TO: Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) Members RE: Pangborn Airport Master Plan PAC Meeting #4 Presentation Material DATE: July 18, 2017

Transcription

1 TO: Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) Members RE: Pangborn Airport Master Plan PAC Meeting #4 Presentation Material DATE: July 18, 2017 Please find attached for your review prior to the PAC Meeting #4, the presentation materials to be covered as necessary to formalize the facility alternatives (site location and layout options). The presentation materials focus on the following alternatives: o Taxiway System o Airline Building, Apron, and Auto Parking o Airport Operations Building (AOB) o General Aviation (GA) FBO Building, Hangars, Apron, Crosswind Runway From the last PAC Meeting #3, we have a good sense from you as to finalizing the site location preferences (see exhibit below). For the PAC Meeting #4, we will focus on the site layout options, and would encourage you to come to the upcoming PAC meeting with your site layout preferences. Pangborn Memorial Airport I One Pangborn Drive I East Wenatchee, WA Phone: ext. 6 I Fax: I I

2 Below is the agenda for the PAC Meeting #4. As you can see, we begin entering the next aspect of the EAT Master Plan, which is Project Implementation Plan. This involves identifying specific projects, priorities, and funding considerations. As always, if you have any questions or comments, you are welcome to call me at Ext. 6, or provide input using the dedicated EAT Airport Master Plan at address I hope to see you at the upcoming PAC Meeting #4. Sincerely, Trent Moyers Airport Director Pangborn Memorial Airport Attached: PAC Meeting #4 Presentation Materials 7/18/2017

3 EAT Airport Master Plan PAC Meeting #4 Review Materials July 20, 2017

4 PARALLEL TAXIWAY SYSTEM

5 EAST SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY CONNECTORS EXISTING AND PLANNED ±1,800 ±1,500 ±2,000 ±1,700 EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY A RUNWAY A6 Remain A5 Remain A4 Remove A4 New Former Runway Remove A3 Remain A2 Remove A1 Remain FAA Taxiway Connector Turnoff Guidance

6 EAST SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY SYSTEM EXISTING AND PROPOSED RUNWAY SEPARATION EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY TO 540 SEPARATION 400 ILS PROPOSED PARALLEL TAXIWAY 400 SEPARATION RUNWAY NOTE: TAXIWAY CONNECTORS NOT SHOWN FOR CLUTTER PURPOSES. EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY: 50 to to 540 Separation From Runway Centerline 250 Taxiway Holdshort From Runway Centerline PROPOSED PARALLEL TAXIWAY 75 Wide Parallel 540 Separation From Runway Centerline 250 Taxiway Holdshort From Runway Centerline

7 PROPOSED WEST-SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY (PHASE 3 DARK BLUE) EAST SIDE AIRFIELD Assumes VOR Station Decommission Or Relocation WEST SIDE AIRFIELD

8 AIRLINE TERMINAL FACILITIES ALTERNATIVES

9 AIRLINE PASSENGER TERMINAL BUILDING AIRLINE EXPANSION SCENARIOS DERIVED FROM THE AIRLINE FORECAST SCENARIO EVENTS: Scenario 1: Scenario 2: Scenario 3: Scenario 4: Meet EAT 20-year forecast passenger growth (60,000 to 95,000 enplaned growth by 2035) Introduce Second West-Coast Destination/Airline (Two-Gate System with 34-Seat Turboprop) Introduce Second West-Coast Destination/Airline (Two-Gate System with 76 to 90-Seat Jets) Introduce Low-Cost Charter (Two-Gate Gate System with 130 to 150-Seat Jet)

