AD-A PEAT MARWICK( MITCHELL AND CO SAN FRANCISCO CALIF F/ 1/I2 LAMBERT-ST. LOUIS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DATA PACKAGE NUMBER 3.
|
|
- Ralph George
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AD-A PEAT MARWCK( MTCHELL AND CO SAN FRANCSCO CALF F/ 1/2 LAMBERT-ST. LOUS NTERNATONAL ARPORT DATA PACKAGE NUMBER 3. -ETCU) MAR 8 DOT-FA77WA-3962 UNLSSFED NL
2 LAMESRT-=STr LOCUS NTE=RNATOCNAL. ARPOC3RT DATAr PACKA CEr '3- ARPORT!JVPROVEMENT TASK FORCE DELAY STUDES. -: R T ECTE prepared... f.. r ~~~.2~~~~ E.ADEAT Di~lO EN.FTRNPRTTO Approved... bc reee or... FEEALA TNAD... T...TO Dr~~~tr~~ut... d... ndrco tr... A..A.-396 PMM... Pet.ri~ Mitchel & Co C )~E X... ~ w E u..... ~1 7.../...
3 DSCLAMER NOTCE THS DOCUMENT S BEST QUALTY PRACTCABLE. THE COPY FURNSHED TO DTC CONTANED A SGNFCANT NUMBER OF PAGES WHCH DO NOT REPRODUCE LEGBLY.
4 Attachment A EXPERMENTAL DESGN AND TABLE OF EXPERMENTS Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport St. Louis Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Acc sion For Prepared by TYS GRA& Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. San Francisco, California " on March 198 Dis tribution/ Availbiblity Codes Av,l a~nd/or D i,-. pecinl =... l.... -' i. -". ". '.'
5 DESCRPTON OF EXPERM ENT5 T-mbert-St. louis nternational Airport A-1 Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Experiment Arrival Departure number Model runways runways Weather Demand ATC mprovements 1 ASM a 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Presentb Baseline 2 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L FRl 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 3 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L FR Demand and Mix Present Baseline 4 ASH 3R,3CL 3R,3L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 5 ASK 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 6 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L FR Demand and Mix Present Baseline 7 ASM 3R,3L,24 3R,3L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 7a ASM 3R,3L,24 3R,3L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline.8 ASM 12R,12L 6,12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 9 ASH 12R,12L 6,12R,12L R 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 1 ASH 12R,12L 6,12R,12L nfr Demand and Mix Present Baseline 11 ASH FR Demand and Mix Present Baseline 12 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 13 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 14 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and mix Present A/F Development 15 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 16 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 17 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L EFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 18 ASH 3R,3L,24 3R,3L F'R Demand and Mx Present A/F Development 18a ASM 3R,3L,24 3R,3L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 19 ASH 12R,12L 6,12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 2 ASH 12R,12L 6,12R,12L FRi 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 21 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 22 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 23 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present WDA Approach 24 ASM 3R,3L,24 3R, 3L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present LDA Approach 24a ASM 3R,3L,24 3R,3L VFR 1979 Demand and Mix Present DA Approach 25 ASM 12R,12L 6,12R,12L FR 1979 Demand and Mix Present LDA Approach 26 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 27 ASM 12R.12L i2r,12l FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 28 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L FR Demand and Mix Present Baseline 29 ASM 3R,3L 3R, 3L VTR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 3 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 31 ASH 3R,3L 3R, 3L FR Demand and Mix Present Baseline 32 ASH 3R,3L,24 3R,3L FRi 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 33 ASH 12R,12L 6,12R,12L FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 34 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Baseline 35 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 1985 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 36 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L FRl 1985 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 17 AS1 3R,3L 3R,3L VFR 1985 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 38 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L LR 1985 Demand and Mix Present A/F Development 39 ASA 3R,3L,24 3R,3L PP Demand and Mix Present AF Development 4 AS.! 12R,12L 12R,12L,6 FRl 1985 Demand and nix Present K/F Development 41 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present WDA Approach 42 ASH 3R,3L,24 3R,3L FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present WDA Approach 43 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L,6 FR 1985 Demand and Mix Present LA Approach 44 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 1985 Demand and Mix Present Terminal Expansion 45 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 1985 ncrease Heavy Mix Present A/F Development 46 ASV 3OR,3CL,24 3R,3L FR 1985 ncrease Heavy Mix Present A/F Development.1 AS. 3SOR,3L 3R,3L TRi 1985 ncrease Heavy Mix Present LDA Approach 43 AS. 3R,3L 3R,2CL FRi 1985 Decrease GA mix Present A/F Development 49 AS:: 3R,3CL,24 3R,3CL fr 1985 Decrease GA Mix Present A/F Develo=ment 5. AS:.: 3R,3CL 3R,3L FR 1985 Decrease GA Mix Present DA A.croach -1 AS:. 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 199 Demand and *:ix Present A/F Development -2 AS:: 12R,1L 12R,,121 FR 199 Derand and Mix Present A/F Developren: =2 AS: 12R,121 12,1:1 -P.T 19.. Derand and :ix Present A/F Develc=ment Z-A:H 2P,3L 3R,3CL %7, 199 Demand and mix Present A/F :evelcpmen: "5 AS-! 3CR.3L 37,3L FR 199 Demand and Mi:: Present A/F Zevelcpment AS:.: 2C.,3CL 3.,3CL :F e.'.and and ::ix Present A/F Develocrent, As::.4,3.,3cL 3-, 3Z Demand and 'ix Present A/7.Develcp.ent 21.,L,L, 6 :Fl "?9 er. and ani -:ix -resent A/F Develcc..ent.. A::...,. F 199C eand sn "x Present A/F Develcpent. A:.: -:F.,ZCL :p S F1 1 9 Oemand ard nix Zresent- LZA A-.-ct-ch al ASM Z4,2,3:. 3F, :FPR1 199' Demand and Mix.resent.rca-h..:..: " - "....1 i r i - - l l...
6 Tab.e 1 (continued) A-2 DESCRPTON OF EXPERMENTS Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Experiment Arrival Departure n mber Model runways runways Weather Demand ATC mprovements 63 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L VrR 199 Demand and Mix Present Terainal Expansion 64 ASH 12R,12L 12R,12L VFR 199 Demand and Mix Present Relocate Midcoast Aviation 64a ASM 12R,12L,1 12R,12L WFR 199 Demand and Mix Present Relocate Midcoast Aviation 65 AS 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 ncrease Heavy Mix Present A/F Development 66 ASM 24,2R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 ncrease Heavy Mix Present A/F Development 67 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 ncrease Heavy Mix Present LDA Approach 68 ASH 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 Decrease GA Mix Present A/F Development 69 ASM 24,3R,36L 3R,3L FR 199 Decrease GA Mix Present A/F Development 69a ASH FR2 199 Decrease GA Mix Present Baseline 7 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 Decrease GA Mix Present DA Approach 71 ASM 1ZR,12L 12R,12L VFR 199 Demand and Mix Futurec A/F Development 72 ASH 12R;12L 12R,12L R 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 73 ASH 12$,12L 12R,12L FR2 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 74 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L VFR 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 75 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 76 ASM 3R,3L 3R,3L FR2 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 77 ASM 3R,3L,24 3R,3L FR 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 78 ASM 12R,12L 12R,12L,6 FR 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development 79 ASM 12R,12L,17 12R,12L FR 199 Demand and Mix Future A/F Development a. Airfield Simulation Model. b ATC Separatic-! o VFR and FR are taken from FAA Document 78-8A. c. 199 ATC Separatic.nts or VFR and FR are taken from FAA Document 78-8A.
7 Table la A-3 DESCRPTON OF EXPERMENTS Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Experiment number Model Demand mprovements ATC 81 ADM a 1979 Demand and Mix Baseline Presentb 81a ADM 1979 Demand and Mix Airfield Development Present 82 ADM 1985 Demand and Mix Baseline Present 83 ADM 1985 Demand and Mix Airfield Development Present 84 ADM 1985 Demand and Mix LDA Approach Procedures Present 85 ADM 1985 ncrease Heavy Mix A/F Development Present 86 ADM 1985 Decreased GA Mix A/F Development Present 87 ADM 199 Demand and Mix Baseline Present 88 ADM 199 Demand and Mix Airfield Development Present 89 ADM 199 Demand and Mix LDA Approach Procedures Present 9 ADM 199 ncrease Heavy Mix Airfield Development Present 91 ADM 199 Decreas GA Mix Airfield Development 92 ADM 199 Demand and Mix Airfield Development Present Futurec 93 ADM 199 ncrease Heavy Mix Airfield Development Future 94 ADM 199 Decrease GA Mix Airfield Development Future a. Annual Delay Model. b ATC Separations for VFR and FR are taken from FAA Document 78-8A. c. 199 ATC Separations for VFR and FR are taken from FAA Document 78-8A. L
8 PRFJ 1979 DEMAND 1985 DEMAND 1979 MX 1 4 MX N(_ tlasl tlavy D z z z - <, = - -= -'== < -JJ Kv 1 f 1_ F2< 2, _ 6326 _ lver 891 [.1 L-_+2736:- -{{ 2Aj d FH T F f?4al BA_24 i <~A18~ H - l,_ l { S FNR2flFSPYALPVM.N3N L LCE N11 N F R
9 LAMBERT ST. LOUS NTERNATONAL ARPORT EXPERMENTAL DESGN (DRAF1 Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. February 198 ESENT ATC 199 DEMAND 1979 DEMAND DEC RLA1A.A 1)( MX in blasl HEAVY DECREASE GA 1979 MX " z z z z z z d. xu x x L -1,, i , k l t... l_ LL L~ i ll L l i _ ~
10 18) FUTURE ATC 1q85 DEMAND 19Q DEMAND 1985 MX N(HLAS[ ie AVY AL( Pt 19' M ' A,it LC t 2 " ' - - C.,2 27-4" ' _ i J.- -J!' - S : 1 _1_ _ l l i l t l l l,
11 EL [?L A'~L ~A C -ii-- ~ - - T1 *rzii 4
12 C) rz o LU C..V CN N
13 C4C ui -LLJ Uf) -~w - J z -j wu
14 /. wz 6 EL - M < L LU ai 'ogr L 44. X Qo)?~ iw \cc q C) (CZZZK
15 J Awl*.M Z - CLZ L.~w~ L.9 91 j ~ _ us Oc A~~ ~-.., ~ cc V E w c '- V ~ u ~ /.L LUcc -. Lc,,
16 x Z < CC:~ u. z -J (n g -.
