State-wise comparison of AI Delivery activities. Surabhi Gupta Animal Breeding Group National Dairy Development Board, Anand

Transcription

1 State-wise comparison of AI Delivery activities. Surabhi Gupta Animal Breeding Group

2 Presentation Outline Introduction Main Components of Animal Breeding Semen Production Scenario in the Country Artificial Insemination (AI) Activities in the Country Key Policy Interventions Conclusion

3 Introduction India: Largest producer of milk since 1997 During Total Production million tonnes (18.5% of world production) Growth Rate % (World s growth Rate - 3.1%) Per capita availability grams per day (World s average 294 grams per day) Highest state producing milk Uttar Pradesh (23.33 million tonnes) with 17% of total milk production in the country (Source) Cattle Population million; Buffalo Population million (19 th Livestock Census- 2012) (Source: Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, GoI)

4 Main components of breeding Breeding policy Produce High Genetic Merit (HGM) bulls Produce quality semen Provide quality AI service SET STANDARDS EVALUATE PERIODICALLY CERTIFY PROGRAMME SET STANDARDS EVALUATE PERIODICALLY CERTIFY STATION SET STANDARDS REGISTER PROVIDER EVALUATE PERIODICALLY Maintain a live computerised database_use information_improve productivity 4

5 Frozen Semen dose (FSD) Production in the Country (Data presented is collected and compiled from related agencies every year by NDDB)

6 men Production Scenario (doses in Lakhs) ency Type vernment operative DB Managed O/Pvt tal

7 FSD production by different agencies FSD Production (In Lakhs) Year Govt Coop NDDB NGO/Pvt Percentage Contribution in total semen production ( ) Government 50% Cooperative 16% NDDB 24% NGO (BAIF)/Pvt.(Chitale) 11%

8 portion of semen production and productivity per bull gory e (FSDs in Lakhs) lo (FSDs in Lakhs) (FSDs in Lakhs) under collection (No.) 2,780 3,129 3,250 3,409 3 ull productivity (No. Ds) 24,018 24,696 24,923 25,977 27,

9 ductivity per Bull (No. of FSDs) Agencies rnment 20,316 20,941 21,036 23, eratives 25,248 25,758 25,695 27, B Dairy Services 33,639 36,116 36,180 34, & Private 31,357 29,219 30,424 33,374 33

10 es producing highest cattle FSDs (FSDs in Lakhs) ion Gujarat Gujarat Gujarat Gujarat G Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Mahar Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Tamil Nadu Tamil Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh Kar Uttar Pradesh Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh Karnataka Uttar P

11 es producing highest buffalo FSDs (FSDs in Lakhs) ion Gujarat Gujarat Gujarat Gujarat Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Maharashtra Maharashtra H Maharashtra Maharashtra Haryana Haryana Maha Punjab Haryana Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Andhra P Haryana Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh Uttar P

12 hest FSDs produced by semen stations (FSDs in Lakhs) Position Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 4 Rank 5 SAG SAG SAG SAG BAIF BAIF BAIF BAIF ABC ABC ABC ABC NSS NSS NSS NSS Echen Nabha Nabha Echenkottai Hissar

13 45.00 Semen Production of Major Indigenous Breeds Sahiwal Gir Red Sindhi Khillar Ongole Hariana Amrithmah Tharparka Hallikar Red Kandh Kankrej Kangayam Rathi

14 ent of FSDs produced by A & B graded semen stations and C & raded semen stations de of Semen on Criteria d B graded d Not-graded FSDs produced (FSDs in Lakhs) % Share 72% 79% 90% 96.1% 96 No of Semen Stations FSDs produced (FSDs in Lakhs) % Share 28% 21% 10% 3.9% 3

15 Artificial Insemination (AI) Delivery activities in the Country

16 45 Agency wise: Artificial Inseminations & Centers LDB/AH (AI) NGO/Pvt (AI) Coop (AI) LDB/AH (AIC) NGO/Pvt (AIC) Coop (AIC)

17 State Wise Comparison of AI Activities Union Territories and North-east states have been excluded for comparison due to very low bovine population.

18 10 State wise Trend: Artificial Inseminations (Top 9) Uttar Pradesh Tamil Nadu Gujarat Karnataka Andhra Prade Punjab Maharshtra West Bengal Rajasthan Years

19 4,000 State wise Trend: Artificial Inseminations (Bottom 8) 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 Haryana Bihar Madhya P Orissa Kerala Uttarakha Jharkhan Chattisga Years

20 Done 0,00,000 0,00,000 0,00,000 0,00,000 0,00,000 0,00,000 0,00,000 0,00,000 0,00,000 0,00,000 - States AI Done by State Live Stock Development Boards/ Animal Husbandry Department, Non-Governmental/ Private Organisations and Cooperatives

21 te wise trend _AIPCPM (Country s Average: 52) Years Punjab Tamil Nad Karnataka Haryana Gujarat West Beng Andhra Pr Bihar Uttarakha Rajasthan Kerala Uttar Prad Maharshtr Madhya P Jharkhand Chattisgar Orissa