10 BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 2/3 OPTION 4 AIRLINE APRON VEHICLE CURBSIDE

11 BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 4 OPTION 5 AIRLINE APRON VEHICLE CURBSIDE

12 BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 2/4 OPTION 6 AIRLINE APRON VEHICLE CURBSIDE

13 MATRIX COMPARISON TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS Facility Component / Factors Alternative Options Scenario Passenger Demand Levels Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Existing Airport Building 19,000 SF (Single Story: 90' x 260' / 92 Departure Lounge Seats) Airline Forecast Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 2/3 Scenario 4 Scenario 2/4 Forecast Airline-Passenger Building Scenario (SF) 26,500 SF 29,200 SF 31,900 SF 30,000 SF 33,300 SF 33,300 SF Proposed Building Size (SF) 19,000 SF 20,600 SF 26,800 SF 25,500 SF 31,100 SF 31,050 SF Building Size Per 20,150 SF Fire Wall Code Threshold Less Less Greater Greater Greater Greater Building Exterior Expansion - Number of Sides 1 - W 2 - W / N 2 - W / N 2 - W / N 3 - W / N / S 2 - W / N Requires Remote Building Relocation Yes Yes No No No No Building Features Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Number of Airlines / Departure Gates 1 / 1 2 / 2 2 / 2 2 / 2 3 / 2 3 / 2 Expands to 2-Story Building (Yes or No) No No Yes No Yes Yes Passenger Loading (Ground or Bridge) Ground Ground Ground Ground Ground Ground Provides New Building Curbside Entry Point No No Yes No No No Provides Flip-Flow Building Entry No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Requires Fire Sprinklers No No TBD TBD TBD TBD

14 MATRIX COMPARISON TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS (CONTINUED) Individual Building Components / Factors Bldg. Trigger Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Airline Operating Area Expansion (Yes or No) Essential Reconfigure Yes Yes Reconfigure Yes Yes Expands Airline Ticket Counter Essential No No Yes No Relocated Relocated Expands Airline Office Area (Net Area) LOS Yes Yes Yes Reconfigure Relocated Relocated Expands Airline Baggage Make-Up LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Expands Airline Passenger Tickekting/Counter Queing LOS No No Yes No Relocated Yes Passenger Departure Lounge Expansion (Yes or No) Essential No Net Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Passenger Departure Lounge (Total SF) Essential 2,150 2,400 2,550 2,050 4,200 2,050 Passenger Departure Lounge (Total Seats) Essential ±90 Seats ±100 Seats Seats 120 Seats 160 Seats 120 Seats Bathrooms Upgraded to ADA Compliance Per Code Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Outbound Baggage Improvements LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Airline Conveyor to Tug (Yes or No) LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes TSA Baggage Screening - By Hand or Equipment Scanner LOS Either Either Either Either Either Either TSA Passenger Screening and Office Area (Yes or No) LOS / Standards No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Expands TSA Passenger Screening Queing LOS No No No No Yes Yes Accommodates TSA SSCP Equipment Upgrades TSA Standards No No No No Yes Yes Meets TSA Checkpoint Guidelines for Space & Layout TSA Standards No No No No Yes Yes

15 MATRIX COMPARISON TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS (CONTINUED) Individual Building Components / Factors Bldg. Trigger Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Airport Administration / Operations LOS ±3,000 SF ±3,000 SF 3,900 SF 4,200 SF 6,150 SF 6,150 SF Accommodates Administrative Staff LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes Accommodates Law Enforcement Staff (LEO) LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes Expands Airport Storage Area LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes Inbound Baggage Improvements LOS No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Baggage Claim - Manual or Conveyor Devise LOS Hand Transfer Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor Expands Passenger Baggage Claim/ Meeter-Greeter Area LOS No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Expands Tenant Office-Counters / Area (Yes or No) LOS No No No No Yes Yes Expands Restrooms - Non-Secured Area (Yes or No) Per Code No No No Yes Yes Yes Expands Storage Area Yes No No No Yes Yes Constructability & Costs N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Economic Value & Financial Return N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Note: Building reconfiguration triggers compliance with federal ADA requirements (bathroom facilities). Note: 20,150 SF is maximum building area without requiring fire suppression systems; firewall separation possible for expanding adjoinging building areas beyond 20,150 SF. Note: 46,000 SF is allowable building area with sprinkler system. Note: Future timeframe for implementation for TSA passenger or baggage screening equipment upgrades are unspecified.

