South East Queensland Stabling Site Selection Report January 2014
|
|
- Vivien Barton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 South East Queensland Stabling Site Selection Report January
2 Contents Page 1. Introduction Project Background Stabling Options Site Selection Process Site Assessment against Key Criteria Robina, Banyo and Elimbah Nambour and Woombye Other Sites Financial Assessment Scenario Analysis North Coast Line Scenarios Total Capacity Analysis Recommendations Appendices Appendix A: Multi-Criteria Assessments A-1 Assessment Criteria A-2 Robina, Banyo and Elimbah A-3 Woombye and Nambour Appendix B: Financial Assessment
3 1. Introduction This document has been prepared to provide a set of recommendations for the staging and implementation of the SEQ Stabling Program to enable procurement activities, design and construction to commence with certainty. In providing such recommendations this document considers the inputs of various stakeholders, the requirements of the New Generation Rollingstock Program and the various technical feasibility studies. 2. Project Background The SEQ Stabling Program s objective is to develop a number of rail stabling facilities to accommodate the expansion of the existing rollingstock fleet, to improve operational efficiency through reduced dead running, and to strategically prepare for projected future growth of the SEQ rail network. The combined program must ensure sufficient stabling capacity is provided in time for the delivery of NGR, while also ensuring that operational efficiencies are achieved by strategically locating each site. A range of studies have been completed to date which has informed the program s objectives. These are as follows: - The South East Queensland Stabling Strategic Investigation (SEQ SSI) which identified sites as potentially suitable for outer network stabling; - Dead running and Stabling Analysis and Citytrain Stabling Strategy, considering the implementation of the January 2014 timetable; and - The South East Queensland Stabling Feasibility Study Part 1 investigated the technical and operational feasibility of 16 sites across the network. - The South East Queensland Stabling Feasibility Study Part 2 investigated in detail, including on-site evaluations, a shortlist set of sites at Nambour, Woombye, Elimbah, Banyo, Rosewood, Thorneside and Robina. In addition the project team has undertaken stakeholder briefings and information sessions to socialise the potential sites and gain feedback from a community and stakeholder perspective. 2.1 Stabling Options From the above listed studies and activities a final set of Stabling Sites that are considered in this paper as potential for delivery are listed below in Table 1. Note that this does not preclude additional sites being investigated in the future. 3
4 Site Location Capacity Thorneside Cleveland Line North Yard 6 x 6 car or South Yard 12 x 6 car Banyo Shorncliffe Line 6 x 6 car Elimbah Caboolture Line 8 x 7 car equivalents (ultimate capacity of 11 x 9 cars) Nambour Sunshine Coast Line 7 x 7 car equivalents Rosewood Rosewood Line 6 x 6 car (ultimate capacity of 15 x 9 cars) Robina Gold Coast Line 4 x 6 car Ormeau Gold Coast line 8 x 6 car (ultimate capacity of 10 x 9 cars) Woombye Sunshine Coast Line 4 x 7 car equivalents (ultimate capacity of 8 x 9 cars) Table 1: Proposed Stabling Options 3. Site Selection Process Site selection was conducted by grouping sites according to how ready each site was to go to market considering if the technical feasibility work was complete, the operational priority of the site and potential statutory and environmental approvals required. In this process the sites were grouped as follows: - Robina, Banyo and Elimbah market ready; - Nambour and Woombye market ready pending strategic preference and final technical feasibility work; and - Thorneside, Rosewood and Ormeau multiple risks or low priority not market ready. Based on these groupings a core team of Queensland Rail and DTMR representatives assessed the sites following the process as illustrated in Figure 1. 4
5 Figure 1: Site Selection Process 4. Site Assessment against Key Criteria The key criteria that each site was assessed against are detailed in Appendix A. These criteria cover the four areas of: - Strategic Rail Planning; - Social and Community; - Constructability, and - Rail Operations. 4.1 Robina, Banyo and Elimbah The Multi-criteria assessment of Robina, Banyo and Elimbah is included in Appendix A. The studies completed of these sites have indicated no high risks that may impede delivery, as detailed in Figure 2. Additionally as the land is within existing rail corridor, with the exception of road reserve required to access Elimbah Stabling, design and construction can commence without delay. 5
6 Strategic Rail Planning Social and Community Constructability Rail Operations Robina Banyo Elimbah Figure 2: Robina, Banyo, Elimbah Assessment Summary (Green = no risk, Orange = medium risk, Red = high risk) 4.2 Nambour and Woombye The Nambour and Woombye sites were both identified in the feasibility studies as potential sites, however both sites required further strategic and technical assessment before a preferred site could be nominated. The Multi-criteria assessment of Nambour and Woombye, informed by both the technical feasibility studies completed by Parsons Brinkerhoff and strategic assessments conducted by Queensland Rail is included in Appendix A and summarised in Figure 3 below. Strategic Rail Planning Social and Community Constructability Rail Operations Nambour Woombye Figure 3: Nambour and Woombye Assessment Summary (Green = no risk, Orange = medium risk, Red = high risk) From the Multi Criteria Assessment a number of risks for both sites were identified, these are detailed further below coupled with management options. Nambour: - The design for Nambour Stabling currently imposes significant changes in vertical alignment for the proposed Landsborough to Nambour (L2N) duplication and impacts on the future upgrade of a local road. In its current form the design is unacceptable and requires a redesign of both the Nambour Stabling and the Landsborough to Nambour duplication in order to proceed. Redesign of Nambour will require gaining agreement between Queensland Rail and DTMR on a new scope and set of requirements for both the stabling and L2N duplication in the tightly constrained Nambour site, this will incur additional design expense and an agreed solution is unlikely within a reasonable timeframe. 6
7 - Construction of Nambour Stabling requires closure of the existing 3 x 6 car stabling sites resulting in a need to find alternative stabling, additional paths and additional crew hours during construction of the new site. It is anticipated that a management strategy could be put in place during this period however this will incur additional operational costs and construction time. - The Nambour site most likely requires relocation of a major trunk sewer main, the full extent of this work has not yet been quantified, introducing additional risk to proceeding with Nambour. - The social and community impact of Nambour is assessed as Medium; however the Sunshine Coast regional council has expressed specific concerns over Nambour due to the proximity of the site to the town center and long term impact on future town uplift programs. It is anticipated that if this site is selected significant management effort will be required with the local authority to understand and respect their interests and future aspirations for Nambour. Woombye: - The rural location of Woombye, is advantageous as the stabling site will have no direct residential neighbours, however it is anticipated that the local community will have concerns over the noise and visual amenity of the stabling site. This is likely to require additional noise mitigation measures and potential landscaping and urban design solutions to minimise the impact on the community. - The feasibility study for Woombye identified that supplementary flood mitigation measures may be required. The concept design includes a drainage design that in the next phase of design will require refinement and most likely additional drainage measures. This risk has been considered in the P50 cost estimate. Based on this assessment the key issues remaining are the misalignment between the Nambour Stabling site and the Landsborough to Nambour Duplication, the anticipated stakeholder management with the local authority and community for both Nambour and Woombye and the management of construction issues at Nambour. A significant effort in redesign is required to proceed with Nambour, which may not result in a workable solution. As Woombye delivers essentially the same benefits as Nambour, is a less constrained site, allows flexibility in long term strategic planning and all identified issues are manageable, it is recommended that Woombye is the preferred site to support Sunshine Coast line services. 