17 4-o ca coc' 5Z i V) E -4 ii
18 A-li The following schedule (Table 2) was used to calibrate the Airfield Simulation Model for use at Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport. Card column Data item 3-4 Airline code Flight number (not used) Terminal gate code 24 Flight type (unspecified) 32 Aircraft class 1-Widebodies 2-Large passenger jets 3-Props and small jets 4-Single-engine props Arrival time (hours and minutes) Departure time (hours and minutes) Arrival runway 64 Arrival fix code 72 Departure runway 8 Departure fix code
19 Table 2 A-12 SCHEDULE FOR ST. LOUS CALBRATON RUN Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies!! A Y aa 1o m GA i GA 9 a? i5 4S 1 9 GA g OZ GA ' rl is OZ i GA OZ o Tw FA GA 9Q A 3 16 S 2 9 SO GA 9 a GA ia GA GA nl GA GA A A Tid AA OL GA z go T CA a A GA 9 a A, ' 2 9 AA Gh Aa FA o 4 2 m 17 1s 1 9 F& 9 A AA 9o MA '1 2 9 &A & 2 16 &S 1 9 A GA go a A Tw ra A ao T W o so 1 9 1o $W oq 1 2 a 6 5' So oa q A cc A S 2 9 o A o 12 2 j7 1 - S
20 Table 2 (continued) A-13 SCHEDULE FOR ST. LOUS CALBRATON RUN Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies oz 9a 13 f GA QZ 9a z Q OZ ra 9 * OZ OZ TW Gi rs G, ' 2 GA CA 9Q AA GA AL * AA Tw LA GA rl GA A TW TW W L #s 1 ra 99 A a* AL nz LA A Q L GA SS 2 A GA ra GA a S oo q A A ra No Q GA A FA 9 A AL 9 4 GA '% AL 9 GA A Ga O %i a o z A
21 Table 2 (continued) A-14 SCHEDULE FOR ST. LOUS CALBRATON RUN Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies A L 9 A Tw 9q GA Tw TW go '? 1 1 6L TW TW S 1 1 AA Ga is OZ 99 A W ra ra g ra TW GA OZ A 1 1 GA F 9 A rl i811 Q 1 4 TW il W ra TW QQ 1 2 is SA ' 1 9 GA o9 A SO GA S S GA 8 3 is r, go A 9Q GA A GA A A A go A a 1 3 fl so 1 2 La S W is so 1 3 Tw OZ S SS 1 3 ia ML P A R 1 1 OZ? ( g &L cc @ lb z go
22 Table 2 (continued) A-15 SCHEDULE FOR ST. LOUS CALBRATON RUN Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Tw z fa 3o T. 4q ' 1 3 So GA Tw !A ki 9q OZ OZ L oa & ia OZ A o GA A aa GA A ao q T q TV FL oi? G is 2 2 GA GA Q Gi aq Tw 9a 1 2 1T L 9Q z Qo P GA qq
23 A-16 Question LAMBERT EXPERMENTAL DESGN Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. March 198 Relevent Experiments 1. Airport Development 1 and 14, 2 and 15, etc %, +4% 14 and 35, 14 and 51, etc. 3. Mixes A and B 38 and 45, 38 and 48, etc. 4. Future ATC 51 and 71, 54 and 74, etc. 5. LDA 17 and 23, 18 and 24, etc. 6. Reduced GA Mix B 7. 17/35 1 and 12, 14 and 21, etc. 8. Terminal Expansion 35 and 44, 51 and 63, etc. 9. Optimum Runway Use All 1. Extend West Most 11. 3/24 5 and 7, 17 and 18, etc. Airline Gate Service Times All A/C Lateness Distribution All Schedule-1979 Demand and Mix All Runway Crossing Times Experiment 4, 12 Crossing Links B,17-35,J,B, 17-35,Midcoast, F,K,A Gate Hold Controls Experiment 14 Departure Queue Controls Experiment 14 Exit Taxiway Utilization - A/F Development Experiment 14 Arrival Runway Occupancy Time - Airfield Development Experiment 14 Exit Utilization in FR2 Experiment 3 Airfield Network With Relocated Midcoast Experiments 64, 64a GA Basing Areas All!
24 Attachment B NPUT DATA SUMMARY SX BASELNE SCENAROS - ARFELD SMULATON Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport St. Louis Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Prepared by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. San Francisco, California March 198
25 B-1 Attachment B NPUT DATA SUMMARY SX BASELNE SCENAROS--ARFELD SMULATON Summaries of the data inputs necessary to run the airfield simulation model have been included for the following experiments: Experiment 1--Arrivals and Departures on Runways 12R and 12L, VFR Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures Experiment 4--Arrivals and Departures on Runways 3R and 3L, VFR Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures Experiment 7A--Arrivals on Runways 3R, 3L, and 24, Departures on Runways 3R and 3L, VFR Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures Experiment 8--Arrivals on Runways 12R and 12L, Departures on Runways 12R, 12L, and 6, VFR Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures Experiment 11--Arrivals and Departures on Runway 24, FR2 Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures * Exeriment 12--Arrivals on Runways 12R, 12L, and 17, Departures on Runways 12R and 12L, VFR Baseline, 1979 Demand and Mix, Present ATC Procedures
26 B-2 Experiment 1--Runways 12R and 12L VFR Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedures A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 1 2. Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL - US Air BN - Braniff DL - Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - General Aviation SS - Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure 1 1. Number of Runways: Runway dentification: 12R and 12L 12. Departure Runway End Links: 12R and 12L
27 Experiment 1 (continued) B Runway Crossing Links (seconds): Run- Crossing Crossing times link D C B A D C B A D C B A 12R R R G R E R Midcoast R C L Exit Taxiway Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold 12R 12R R ,59 7,28 12R 12R J G 6,975 6,5 12R B 4,91 12R E 3,51 12L R 6,63 12L P 4,56 12L G 3,465 12L ,465 12L B 1, Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - 3 Braniff - 1 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air - 1 Ozark - 6 Republic - 5 TWA- 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - 6 Supplemental General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13
28 Experiment 1 (continued) B-4 C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-VFR (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures 6a and 6b. 2. Two-Way Path Data: See Figures 6a and 6b.
29 t a', C. -. / r /Z
30 Si LU U CC c2'- -/ m.-.
31 Experiment 1 (continued) B Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) VFR A 2. B 2. C 6. D Vectoring Delays: Report sum of speed control, Vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 12L queue exceeds 6, when Runway 12R queue exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in No. 18 to 8 miles when departure queue exceeds 6 on Runway 12R and exceeds 4 on Runway 12L. 27. Runway Crossing Delay Control: Arrival separations increase from those in No. 18 to 5 miles when crossing queue exceeds 4 on Runway 12R and exceeds 2 on Runway 12L. 28. Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class R J G B E 12R A B C D R P G B 12L A 99 1 B C D 1!
32 Experiment 1 (continued) B Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Weighted R J G B E average 12R A B C D Weighted R P G B average 12L A B C D Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D Taxi Speeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (Figure 6c). 33. Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force. 35. Airspace Travel Times: See Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds. 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force. 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix.
33 CCZ- Lit N co 4 L -- -"'- > ca N < 'V / r / /CC w Em 91 '"p /
34 Experiment 1 (continued) B-1 Table 3 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL TME--EXPERMENT 1 Lamert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Travel Runway Fix time name code Class (minutes) 12R K R K R K R K R B R B R B R B R F R F R F R F R V R V R V R V L K L K L K L K L B L B L B L B L F L F L F L F L V L V L V L V
35 B-L. Experiment 4--Runways 3R and 3L VFR Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedures A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 4 2. Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL - US Air BN - Braniff DL - Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - General Aviation SS - Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure 1 1. Number of Runways: Runway dentification: 3R and 3L 12. Departure Runway End Links: 3R and 3L
36 Experiment 4 (continued) B Runway Crossing Links (seconds): Run- Crossing Crossing times way link D C B A D C B A D C B A 3R B R To be provided L B To be provided L E L G L J 3L L Midcoast To be provided 14. Exit Taxiway Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold 3R 3R B G 4,745 3,325 3R ,99 3R ,225 3L 3L A ,935 7,78 3L 3L E B-left 6,2 4,8 3L B-right 4,8 3L G 3,75 3L J 2,735 3L , Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - 3 Braniff - 1 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air - 1 Ozark - 6 Republic - 5 TWA- 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - Supplemental - 6 6
37 Experiment 4 (continued) B General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13 C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-VFR (nautical miles) Lead Aircraft Class Trail Aircraft Class A B C D A B C D * Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class, A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures 7a and 7b Two-Way Path Data: See Figures 7a and 7b.
38 < z r < con CCYO 4. & p d - 15 ;z < a 11 S: :E z x uj.2 Un U. m Z _j C. LL. >- ci- x z a ss: - z UJ LU cc z Z CA _j < > cc VC
39 C- _ o i 4C 1E z U
40 Experiment 4 (continued) B Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) VFR A B C 6. D Vectoring Delays: Report sum of speed control, vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 3R queue exceeds 6, when Runway 3L queue exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in No. 18 to 8 miles when departure queue exceeds 6 on Runway 3L and exceeds 4 on Runway 3R. 27. Runway Crossing Delay Control: Arrival separations increase from those in No. 18 to 5 miles when crossing queue exceeds 4 on Runway 3L and exceeds 2 on Runway 3R. 28. Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class Exit B G R A 1 99 B C D 1!
41 Experiment 4 (continued) B-17 Runway Class Exit B- B- A 6-24 E left right G J L A 5 5 B C D Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Exit Weighted B G average 3R A 4 4 B C D 5 5 B- B- Weighte7 A 6-24 E left right G J average 3L A B C D Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D Taxi Speeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (see Figure 7c).
42 Experiment 4 (continued) B Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force. 35. Airspace Travel Times: See Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds. 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force. 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix.
43 Lu~ - OZ Z= / :'/ -t > UJ J U) 2Mh C-4- CL.,' JeAe \~O /Vl
44 i Experiment 4 (continued) B-2G Table 4 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL TME--EXPERMENT 4 Lamert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Travel Runway Fix time name code Class (minutes) 3R K R K R K R K R B R B R B R B R F R F R F R F R V R V R V R V L K L K L K L K L B L B L B L B L F L F L F L F L V L V L V L V 4 --
45 B-2 Experiment 7A--Runways 3R, 3L, and 24 VFR Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedures A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 7A 2. Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL - US Air BN - Braniff DL Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - General Aviation SS - Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure 1 1. Number of Runways: Runway dentification: 3R, 3L, and Departure Runway End Links: 3R and 3L
46 Experiment 7A (continued) B Runway Crossing Links (seconds): Run- Crossing Crossing time way link D C B A D C B A D C B A 3R North To be provided R B To be provided R South To be provided R P To be provided L R L 3L B Midcoast To be provided To be provided L E L To be provided L G L J To be provided A F To be provided R-12L P Exit Taxiway Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold 3R B 4,745 3R G 3,325 3R ,99 3R ,225 3L A 8,935 3L 3L 6-24 E 7,78 6,2 3L 3L B-left B-right 4,8 4,8 3L G 3,75 3L J 2,735 3L ,43 24 C 7,62 24 P 3,42 24 L 6,35 24 A 5,19 24 A-south 5,55
47 Experiment 7A (continued) B Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - Braniff - 3 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air - 1 Ozark - 6 Republic - TWA- 5 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - 6 Supplemental General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13 C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-VFR (nautical miles) Trbil Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D J Lead Aircraft Class A B C D
48 Experiment 7A (continued) B-24 Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures 8a and 8b. 2. Two-Way Path Data: See Figures 8a and 8b. 21. Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) VFR A 2. B 2. C 6. D Vectoring Delays: Report Sum of speed control, vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 3R queue exceeds 6, when 3L exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in #18 to 8 miles when departure queue exceeds 6 on Runway 3L and 4 on Runway 3R. 27. Runway Crossing Delay Control: Arrival separations increase from those in #18 to 5 miles when crossing queue exceeds 4 on Runway 3L and 2 on Runway 3R.
49 < <. CC x* EU z U..7 L4U 6/Q~i 1 CC V
50 Ut 2 ). *o o*4 o" 4- KP. - CD U. o CV gz _ CA, 4- LU G 4 L4 N.
51 Experiment 7A (continued) B Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class Exit B G R A 1 99 B C D 1 C A L P 24 A 99 1 B C D B- B- A 6-24 E left right G J L A 5 5 B C D Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Exit Weighted B G average 3R A 4 4 B C D 5 5 B- B- Weighted A 6-24 E left right G J average 3L A B C D Weighted C A L P average 24 A B C D
52 Experiment 7A (continued) B-2 P 3. Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D Taxi Speeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (Figure 8c). 33. Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force. 35. Airspace Travel Times: Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds. 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force. 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix.