16 -ALTERNATIVES - AIRLINE APRON

17 AIRLINE APRON EXISTING CONDITIONS TERMINAL BUILDING VEHICLES GSE STORAGE TOTAL APRON = 95,500 SF AIRCRAFT MANEUVERING = 87,500 SF AIRCRAFT PARKING = 55,000 SF APRON SUPPORT = 8,000 SF PARKING POSITION #1 (TURBOPROP) C-III TOFA@ 93 PARKING POSITION #2 (TURBOPROP) NON-PARKING AREA TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA 1.50% Wingtip Separation 3.40% ±90 B-II 65.5 GA APRON PARALLEL TAXIWAY A

18 AIRLINE APRON EXPANSION OPTION ACAP 3 TERMINAL BUILDING VEHICLES NARROW-BODY JET TYPES: EMB-190 MD-90 SERIES B-737 SERIES EMB-190/195 BOMBARDIER CS-300 NARROW BODY JET GSE STORAGE PARKING POSITION #1 NON-PARKING AREA TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA Wingtip Separation B-II 65.5 GA APRON PARALLEL TAXIWAY A

19 - ALTERNATIVES - AIRLINE AUTO PARKING

20 FUTURE AIRLINE AUTO PARKING DEMAND (SPACES AND AREA) Lot and Parking Function 2015 (Actual) to 2035 Change Daily Enplaned Passengers - Peak Month PARKING SPACES (NO OVERFLOW) PARKING SPACES (PLUS OVERFLOW) Short-Term * Long-Term Rental Car Employee/Tenant Overflow/Special Event PARKING AREA - SF (NO OVERFLOW) 148, , , , ,800 86,400 PARKING AREA - ACRES (NO OVERFLOW) PARKING AREA - SF (PLUS OVERFLOW) 148, , , , , ,200 PARKING AREA - ACRES (PLUS OVERFLOW) Short-Term * 24,000 25,400 28,600 31,900 34,800 10,800 Long-Term 86,400 98, , , ,000 55,600 Rental Car 25,500 30,900 33,800 36,800 39,300 13,800 Employee / Tenant 12,500 15,200 16,200 17,400 18,700 6,200 Overflow / Special Event 0 31,400 35,400 39,800 44,800 44,800 Additional 20- Year Demand - Spaces - Additional 20- Year Demand - Area -

21 AIRLINE AUTO PARKING OPTION AUTO 1 (RECONFIGURE LOT) New Entry Relocate Rental Expand Short- Term New Livery Lane Expand Employee

22 AIRLINE AUTO PARKING OPTION AUTO 2 (RECONFIGURE LOT, ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT) Expand Long-Term Relocate Rental Straighten Entrance / New Access Point Expand Employee

23 AIRLINE AUTO PARKING OPTION AUTO 3 (RECONFIGURE LOT, NEW ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT, OVERFLOW) New Overflow New-Expanded Long Term New Circulation Route

24 AIRLINE AUTO PARKING OPTION AUTO 4 (RECONFIGURE LOT, NEW ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT, OVERFLOW) New Overflow New-Expanded Long Term / Rental New Circulation Route

25 COMBINED AIRPORT OPERATIONS BUILDING (AOB) ARFF AND SRE

26 AOB - EAT RENDERING PROPOSED BUILDING ALLOCATION: ARFF: 5,500 to 7,000 SF SRE: 18,000 to 22,000 SF Storage/Materials: 500 SF Staff Operations: 3,000 to 4,500 SF TOTAL: 27,000 to 34,000 SF Airport Operations Building (AOB): EXISTING BUILDING SPACE: The AOB is a single structure to consolidate Airport Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) and Snow Remove Equipment (SRE) facilities and staff. The ARFF and SRE share many common functions, including staff, emergency response, storage, and vehicle maintenance. ARFF (3 Bays): 4,050 SF SRE (Total Structures): 16,150 SF Storage/Materials: 0 SF Staff Operations: 1,500 SF TOTAL: 21,700 SF

27 AOB FACTORS EXISTING CONDITIONS AIRPORT WAY SRE SRE SRE SRE AIR CARGO FBO ARFF GA APRON RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE Obsolete Airport Ops. Building Equipment Stored Outside Constrained SRESpace and Door Set Up Airport Staffing of FBO SRE/ARFF Joint Airport and Douglas County Operations Constrained Door Size and Operating Space Proximity of Overnight Quarters