4.3 Other Sites The other sites considered in the feasibility study (Table 1) either have multiple risks that, at this stage, prevent the site proceeding to delivery or are a low priority operationally, as detailed below. Thorneside: Multiple risks including odour management and ecological sensitivity. Redlands City Council does not support this site due to the proximity to the Sewage Treatment Plant and potential growth of the plant. Strategy is to reassess alternate sites on the Cleveland Line. 7
8 Rosewood: Flooding risks still to be adequately addressed and agreed with Ipswich City Council. Site is now a low operational priority as sufficient stabling is provided on the Ipswich corridor when recently released operations of the Wulkuraka Depot are considered. Strategy is to reassess priority if additional NGR fleet is ordered and services increase on this line. In the interim the site will be protected for future transport requirements. Ormeau: Ormeau was identified as a potential site strategically as an alternative to Beenleigh Stabling, and until such time as services increase on the Beenleigh/Gold Coast Line, Ormeau stabling is a low priority. Strategy is to reassess priority if additional NGR fleet is ordered or services increase on this line. In the interim the site will be protected for future transport requirements. As these sites are not ideal candidates to implement as part of the first stage of the SEQ Stabling Program, they will not be further considered in this report. Stabling on the Cleveland line is however becoming a critical issue and will be addressed separately to this first stage of the program. 5. Financial Assessment A financial assessment of each corridor and associated scenarios was conducted as summarised in Table 2 below. The capital cost estimates were conducted as part of the technical feasibility study for each site and adjusted for a P50 risk assessment. A separate dead running analysis, based on an average train cost / km was conducted for each scenario, with potential savings for each site indicated below. Considering capital costs, dead running savings and operational costs a Net Present Value (NPV) and payback calculation was completed for each corridor scenario to ensure value for money is achieved. The detailed calculations for each scenario are included in Appendix B. Scenario Capital Cost (P50) Dead Running Payback NPV Saving Period Robina $7,900,000 1 $2,463,716 23,624,823 4 years Banyo $25,900,000 $525,962-20,164, years Elimbah $27,000,000 $2,807,766 9,103,727 9 years Elimbah + Woombye $53,100,000 2 $4,567,563 10,620, years Elimbah + Nambour $59,100,000 3 $4,717,838 5,127, years Table 2: Stabling Site Financial Assessment For the North Coast line scenarios (Elimbah, Elimbah + Woombye and Elimbah + Nambour) the analysis indicates that while Elimbah has a shorter payback period, for the life of the stabling yards 1 Robina P50 estimate based on Varsity Lakes Stabling estimate (similar scope and size), as a P50 estimate for Robina was completed only for a significantly larger site that is not to be constructed. 2 Woombye P50 estimate is $26.1 million for 6 x 6 cars; note that a minimum of 4 x 7 cars is required operationally 3 Nambour P50 estimate is $33.2 million for 7 x 6 cars. 8
9 the Elimbah + Woombye scenario is the preferred option. Additionally it is expected that some savings will be realized at Woombye by reducing the overall capacity to 4 x 7 car equivalents, further strengthening the NPV and Payback period for this scenario. An anomaly in this analysis is Banyo; with minimal savings in dead running costs (due to the proximity to Mayne and length of the Shorncliffe line) the NPV would suggest not to proceed with the site. Despite this result, as detailed in the scenario analysis (section 6) it is proposed to proceed with Banyo to increase essential stabling capacity on the Shorncliffe line. The Banyo site will also provide an opportunity for day time stabling. 6. Scenario Analysis The scenario analysis identifies the ideal suite of stabling sites to be delivered to achieve both program objectives of providing sufficient stabling capacity for the growth in the rollingstock fleet and improving efficiency on the network by reducing dead running. The scenario analysis considered both North Coast line scenarios and a total capacity analysis. 6.1 North Coast Line Scenarios The scenario options considered for the North Coast Line are: 1. Elimbah only: 8 x 7 cars, this site would cater for the existing services starting at Caboolture and trains to dead run from Elimbah for the existing services starting at Nambour. It does not allow for any service growth. 2. Elimbah 8 x 7 cars and Woombye 4 x 7 cars, this scenario would cater for the existing and growth services starting at Caboolture and existing services starting at Nambour with a small amount of dead running between Nambour and Woombye. 3. Elimbah 8 x 7 cars and Nambour 7 x 7 cars, this scenario would cater for the existing and growth services starting at Caboolture and existing services starting at Nambour. Table 3 below outlines the potential benefits and issues with each scenario, work shopped with key Queensland Rail Operational representatives. Additionally a financial comparison of the options was completed and summarised in Appendix B. Cost: $27,000,000 NPV: 9,103,727 Payback period: 9 years Benefits Scenario 1: Elimbah 8 roads Issues - Reduced capital and operating cost - No spare capacity on day 1 - Dead running still to occur between Elimbah and Nambour for 4 morning services Scenario 2: Elimbah 8 roads & Woombye 4 roads Cost: $53,100,000 (note cost is for 6 roads so some cost reduction is expected for 4 roads) 9
10 NPV: 10,620,362 Payback period: 10 years Benefits - Reduced dead running - Reduced crew hours approx. 16h/day - Improved crew facility to house simulator and training rooms (move from Nambour existing accommodation to Woombye) - Increased capacity on single line section for both freight and passenger services - Reduced non-atp crosses (safety improvement and potential saving in crew hours - More efficient Rollingstock use - Increased on-track possession time - Alignment with train crew optimisation program Cost: $59,100,000 NPV: 5,127,130 Payback period: 11 years Benefits - Reduced dead running - Reduced crew hours approx. 16h/day - Improved crew facility to house simulator and training rooms (move from Nambour existing accommodation) - Increased capacity on single line section for both freight and passenger services - Improved disruption management with trains located at the terminus - Reduced non-atp crosses (safety improvement and potential saving in crew hours - More efficient Rollingstock use - Increased on-track possession time Issues - Increased capital cost to build additional site - Increased operational costs to maintain two sites - Still requires a small amount of dead running and operational management between Nambour and Woombye Scenario 3: Elimbah 8 roads & Nambour 7 roads - Alignment with train crew optimisation program Table 3: North Coast Line Scenarios Issues - Increased capital cost to build additional site - Significant amount or in corridor work to close and relocate existing stabling - Current design does not align with L2N duplication requiring re-design and changing of assumptions - Sunshine Coast Regional Council is concerned over alignment of site with long term strategic town planning - Loss of Stabling for duration of construction - Reduced flexibility in terms of potential future station / track upgrades at Nambour. Based on the analysis and extensive consultation with key Queensland Rail stakeholders, the Scenario 2, Elimbah and Woombye is recommended as these two sites provide the best solution to adequately meet the objectives of the program and the best overall value for money solution. 10