53 - No - -' 1~~1A, /' - N.f -% 48( S CAl d C m Au.\~%%~) -/J2 > > 2 ~ %L7 ~ dwoz L > :1 Z -n a.r,o>n' M/ Or~ / - > /c > ' 's >c*' 1mp )- C rom O",'
54 Experiment 7A (continued) B-3 Table 5 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL TME--EXPERMENT 7A Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Runway Fix Travel tim name code Class (minutes)- 24 K K K K B 1-24 B B B 4-24 F F F F 4-24 V 1-24 V V V 4-3CR K 1-3CR K R K R K R B 1-3CR B CR B R B 4-3CR F 1-3CR F CR F CR F 4-3CR V CR V 2-3CR V CR V 4-3L K L K L K L K 4-3L B L B L B L B 4-3L F L F L F L F L V L V L V L V 4 -
55 B-3j Experiment 8--Runways 6, 12R, and 12L VFR Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedure A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 8 2. Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL - US Air BN - Braniff DL - Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - General Aviation SS - Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable.
56 Experiment 8 (continued) B-32 B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure Number of Runways: Runway dentification: 12R, 12L, and Departure Runway End Links: 12R, 12L, and Runway Crossing Links (seconds): Run- Crossing Crossing time way link D C B A D C B A D C B A 12R R R M To be provided R G R E R B To be provided R Midcoast R L L B To be provided F To be provided A To be provided To be provided L To be provided Exit Taxiway Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold i 12R R 9,59 12R ,28 12R J 6,975 12R G 6,5 12R B 4,91 12R E 3,51 12L R 6,63 12L 12L P G 4,56 3,465 12L ,465 12L B 1,945
57 Experiment 8 (continued) B-3, 15. Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - 3 Braniff - 1 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air- Ozark- 1 6 Republic - TWA - 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - 6 Supplemental General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13 C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-VFR (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D
58 Experiment 8 (continued) B-3. Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures 9a and 9b. 2. Two-Way Path Data: See Figures 9a and 9b. 21. Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) VFR A 2. B 2. C 6. D Vectoring Delays: Report sum of speed control, vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 12L queue exceeds 6, when Runway 12R queue exceeds 1, and when Runway 6 queue exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in No. 18 to 8 miles when departure queue is greater than 6 on Runway 12R and 6, and grea-er than 4 on Runway 12L.
59 cdl >t- 6 X Ez w in o U 4- A,5 7-,',
60 L-J w w C -i /1A L) > L
61 Experiment 8 (continued) B Runway Crossing Delay Control: Arrival separations increase from those in No. 18 to 5 miles when crossing queue is greater than 4 on Runways 6 and 12R, and greater than 2 on Runway 12L. 28. Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class Exit R J G B E 12R A B C D R P G B 12L A B C D Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Exit Weighted R J G B E average 12R A B C D Weighted R P G B average 12L A B C D Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D 39 4
62 Experiment 8 (continued) B-3P 32. Taxi Sgeeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (see Figure 9c). 33. Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force. 35. Airspace Travel Times: See Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force. 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix
63 ao ozc.5w o u, a. ~C (V t, /- <'~ Li Z W < -- cl /u 127.
64 Experiment 8 (continued) B-4; Table 6 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL Tl2E--EXPERENT 8 Lam art-st. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Travel Runway Fix time -name code Class (minutes) 12R K R K R K R K 4-12R B R B R B R B R F R F R F R F 4-12R V R V R V R V 4-12L K 1-12L K L K L K L B 1-12L B L B L B L F 1-12L F L F L F L V 1-12L V L V L V
65 B-4: Experiment 11--Runway 24 FR2 Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedures A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL - US Air BN - Braniff DL - Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - General Aviation SS - Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable
66 Experiment 11 (continued) B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure Number of Runways: Runway dentification: Departure Runway End Links: Runway Crossing Links: None 14. Exit Taxiway Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold 24 C A-South 7,62 5,55 L 6,35 A 5,19 E-South 3, Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - 3 Braniff - 1 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air -, 1 Ozark - 6 Republic - 5 TWA- 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - 6 Supplemental General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13
67 Experiment 11 (continued) B-4! C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-FR2 (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures 1a and 1b. 2. Two-Way Path Data: See Figures 1a and 1b.
68 C K 2 /_1 ss-,- N C CZ,./E
69 r- cc> -' z m C) LL ~ %L / ~ K oln '~- -'~ ~cc 7L;C c
70 Experiment 11 (continued) B- 21. Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) FR2 A 6. B 6. C 6. D Vectoring Delays: Report sum of speed control, vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 24 queue exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in No. 18 to 8 miles when departure queue exceeds 6 on Runway Runway Crossing Delay Control: No runway crossing links. 28. Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class Exit A P C L 24 A B C D Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Exit Weighted A P C L average 24 A B C D
71 Experiment 11 (continued) B Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D Taxi Speeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (see Figure 1c). 33. Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force 35. Airspace Travel Times: See Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix
72 o C4 3 e- /u z EZ / ij 2 u- 2 'V o ~ Qj -,< -4 rv ~. ~Z E '~; N / / ~//9N V,/ / 1f) /J /1 ~-4L 'V V/
73 Experiment 11 (continued) B-49 Table 7 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL TME--EXPERMENT 11 Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Travel Runway Fix time name code Class (minutes) 24 K K K K B B B B F F F F V V V V 4 --
74 B-5S Experiment 12--Runways 17, 12R, and 12L VFR Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix Present ATC Procedures A. Logistics 1. Title: Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment Random Number Seeds: 217, 369, 4235, 5873, 6981, 7137, 899, 9355, 123, Start and Finish Times: 7 to Print Options: Standard options including summary outputs 5. Airline Names: AA - American AL US Air BN - Braniff DL - Delta EA - Eastern FL - Frontier NW - Northwest Orient OZ - Ozark RC - Republic TW - Trans World Airlines AT - Air Taxi AF - Air Freight ML - Military GA - SS - General Aviation Supplemental 6. Processing Options: COMPUTE 7. Truncation Limits: + 2 standard deviations 8. Time Switch: Not applicable i
75 Experiment 12 (continued) B-53 B. Airfield Physical Characteristics 9. Airfield Network: See Figure Number of Runways: Runway dentification: 17, 12R, and 12L 12. Departure Runway End Links: 12R and 12L 13. Runway Crossing Links (seconds): Run- Crossing Crossing time way link D C B A D C B A D C B A 12R R R M R G R Midcoast R E R R C R D To be provided L L B To be provided 12L P To be provided 17 K To be specified 17 F To be specified 14. Exit Taxiwav Locations: Feet from Runway Exit threshold! 12R R 9,59 12R 12R J 7,28 6,975 12R G 6,5 12R 12R B E 4,91 3,51 12L 12L R P 6,63 4,56 12L G 3,465 12L ,465 12L B 1, F 2,37 17 K 2,
76 Experiment 12 (continued) B Holding Area-Link Number: Airline Gates: American - 3 Braniff - 1 Delta - 2 Eastern - 1,2 Frontier - 4 Northwest Orient - 6 US Air - 1 Ozark - 6 Republic - 5 TWA- 5 Air Taxi - 1,3 Air Freight - 6 Supplemental General Aviation Basing Areas: 7, 8, 9, 1, 11, 12, and 13 C. ATC Procedures 18. Aircraft Separations: Arrival-Arrival Separation-VFR (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Departure-Departure Separations-VFR (seconds) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D A Lead B Aircraft C C Class D
77 Experiment 12 (continued) B-5 Departure-Arrival Separation (nautical miles) Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Route Data: See Figures lla and llb. 2. Two-Way Path Data: See Figures lla and llb. 21. Common Approach Paths: Aircraft class Length (nautical miles) VFR A B C 6. D Vectorin Delays: Report sum of speed control, vectoring, and holding delay as one total. 23. Departure Runway Queue Control: Not used. 24. Gate Hold Control: When Runway 12L queue exceeds 6, when Runway 12R queue exceeds Departure Airspace Constraints: Specified in separations and no aircraft held at gate due to airspace constraints. 26. Runway nterarrival Gap: Arrival separations increase from those specified in No. 18 to 8 miles when departure queue is greater than 6 on Runway 12R and greater than 4 on Runway 12L.
78 <O. C x ' z u. / j ' -
79 zo co a 4 z x w cc o Z _j 5P LL. > U--.T Z z UJ 2 W cc ul cc z V) CL LU CC il Sao:
80 Experiment 12 (continued) B-!, 27. Runway Crossing Delay Control: Arrival separations increase from those in No. 18 to 5 miles when crossing queue is greater than 4 on Runway 12R and greater than 2 on Runway 12L. 28. Exit Taxiway Utilization (percent): Runway Class Exit B- B- R J G left right 12R A B C D R P G B 12L A B C D F K 17 A B C 1 D Arrival Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Runway Class Exit B- B- Weighted R J G left right average 12R A B C D
81 Experiment 12 (continued) B-5- Runway Class Exit Weighted R P G B average 12L A B C D F K 17 A B C D To be provided 3. Touch and Go Occupancy Times: No touch and go's. 31. Departure Runway Occupancy Times (seconds): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 34 4 B 34 4 C 39 4 D Taxi Speeds (knots): 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, and 35 (see Figure lic). 33. Approach Speeds (knots): Aircraft Standard class Mean deviation A 95 1 B 12 1 C 13 1 D 14 1
82 Experiment 12 (continued) B-5, 34. Gate Service Times: To be supplied by airport task force 35. Airspace Travel Times: See Table Runway Crossing Times: 2 seconds 37. Lateness Distribution: To be supplied by airport task force 38. Schedule: 1979 Demand and Mix
83 xcm /3 z /1~~~ 7,., * OuC'4 > - r- -. wj >. = -z z -,~ / - r -z R/ -- 'CL 4,, ~ rv(v C).\ OA -C'! 'i'~ / -~ 7 / / - 1/ N * \*\ \\\' / C> 1"1
84 Experiment 12 (continued) B-6 Table 8 ARRVAL FX TRAVEL TLME--EXPERMENT 12 Lamert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Travel Runway Fix time rame code Class (minutes) 12R K R K 2 1?. 12R K R K R B R B R B R B R F R F R F R F R V R V R V R V L K L K L K L K L B L B L B L B L F L F L F L F L V L V L V L V K 1 i7 K 2 17 K 3 17 K 4 17 B 1 1. B 2 i B 3 i B 4 17 F 1 17 F 2 17 F 3 17 F v V 4!V
85 Attachment C NPUT DATA CHANGES ARFELD MPROVEMENT DELAY EXPERMENTS Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport St. Louis Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Prepared by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. San Francisco, California March 198 j
86 C-4 Table 1C FR2 ARRVAL RUNWAY OCCUPANCY T24ES-PESENT ATC (SECOS) Lambert-St. Lcuis nternational Airport Airport improvement Task Force Delay Studies Runway 12R Exit Class F J G B-left B-right Weichted average A B C D Runway 12L Exit Class R P G B Weighted average A B C D Runway 3CR Exit Class B G Weighted average A 5 5 B C D 6 6 Runway 3L Exit Weighted Class A 6-24 E B-left Brht G J average A B C D as Runway 24 Exit Class C A L P Weighted average A B ' C Runway 17 Exit Class F K Weighted averaae A B C D To be provided
87 . a 4 a, C C *3. Os U C C U. Os U 5-. U - a - a a 4 s U - a- U - ~ U, j. ~. ~ ~.~ U 4.. * C -. ~ - C ; - 4, 4 * sq.~ o * - - U a U 3 * ~ a C " *, 4.4, M ~ O 4 -o O"O~JA ~ * Erp. 1,4.4,. - S U 44 a., S ~. :545-V 2. ~*S * *to ~ ~ C 4 U 444. ~ i 5S~4~*4, ~1O ~ 54 * * S.5,4 C 4 C.654;.,, 4, 4.~ S S V V C. 44V-. *"~* ijs**.j.*; ~ fl.54 girt '.~-'44 1,41,4.~ so r.1.41,. ~ 1 ma~t.g. a ~ ~4... S., - S ~ Al C. a '.4 U d C " ~ - U ~ - a OS ~.. U U OS i ' v - " a,.., - 4) C C U. ' - S U - * L 4 ) -. U) a a. ~ 4, 5. U) ' a U * 1 j15 ~ v'; ~ 1 -. *~. C U 95 4.') 4, r L ~ ::u7.yz
88 S "rn, 4 ~t i *.a. *h - o z. - - a O a- - h. U a C - c 4, -. a ~. a S C ~ S CO 4 ~ C - - C,. - ; ~ a* - -, C - a S. a a -. S. -.~..'~n. C at - C CC ~ *J * a a - A * C**CaU - C SD 4-4,54, U C M C. U. a SD 4' C. a... ~ 6 ~ - -- "--~SS.-.S... A? CA v-r -~ S r~ a' a C: C. Z a C O r.. C- 5. O a. C C, C CCC - -~ S t. o - a C. ~ u a CC -~ Co g - :2:: a ai.a:;:.:: C-,, OS 4.1..', C-C. *- CUS 4, CC j 4 ' '''H U " -. S-a $1