28 AOB LAYOUT OPTION SITE A AOB-A4 AOB-A5 AOB-A6 AOB-A2-2 AOB-A2-1 AOB-A3 AOB-A1-1 AOB BLDG. FOOTPRINT ±35,000 SF

29 AOB LAYOUT OPTION SITE D PANGBORN AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

30 ALTERNATIVES -GENERAL AVIATION -

31 FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) BUILDING SITE LAYOUT OPTIONS EAST-SIDE

32 PANGBORN FLIGHT CENTER - EXISTING SITE FACTORS Future Aircraft Fueling Storage Locations Existing FBO Building Factors: REPLACEMENT FBO BUILDING (±3,500 SF) AIRPORT WAY SRE Building Disposition Adjacent FBO Facilities and Services - Condition - Hangar Size - Door Height - Amenities - Aesthetics Long-Term T-Hangar Disposition and Redevelopment Long-Term Hangar Disposition GA HANGARS T-HANGAR SITE DISPOSITION GA AIRCRAFT PARKING JET-A FUEL SRE FBO 100LL FUEL TAXIWAY A GA APRON ARFF CARGO Optimize GA Apron Frontage ARFF Building Proximity/Future Expansion/AOB Consolidation to Alternate Airfield Site Future GA Aircraft Parking Needs (Aircraft Type)

33 FBO BUILDING/HANGAR OPTION FBO A-1 AIRPORT WAY FUTURE T-HANGAR DISPOSITION F GA AUTO (FUTURE) TB SRE HR RAMP (F) HR HR HR ARFF CARGO RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE F F

34 FBO BUILDING/HANGAR OPTION FBO A-3 AIRPORT WAY F AUTO OVERFLOW FUTURE T-HANGAR DISPOSITION HR TB SRE RAMP (FUTURE) F F GA AUTO (FUTURE) FUTURE AOB ARFF CARGO RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE F

35 FBO BUILDING/HANGAR OPTION FBO A-5 AIRPORT WAY F GA AUTO (FUTURE) FUTURE T-HANGAR DISPOSITION SRE HR RAMP (FUTURE) TB ARFF CARGO RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE F F

36 GA T-HANGAR DISPOSITION SUB OPTION - GA T-HANGAR REMOVAL SITE OPTION POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT SITE ADVANTAGES Large Paved Surface Visibility (Airfield & Landside) Proximity to Paved Apron Existing Utilities Strong Commercial Potential FUTURE T-HANGAR DISPOSITION SITE DISADVANTAGES T-Hangar Removal Timeframe Vehicle Access and Parking Proximity to GA Hangars Proximity to Airline Operations Aircraft Parking (Large GA) Aircraft Parking (Overflow) GA FBO Building GA Tenant Service Providers GA Aircraft Deicing Pad Aircraft Fuel Storage Airport Operations Facilities Potential Air Cargo Site Flexible Development Area Note: Resist Redevelopment for replacement T-Hangars

37 EAST-SIDE GA SMALL AIRCRAFT HANGARS LAYOUT OPTIONS

38 GENERAL AVIATION HANGAR TYPES COMMON / CORPORATE (C) Size: 10,000 to 30,000 SF Stored Aircraft: 2 to 4 Aircraft (Corporate-Class Turbine) Use: Aircraft Storage, Workshop, Office Space, Potential Public Use EXECUTIVE (E) Size: 6,000 to 15,000 SF Stored Aircraft: 1 to 3 Aircraft (Piston-Turbine Business-Class/Helicopter) Use: Aircraft Storage, Small Office Space BOX (B) T-HANGAR / SHADE Size: 3,000 to 6,000 SF Stored Aircraft: 1 to 2 Aircraft (Piston-Class) Use: Aircraft Storage, Small Workshop Size: 8,000 to 12,000 SF (Closed Stacked or Nested / Open Shade) Stored Aircraft: 6 to 10 Aircraft (Single/Twin Piston) Use: Aircraft Storage, Workbench Note: This information is intended to reflect a range of common industry hangar sizes and uses.

39 GENERAL AVIATION HANGAR TYPES Future hangars sites are required for 1) new based aircraft owners, 2) tenant expansion, and 3) replacement for obsolete or removed hangars. Nearly all future based aircraft will be stored in hangars. The following identifies general hangar siting considerations: Ideally, hangars should be developed in a linear, modular manner. Hangar locations should be centralized or grouped by type and function, and aircraft sizes-categories (piston, turboprops, jets, rotor), to promote efficient airfield and landside access, and constructed along existing flightlines as possible, to minimize costs associated with expanded paved areas, drainage, utilities, auto parking and secured access. Hangar orientation should consider weather conditions, and provide adequate drainage with minimal slope differential, especially in front of hangar doors. Hangars must be constructed beyond the runway and taxiway safety areas, navigational critical areas, remain beyond visibility line-of-sights, and be regulated by height so as to not encroach imaginary airspace surfaces. Hangar buildings should be separated to meet, at minimum, FAA taxilane width and safety area distances in providing sufficient access, maneuvering and ramp space.