11 6.2 Total Capacity Analysis A capacity analysis with the proposed sites was completed to ensure the total program was providing sufficient stabling capacity, in the right locations, for the expansion of the rollingstock fleet. Figure 4 below outlines the ideal scenario comprising of Banyo 6 roads, Elimbah 8 roads, Robina 4 roads and Woombye 4 roads, to provide sufficient and contingency capacity with the following assumptions: - NGR delivery rates correct as at December Fleet retirement rates as planned by Rollingstock Projects - Stabling Site delivery timeframes in accordance with the PB feasibility study findings - 5 stabling roads available at Wulkuraka Maintenance Depot - 10 x 6 car stabling sites provided a Kippa Ring with the Moreton Bay Rail Project. 350 Scenario: Banyo 6x6, Elimbah 8x6, Robina 4x6, Woombye 4x Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sep 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16 May 16 Jun 16 Jul 16 Aug 16 Sep 16 Oct 16 Nov 16 Dec 16 Jan 17 Feb 17 Mar 17 Apr 17 May 17 Jun 17 Jul 17 Aug 17 Sep 17 Oct 17 Nov 17 Dec 17 Jan 18 Feb 18 Mar 18 Apr 18 May 18 Jun 18 Jul 18 Aug 18 Sep 18 Oct 18 Nov 18 Existing Stabling Stabling Robina Dec 15 Stabling Banyo Mar 16 Stabling Wulkuraka Stabling Elimbah Aug 16 Stabling Woombye Aug 16 Stabling Kippa Ring Dec 16 Fleet Total 4. Recommendations Figure 4: Stabling Scenario Capacity Analysis Through detailed analysis of the SEQ Stabling options to ensure the key objectives of the program can be achieved it is recommended to proceed to procurement, design and delivery with the following sites: - Robina: 4 x 6 cars - Elimbah: 8 x 7 car equivalents - Banyo: 6 x 6 cars 11
12 - Woombye: 4 x 7 car equivalents In regards to 7 car equivalents, DTMR have advised that where possible on the North Coast line the design shall allow for 7 car equivalents, however construction is required for 6 car lengths only. In practice the extent / allowance for 7 car lengths will be assessed on a case by case basis as it may be economically beneficial to complete some work for 7 car lengths during construction. This will be refined in the detailed design phase of the project. 5. Appendices - Appendix A: Multi-Criteria Assessments - Appendix B: Financial Assessments 12
13 Appendix A: Multi-Criteria Assessments A-1 Assessment Criteria Consideration Strategic Rail Planning Assessment Criteria Detailed Criteria Site aligns with future strategic rail plans (SEQCI, CAMCOS, Underground Bus and Train, Rail Investment Strategy) Site allows for future growth and planned corridors as necessary such as Landsborough to Nambour Ensuring there is a general agreement between the Local and State Authorities for the development of the Stabling Yard Social and Community Ensure that any noise and vibration impacts can be adequately mitigated against, such that the site is compliant with all relevant noise legislation Ensuring that the requirements of the local authority are understood and achievable, including but not limited to: Traffic management requirements Land impacts - alignment to local planning objectives Visual amenity Social impact Ensuring that the land acquisition process is achievable for private land, Local Authority land and State land Environmental Approvals and Environmental Impact - ensure that the required environmental approvals are achievable and that as far as possible the site minimises the impact to the local environment Flood Impacts - ensure that any flood impacts can be managed within the requirements of local and state authorities Constructability Access for construction - Ensure the site has adequate access for construction vehicles Assessment and acceptance of the overall construction requirements for the site including but not limited to; geotechnical conditions, contaminated land, extent of earthworks, service relocation, overall ease of construction Schedule - Ensure that the timeframes for approvals and construction are such that the required stabling capacity can be delivered in line with operational requirements Rail Operations The proposed alignment meets operational and network maintenance requirements The site is an operational priority in terms of dead running and aligns to the overall SEQ Stabling Strategic Outcomes 13
14 Consideration Assessment Criteria Detailed Criteria Day to day operations including train crew rostering and driver changeover can be adequately managed with the site NGR Project Co Requirements - Ability to provide the Project Co stabling requirements for NGR if necessary Assessment Scoring Rating Description Low Risk to achieving Program Stabling site presents no issue to the relevant Objectives consideration Medium Risk to achieving Program Objectives High Risk to achieving Program Objectives Stabling site presents some minor issues to the relevant consideration Stabling site presents some major issues to the relevant consideration 14
15 A-2 Robina, Banyo and Elimbah Consideration Strategic Rail Planning Social and Community Assessment Criteria Detailed Criteria Site aligns with future strategic rail plans (SEQCI, CAMCOS, Underground Bus and Train, Rail Investment Strategy) Site allows for future growth and planned corridors as necessary such as Landsborough to Nambour Ensuring there is a general agreement between the Local and State Authorities for the development of the Stabling Yard Ensure that any noise and vibration impacts can be adequately mitigated against, such that the site is compliant with all relevant noise legislation Robina Banyo Elimbah Comments Banyo: the local member raised concerns over noise and traffic impact. This can be managed through design and installation of noise walls. Elimbah: the local councilor raised concerns over noise, visual amenity and anticipated a negative reaction from the local community. The local member felt that the site is a good discrete location, separated from the local community by a main road and vegetation screening. Letters were sent to adjacent residents however no feedback was received. Banyo: Likely to require noise walls Elimbah: May require noise walls or vegetation to mitigate visual amenity concerns
16 Consideration Assessment Criteria Detailed Criteria Robina Banyo Elimbah Comments Ensuring that the requirements of the local authority are understood and achievable, including but not limited to: Traffic management requirements Land impacts - alignment to local planning objectives Visual amenity Social impact Ensuring that the land acquisition process is achievable for private land, Local Authority land and State land Environmental Approvals and Environmental Impact - ensure that the required environmental approvals are achievable and that as far as possible the site minimises the impact to the local environment Banyo: Existing noise restrictions on site. Not specifically relevant to stabling site, however to be managed with the local community. Elimbah: EPBC referral required for flora and fauna however not considered a risk to the project. Constructability Flood Impacts - ensure that any flood impacts can be managed within the requirements of local and state authorities Access for construction - Ensure the site has adequate access for construction vehicles Assessment and acceptance of the overall construction requirements for the site including but not limited to; geotechnical conditions, contaminated land, extent of earthworks, service relocation, overall ease of construction Schedule - Ensure that the timeframes for approvals and construction are such that the required stabling capacity can be delivered in line with operational requirements Elimbah: Significant earthworks / cut for the site. On-site sewage treatment required as no main sewer connection available.