89 S - ~ i V... +, )t :.....
90 C-12 Table 11 ESTMATED RUNWAY EXT DSTANCES (N FEET) FOR ARFELD MPROVEMENT EXPERMENTS Lamert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Runway 3R Exit R Midcoast & 6 B A 2,5 4,6 5,25 7,25 8,95 Runway 3L Exit R Midcoast J G B E C A 1, 2,4 3,25 3,7 4,5 5,8 7,3 8,3 9,9 Runway 12R Exit R J G B E "Alla 9,59 7,28 6,975 6,5 4,91 3,57 11, Runway 12L Exit R P G B "A" pob 6,63 4,56 3,465 3,465 1,945 7,63 9,12 a. "A" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12R. b. "P" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12L. i!
91 C-13 Table 12 ARRVAL RUNWAY EXT UTLZATON (PERCENT) Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Runway 3R Exit Class R Midcoast G B 6-24 A B C D Runway 3L Exit Class Midcoast J G B E C A B C D Runway 12R Exit Class R J G B-left B-right A B C D Runway 12L Exit Class B G P R "A" a.plob A 99 B C D a. "A" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12R. b. "P" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12L.
92 C-14 Table 13 ARRVAL RUNWAY OCCUPANCY TMES FOR ARFELD MPROVEMENTS (ESTMATED SECONDS) Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies VFR-Runway 3R Exit Class R M1idcoast B G 24-6 A B C D Runway 3L Exit Class Midcoast J G B E C A B C D Runway 12R Exit Class R J G B-left B-right A B C D Runway 12L Exit Class B G P R "Ala "p"b A B C D a. "A" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12R. b. "B" represents the taxiway end-link at the end of Runway 12L.
93 EmlEmp.. UuP*sW.m...m.M ~.lalum. -!!! * ~ 1: Ol 43 ~! ~x '4 S ~ $ U $4; a 4. - *. - K ~ ~ s-c ~ 4' s~ 4~ A , l.a 4. 4P 449~.~4 " a.., ~4. *. ii C.. ~' c a gi - * A $4 4,416 i * 4' 44444, $4.. - * * C o t-~i-;~4.ij~us ~~4,1 44.1, ~.1,. *.Oa$4., 44~t~$4. $ $4.. O ~aaaaaaaa- L ' ""'~''~ nfl $ '4 ' o 4,.$,~.~ $444 $4 : N Nfl U $44 $4.4. ~. ~.14 $42 $44 *4 4 4J.,~ 4 4 *. 4 4 l (' ~lo 3[ - i $4114 ~~4'*, '
94 2 Li 4.2 a Si. 2 ~ a Si S Nfl N -~44 44 N - N... N * a a a a a ii Si~ 4. a Wa ~. -- Si, u a a a a.o.o V a Si a. a * N a a a. Si t Si SilSil a a2 a " ~44W a a W s.s 4..Li a ~l ~- Si *. Si - ii Si Si Si., ii 'U Si ,. U S. - * c a Si C - Si Si U i Si a. - a ~ - Si * U -'U Si * Si - Si Si, Si Si. -,, -~,, ~ - ".., 4. NUN U Si U U Si Si. Si - - Si N ' a. Si a t4 Si ~ Si44.SiiaSi a Si s~ a - *l.. - a., - - 'S Si U Si U,, - U C Si ~ N * -a". '; F- ~ :~... - ~ ON,.' 2 bsi. i.s ~ Si U Si * a. Si. a -a Si - -..* i, Si~Si ,.. Si SD UCS Si**Si SC. C Si S 'U - N.' Si. - Si* C Si.4 USi~SiJ ii Si Si N CS..,.. :1 Si. Si., Si... Si...a Si ~i. U Sii~ Si * U S - Si U - Si Si Si Si U a,:a, U- Si.;;-a ~ Si. 5. *~ Si Si~O Si Si ~ MCi is A, SiSiSi. Si ii '~'.~i,~i fl,**i a.si., '.1 U".:,,.. ~ U,.USiuUU-.,i~U..' U..,i* SC~4flN~Sit~N S a5.n'sisi.a. *. - a.., Si... ~ 'S Ni.4 4. N.. U ' U a ~ S U a N N N 44 N 4 U a., i a. Na o - N a US U V Si :1 'Si Si 4, Li 1 J 1 4..' 2 ~ ~ ~,~.:: Si~lj.Li4 *isin~ i~ N t 1 '
95 41,. r. 1. C * u u d 3 41' 41~4353 4' o
96 1"1"rFTrr'rv.EhE.p.. U U U ~ ~ j~.i~iiiiieu~ j - ~ '44 - leo GE K - N EN tee N EN 41 GE - 4GE SE o - U 4 U 4 4 GE ~E UL. 4 C El 14 ' Z.. -- '4 - L' 4.41 GE GE GE GE.. GE ~J o.o GE.o GE. GE -- - GE GE 6 OlE GE 14 GE GE 4. -' En V EE~WW 41 GE l ~1 GE GE. U. 4. GE O GE.. -.~.E - -' - GE GE 4 GE GE GE EEl -, - GE GE 4 E~GEt~ - GE GE GE GE C GE GE - GE 4 GE 4. GE ~44 GE A GEEJGE4GE4. GE -, - 4E - GE EE 4 - WEE 1, GE EG.EE ~ 4 GE GE GE * A Ga ' GE -~ 4 GA4.GEE4.*GE4E4. ~ ~4 OE 6 :~ "4 4. GE - GE,.4 ~ 4~GE4 4 ~4 4 '~ t. 4' 4 *~ 4' GE ~ ~ U - 4 a U.E GE GE. El 4 GE 4 4 Elf.' EE GE '444 G4.GE - O g.~ge~.ebouq ~i'4ge 4i U E' GE ii. GE a GE o. E 4,. 4EE. 14 GE GE 4 4 ~J - GE ~ ~*~44.~ * U E.G GO ~4E. EEGE4ELGE., GE GE 4 4 LEO EE LEGE *4E4E. El. 44 GE 4~ a 8~4E GEl E4 fl tutu GE.%o....~ * i. o. EJ O En F. ~4EG~4EE~EG4G Al EEl GEl ~ ~ ~ U. i GE.44 - U. z '4'4 '4 '4 N E.ENN N Nfl GE GE GE GE GE lee GE GE C GE 4 GE 44 t..~ GE~. ci ~ K 1 4 " K,. 4 ~ ~ 4 4. T J 4'4' 4 ' O' EO.4ha -i. 44~E *GE 4.1 4, C "GE. rlge4-4 4 GE 4 ~' "~~ P E..1 i
97 ~. - M, r - UEUH * E k - r w u u w v c m
98 AD-A PEAT MARWCK MTCHELL AND CO SAN FRANCSCO CALF F/6 1/2 LAMBERT-ST. LOUS NTERNATONAL ARPORT DATA PACKAGE NUMBER 3. --ETC(U) MAR 8 DOT-FA77WA-3961 UNCLASSFED NL 1 ////l//l///lll /2ff/ff/fllfllflfflf EEEEEEEE//h
99 444 4.c A w 1" ! ~4 u. c Zlr 2;'
100 ' a M a. 3. ~i;j u M a S ~. S.. *~ ~3 - a * - - '. - C - a K * o a. S. '.3 C.) S. U) 3. ra3 ~4' ~ a U. 3- C a.~ ~ a a - a.. S 3. a. 33 p a 3a - a 4i *~ t~a a.~ a.. a a. ~. a a a a. S *4 a a a 34 - C a, 3. :~-~- ~ a. : a;aa.*o,~.. aa -~ ~ - -~ ** ~ :.a.3.a a.aa.., -, ~ U 4 U 4 a. a~* a sit a ~ ~ * - ~ *a. a. a * 4 3.aS,.a. a. Ca. U O.a,,.a.aaa.a. r HOVEl A, as. S a - a a a.~.3 - U *.3 a. 4) - -~ ~ 3 a..3 3%a..~ ~ ~ ~a, a. a a.a.a a a. -~ , a 'C * a 1.1 N '.3 S. C-.3 t~ La F 3* - - ~ a a C., -. a a S. 4'., C ~ a. a r. ~ a, ~ C,) A, U S. -a. - ' as. U d2. "2 > -~1 - a a -. it - a a a. a - a a. r a a a. ca. * a - A * * Pa * 6 ' U a a a a- a a a a. a a a. r a.,.,.'a.j.~). a. a p a ~. ia,,.,.. a., * a a). a a..:: ' V a a. a. a ~ ~ a.,. a... a "... a ~? ~: (P ** *.. a asa a. p a a t~ a -,.. a 'ii" a L *~ ad.. lit, a - a. r a.,,,~ au*'13-'a a * F,, ~ ado Oo,, d..,,.~.'