40 EAST GA HANGAR OPTION EXISTING (HANGAR IN-FILL AND RETAIN TAXIWAY F ) LARGE EXECUTIVE T-HANGAR / SHADE EEXEC EXEC TAXIWAY F FORMER RUNWAY AIRCRAFT PARKING AREA

41 EAST GA HANGAR OPTION HGR A (ACQUIRE AIRPORT PROPERTY) ROAD ACCESS- OPTION A (FUTURE) EXISTING HANGARS EXE B EXE B EXE B EXE B EXE B EXE B T-HANGAR / SHADE T-HANGAR / SHADE FUTURE TAXIWAY FORMER RUNWAY AIRCRAFT PARKING AREA Note: Site considered for future removal of the four T-Hangars from the main general aviation apron.

42 EAST GA HANGAR OPTION HGR B (BEYOND FORMER CROSSWIND) EXISTING HANGARS ROAD ACCESS ROAD (FUTURE) TAXIWAY F TAXIWAY (FUTURE) FORMER RUNWAY FUTURE TAXIWAY B EXE B B EXE B T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE Note: Site considered for future removal of the four T-Hangars from the main general aviation apron.

43 EAST GA HANGAR OPTION HGR C (SOUTH OF FORMER CROSSWIND) FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 FUTURE TAXIWAY B EXE B EXE B T-HANGAR (R) ROAD OPTION (FUTURE) ASOS STATION T-HANGAR (R) T-HANGAR (R) ROAD OPTION (FUTURE) Note: Site considered for future removal of the four T-Hangars from the main general aviation apron.

44 EAST GA HANGAR OPTION HGR D (HANGAR IN-FILL, SHADE HANGARS, RETAIN TAXIWAY F ) B B B B B B B B UNSPECIFIED TAXIWAY F (REMAIN OPEN) T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE FORMER RUNWAY - AIRCRAFT PARKING / CONVERT TO FUTURE TAXIWAY

45 EAST GA HANGAR OPTION HGR D (EXISTING IN-FILL, MAXIMIZE SPACE, CLOSE TAXIWAY F ) B B B B B B T-HANGAR T-HANGAR UNSPECIFIED B B B B B B T-HANGAR B B B B B B EXE EXE TAXIWAY F (CLOSE) TAXILANE TAXILANE TAXILANE TAXILANE TAXILANE FORMER RUNWAY - AIRCRAFT PARKING / CONVERT TO FUTURE TAXIWAY

46 EAST GA HANGAR OPTION WEST SIDE (CONDITION OF USFS WINTHROP) RESERVE FOR FUTURE LARGE CORPORATE GENERAL AVIATION LOTS TAXIWAY B TAXIWAY B EXTENDED CORPORATE CORPORATE AUTO PARKING AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

47 EAST-SIDE GA APRON PARKING LAYOUT OPTIONS

48 GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT PARKING TYPES Type: Business Jet Parking Area: ±6,000 SF (60 x 100 ) Aircraft Weight: 16,000 to 90,000 Pounds Pilot/Passengers: 5 to 12 Type: Single/Twin-Piston Parking Area: ±2,500 SF (40 x 60 ) Aircraft Weight: 3,000 to 8,000 Pounds Pilot/Passengers: 2 to 5 Type: Single/Twin Turboprop Parking Area: ±4,500 SF (50 x 90 ) Weight: 12,000 to 22,000 Pounds Pilot/Passengers: 3 to 8 Type: Helicopter: Parking Area: ±3,600 SF (60 x 60 ) Aircraft Weight: 2,000 to 15,000 Pounds Pilot/Passengers: 2 to 6 Note: This information is intended to reflect a range of common industry aircraft sizes.