17 Consideration Rail Operations Assessment Criteria Detailed Criteria The proposed alignment meets operational and network maintenance requirements The site is an operational priority in terms of dead running and aligns to the overall SEQ Stabling Strategic Outcomes Day to day operations including train crew rostering and driver changeover can be adequately managed with the site NGR Project Co Requirements - Ability to provide the Project Co stabling requirements for NGR if necessary Robina Banyo Elimbah Comments Banyo: Most likely significant power and signalling upgrades required to support the site Banyo: Dead running saving is less than other sites as closer to Mayne Stabling
18 A-3 Woombye and Nambour Consideration Strategic Rail Planning Social and Community Assessment Criteria Detailed Criteria Site aligns with future strategic rail plans (SEQCI, CAMCOS, Underground Bus and Train, Rail Investment Strategy) Site allows for future growth and planned corridors as necessary such as Landsborough to Nambour Ensuring there is a general agreement between the Local and State Authorities for the development of the Stabling Yard Ensure that any noise and vibration impacts can be adequately mitigated against, such that the site is compliant with all relevant noise legislation Ensuring that the requirements of the local authority are understood and achievable, including but not limited to: Traffic management requirements Land impacts - alignment to local planning objectives Visual amenity Social impact Nambour Woombye Comments Nambour: The stabling design currently does not align with the planned Landsborough to Nambour (L2N) duplication. To proceed with Nambour a redesign of both the stabling yard and the L2N alignment is required. This includes agreeing alternative design criteria for L2N. A timely agreement on a revised scope is unlikely, and will incur additional design costs without a guaranteed outcome. Nambour: Local authority expressed concern that site impacts future town planning and uplift. Woombye: Local authority expressed concern over visual amenity and impact on local town. Nambour: Located in the town centre some noise mitigation may be required, however the site is surrounded by commercial use Woombye: Noise mitigation is highly likely, however with no direct residential neighbours mitigation efforts are likely to be sufficiently effective. Nambour: Issues to be managed include land use and planning, impact on local creek system and visual amenity. Woombye: Issues to be managed include visual amenity and social impact noting that the site is located adjacent to the existing rail and on the opposite side from the town.
19 Consideration Constructability Assessment Criteria Nambour Woombye Comments Detailed Criteria Ensuring that the land acquisition process is achievable for private land, Local Authority land and State land Environmental Approvals and Environmental Impact - ensure that the required environmental approvals are achievable and that as far as possible the site minimises the impact to the local environment Flood Impacts - ensure that any flood impacts can be managed within the requirements of local and state authorities Access for construction - Ensure the site has adequate access for construction vehicles Assessment and acceptance of the overall construction requirements for the site including but not limited to; geotechnical conditions, contaminated land, extent of earthworks, service relocation, overall ease of construction Schedule - Ensure that the timeframes for approvals and construction are such that the required stabling capacity can be delivered in line with operational requirements Nambour: Acquisition of a property that currently houses a trade school, may require additional management effort to relocate trade school. Details to be further investigated. Nambour: offsets to local creek and drainage to be managed. Woombye: environmental approvals likely to be required, however can be managed Woombye: Additional design work required to mitigate flood impacts. Reduction from 9 to 7 car sets will reduce the impact. P50 Cost estimate has included a risk adjustment for flooding; anticipate any additional cost will be within the P50 estimate range. Nambour: Construction access restricted through town centre and low clearance bridges. Woombye: Construction access restricted by low clearance bridge, alternative but longer route available Nambour: Construction requires closure of the existing Nambour Stabling and a larger proprtion of Brown Field Works which adds to the construction risk of the site. Nambour also requires extensive trunk sewer relocation of which the details are currently unknown Nambour: Time for acquisitions may impact overall schedule due to relocation of trade school Woombye: Ok on the assumption that acquisition takes place by agreement and is not challenged through court, however this is considered low risk as only the process can be challenged and the site is directly adjacent to the L2N corridor.
20 Consideration Assessment Criteria Nambour Woombye Comments Detailed Criteria The proposed alignment meets operational and network maintenance requirements Woombye: Will require additional management as will act as a satellite site to Nambour. Rail Operations The site is an operational priority in terms of dead running and aligns to the overall SEQ Stabling Strategic Outcomes Day to day operations including train crew rostering and driver changeover can be adequately managed with the site NGR Project Co Requirements - Ability to provide the Project Co stabling requirements for NGR if necessary Woombye: Site is a high priority, however compared to Nambour will incur a small amount of additional dead running
21 Appendix B: Financial Assessment See attached spreadsheet 21
22 Input Data Robina Banyo Elimbah Woombye Elimbah + Elimbah + Nambour Woombye Nambour Capital Cost $ 7,900,000 $ 25,900,000 $ 27,000,000 $ 26,100,000 $ 53,100,000 $ 33,200,000 $ 59,100,000 Operating Cost $ 95,000 $ 95,000 $ 95,000 $ 95,000 $ 190,000 $ 95,000 $ 190,000 Dead Running km (week day) Cost/km (excluding crew) Dead Running Saving / year $ 2,463,716 $ 525,962 $ 2,807,766 $ 4,567,563 $ 4,717,838 Crew Saving specifically for NCL Scenarios $ - $ - $ - $ 410,265 $ 410,265 Yearly Cost/Saving $ 2,368,716 $ 430,962 $ 2,712,766 $ 4,787,828 $ 4,938,103 Robina Years Capital Cost $K - 7,900,000 Cost/Savings $K 2,368,716 2,427,934 2,488,632 2,550,848 2,614,619 2,679,985 2,746,984 2,815,659 2,886,050 7,942,960 Net Cash Flow $K - 7,900,000 2,368,716 2,427,934 2,488,632 2,550,848 2,614,619 2,679,985 2,746,984 2,815,659 2,886,050 7,942,960 Cum Net Cash Flow $K - 7,900,000-5,531,284-3,103, ,718 1,936,129 4,550,748 7,230,733 9,977,717 12,793,376 15,679, ,012,717 Discount Rate Discounted Net Cash Flow $K - 7,900,000 2,157,900 2,014,993 1,881,550 1,756,945 1,640,591 1,531,943 1,430,490 1,335,756 1,247,295 75,145 NPV 23,624,823 Payback Period 4 years Banyo Years Capital Cost $K - 25,900,000 Cost/Savings $K 430, , , , , , , , ,085 1,445,134 Net Cash Flow $K - 25,900, , , , , , , , , ,085 1,445,134 Cum Net Cash Flow $K - 25,900,000-25,469,038-25,027,302-24,574,523-24,110,424-23,634,723-23,147,129-22,647,346-22,135,068-21,609,983 16,112,030 Discount Rate Discounted Net Cash Flow $K - 25,900, , , , , , , , , ,932 13,672 NPV - 20,164,405 Payback Period 38 years Elimbah Years Capital Cost $K - 27,000,000.0 Cost/Savings $K 2,712,766 2,780,585 2,850,100 2,921,352 2,994,386 3,069,246 3,145,977 3,224,626 3,305,242 9,096,655 Net Cash Flow $K - 27,000,000 2,712,766 2,780,585 2,850,100 2,921,352 2,994,386 3,069,246 3,145,977 3,224,626 3,305,242 9,096,655 Cum Net Cash Flow $K - 27,000,000-24,287,234-21,506,649-18,656,549-15,735,197-12,740,811-9,671,565-6,525,588-3,300,962 4, ,452,227 Discount Rate Discounted Net Cash Flow $K - 27,000,000 2,471,330 2,307,666 2,154,841 2,012,136 1,878,883 1,754,454 1,638,265 1,529,771 1,428,462 86,060 NPV 9,103,727 Payback Period 9 years Elimbah + Woombye Years Capital Cost $K - 53,100,000 Cost/Savings $K 4,787,828 4,907,524 5,030,212 5,155,967 5,284,866 5,416,988 5,552,413 5,691,223 5,833,504 16,054,913 Net Cash Flow $K - 53,100,000 4,787,828 4,907,524 5,030,212 5,155,967 5,284,866 5,416,988 5,552,413 5,691,223 5,833,504 16,054,913 Cum Net Cash Flow $K - 53,100,000-48,312,172-43,404,648-38,374,437-33,218,469-27,933,603-22,516,615-16,964,203-11,272,980-5,439, ,638,295 Discount Rate Discounted Net Cash Flow $K - 53,100,000 4,361,711 4,072,857 3,803,132 3,551,270 3,316,087 3,096,479 2,891,415 2,699,931 2,521, ,889