101 ji i.....o - C : ~ UC'C, - * C. -',C. - *, 1 Cr..... C. U.. j8 nl4 i
102 C U a a ~ - 2~ *.9 S.4 - b' o U ~ U 49 J. g 42 k * hi ~ 4. Q.94 a..4 C '~ A. K ~ 1 C.. p a. 4. * S *u * C = ~ ~ - C - 49 C ** c ~ *.9.4 C- Si ~ - * C )99.4 ~ S 4. 2 C AC 9:4.~ C 99C99'*C* 4.t 4 au., C ' '~ w 4 ~ 9.9 * Wa *ft~ a. n U) C ~l a as a 49 9'. C U 9: ~ t ~ * C 2 ' a r.. g ~.4 9' a * o C ) b9 *.. C - a. C - - p C. - C C * 4., C A.9 C -C :3C~S4 C C C 994." 9. (C C 4.9.9j hi 42~i ~ q
103 431 hil a ' A - a a v'1a a, hi V
104 a1 ~ t * ~ - " * 4 ~ '4 ~ a 4' 4, U - - T a ~ ~j S.4 4. ~ ~ g ~ * o 4 *,, ~ wo.f~~! ~ ~ - 8 a~1 : : : ~., 49'. & *i. *.* Lw.. flw4w~t. a ~ *.4,41,4~C44 1 '.4 * ,4*C4 ~'' "~ ' ~O 4 C -.. *, 9 4~ ~ 4. r 4 t C~.44.1',.4' 4.4' *.~4w-,. a ' - m , ~ ~4* flflflfll444fl 4. K F *i , 4..4,, * U a' '4 - a ~ j i '.4 -t 9 C 4.4, ) a ' ~' * * ~ ~ 4~.~ 4 - '~'4~~.~ -~p 4,.~., 4 * C Ct L *1 4a 4-, 4 r.,, = ;~.. ~, os... -,. -M 44C4.~ 4. Cat, ~ 4' U ~.4. (U~L '4
105 * 4. 4*h - 4, -; a'l a.! ' 1 4 : a 44 4 Vai.. - a U *4* 4 4 W4. a a *.,
106 U -, b4 U ~ 44 A. ~.4 - ~4 U z h4 - i. z~ C 4! a 4.4 * ~ 4; ~ -. U.444 * C 4', *4 44 ~1. - *4-4 4J - a 4~ * * 44 a. a - ti 4 ~. *, ~11~. - * ~ * *44 Or ~ h ha ~...:so.. ~*.~..*. ~ ~ ~ oo 4~ ~44e. 4~) 4 4 * ~ :A a os - ~ in p. j3~o[~ a E * ~ ~CS44t , U44~.41*4) *JE... r 44 4.,44 ~44,. - - S ~44 *~~~~* C ha * a 1 U C 44.4 A. 'a Z C a -. 44' ' 44,4 44 * ~.,4 ' 14 U 444 U.4 4.J U' 4 C ~4.4~ U * * ~. a a 4. ~U4...~ 4 14M. t o44~ ~ , 444~4~ ,44 - a,a, , W * ~.4., ~*,. -~ fl~ , 44 4~ 44,, 44 U ~ 4.. ~ 4o ~ U 44j ~~44 ~::;;,~ ,., ~4.;1.j - -, ~* ~ '4
107 M -. 4 C - i2. " :: ,! 41; 4, 1 o " "-".. i. ' ' 4, a.,.4i 4 " 1 A - - ',i U, ',,-,,
108 q~ - U - '~1 '.4 w * i..g CS CS C 2 U U * E. U.5, * ~ a. -. C U 'p ~ ~ * ~ C.5 2 C - ' ~ s S A - C C 4 - o Us-S. ~ ~ ~1~. 5*. 5s S CS C ~ V. *.4flflV X.. 4,...'5'.. ~'! ~'.5 -. hi., p C S hi U - '5 1.. CS45 *~ C ~ Z C.555 U 9 G S 55 2 p * M U *~.5.5 " C.5.. S *'1 n.5, 5,.5.) ~
109 w - - ~p /.~.. a A C.i C Z C - - (4 -.. a -.4-4( 4' a ~ * - o. Al A 44 4' g U 4' 4 CA 44 C C'.4 U Al C q - A U.4, C S 48** fl A V 44 :'..4 * ~O 44)4 7~* C. 44 = * C C S M~44~ **4~4. 4.s (48 *4~4.*~ A 8 4* V.a44(4. * P at * ~* A 48 a 4 4..* 444.4' 2 do..., ~ 4.~,.. 4o,. C 6 UsEs S 64O.~A..4 CC 4844, = ,4.44' a C C UeaA..4~flnr A~4 4.- U 4. ~,,, ~,, ~ 4 a.1.,! - - -r *-.- *' *.*~.. C *8 p. z * 4'.4 C a. a -~.4 4 AS J a - a '.~ ~ a * O~' 5.4 ~ ' ~!. H _
110 'A. JO -, 4 K - r.j~ K ~; 4.~ ~- 4, -) C lb U.4 - ~ S E o ~.' c B 4,l C).4 4, U,.4, -.4 * 1 l C. * 4 * 4 * ~. - ~ **'i - C 1 - C 4 K * * f-ella S 'C.' - ~ ~ 6 - ~ C 44 4b*. U). 4 S 4db 44 -.oe~.*s4,* - *),1,,.. c 4 U a.. '. a C Cl..1 ** U.'C)14 ot.. C' -, -.~ ~ a, ~. ~ S 4 Al Th. CU K '1 2 ~.2 C U z 4 44 Cl Cl..~ 1.1-4, C ~ S S * ~. o - 4 C. ~ 41 U 4' 4. - C - Cfl.4 4. Cl? -' 4 a a rl C l U, - 4 CC a*, C C K '.4 r. lc*co sa.' 4.1!J ~j *~l ~? ~ 4 a *~ ''~. CC j J 11 ~
111 4 J C4~ a hl~.4 a 4, ~ - - a 1 4-4, ~.' A. C Z a 4, - - U , w - * a. '4* - a 'a, ~ ' C.C - U '4 C - U 4, 4,, C. ~ - C 4. C U *.. ~ i~ 3:! * 1..4 c 4, ~ C 4 C C. ~. ~1 -, u 'a CA C 'A *C.CC.~ S i *C.CC - C,' C. 3: 43.~ -~ -~ A - 44C...~a S., G3") ~ =. ~ ~.* 5.., 4C.,~ C'C413 ~C-J.. -.,a~ C a z ~ ~ ~ C ;. L~U t..co 4,.4,: ej.. 5 CUCC ) 44 4 O4S44HCp1 *.J ~ 4. 44, 4. 4' 'a a U.4 4, a '4 a. C a 3-. r.. - ~, U, ,p. A z - C- S a. a 2 A Cl-...- C *.. o C A, 3, CCC ~ 3-C*~ * C.5 C *OflS.4 V *, C a -' A C A 4 C 4 a r U , 4 " o.4..,3- C.,., ' U.4 O~C O.,4~ C----
112 C6 4, -4. i ~ t. ~ a. ~ CL 1.2 "U U~ i'i
113 gn uk. og or n 64, C 5. V.5
114 - a C oa 44.. t C Z C * - K W.3 4 to 'A 'A luu 4, c a 41 a aw wa X~ "Orn w. * 3. * f f ~ ~ p...,.
115 .4D. Cl 4.. :2 A a n Z Z a ) 1. -'1.A i4 1 see WA LD Ln. aw
116 be * ~ N N U - N * be o - be ~ g N * hi U. C N ~ a' A U -- be S A - S S - 3 4j - U *. *.~ * - - ' S C. ' ~ o - S.C b o~@ 1 A S - * ~ ''*' : fl C.U S 44 C... C * S - Oil,. bem..4 NO S S *4 - hi q. U ma a 55. S - C, -. * * C C. U.4 ~ :: N*M - C a C. **~ - S 3 L 5:. ~ ~ *i~: *-~~ * ~ iiij ~ * e hi be * a4. C. be C t1 ~ C C Z. N. be o -. w be g C a -. C S. * a 144. be Wa.e St ;~ : : ~ ~ u a.4 *a ~ 1~...4 C U C SCa.4 ~i.eo-... a *,,bfl~*:, *~,,.e.4.ei Z r * ~ ~ji Cl,i;
117 - - - lb hi ii M 4. ~ a. lb A. 1 - lb - A. hi z A lb 14 * A. M A o lb hi - lb o 44. A. 44 -, 4 *.. * -~ ~ ~ C ii - C U ii. *lb - 4.,. ' 3 lb ij * A. DWh4itU USC * '.1 - S.5 g~ U. U lb lb lb Al ~ 44. lb~ a a lb a'.. N. Al lb - = U, U A. - A - - A. 1. ~ lb ~ A S - lb. ~ -. U ~ inal A U' - C -'~1 U. *U. ~ 2..i.2 - ulo * ~ ~. lk ~ t 7.7<2 ~
118 ~mhmm*pmh * * ~ ' C ~ ~ * * s. 4 5 * 45 o *1 U *1 Sc 4 r *4 C * 3 5'.4 *. '-.1 5 t j 5. 5s 4 55 ~. ~. 4 a a C * C z i..~* - a a = e.g * *a V - U * * - Slit -, 'S Ca *~ 4 - * - is U - * -.5: a * u -.s.~i ~ 5' U 5555 a *b5..5 5*..55. it S..wp U ~,4 *5s 5'~ 5e S - * 55 - *ii - ' *---T. -~ -. ~ Sc U C C Li C 'C ~ U * ~ -. 1 :!:j ii ;J a p. ~ j, 5 Sj~* U ~ * - ~' -s.' 55 S it ~ U "'a
119 - - - a - a 44 4' U - 4' d. a * 14 C 4' -4' a ~ -4 4' A. 4' a = C f~ U U z o - ~ A * L 4'. * C 14 C CC o - in 4' a..4 U 44 u 41W ~ a '4 * A U 4' C 4 a. a ' * * 4 :~ '4 4 4 el.. 4' : : U.. ~ a ~ 4'.. : ~ u * a ,. a.~. ~ - A - 4,*~ 4.~ 444tU (1 :~ ~i2 ~ a~ ~; : Or US 5444)4 44 *4U4) V 4,C444~44' f..; ~ '~. g~*~* & a **.,. 4~4.~ 4*~ a * ~ * ~ - C ~:s ~ ~ s ) ~.4. ~?g*~"~~ 44.4 ~ *VOflV, Va r ~ 44U , 4..))).4 ~ g ~ a a ' 4flS.4 4). 4 a. 14) C a a )1 4' C 4. V J 4~ , '4 ~ A * *.4 -., o 4. -~ 444 4,. - a P LU ,4 V 444 L..a,4.4a... 4,4. o., ' ~ 4 *4~
120 ' S S S 5' -~ w~. - 4 S '~ S A C.5 ~ 5' 5 e h. H -~ 5 * ~ o -. '.5' 5' 5 K U 4. :1 ~j~ ~;,~f ju~,,, Ce.. 5:.tp.. 5 *55'~4J4*~ 554 ~ 4O5~ ~ V.,.; 5'sC - *5*5 s' ~ 1 ~ *q. u -S s.5... j.d 5,4 - -,1 -. U a. a.5. 5' 5' 4 C 2 - U S s ' S 4. ~ 4* - - E S - 4 S A a ' ~ 4. g U A 4..Q.~ S * ~ S ~ U. C *~ ,,' - * ~ -. *. a, o 6 ~a.-s ~.~45 S U a, **4* o ~ ~ ''s'' V -, ( ** ~, 4,4.,~', U ' 5.,' "4 e - -. s ni.j...1. * - * i '~1, ', 4. '1' '',.,.-
121 ~ 4. 'a - C M.q = U 44 Ca ' 'a A. 'a Z S.. - U- a. a ~. o - a a!*!~ ~ '4' 4. 4 a w ~ C' a, :~ =.aa..a - a - * 4- 'C a 1. t ~ 14?88~~On s.c * 44 a a 4 *1 a 44, * *, ~.8 6~ ~a ~ ~m a ~ ~ ~ : : L ~ 5 4 * - * a C. *@~ ~ ** ~ 4)~ S -.4,, O~.. r 4. SC. a.,.1 So ~ L ' a 44 a ~.~ 'C C 4' C C r.. a - a ~ A a ~ ~ u U, 44 S 44 4' o C n. - C. -. : ~.~ ~ * "C. a S..4 wry-v.