49 GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT PARKING GA APRON 1 (TWY A RELOCATION ) GA HANGARS POTENTIAL AIRCRAFT PARKING (OVERFLOW) SRE FBO ARFF UPS CARGO CARGO FEDEX CARGO LONG-TERM TIE-DOWN (MIX) GA ROTOR FBO (PISTON) F FUEL FBO (TURBINE) FBO (JET) USFS OVERFLOW

50 CROSSWIND/TURF RUNWAY ALTERNATIVES

51 OPTIONS FOR FORMER CROSSWIND AS FUTURE PAVED RUNWAY

52 MATRIX TABLE PAVED CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTIONS Facility Component Factor FAA Runway Length (FAA Standards) FAA Runway Design Category FAA Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Facility Factors 3,400' x 60' A/B-I - Small Aircraft Only (Single and Twin-Piston Aircraft) 250' x 1,000 x 450' (Visual Runway) Assessment Option P-A Option P-B Option P-C Option P-D Option P-E Option P-F Length Benefit (% of 3,400' FAA Length) 3,400' 3,400' 2,500' (73%) 2,500' (73%) ±1,800' (52%) ±900' (26%) Length Benefit - Annual Fights (% Total) 2,150 2,150 1,600 (75%) 1,600 (75%) 1,100 (50%) 800 (35%) Occupied Airport Aeronautical Property (Acres) 65 Acres± 65 Acres± 55 Acres± 55 Acres± 48 Acres± 40 Acres± Airfield Configuration, Access and Geometry Rwy Taxiway Access/Geometry (Turnaround Needed)* Yes No Rwy No Rwy New Entry Runway and Taxiway 'A' Crossing Yes Yes Yes Yes West End No Airspace Imaginary Surfaces Accommodates RPZ On Airport Property Partial Leased Area Partial Compatibility - Airport Operations / Aircraft Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking West End Partial West End Compatibility - On-Airport Land Use / Visibility Zone Compatibility - Off-Airport (Noise, Overflight) RPZ RPZ Environmental Considerations RPZ RPZ Constructability / Costs Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Economic Value & Financial Return Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Benefit/Use

53 OPTIONS FOR TURF CROSSWIND SITE LOCATIONS AND LAYOUTS

54 MATRIX EXHIBIT NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTIONS Sailplane Hangar and Apron Location Taxiway Considerations Former Glider Landing Strip Does not Comply with FAA Separation and Setback Standards: - Twy Separation (150 ) - Rwy Separation (700 ) - Primary Surface (250 ) - Hold Position (125 ) - Aircraft Parking (125 ) - Runway Safety Area - Runway Object Free Area NON-PAVED TURF RUNWAY REQUIRED TO MEETFAA DESIGN STANDARDS Off Airport Property and Residence Location(s)

55 MATRIX TABLE NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND OPTIONS (LIGHT SPORT AIRCRAFT) Facility Component Factor Runway Length (Former Turf Length) Aircraft Category FAA Runway Design Category FAA Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Facility Factors ±1,000' x 60' (Non-Paved Turf) Light Sport Aircraft (Maximum Gross Takeoff Not Greater Than 1,320 Pounds) / Sailplane Landings A/B-I - Small Aircraft Only (Light and Sport Aircraft) 250' x 1,000 x 450' (Visual Runway) Assessment Option T-A Option T-B Option T-C Option T-D Option T-E Option T-F Turf Strip On Existing Airport Property Yes Yes Partial Partial Partial No Turf RPZ On Existing Airport Property Yes Partial Partial No South End No Airfield Configuration, Access and Geometry Former Runway Aligned with Prevailing Winds Taxiway Access Entry and Geometry Reconfigure Turf Access Turf Access Turf or Paved Turf or Paved Hangar Access? Airspace Geometry-Design Former Runway Parallel Primary Compatibility - Closed Runway 7-25 as 'Paved Runway' Not Co-Existent Requires 700' Conflicts Conflicts 700' Separation 700' Separation Compatibility - Closed Runway 7-25 as 'Aircraft Parking' Not Co-Existent Requires 250'+ Requires 250'+ Conflicts Compatibility - On-Airport Land Use / Visibility Zone ASOS? Relocate ASOS ASOS/Hangars Visibility Visibility Remote Compatibility - Airport Operations Former Runway Compatibility - Off-Airport (Noise, Overflight) Former Runway Home Overflight Overflight(s) Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase Environmental Considerations Former Runway Partial RPZ Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase Constructability / Costs Turf or Paved? Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost Economic Value & Financial Return Functional Use Best Use? Land Revenues

56 NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTION T-B REQUIRES FAA COORDINATION RPZ BEYOND EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY NOTE: REQUIRES FAA AIRSPACE FOR FINAL LAYOUT AND LENGTH DETERMINATION