23 NPV 10,620,362 Payback Period 10 years Elimbah + Nambour Years Capital Cost $K - 59,100,000 Cost/Savings $K 4,938,103 4,938,103 5,061,555 5,188,094 5,317,797 5,450,742 5,587,010 5,726,685 5,869,852 16,154,952 Net Cash Flow $K - 59,100,000 4,938,103 4,938,103 5,061,555 5,188,094 5,317,797 5,450,742 5,587,010 5,726,685 5,869,852 16,154,952 Cum Net Cash Flow $K - 59,100,000-54,161,897-49,223,794-44,162,239-38,974,145-33,656,348-28,205,607-22,618,597-16,891,911-11,022, ,667,013 Discount Rate Discounted Net Cash Flow $K - 59,100,000 4,498,612 4,098,235 3,826,830 3,573,398 3,336,750 3,115,773 2,909,431 2,716,754 2,536, ,836 NPV 5,127,130 Payback Period 11 years Data CPI Rate per annum 2.50% Cost per Km Discount Rate 8.90%
Brisbane Metro Infrastructure Association of Queensland 14 February 2018
Brisbane Metro Infrastructure Association of Queensland 14 February 2018 Agenda Brisbane Metro project update Packaging and procurement overview Panel discussion Audience Q&A The journey so far Planning
More informationAppendix. Gatwick Airport Ltd - Further information on Gatwick s revised phasing strategy (including Programme) Gatwick Airport Limited
Gatwick Airport Limited Response to Airports Commission Consultation Appendix 37 Gatwick Airport Ltd - Further information on Gatwick s revised phasing strategy (including Programme) Further information
More informationQueenstown aerodrome price proposal for night operations and building upgrade. For aircraft over five tonnes
Queenstown aerodrome price proposal for night operations and building upgrade. For aircraft over five tonnes 29 October 2014 1 Purpose This document outlines Airways proposed price increase for new lights
More information12, 14 and 16 York Street - Amendments to Section 16 Agreement and Road Closure Authorization
REPORT FOR ACTION 12, 14 and 16 York Street - Amendments to Section 16 Agreement and Road Closure Authorization Date: April 27, 2018 To: Toronto and East York Community Council From: Senior Strategic Director,
More informationWith the completion of this project, we would like to follow-up on the projections as well as highlight a few other items:
TO: FROM: Mayor and Council Interim City Manager Rebecca Underhill, Director of Finance DATE: February 28, 2014 SUBJECT: Water Meter Project Analysis On March 28, 2012, Acting City Manager Mike Loftin
More informationA Master Plan is one of the most important documents that can be prepared by an Airport.
The Master Plan A Master Plan is one of the most important documents that can be prepared by an Airport. A Master Plan is a visionary and a strategic document detailing planning initiatives for the Airport
More informationJanuary 2018 Air Traffic Activity Summary
January 2018 Air Traffic Activity Summary Jan-2018 Jan-2017 CY-2018 CY-2017 Passengers 528,947 505,421 4.7% 528,947 505,421 4.7% Passengers 537,332 515,787 4.2% 537,332 515,787 4.2% Passengers 1,066,279
More informationPerformance monitoring report for 2014/15
Performance monitoring report for 20/15 Date of issue: August 2015 Gatwick Airport Limited Summary Gatwick Airport is performing well for passengers and airlines, and in many aspects is ahead of the performance
More informationUpdate on the Thameslink programme
A picture of the National Audit Office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Department for Transport Update on the Thameslink programme HC 413 SESSION 2017 2019 23 NOVEMBER 2017 4 Key facts
More informationATM Network Performance Report
ATM Network Performance Report 2018. Page 1 of 16 Table of contents Summary... 3 Network Wide Performance... 4 Airborne delay... 4 Sydney... 6 Airborne delay... 6 Notable events... 6 Melbourne... 9 Airborne
More informationEAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Community Liaison Committee Meeting #3 July 15, :30 to 8:30 pm Flemingdon Park Library
EAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Community Liaison Committee Meeting #3 July 15, 2013 6:30 to 8:30 pm Flemingdon Park Library Agenda 1. Welcome 2. Housekeeping and Updates a) Housekeeping b) CLC
More information1.0 BACKGROUND NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES STUDY APPROACH EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7
New Veterans Charter Evaluation Plan TABLE CONTENTS Page 1.0 BACKGROUND... 1 2.0 NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES... 2 3.0 STUDY APPROACH... 3 4.0 EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7 5.0 FUTURE PROJECTS...
More informationWith the first portion of this process complete, we anticipate the general timeline for the remainder of the process to be:
THE CITY OF FIRE RESCUE E D M O N T O N FIRE RESCUE SERVICES 10351 96 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5H 2H5 April 19, 2013 Dear Rossdale residents: As many of you know, Fire Rescue Services is currently in
More informationParkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan
Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan New Plan Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan Amendment Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Board Reference
More informationPSP 75 Lancefield Road. Northern Jacksons Creek Crossing Supplementary Information
PSP 75 Lancefield Road Northern Jacksons Creek Crossing Supplementary Information September 2017 The northern crossing of Jacksons Creek proposed within the Lancefield Road PSP is a key part of the ultimate
More informationLongmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT
Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT December 2018 Project Summary Boulder County, Colorado, in partnership with the City of Boulder, is evaluating options for multi-use
More informationNewcastle Transport Program Newcastle Light Rail Determination Report
Newcastle Transport Program Newcastle Light Rail Determination Report Date Author 25 July 2016 TfNSW Ref 5276649 Status Final TfNSW 2014 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED Page 1 of 19 Table of contents 1 Introduction
More informationStage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Kitchener to Cambridge
Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Kitchener to Cambridge Public Consultation Centre (PCC) No. 3 Please Sign-in Cambridge City Hall November 21, 2017 2:00 to 8:00pm Preston Memorial Auditorium
More informationEvaluation of Alternative Aircraft Types Dr. Peter Belobaba
Evaluation of Alternative Aircraft Types Dr. Peter Belobaba Istanbul Technical University Air Transportation Management M.Sc. Program Network, Fleet and Schedule Strategic Planning Module 5: 10 March 2014
More informationGold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content
Gold Coast Rapid Transit Chapter twelve Social impact Chapter content Social impact assessment process...235 Existing community profile...237 Consultation...238 Social impacts and mitigation strategies...239
More informationIndustry briefing NOVEMBER 2017
Industry briefing NOVEMBER 2017 SYDNEY METRO AUSTRALIA S BIGGEST PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROJECT A new stand-alone railway, this 21st century network will revolutionise the way Sydney travels. Services start
More informationPERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. 22 June 2016 DEVELOPING THE CULTURAL OFFER IN PERTH AND KINROSS UPDATE AND NEXT STEPS
PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL 8 16/278 22 June 2016 DEVELOPING THE CULTURAL OFFER IN PERTH AND KINROSS UPDATE AND NEXT STEPS Report by Senior Depute Chief Executive (Equality, Community Planning & Public Service
More informationWelcome. Green Line in Your Community
Welcome Green Line in Your Community Today s session will provide you with information on options The City is exploring for connecting the Green Line in the Beltline to the future Inglewood/Ramsay station.