122 'a ' S a hi U C C. a *i fl C Z C 4, -. *~ S S - h. U a - - S * w * ~ C., a - U a. C is. *ii ~. s ~~ C. 2 * *1 5,.. ~ S. - ~ *... z~.2 3 ~. * *SL. *S.C S. ~ C~)C 4 4 SC H H *~ = - P4 e ~ L ~ C) U U Li - Ct* ~6.4 C).4 ~C4 ~., flsi a Al * - - is. a. C CJ 4, s. 4, -.~ S ~ C C - = C a ~ ~, 3 U ' C' -- C t C *1-3). *9 5. -' C C C C. ~S.~ C - C 21.~ ~. C S S. - ~ ~':q:~
123 C ha 4 - C ha~ 4 - C * 4 U - - a - o 4 b. a -9.. a. a o - ha a 'a u a z C - 6J. m. - a, 4 ii -, a a, * ~*'!~ -. N C e.,.'., a, ~ M C. C C C - C C N - *C A 'a C*CC *'"~ N * A C CANON C C N U - NOC.aC, H 1 * *.3 *C 4b4 -' C ~. N 'EL..1 i~j ~ 'a. 4CTh. - - z a C C 'a C C C C C * C.S ~ ~ a,'ac~a* ~L ~.3CC ~C *Cha*'A~'N ~C' CalM * -, C CCa~ S C C - ha C s a, 4...' Thor a.. Uina..anin.r. - C U * tal,, 4 a. 'a K ha 4 a.. a C C C - - a -, a, - a..c.. U ~. 4 h N a * Ci. * - C C ~ "A.,-. * 'a ac4. -. '~ ~' Th ~ ~ 9. "i A - N 3 1.S'CC - N*aa-.~4 ~.' U Ut' *j a ~ ';:~~J 4 t ~ S a C- SaaC ~ ~z 4 9, 1 NNCb~CO~ 3 1 r U 4 -~ ~.ai ;ji
124 a. 1 a,. - -a = N E C Ca Z a N Ca B - lag N 14 C a, - 14 N t *. C ~ U La 2 a. C. B S a) * a. o C ac U a.. ~. *.1 -, a a, a. a - 5a. - C C U a U a. C S - e~ S - a. a. 'a a,, * a 7',.a 'au.o 5*C a, a a a c.3 - 'a a, a' a. a, C, a - - a'. - ~ ~ 6~;'a ~ N ~ aa*4 aaa..t~ja' ~ a.a'. 5a ~ a) asl - S...~ : ~ - ~ a; - - ~ * *. a ad., - age r ) a.'. LS.. ',.a. La. a a gal ~ 'a*' - w o 65. ~ U a N ~ N a a, a. a-a - - i a, - Ca. - La C. 54 N a, N C a a B Ca - B 14 a, -~ a a. -. 5'.. aa-a.g.~a, ' ~ - 2 ' - *1 Na-lis ~ 2 a' i~i~ ~ja-a a
125 Table 14 AXRCRAFT SPARATOlS WTH 199 ATC Lamhert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies VFR A rival-arrival Semarations (nautical miles)- Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Denarxture-Devarture Separations (seconds): Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D FR Arrival-Arrival Semarations (nautical miles): Trail Aircraft Class A B C D Lead Aircraft Class A B C D Devarture-Deoar.are Semarations (seconds): Trail Aircraft Class A B C Lead Air:Traf: Class A M C D 6 6c 6,3 e
126 C-79 Table 15 FUTURE FR2 ARRVAL RUNWAY OCCUPANCY TMES Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Runway 12R Exit Class R J G B-left B-right Weighted average A B C D Runway 12L Exit Class R P G B A B C D 7 Runway 3R Exit Class R G A 45 B C D 55 Runway 3L Exit Class A 6-24 E B-left B-right G J A 5 35 B C D i
127 c m U Si K j. 1 -"....,.. hi K S i h *i " i ' iiai n ' w v 96 -!,- in C.~ ' in t i,, u 1, 2.1.
128 -c 96 to M. R.' C l k. K o - C UU.1. " w n R V
129 *1.S a.c S 'a A.. r. V....*.. '.Sa-.
130 Attachment D NPUT DATA SUMMARY ANNUAL DELAY EXPERMENTS Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport St. Louis Airport mprovement Task Force Delay Studies Prepared by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. San Francisco, California March 198
131 D-1 ANNUAL DELAY MODEL Experiment Annual Demand: 336, Group Specification: 3 day groups - high, average, low 12 week groups - 12 months, January through December (1978) 3 weather groups - VFR, FR, FR2 and 3 6 runway uses Annual runways Departure runways 1. 12R, 12L 12R, 12L 2. 3R, 3L 3R, 3L 3. 3R, 3L, 24 3R, 3L 4. 12R, 12L 12R, 12L, R, 12L, 17 12R, 12L 4. Traffic Distributions: Week group Jan. Feb. Mar. A M June Percent of annual in one week Number of weeks in one month Percent of annual in one month Week group J A Sept. Nov. Dec. Percent of annual in one week Number of weeks in one month Percent of annual in one week
132 D-2 S& 6. Daily Traffic Distribution (August 1978 combined 2-week period 8/18/78 to 8/31/78): Day group High Average Low Percent of weekly in one day Number of days in day group Percent of weekly traffic in day group Weather Occurrences: Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June Percent VFR Percent FR Percent FR2& July Au Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Percent VFR Percent FRl Percent FR2& Hourly Runway Capacity Parameters: Hourly Capacity (Ops/hr) Runway use VFR FR FR2&3 1 To be developed
133 D-3 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factors: VFRl FR FR2&3 For all runways Runway Use Occurrence: Percent occurrence Rna.VFR FR FR2 & To be provided Hourly Traffic: Percent Percent Percent Percent daily daily daily daily Hour traffic Hour traffic Hour traffic Hour traffic & 13. Delay Curve Specifications: To be determined after airfield simulation runs 14. Percent Arrivals - Daily percentage % Percent Percent Percent Percent Hour arrivals Hour arrivals Hour arrivals Hour arrivals Cancellzition Diversion Specification: To be provided by Task Force 16. Title: St. Louis Annual Baseline 1979 Demand and Mix
134 Annual Demand , ,578 Revised 1979 a - 344,6 Traffic Ostribution: 1978! Table 16 D-4 DAD A:M TRAFFC DSTRBUTZON Lamert-St. Louis nterrational Airport Airport r.provement Task Force Delay Studies Week acuo Jan. Feb. Mar. Ar.?4av June July Au. so. Oct. nov. Dec. Percent of annual in one week Number of weeks in one onth Percent of an.ual in one month Percent of annual in one week Nbrof weeks in one =c.%_t Percent of annual in one Zcnth CO C Revised 1979 a Percent of annual in one week :u.uber of weeks in one month Per:ent of annual in one month a. Assumes no C-ark Airlines strike. O:ark Airlines has an esti.,ated 4,7 operations per month at St. Louis. Strike afftcted September, October, and Uovenber traffic fiqr!es ar.d lasted 52 days.
135 D-5 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 81A
136 D-6 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 1985 Demand - 339, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 82
137 D-7 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 1985 Defand - 339, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 83
138 D-8 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 1985 Demand - 339, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Larbert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 84
139 D-9 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 1985 Demand - 339, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 85
140 D-1 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 1985 Demand - 339, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 86
141 D-11 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand- 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport _Experiment 87
142 D-12 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic i Delay Curve Specification 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification To.be determined by airfield simulatior 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport _Experiment 88
143 D-13 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand- 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 89 V
144 D-14 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic 12. Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 9
145 D-15 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 91
146 D-16 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 92
147 D-1 7 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 93
148 D-18 ST. LOUS DATA PACKAGE Annual Delay Model Changes 1. Annual Demand 199 Demand - 362, 2. Group Specification Traffic Distribution Daily Traffic Distribution 7. Weather Occurrences 8. Hourly Runway Capacity To be developed Parameter 9. Runway Use/Weather Group Demand Factor 1. Runway Use Occurrences 11. Hourly Traffic Delay Curve Specification To be determined by airfield simulation 14. Percent Arrivals 15. Cancellation Diversion Specification 16. Title Lambert-St. Louis nternational Airport Experiment 94
149 rim
LEYELOV I I ... ** L 8. I *~~~~~...i DATA PACKAGE IVM, 8~ AIRPORT IMPROVEMVENT TASK FORCE DELAY STUDIES
R DAO99 871 PEAT MARWICK MITCHELL AND CO SAN FRANCISCO CALIF F/S 1/2 NEW YORK AIRPORTS DATA PACKAGE NUMBER A, JOHN F KENNEDY INTERN--ETC(U) DEC 79 DOT-FA77WA- 3961 INCLASSIFI ED NL ED LEYELOV I I DATA
More informationPublic Information Meeting. September 2015
W ki P O & T / Working Papers One & Two/ Public Information Meeting September 2015 Agenda Introductions and Opening Comments Project Overview, Process, and Schedule Review Materials from Working Papers
More informationAppendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis
Appendix B ULTIMATE AIRPORT CAPACITY & DELAY SIMULATION MODELING ANALYSIS B TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS TABLES B.1 Introduction... 1 B.2 Simulation Modeling Assumption and Methodology... 4 B.2.1 Runway
More informationRegional Jets ,360 A319/ , , , ,780
Excel Tab Name: Seats (18 MAP) PASSENGER AIRLINE FLIGHT SCHEDULE CALCULATION RECORD Summary 17.2 MAP flight schedule* (with Southwest Airlines B737-800s changed to B737-700s) Number of Total Seats Avg.
More informationSIMMOD Simulation Airfield and Airspace Simulation Report. Oakland International Airport Master Plan Preparation Report. Revised: January 6, 2006
Table of Contents SIMMOD Simulation Airfield and Airspace Simulation Report Oakland International Airport Master Plan Preparation Report Revised: January 6, 2006 Produced For: 1. Simmod PRO! Description...