22 Per Centre Per Month (AIPCPM) f AIs done by an AI Technician in one month STATES

23 cent Coverage of Breedable Bovine Population PERCENT COVERAGE STATES Percent Coverage - Bovine population covered through AI Breedable Bovine Population - Bovine population fit for performing AI ~70%) Country s Average 25%

24 I Done in Cattle and Buffalo AI Done in Cattle More than 95% West Bengal (99%), Kerala (99%), Odisha (98%), Tamil Nadu (95%) and Jharkhand (95%), all North East States (95 to 100%) 60% to 80% Chhattisgarh (85%), Karnataka (84%), Bihar (80%), Uttarakhand (70%) and Uttar Pradesh (60%) 50% to 60% Rajasthan (56%), Maharashtra (56%), Punjab (55%) AI Done in Buffalo More than 50% ates with highest %coverage of Cattle Population njab (90%) mil Nadu (72%) rnataka (62%) ryana (58%) jarat (37%) untry s Average 30% Telangana (74%), Haryana (71%), Andhra Pradesh (57%), Gujarat (52%) States with highest %coverage of Buffalo Population Tamil Nadu (41%) Haryana (39%) Punjab (33%) Andhra Pradesh (31%) Gujarat (29%) Country s Average 18%

25 ate wise analysis_ CPM AI Done Percent Coverage jab/ Tamil Nadu (79) Uttar Pradesh (95 Lakhs) Tamil Nadu (69) nataka (72) Tamil Nadu (68 Lakhs) Punjab (51) yana (71) Gujarat (65 Lakhs) Karnataka (50) arat (69) Karnataka (62 Lakhs) Haryana (43) hattisgarh (19) Uttarakhand (5.99 Lakhs) Bihar/Rajasthan (14) sha (16) Jharkhand (5.87 Lakhs) Jharkhand (10) Chhattisgarh (5.12 Lakhs) Madhya Pradesh (9) Chhattisgarh (7) Tamil Nadu represents best performance in all the three parameters among all the states followed by Karnataka Uttar Pradesh is the largest milk producer and carries highest no. of AI but percent coverage (19) is very low Chhattisgarh shows poor performance for all the parameters Odisha has lowest AIPCPM, No. of AICs is very high. Rest of the states shows average performance with AIPCPM ranging from 30 to 50, AI done from 10 to 40 Lakhs an percent Coverage from 20 to 35.

26 Key Policy Interventions Minimum Standards (MS) for Frozen Semen Dose (FSD) production Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Periodic evaluation of semen stations through Central Monitoring Unit (CMU) Enforcement of area specific Breeding Policy Adoption of unique Animal Identification system (Pashu Aadhar). Use of common INAPH* information system for program implementation and data analysis. Training and Capacity Building De-notification of AI delivery services from Minor Veterinary Services (MVS) Enactment of Bovine Breeding Bill circulated by DADF, GoI, in 2011 (at least 3 states) *INAPH-Information Network on Animal Productivity and Health

27 Conclusion Frozen Semen Doses should be purchased only from A and B graded semen stations MS for frozen semen and bull production and SOP for delivering AI services and bull production should be diligently followed as stipulated by DADF, GoI Area specific Breeding Policy of the state should be adhered to

28 Thank You

29 Sahiwal 29

30 Gir 30

31 Rathi 31

32 Kankrej

33 Hariana Bull 33

34 Mehsani

35 Pandharpuri 35

36 Nili Ravi Back 36

37 TOPICS Refresher training Quality Control Minor Veterinary Services Expansion of AI centres Strengthening of AI Centres Data_demand for milk till 2050

38 Analysis Contd. Tamil Nadu has maintained good AIPCPM (72; highest for ) constantly over 5 years Orissa are the have lowest AIPCPM constantly over last 5 years followed by Chhattisgarh. Punjab AI Centres AI Done AIPCPM , , , , , Uttar Pradesh AI Centres AI Done AIPCPM , , , , ,

39 ductivity per bull (Will ask for figures for )* gory ic 27,642 28,566 29,672 * 32 sbreds 23,907 24,977 26,184 * 26 enous loes 20,661 21,658 21,167 22,560 21,710 * 24 21,497 * 23 ull productivity (No. Ds) 24,018 24,696 24,923 25,977 27,

40 Trend in bovine population, productivity and production articulars emale Animals (In million) Local Cows Crossbred cows Buffaloes Animals (In million) Local Cows Crossbred cows Buffaloes er day per Animal (In kgs.) Local Cows Crossbred cows Buffaloes ilk Production (in million MT) Local Cows Crossbred cows Buffaloes Goats Total Annual Growth

41 Milk production and per capita availability of milk Year Year Milk Production (Million Tonnes) (Projected) (Projected) (gms. per day) Year Per Capita Availability of milk Year (gm per day)