More informationDraft Western District Plan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Draft Western District Plan Submission_id: 31732 Date of Lodgment: 15 Dec 2017 Origin of Submission: Online Organisation name: APP Corporation Pty Ltd Organisation type:
More informationLYNDHURST NEW URBAN DEVELOPMENT AREA STRUCTURE PLAN. Lyndhurst New Urban Development Area Structure Plan OUTCOMES AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
APPENDIX 15.1-3 LYNDHURST NEW URBAN DEVELOPMENT AREA STRUCTURE PLAN Purpose of the Structure Plan Lyndhurst New Urban Development Area Structure Plan OUTCOMES AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS LSP-P1 The District
More informationTHIRTEENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE
International Civil Aviation Organization AN-Conf/13-WP/22 14/6/18 WORKING PAPER THIRTEENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1: Air navigation global strategy 1.4: Air navigation business cases Montréal,
More informationFUTURE AIRSPACE CHANGE
HEATHROW EXPANSION FUTURE AIRSPACE CHANGE UPDATE SEPTEMBER 2018 On 25 June 2018, Parliament formally backed Heathrow expansion, with MPs voting in support of the Government s Airports National Policy Statement
More information2007/08 Full Year Results Investor Briefing
2007/08 Full Year Results Investor Briefing Highlights of Result Profit before tax up 46% to $1,408 million Up 36% on the reported result Margin improvement $3 billion of Sustainable Future Benefits achieved
More informationDraft Greater Sydney Region Plan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan Submission_id: 31119 Date of Lodgment: 12 Dec 2017 Origin of Submission: Online Organisation name: Serapark Pty Ltd Organisation type:
More informationCAIRNS RECTANGULAR PITCH STADIUM NEEDS STUDY PART 1 CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL DRAFT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2011
CAIRNS RECTANGULAR PITCH STADIUM NEEDS STUDY PART 1 CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL DRAFT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2011 CAIRNS RECTANGULAR PITCH STADIUM NEEDS STUDY PART 1 Cairns Regional Council September 2011 Coffey
More informationInternational Transport Forum Paris February Jeffrey M. Zupan Regional Plan Association
International Transport Forum Paris February 2013 Jeffrey M. Zupan Regional Plan Association Who Are We? Regional Plan Association Not for profit research, planning and advocacy organization in the New
More informationOpen Report on behalf of Richard Wills, Executive Director for Environment and Economy
Agenda Item 7 Executive Open Report on behalf of Richard Wills, Executive Director for Environment and Economy Report to: Executive Date: 02 September 2014 Subject: Lincoln East West Link Road Phase 1
More informationBlackburn Road Blackburn Level Crossing Removal. Frequently Asked Questions August 2014 GENERAL
Frequently Asked Questions August 2014 Blackburn Road Blackburn Level Crossing Removal GENERAL What is the project? The Victorian Government has committed to eliminating a number of the busiest level crossings
More informationTORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.
Revised: March/13 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: March 26, 2014 SUBJECT: KENNEDY INTERCHANGE STATION: METROLINX EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT - PRELIMINARY CONCEPT
More information5 Rail demand in Western Sydney
5 Rail demand in Western Sydney About this chapter To better understand where new or enhanced rail services are needed, this chapter presents an overview of the existing and future demand on the rail network
More informationPart four. In this part you will find: The next steps to deliver the master plan
Part four NEXT STEPS In this part you will find: The next steps to deliver the master plan 6. How COULD the Master Plan be delivered? There are a number of steps required to take the proposals in the master
More informationTERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
5.0 TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.0 TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Key points The development plan in the Master Plan includes the expansion of terminal infrastructure, creating integrated terminals for international,
More informationWhangarei Airport. Prepared by Carine Andries 10/20173
Whangarei Airport Prepared by Carine Andries 10/20173 March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 INTRODUCTION... 3 AIRPORT ROLE AND FUNCTION... 3 AIRPORT FEATURES AND CAPACITY... 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5.1 3.5.2
More informationFelixstowe Branch Line FAQ
Felixstowe Branch Line FAQ How was the location of the track doubling work decided? We undertook a study to identify how to meet the freight demand along the Felixstowe Branch Line by modelling the route.
More informationResponse to the London Heathrow Airport Expansion Public Consultation
Response to the London Heathrow Airport Expansion Public Consultation Summary This report sets out the response to the Heathrow Airport s consultation on airport expansion and airspace change. The consultation
More informationE40. Temporary activities
E40. Temporary activities E40.1. Background Temporary activities contribute to Auckland's vibrancy and to the social, cultural and economic well-being of communities. Temporary activities also enable filming
More informationReport to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub
Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January 2018 Lead officer: Chris Tunstall GCP Director of Transport A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub 1. Purpose 1.1 The list of
More informationRegion of Waterloo Planning, Development and Legislative Services Region of Waterloo International Airport Office of Economic Development
Region of Waterloo Planning, Development and Legislative Services Region of Waterloo International Airport Office of Economic Development To: Chair Tom Galloway and Members of the Planning and Works Committee
More informationLondon Borough of Barnet Traffic & Development Design Team
London Borough of Barnet Traffic & Development Design Team AERODROME ROAD PEDESTRIAN FACILITY AND BUS STOP INTRODUCTION FEASIBILITY REPORT Job Number: 60668 Doc Ref: S106/12-13/60668 Author: Manoj Kalair
More informationThe Sunshine Coast is part of the global community and generates wealth through export, high-value industries and new investment.