More informationPrepared By: Mead & Hunt, Inc Port Lansing Road Lansing, MI 48906
Master Plan The preparation of this document was financed in part through a planning grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as provided under Section 505 of the Airport and Airway Improvement
More informationStudy Committee Meeting. September 2015
W ki P T / Working Paper Two/ Study Committee Meeting September 2015 Agenda Introductions and Opening Comments Project Overview, Process, and Schedule Review Materials from Working Paper Two Comments,
More informationLas Vegas McCarran International Airport. Capacity Enhancement Plan
Las Vegas McCarran International Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan Las Vegas McCarran International Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan September 1994 Prepared jointly by the U.S. Department of Transportation,
More informationAirport Engineering Lectures
Airport II- Airport. II-1 Definitions System capacity: Ability efficiently process the transported units. Aircrafts Passengers Baggage cargo Public access facilitation Runway Taxiway Gate Terminal Building
More informationAPPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis
APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis This page is left intentionally blank. MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis Technical Report Prepared by: HNTB November 2011 2020 Improvements Environmental Assessment/
More informationAnalysis of Air Transportation Systems. Airport Capacity
Analysis of Air Transportation Systems Airport Capacity Dr. Antonio A. Trani Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Fall 2002 Virginia
More informationAPPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR
APPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR This appendix sets forth the detailed input data that was used to prepare noise exposure contours for 2022 Baseline conditions. H.1 DATA SOURCES AND ASSUMPTIONS
More informationAccording to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:
4.1 INTRODUCTION The previous chapters have described the existing facilities and provided planning guidelines as well as a forecast of demand for aviation activity at North Perry Airport. The demand/capacity
More informationheli//himel IIIIIIIIIIIIIlfflfflfL: Ao-A FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL CENTER ATL;-ETC IF/6 1/2 MIAMI INTERNATIONAL
Ao-A099 962 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL CENTER ATL;-ETC IF/6 1/2 EE" MIAMI INTERNATIONAL heli//himel AIRPORT. DATA PACKAGE NUMBER 1. MIAMI AIRPO--ETC(U) DEC 78 UNCLASSIFIED N IIIIIIIIIIIIIlfflfflfL:
More informationChapter 3. Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements
Chapter 3. Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Chapter 3. DEMAND/CAPACITY & FACILITY REQUIREMENTS This chapter provides an assessment of future airport development requirements based upon the forecasts
More informationAIRPORT OPERATIONS COUNT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 2005
AIRPORT OPERATIONS COUNT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 2005 ITINERANT(1) LOCAL(2) TOTAL Month-Year AC(a) AT(b) GA(c) MI(d) CI(a) MI(b) Operations (3) January-05 4,452 2,153 1,650 30 8,285 244 0
More informationLONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 1 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA Airside Capacity Evaluation Techniques Matt Davis Assistant Director of Planning Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport Matt.Davis@Atlanta-Airport.com
More informationAirport Noise Management Report 1st Quarter 2018
AIRPORT NOISE MANAGEMENT REPORT 2 nd QUARTER 2018 Airport Noise Management Report 1st Quarter 2018 The Airport Noise Management Report provides the 2nd Quarter 2018 summary of St. Louis Lambert International
More informationAssignment 10: Final Project
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2017 Assignment 10: Final Project Due: May 4, 2017 (via email and PDF) Final Exam Time is May 5 Requirements for this assignment are: a) Slide presentation
More informationLFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG
This page is intended to draw commercial and private pilots attention to the aeronautical context and main threats related to an aerodrome. They have been identified in a collaborative way by the main
More informationSTAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 7D
STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: 7D STAFF CONTACT: Peter Imhof, Andrew Orfila RECOMMENDATION: Adopt findings
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary. December 2007
T F Green Airport 06/23/08 Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary December 2007 Calendar Year Basis Year Year December December Percent to Date to Date Percent 2007 2006 Change 2007 2006 Change Enplaned
More informationStatistical Report Calendar Year 2013
Statistical Report Year 213 Houston Airports P.O. Box 616 Houston, TX 7725-16 Request for User Input The intent of the monthly and annual statistical reports is to provide data that is both relevant and
More informationAnalysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages
Analysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages Jasenka Rakas and Paul Schonfeld November 14, 2000 National Center of Excellence for Aviation Operations Research Table of Contents Introduction Objectives
More informationApril 4, McKinney Airport Advisory Committee Airport Master Plan Update.
McKinney Airport Advisory Committee Airport Master Plan Update http://mckinney.airportstudy.com/project-documents April 4, 2017 Paul Hendricks phendricks@fairviewtexas.org McKinney National Airport (TKI)
More informationNational Transportation Safety Board Aviation Incident Final Report
National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Incident Final Report Location: Los Angeles, CA Incident Number: Date & Time: 08/16/2007, 1257 PDT Registration: Aircraft: Boeing 737-700 Aircraft Damage:
More informationUSE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE
USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE 1. Introduction The indications presented on the ATS surveillance system named radar may be used to perform the aerodrome, approach and en-route control service:
More informationJapan Export Air. International Air Freight Fuel Surcharge. All Destinations
Japan Export Air January 12, 218 International Air Freight Fuel Surcharge Carrier 3K Jet Star Asia Airways 66 1-Jan-15 Taiwan, Philippines 48 1-Jan-15 5C C.A.L. Cargo 13 1-Oct-12 China, Hong Kong, Korea,
More informationJapan Export Air. International Air Freight Fuel Surcharge. All Destinations
Japan Export Air January 3, 218 International Air Freight Fuel Surcharge Carrier 3K Jet Star Asia Airways All s 66 1-Jan-15 Taiwan, Philippines 48 1-Jan-15 5C C.A.L. Cargo All s 13 1-Oct-12 China, Hong
More informationJapan Export Air. International Air Freight Fuel Surcharge. All Destinations
Japan Export Air March 30, 2019 International Air Freight Fuel Surcharge 3K Jet Star Asia Airways All s 66 1-Jan-15 Taiwan, Philippines 48 1-Jan-15 5C C.A.L. Cargo All s 130 1-Oct-12 China, Hong Kong,
More informationWashington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update
Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update Ultimate ASV, Runway Use and Flight Tracks 4th Working Group Briefing 8/13/18 Meeting Purpose Discuss Public Workshop input
More informationJapan Export Air. International Air Freight Fuel Surcharge. All Destinations
Japan Export Air February 27, 2019 International Air Freight Fuel Surcharge 3K Jet Star Asia Airways All s 66 1-Jan-15 Taiwan, Philippines 48 1-Jan-15 5C C.A.L. Cargo All s 130 1-Oct-12 China, Hong Kong,
More informationSurveillance and Broadcast Services
Surveillance and Broadcast Services Benefits Analysis Overview August 2007 Final Investment Decision Baseline January 3, 2012 Program Status: Investment Decisions September 9, 2005 initial investment decision:
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved
TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page Number LIST OF ACRONYMS... a CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION General... 1-1 Study Objectives... 1-1 Public Involvement... 1-2 Issues to Be Resolved... 1-2 CHAPTER TWO EXISTING
More informationAIRPORT WITH NO RUNWAYS IS A MALL
RUNWAY EXTENSION INITIATIVE AT FT. LAUDERDALE HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ISMAEL IZZY BONILLA DEPUTY DIRECTOR BROWARD COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT WITH NO RUNWAYS IS A MALL Runway Business Case
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary. Aug 2017
T F Green Airport Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary Aug 2017 Calendar Year Basis Year Year Aug Aug Percent to Date to Date Percent 2017 2016 Change 2017 2016 Change Total Enplaned 190,676 169,667
More informationIII. EulI. 292 CONCEPTS FOR TERMINAL AREA CONFIGURATION MRNAOEIIENT(U) ini 7 AD-AI142. MP-SiI13i DTFROi-i-C-i81
7 AD-AI142 EulI 292 CONCEPTS FOR TERMINAL AREA CONFIGURATION MRNAOEIIENT(U) ini MITRE CORP MCLEAN VA METREK DIV R N SINHA SEP Bi I MP-SiI13i DTFROi-i-C-i81 UNCLASSIFIED F/G 1/5 NL III '-V P2.8 1.0. -N
More information6.C.1 AIRPORT NOISE. Noise Analysis and Land Use Impact Assessment FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
6.C.1 AIRPORT NOISE The existing land uses are described in Chapter Five, Affected Environment. The methodologies used to develop the Geographic Information System (GIS) land use database, the estimated
More informationSpecification Details: Coded Dash Number M28803/1 -MC PART LISTINGS MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OR TYPE NUMBER TEST OR QUALIFICATION REFERENCE
Specification Details: DLA Land and Maritime - VQ Date: 2/4/2015 Specification: MIL-DTL-28803 Title: Display, Optoelectronic, Readouts, Backlighted Segmented Federal Supply Class (FSC): 5980 Conventional:
More informationThe purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration
Chapter 4 Page 65 AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY The purpose of this Demand/Capacity Analysis is to examine the capability of the Albert Whitted Airport (SPG) to meet the needs of its users. In doing so, this
More informationRHODE ISLAND AIRPORT CORPORATION 07/16/08 T. F. GREEN AIRPORT
RHODE ISLAND AIRPORT CORPORATION 7/16/8 T. F. GREEN AIRPORT JANUARY 25 TOTAL PASSENGERS UA 5% SP 7% January 2,5 Air Georgian Limited 1,6 Air Wisconsin American Airlines 2,561 American Eagle (Flagship)
More informationRunway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport
APPENDIX 2 Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport May 11, 2009 Version 2 (draft) Table of Contents Introduction... 1-1 Section 1 Purpose & Need... 1-2 Section 2 Design Standards...1-3 Section
More informationAutomated Integration of Arrival and Departure Schedules
Automated Integration of Arrival and Departure Schedules Topics Concept Overview Benefits Exploration Research Prototype HITL Simulation 1 Lessons Learned Prototype Refinement HITL Simulation 2 Summary
More informationInternational Civil Aviation Organization. UNDP/ICAO Regional Project RLA/98/003 Transition to the CNS/ATM Systems in the CAR and SAM Regions
AP/ATM/5 05/06/03 International Civil Aviation Organization UNDP/ICAO Regional Project RLA/98/003 Transition to the CNS/ATM Systems in the CAR and SAM Regions Fifth Meeting/workshop of Air Traffic Management
More informationA Hong Kong-based Virtual Airline. Hong Kong VFR Guide. VOHK Training Team. Version 1.2
A Hong Kong-based Virtual Airline Hong Kong VFR Guide VOHK Training Team Version 1.2 Flight Simulation Use Only 5 March 2017 1 Introduction This Guide provides necessary information and guidelines for
More informationCATCODE ] CATCODE
Runways. FAC: 1111 CATCODE: 111111 OPR: AFCEC/COS OCR: AF/A3O-A 1.1. Description. The runway is the paved surface provided for normal aircraft landings and take offs. Runways are classified as either Class
More informationPBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP. SIDs/STARs/HOLDS. Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931
International Civil Aviation Organization PBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP SIDs/STARs/HOLDS Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931 Design in context Methodology STEPS TFC Where does the traffic
More informationNOTICE TO MEMBERS No February 5, 2003
NOTICE TO MEMBERS No. 2003-008 February 5, 2003 NEW EQUITY OPTION CLASSES Bourse de Montréal Inc.(The Bourse) and (CDCC) hereby inform you that at the opening of trading on Monday, February 10, 2003 the
More informationAirport Noise Management Report 1st Quarter 2017
Airport Noise Management Report The Airport Noise Management Report is a publication of the Airport Noise Management Office. This report provides a 1st quarter summary of St. Louis Lambert International
More informationAirport Noise Management Report 1st Quarter 2018
AIRPORT NOISE MANAGEMENT REPORT 1 ST QUARTER 2018 The Airport Noise Management Report provides the summary of St. Louis Lambert International Airport s operations and noise complaints. The data in this
More informationCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND An Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates the effects of a proposed Federal action on the surrounding environment and is prepared in compliance with the National
More informationHartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper
Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway 11-29 Closure White Paper June 2012 In recent years there has been discussion regarding the necessity of Runway 11-29 to the Hartford- Brainard Airport (HFD)
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary
T F Green Airport Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary January 2018 Calendar Year Basis Year Year Jan Jan Percent to Date to Date Percent 2018 2017 Change 2018 2017 Change Total Enplaned 148,452
More informationAirport Noise Management 2017 Annual Report
Airport Noise Management 2017 Annual Report The Airport Noise Management Report provides a yearly summary of St. Louis Lambert International Airport s operations and noise complaints. The NAS (National
More informationIntegrated Optimization of Arrival, Departure, and Surface Operations
Integrated Optimization of Arrival, Departure, and Surface Operations Ji MA, Daniel DELAHAYE, Mohammed SBIHI ENAC École Nationale de l Aviation Civile, Toulouse, France Paolo SCALA Amsterdam University
More informationCalendar Year Basis Year Year Apr Apr Percent to Date to Date Percent Change Change
T F Green Airport Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary April 2018 Calendar Year Basis Year Year Apr Apr Percent to Date to Date Percent 2018 2017 Change 2018 2017 Change Total Enplaned 194,510 157,788
More informationDepartures over the north-west, west and south-west from Runway 25. Arrivals from the south on Runways 34L and 34R.
