristics
SECTION 1 Description and Background of Study Area 1.1 Introduction This preliminary engineering report was prepared for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT&PF). It is part
More informationEvaluating Lodging Opportunities
Evaluating Lodging Opportunities This section explores market opportunities for new lodging accommodations in the downtown area. It will help you understand travel and visitation trends, existing competition,
More information5.1 Traffic and Transportation
5.1 When it opens in 2009, the Bellevue Nickel Improvement Project will increase the number of vehicles able to travel through the study area, improve travel speeds, and improve safety by reducing the
More information1.0 BACKGROUND NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES STUDY APPROACH EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7
New Veterans Charter Evaluation Plan TABLE CONTENTS Page 1.0 BACKGROUND... 1 2.0 NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES... 2 3.0 STUDY APPROACH... 3 4.0 EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7 5.0 FUTURE PROJECTS...
More informationQuality of Life Study
FasTracks: Quality of Life Study Transportation Systems Performance Measurement Conference May 19, 2011 Overview Quality of Life Study Background/Purpose Study Scope Reporting Example Measures 2 RTD Regional
More information