3.2 Strategic intent 3.2.1 Shaping growth an overview In 2031, the Sunshine Coast is renowned for its vibrant economy, ecological values, unique character and strong sense of community. It is Australia
More informationLaxon Terrace - Sarawia. Click to add title. Street Rail Level Crossing. Public Forum. December
Laxon Terrace - Sarawia Click to add title Street Rail Level Crossing Public Forum December 2012 www.aucklandtransport.govt.nz Overview of Presentation Objectives and Reasons for Separation Project Background
More informationStrategic Transport Forum
Strategic Transport Forum Friday 16 th March 2018 www.englandseconomicheartland.com Item 3: Innovation www.englandseconomicheartland.com Innovation work stream - EEH 1. Policy modelling 2. MaaS 3. EEH
More informationExisting Conditions AIRPORT PROFILE Passenger Terminal Complex 57 air carrier gates 11,500 structured parking stalls Airfield Operations Area 9,000 North Runway 9L-27R 6,905 Crosswind Runway 13-31 5,276
More informationEnvironmental Assessment. Runway 14 Smart Tracking Approach Gold Coast Airport
Environmental Assessment Runway 14 Smart Tracking Approach Gold Coast Airport Table of Contents Introduction ` 3 Runway 14 Smart Tracking approach 3 Assessment 3 Assumptions 3 Nominated aircraft 3 How
More informationBACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM
BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM Backcountry Trail Flood Rehabilitation A June 2013 Flood Recovery Program Summary In June 2013, parts of Southern Alberta were devastated from significant
More informationPlanning Approval Consistency Assessment Form
Integrated Management System Planning Approval Consistency Assessment Form SM ES-FT-414 Sydney Metro Integrated Management System (IMS) Applicable to: Document Owner: System Owner: Status: Sydney Metro
More informationThe Strategic Commercial and Procurement Manager
Item 3 To: Procurement Sub Committee On: 8 June 2016 Report by: The Strategic Commercial and Procurement Manager Heading: Renfrewshire Council s Community Benefit Strategy 2016 1. Summary 1.1. The purpose
More informationFLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP)
International Civil Aviation Organization FLTOPSP/1-WP/3 7/10/14 WORKING PAPER FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP) FIRST MEETING Montréal, 27 to 31 October 2014 Agenda Item 4: Active work programme items
More informationHigh Speed Two: From Crewe to Manchester, West Midlands to Leeds and beyond
High Speed Two: From Crewe to Manchester, West Midlands to Leeds and beyond Phase 2b Route Decision Moving Britain Ahead July 2017 September 2016 High Speed Two: From Crewe to Manchester, West Midlands
More informationSTRATEGY/ACTION PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMA IN THE AFRICA-INDIAN OCEAN REGION 22 NOVEMBER 2003
STRATEGY/ACTION PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMA IN THE AFRICA-INDIAN OCEAN REGION 22 NOVEMBER 2003 Prepared by the APIRG RVSM Implementation Task Force AFI STRATEGY/ACTION
More informationGold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter content. Chapter four Route selection and staging
Chapter four Route selection and staging Gold Coast Rapid Transit Chapter four Route selection and staging Chapter content Route selection...73 Section one: Helensvale to Griffith University...74 Section
More informationDecision Strategic Plan Commission Paper 5/ th May 2017
Decision Strategic Plan 2017-2019 Commission Paper 5/2017 5 th May 2017 Commission for Aviation Regulation 3 rd Floor, Alexandra House Earlsfort Terrace Dublin 2 Ireland Tel: +353 1 6611700 Fax: +353 1
More informationRecommendations for Northbound Aircraft Departure Concerns over South Minneapolis
Recommendations for Northbound Aircraft Departure Concerns over South Minneapolis March 21, 2012 Noise Oversight Committee Agenda Item #4 Minneapolis Council Member John Quincy Background Summer of 2011
More information1 PROJECT STATUS UPDATE 2 ND CONCESSION FROM BRISTOL ROAD TO DOANE ROAD TOWNS OF EAST GWILLIMBURY AND NEWMARKET
Report No. 3 of the Regional Council Meeting of March 28, 2013 1 PROJECT STATUS UPDATE 2 ND CONCESSION FROM BRISTOL ROAD TO DOANE ROAD TOWNS OF EAST GWILLIMBURY AND NEWMARKET The recommends: 1. Receipt
More informationAIR NEW ZEALAND ANNUAL RESULTS ANNUAL RESULTS
AIR NEW ZEALAND ANNUAL RESULTS 2008 1 HIGHLIGHTS Record operating revenue, up 9% Normalised earnings* $197m Net cash position of $1.3bn Launched direct service to Vancouver and Beijing Award winning product
More informationHeathrow Airport Ltd Rail Engineering Access Statement Sunday 10 th December 2017 to Saturday 8 th December 2018
1 Heathrow Airport Ltd Rail Engineering Access Statement Sunday 10 th December 2017 to Saturday 8 th December 2018 2 of 26 ISSUE RECORD Issue Date Comments Draft V0 16/09/2016 Draft Rules Draft V1 21/10/2016
More informationCorporate presentation CIBC Whistler Institutional Investor Conference January 21, 2010
Corporate presentation CIBC Whistler Institutional Investor Conference January 21, 2010 Forwardlooking statement Certain information in this presentation and statements made during this presentation, including
More informationBirmingham Airport 2033
Over the next 15 years, we will expand and improve the Airport to maximise our potential as a single runway airport by investing 500 million in new development. Our plans take account of our forecasted
More informationPerformance Criteria for Assessing Airport Expansion Alternatives for the London Region
Performance Criteria for Assessing Airport Expansion Alternatives for the London Region Jagoda Egeland International Transport Forum at the OECD TRB Annual Meeting 836 - Measuring Aviation System Performance:
More informationPerth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 27 August 2008 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager
Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 27 August 2008 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager 5(7) 08/414 Erection of kennels and cattery at Baltree Farm, Hatchbank, Kinross, KY13
More informationMELBOURNE METRO RAIL PROJECT EXPANDING MELBOURNE S UNDERGROUND RAIL NETWORK UPDATE FOR RESIDENTS OF THE DOMAIN PRECINCT APRIL 2016
MELBOURNE METRO RAIL PROJECT EXPANDING MELBOURNE S UNDERGROUND RAIL NETWORK UPDATE FOR RESIDENTS OF THE DOMAIN PRECINCT APRIL 2016 MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF POPULATION GROWTH 24 14.4 12.6 MELBOURNE METRO
More informationUpdate of the Airport Master Plan. Initial Runway & Land Use Alternatives
Johannesburg International Airport Update of the Airport Master Plan Initial Runway & Land Use Alternatives 15 February 2006 BACKGROUND JNB current Master Plan Approved by ACSA Board in 1999 20-22 mppa?
More informationSALISBURY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
SALISBURY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST PAPER SFT 1868 TITLE CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO THE TRUST BOARD FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 2008 MAY 2008 PURPOSE OF PAPER The purpose of this paper is to up-date the Board
More informationSTAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED PLANNING AND CONSULTATION PROCESS FOR SECOND EXITS CHESTER STATION UPDATE Date: September 28, 2015 To: From: TTC Board Chief Executive Officer Summary Staff reported to the
More informationSarawia Street Laxon Terrace Rail Level Crossing Removal
Sarawia Street Laxon Terrace Rail Level Crossing Removal Recommendations It is recommended that the Board: Receives the report. Executive summary The removal of the Sarawia Street to Laxon Terrace rail
More informationAIRCRAFT NOISE INFORMATION PACK: CANNING VALE
AIRCRAFT NOISE INFORMATION PACK: Table of Contents CANNING VALE 1. Aircraft movements affecting Canning Vale... 2 2. Effects of wind on runway selection... 2 3. Seasonal winds... 2 4. Flight path illustrations...
More informationAnalysts and Investors conference call. Q results. 15 May 2013
Analysts and Investors conference call Q1 2013 results 15 May 2013 Management summary Key messages of Q1 2013 +6% +9% +3.3%p. Q1 2013 operational KPIs are in line with 109.7 116.2 6.5 7.1 82.3 85.6 expectations,
More informationDecember 2017 Quarterly Report
ASX Announcement 31 January 2018 ASX: CRB December 2017 Quarterly Report KEY POINTS Continuation of work including final design criteria and front end engineering following Demonstration Plant test work
More informationAir China Limited Annual Results. March Under IFRS
Air China Limited 21 Annual Results Under IFRS March 211 Agenda Part 1 Highlights Part 2 Business Overview Part 3 Financial Overview Part 4 Outlook 2 Part 1 Highlights Steady Economic Growth; Asia Pacific
More informationMUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018
MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018 The Muskegon Area Transit System is proposing a series of System Adjustments to be implemented
More informationSection II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.