Mode 7 Method of operation Departures over the north-west, west and south-west from Runway 25. Arrivals from the south on Runways 34L and 34R. Departures over the north and northwest from Runway 34L for
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary. December 2010
T F Green Airport 01/13/11 Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary December 2010 Calendar Year Basis Year Year December December Percent to Date to Date Percent 2010 2009 Change 2010 2009 Change Enplaned
More informationState of the National Airspace Infrastructure
State of the National Airspace Infrastructure National Airspace System Performance Workshop Asilomar Conference Center Pacific Grove, CA March 14-17, 2006 Jasenka Rakas NEXTOR University of California,
More informationCOMMERCIAL AND GENERAL AVIATION
Existing Facilities Daytona Beach International Airport is served by a number of airside and landside facilities. The airport has three asphalt runways: Runway 07L/25R (10,500 feet long by 150 feet wide),
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary. March2017
T F Green Airport 04/17/17 Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary March2017 Calendar Year Basis Year Year March March Percent to Date to Date Percent 2017 2016 Change 2017 2016 Change Enplaned 152,513
More informationSmall Aircraft Transportation System (SATS) Environmental Noise Impact Study
Small Aircraft Transportation System (SATS) Environmental Noise Impact Study Dr. Antonio A. Trani Howard Swingle Dr. Hojong Baik Dr. Dusan Teodorovic Chad Ackley Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary. Sep 2017
T F Green Airport Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary Sep 2017 Calendar Year Basis Year Year Sep Sep Percent to Date to Date Percent 2017 2016 Change 2017 2016 Change Total Enplaned 161,165 151,982
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary. February 2017
T F Green Airport 03/24/17 Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary February 2017 Calendar Year Basis Year Year Febuary Febuary Percent to Date to Date Percent 2017 2016 Change 2017 2016 Change Enplaned
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary. May 2017
T F Green Airport Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary May 2017 Calendar Year Basis Year Year May May Percent to Date to Date Percent 2017 2016 Change 2017 2016 Change Enplaned 158,331 158,270 0.04%
More informationSafety Enhancement RNAV Safe Operating and Design Practices for STARs and RNAV Departures
Safety Enhancement Action: Implementers: Statement of Work: Safety Enhancement 213.5 RNAV Safe Operating and Design Practices for STARs and RNAV Departures To mitigate errors on Standard Terminal Arrival
More informationCharlotte - Douglas International Airport Traffic Control Tower
Charlotte - Douglas International Airport Traffic Control Tower Standard Operating Procedures CLT ATCT 7110.65D Effective: May 1, 2011. 1 1-1-1. Callsign Usage and Frequency Delegation: CHAPTER 1. GENERAL
More informationAirfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni
Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni Istanbul Technical University Air Transportation Management M.Sc. Program Air Transportation Systems and Infrastructure Module 10 May 27, 2015 Airfield Capacity Objective:
More informationNextGen: New Technology for Improved Noise Mitigation Efforts: DFW RNAV Departure Procedures
NextGen: New Technology for Improved Noise Mitigation Efforts: DFW RNAV Departure Procedures DFW International Airport Sandy Lancaster, Manager Noise Compatibility October 13, 2008 OUTLINE About DFW Airport
More informationFeasibility and Benefits of a Cockpit Traffic Display-Based Separation Procedure for Single Runway Arrivals and Departures
Feasibility and Benefits of a Cockpit Traffic Display-Based Separation Procedure for Single Runway Arrivals and Departures Implications of a Pilot Survey and Laboratory Simulations Dr. Anand M. Mundra
More informationKBLI MEDIUM. Bellingham Intl Airport Bellingham, Washington, United States. Diagram #1: All Runways. NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack
Diagram #1: p. 1 of 5 Diagram #2: p. 2 of 5 OVERVIEW Bellingham International Airport (BLI) is a full service commercial airport located in Whatcom County, approximately 3 miles N.W. of the city limits
More informationTechnical Report. Aircraft Overflight and Noise Analysis. Brisbane, California. December Prepared by:
Aircraft Noise Abatement Office Technical Report Aircraft Overflight and Noise Analysis Brisbane, California Prepared by: P.O. Box 8097 San Francisco, California 94128 (650) 821-5100 Introduction In response
More informationRaleigh-Durham International Airport Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan. August 1991
ii Raleigh-Durham International Airport Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan August 1991 Prepared jointly by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Raleigh-Durham Airport
More informationNoise Exposure
4-1 4. FAR Part 150 guidelines require the evaluation of a five-year future forecast condition in the analysis of noise exposure at an airport. This section documents the expected future operating conditions
More informationCalendar Year Basis Year Year August August Percent to Date to Date Percent Change Change
T F Green Airport Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary August 2018 Calendar Year Basis Year Year August August Percent to Date to Date Percent 2018 2017 Change 2018 2017 Change Total Enplaned 202,148
More informationACRP Project 03-17: Evaluating Airfield Capacity
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 1 2 ATLANTA, GEORGIA Planning Session 4: Airside Capacity Analysis Tools and Techniques ACRP Project 03-17: Evaluating Airfield Capacity December 6, 2011 Bill Dunlay Director LeighFisher
More informationAssignment 7: Airport Geometric Design Standards
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2018 Date Due: March 23, 2018 Instructor: Trani Problem 1 Assignment 7: Airport Geometric Design Standards An airport is designing a new pier terminal to accommodate
More informationEvaluation of Strategic and Tactical Runway Balancing*
Evaluation of Strategic and Tactical Runway Balancing* Adan Vela, Lanie Sandberg & Tom Reynolds June 2015 11 th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2015) *This work was
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary. October 2017
T F Green Airport Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary October 2017 Calendar Year Basis Year Year Oct Oct Percent to Date to Date Percent 2017 2016 Change 2017 2016 Change Total Enplaned 196,345
More information('j~) Technical '.eport Documentation Page
A0-A092 455 PEAT MARWCK MTCHELL AND CO SAN FRANCSCO CALF F/S 1/5 TASK FORCE DELAY STUDY. WLLAM B. HARTSFELD ATLANTA NTERNAT--ETC(U) JUN 80 DOT-FA77WA-3961 UNCLASSFED NL 3.' 'll".l ('j~) Technical '.eport
More informationSpecial Aircraft Arrival and Departure Procedures in Effect Noon Wednesday, Nov 4 th through Noon Sunday, Nov 8 th AREA OVERVIEW
Special Aircraft Arrival and Departure Procedures in Effect Noon Wednesday, Nov 4 th through Noon Sunday, Nov 8 th AREA OVERVIEW AOPA is proud to present the 2009 Aviation Summit in Tampa Florida. This
More informationA 3D simulation case study of airport air traffic handling
A 3D simulation case study of airport air traffic handling Henk de Swaan Arons Erasmus University Rotterdam PO Box 1738, H4-21 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands email: hdsa@cs.few.eur.nl Abstract Modern
More informationRef. AIM Para AOPA Air Safety Foundation Supported by the FAA Ref. AIM Para Supported by the FAA
ILS Critical Area Holding Position Sign: ATC may hold you at this sign, on a taxiway, when the instrument landing system is being used at the airport. Aircraft taxiing beyond this point may interfere with
More informationVIRTUAL AIR TRAFFIC SIMULATION NETWORK UNITED STATES DIVISION. SUBJ: Phoenix (PHX) Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) Standard Operating Procedures
VIRTUAL AIR TRAFFIC SIMULATION NETWORK UNITED STATES DIVISION ALBUQUERQUE ARTCC ORDER PHX ATCT v7110.1a Effective Date: Sept. 18, 2014 SUBJ: Phoenix (PHX) Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) Standard Operating
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary. December 2011
T F Green Airport 01/17/12 Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary December 2011 Calendar Year Basis Year Year December December Percent to Date to Date Percent 2011 2010 Change 2011 2010 Change Enplaned
More informationTime-Space Analysis Airport Runway Capacity. Dr. Antonio A. Trani. Fall 2017
Time-Space Analysis Airport Runway Capacity Dr. Antonio A. Trani CEE 3604 Introduction to Transportation Engineering Fall 2017 Virginia Tech (A.A. Trani) Why Time Space Diagrams? To estimate the following:
More informationKSFO RNAV TO GLS DEMONSTRATION
Delta Air Lines - Noah Flood GLS GLS DTT 1.9 DTT 1.9 GLS1 GLS1 KSFO RNAV TO GLS DEMONSTRATION Key Components Three Key Components 1. Global Navigation Satellite System A. GPS/Galileo/GLONASS 2. Ground
More informationCalendar Year Basis Year Year May May Percent to Date to Date Percent Change Change
T F Green Airport Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary May 2018 Calendar Year Basis Year Year May May Percent to Date to Date Percent 2018 2017 Change 2018 2017 Change Total Enplaned 192,063 158,331
More informationMonthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary
T F Green Airport Monthly Airport Passenger Activity Summary December 2017 Calendar Year Basis Year Year Dec Dec Percent to Date to Date Percent 2017 2016 Change 2017 2016 Change Total Enplaned 175,889
More informationAirport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3
Airport Master Plan for Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3 Public Meeting #1 > 8/24/17 from 5:30 to 8:00 pm > 41 attendees signed-in > Comments: > EAA area > Environmental constraints > Focus
More informationCharlotte - Douglas International
Charlotte - Douglas International Standard Operating Procedures CLT TRACON 7110.65D Effective: May 1, 2011. 1 CHAPTER 1. Departure/Satellite Radar SECTION 1. EQUIPMENT 1-1-1. Callsign Usage and Frequency
More informationCHAPTER 9 RUNWAYS AND AIRFIELD DEVELOPMENTS
CHAPTER 9 RUNWAYS AND AIRFIELD DEVELOPMENTS CANBERRA AIRPORT IS THE ONLY 24 HOUR BOEING 747, B777-300 AND A340 CAPABLE AIRPORT...BETWEEN BRISBANE AND MELBOURNE. 9 Runway and airfield developments Airports
More informationSuvarnabhumi Airport Runway Maintenance. Air Traffic Management Situation Review Week 4: 2 8 July 2012
Suvarnabhumi Airport Runway Maintenance Air Traffic Management Situation Review Week 4: 2 8 July 2012 9 Jul 2012 1 Flight Movements Daily Traffic & Runway Utilization 900 800 700 Daily Traffic & Runway
More informationMultiple comparison of green express aviation network path optimization research
Multiple comparison of green express aviation network path optimization research XIANGCHAO LIU CHANGSONG MA HUA HE LI LUO Tian Fu College of Southwestern University of Finance and Economics IFSPA2012 HongKong
More informationARCHERFIELD AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL PAPER TP 03/10 RUNWAY CAPACITY
ARCHERFIELD AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL PAPER TP 03/10 (Revision 2) RUNWAY CAPACITY An Investigation of Practical Capacity with Class D Airspace Procedures and the Proposed Runway Configuration JULY
More informationNATIONAL BUSINESS AVIATION ASSOCIATION (NBAA) CONVENTION
NATIONAL BUSINESS AVIATION ASSOCIATION (NBAA) CONVENTION LAS VEGAS, October 10 12, 2017 In anticipation of a large number of aircraft operating to and from the Las Vegas area in conjunction with the 2017
More informationAviation Gridlock: Airport Capacity Infrastructure How Do We Expand Airfields?
Aviation Gridlock: Airport Capacity Infrastructure How Do We Expand Airfields? By John Boatright Vice President - Delta Air Lines Properties and Facilities Issue What can be done to expand airfield capacity?
More informationExecutive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport
Executive Summary MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport As a general aviation and commercial service airport, Fort Collins- Loveland Municipal Airport serves as an important niche
More informationMASTER PLAN UPDATE WORKING PAPER NO. 3. Demand/Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements. March 18, 2013
MASTER PLAN UPDATE WORKING PAPER NO. 3 Demand/Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements March 18, 2013 Contents 4 Demand/Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements... 4 1 4.1 Summary of Aviation Demand
More information