Section II Planning & Public Process Planning for the began in 2010 as a City of initiative. city staff began discussions with the Park District on the possibility of a north/south regional trail connection
More informationCAPACITY PLANNING. CALENDAR OF MILESTONE DATES DECEMBER 2019 and MAY 2020 TIMETABLES (PRODUCTION SCHEDULE)
CAPACITY PLANNING CALENDAR OF MILESTONE DATES DECEMBER 2019 and MAY 2020 TIMETABLES (PRODUCTION SCHEDULE) Published on behalf of:- Capacity Planning Quadrant: MK Elder Gate Milton Keynes Central MK9 1EN
More informationAppendix F International Terminal Building Main Terminal Departures Level and Boarding Areas A and G Alternatives Analysis
Appendix F International Terminal Building Main Terminal Departures Level and Boarding Areas A and G Alternatives Analysis ITB MAIN TERMINAL DEPARTURES LEVEL & BOARDING AREAS A & G ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
More informationMoreton Bay Rail Link community consultation report. January 2016
Moreton Bay Rail Link community consultation report January 2016 Contents Project background 1 How we planned your new network 2 Consultation overview 3 How you participated in consultation 4 Online survey
More informationExchange Sunshine Coast 2014
Exchange Sunshine Coast 2014 A refresher on CSQ... What does CSQ do? We: promote careers in the building and construction industry invest in skills and training grow the number of skilled workers build
More informationFor personal use only
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 26 March 2015 APA Group (ASX: APA) (also for release to APT Pipelines Limited (ASX: AQH)) APA Group Presentation The APA Group Australian Domestic Gas Outlook Conference presentation is
More informationCAPACITY PLANNING. CALENDAR OF MILESTONE DATES DECEMBER 2018 and MAY 2019 TIMETABLES (PRODUCTION SCHEDULE)
CAPACITY PLANNING CALENDAR OF MILESTONE DATES DECEMBER 2018 and MAY 2019 TIMETABLES (PRODUCTION SCHEDULE) Published on behalf of:- Capacity Planning Quadrant: MK Elder Gate Milton Keynes Central MK9 1EN
More informationFirst Steps Towards Sustainable Operation of Road Tunnels. George Mavroyeni Australia
First Steps Towards Sustainable Operation of Road Tunnels George Mavroyeni Australia Road Tunnel Operations First steps towards sustainable operation of road tunnels Available on PIARC website here PIARC
More informationSeek the Board s approval for the Donald Place kerb and channel renewal to progress to final design, tender and construction; and
3. DONALD PLACE - KERB AND CHANNEL RENEWAL General Manager responsible: General Manager City Environment Officer responsible: Transport and City Streets Manager Author: Michelle Flanagan, Streets Capital
More informationSeychelles Civil Aviation Authority. Telecomm & Information Services Unit
Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority Telecomm & Information Services Unit 12/15/2010 SCAA 1 WORKSHOP EXERCISE Workshop on the development of National Performance Framework 6 10 Dec 2010 10/12/2010 SCAA
More informationDate: 11 th January, From: Plaistow & Ifold Parish Neighbourhood Plan - Steering Group. Plaistow & Ifold Parish Council
Date: 11 th January, 2017 From: Plaistow & Ifold Parish Neighbourhood Plan - Steering Group To: Plaistow & Ifold Parish Council Re: Neighbourhood Plan Report to Parish Council Meeting 17 Jan 2017 The Steering
More informationBUSINESS CASE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHANNEL CAPACITY UPGRADE
www.channelcapacityupgrade.com.au 2 $10 BILLION in trade value Introduction The Port of Townsville is the largest container and automotive port in Northern Australia and last financial year handled around
More informationDraft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005
Section 10 Preferred Inaugural Airport Concept 10.0 Introduction The Preferred Inaugural Airport Concept for SSA was developed by adding the preferred support/ancillary facilities selected in Section 9
More information1 SUBWAY EXTENSION TO VAUGHAN CORPORATE CENTRE - OPERATING AGREEMENT UPDATE
1 Report No. 1 of the Chief Administrative Officer Regional Council Meeting of June 21, 2007 THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK REPORT NO. 1 OF THE REGIONAL CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER For Consideration
More informationRecreation Management Plan Lake Baroon and Ewen Maddock Dam
Lake Baroon and Ewen Maddock Dam December 2013 Contents Overview... 3 The Value of Our Natural Areas... 4 Management Approach... 6 Funding... 7 Recreation Management... 8 Conditions of Access and Use...
More informationPublic Submissions in response to the Bill closed on 2 July 2015 and Council lodged a copy of the submission provided as Attachment 1.
54 PLANNING AND ECONOMIC COMMITTEE 8 JULY 2015 3 SUSTAINABLE PORTS DEVELOPMENT BILL Neil Quinn 1/58/14 #4771706 RECOMMENDATION: That Council endorses the Submission made to the Infrastructure, Planning
More informationSouth Bay Metro Light Rail Extension. Summer/Fall 2017 Project Briefings
South Bay Metro Light Rail Extension Summer/Fall 2017 Project Briefings Meeting Agenda 2 Project History Project Development Schedule Feedback 3 Project History Alternatives Analysis Measure R $272M 2008
More informationCAPSCA Global Feedback
CAPSCA Global Feedback CAPSCA-MID/06 February 2017 Dr. Ansa Jordaan Chief, Aviation Medicine Section International Civil Aviation Organization Public Health Effects on Aviation Spread of disease by air
More informationInterstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by
Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL 2017 Commissioned by Prepared by Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study Commissioned by: Sound Transit Prepared by: April 2017 Contents Section
More informationFY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission
FY 18-19 Transit Needs Assessment Ventura County Transportation Commission Contents List of Figures and Appendices.. 2 Appendices... 1 Chapter 1: Introduction What is the Ventura County Transportation
More informationACAS on VLJs and LJs Assessment of safety Level (AVAL) Outcomes of the AVAL study (presented by Thierry Arino, Egis Avia)
ACAS on VLJs and LJs Assessment of safety Level (AVAL) Outcomes of the AVAL study (presented by Thierry Arino, Egis Avia) Slide 1 Presentation content Introduction Background on Airborne Collision Avoidance
More informationThe implementation of this Master Plan will be undertaken in logical stages to meet passenger and workforce demands.
The implementation of this Master Plan will be undertaken in logical stages to meet passenger and workforce demands. Connecting People Building Opportunities 198 Brisbane Airport Corporation CHAPTER 10
More informationLocal Development Scheme
Local Development Scheme August 2014 Local Development Scheme (August 2014) / Page 2 Contents Section 1: Introduction Great Yarmouth s Development Plan 4 Section 2: Plan Making Process Public participation
More informationSafety and Airspace Regulation Group
Page 1 of 11 Airspace Change Proposal - Environmental Assessment Version: 1.0/ 2016 Title of Airspace Change Proposal Change Sponsor Isle of Man/Antrim Systemisation (Revised ATS route structure over the
More informationULDA Update Yarrabilba Project The Developers Perspective Tanya Martin Project Planner Communities Lend Lease June 2011
ULDA Update Yarrabilba Project The Developers Perspective Tanya Martin Project Planner Communities Lend Lease June 2011 Development Context & Approvals Background The Region Strategic Location Single Ownership
More information