FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL
|
|
- Beverly Stevenson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 International Civil Aviation Organization FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/14 27/04/2015 WORKING PAPER FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL WORKING GROUP SECOND MEETING (FLTOPSP/WG/2) Rome Italy, 4 to 8 May 2015 Agenda Item 4 : Active work programme items 4.4: Rescue and Fire Fighting Systems guidance material (Rescue and Fire Fighting Systems guidance material) (Presented by L. Teodoro) SUMMARY Annex 6 part I requires each operator to assess the level of rescue and fire fighting service (RFFS) protection available at any aerodrome intended to be specified in the operational flight plan in order to ensure that an acceptable level of protection is available for the aeroplane intended to be used. Associated Attachment J provides aeroplane operators guidance for assessing the level of RFFS that may be deemed acceptable. The proposition contained in this working paper (WP) consists in amending current Attachment J so as to complete it. In particular, it addresses cases not mentioned till now in Attachment J; it also provides more flexibility for the determination of an acceptable aerodrome RFFS protection level, on the condition that a risk assessment is performed and allows. The amended Attachment J is attached as an appendix to this WP. Action by the FLTOPSP/WG/2 is in paragraph 3. COORDINATION The new Attachment J has been forwarded to the Aerodrome Panel (ADOP) with the aim of ensuring that its content was compatible with Annex 14. ADOP's feedback confirmed the absence of any interference. (11 pages) FLTOPSP WG02 WP-14 AI-4.4 RFFS guidance.docx
2 FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/ INTRODUCTION 1.1 Reminder of the changes introduced during FLTOPSP/WG/1 and previous OPS Panels Attachment J of Annex 6 part I addresses the RFFS protection levels that are deemed acceptable at the aerodromes selected by the aeroplane operator. Amendments to this guidance, as they resulted from FLTOPSP/WG/1 and previous OPS Panels, aimed at: - addressing the operational need for more flexibility (e.g. lower RFFS protection values that those implemented through table J-1) - in particular when levels of aerodrome RFFS protection defined in attachment J cannot be complied with - provided a risk assessment is performed and positive (SMS); - closing loopholes (e.g. no reference to what the acceptable aerodrome RFFS protection level is when temporary downgrades exceed 72 hours at en-route alternate aerodromes); - clarifying guidance if need be. These objectives are maintained: amendments to Attachment J included in this working paper encompass those presented during previous meetings of the FLTOPSP and OPSP. 1.2 In addition, a new change to Attachment J concerning acceptable RFFS protection levels is proposed according to which recommended RFFS protection levels at en-route alternate aerodromes (non EDTO ) and at EDTO en-route alternate aerodromes would become identical. 2. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION 2.1 First, a formal change to table J-1 is proposed: this table is split into two tables, J-1-1 and J-1-2 in the amended Attachment J, to make a clear distinction between the acceptable RFFS protection levels at departure/destination aerodromes, which are aerodromes the operator will (most probably) use, and acceptable RFFS protection levels at alternate aerodromes for which the probability of use may be extremely low. 2.2 Operational need for more flexibility is the main driver for amending Attachment J. Whereas at many destination and alternate aerodromes, the RFFS protection levels will be compliant with those deemed acceptable in tables J-1-1 and J-1-2, at some, it will not be the case. Actually, an aeroplane operator will have to consider many factors to determine if e.g. an alternate aerodrome is adequate or not. The level of RFFS protection at said aerodrome is only one of them. Weather conditions, runway characteristics and conditions, length of diversion with the correlated need for additional fuel, increase in fatigue due to the extension of the flight duty etc. are other important, and sometimes prevailing, factors. Combination of all these factors will lead an operator to sometimes conclude that, between two candidate alternate aerodromes, the safest is the one with the lowest RFFS protection level, this protection level being possibly lower than foreseen in the tables J-1-1 and J-1-2. In that perspective, SMS is the adequate tool to find the right balance between all factors potentially affecting the safety of operations, with no specific emphasis to be put on the RFFS protection level when selecting an aerodrome.
3 - 3 - FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/14 Hence operational flexibility, consisting in giving the possibility to an operator to determine an aerodrome RFFS protection level different from the ones defined in the tables J-1-1 and J-1-2, should be more explicitly addressed in Attachment J and SMS be referred to as the enabler for this flexibility. Thus, developments concerning the use of the SMS and the introduction of flexibility are included in the new paragraph Variations to the tables J-1 and J-2 of the amended Attachment J. 2.3 Temporary downgrades of the RFFS protection level Only those downgrades of the aerodrome RFFS protection level not exceeding 72 hours are currently mentioned in Attachment J. Deleting the 72 hours period in the definition of a temporary downgrade in paragraph 2 Glossary of terms allows addressing all temporary downgrades, whether they last less or more than 72 hours. 1) Downgrades of 72 hours or less are considered nominal, hence mentioned in the tables J-1-1 and J- 1-2, as was the case for the current table J-1. Yet, splitting the table J-1 into two tables has highlighted a gap: no acceptable RFFS protection level has been defined for alternate aerodromes in case of temporary downgrades not exceeding 72 hours. To fill this gap, the amended Attachment J allows that the RFFS protection level at alternate aerodromes be three categories below the aeroplane RFFS category during such temporary downgrades (see table J-1-2). The rationale for the 3 categories below has been exposed in WP27 presented during FTLOPS/WG/1. To sum it up, the risk severity may be higher if risk probability is lower (classical risk severity/risk probability matrix), that is to say the RFFS protection level at an alternate aerodrome level may be lower if exposure to risk (probability that the alternate be used) is lower. 2) Downgrades exceeding 72 hours, which are not currently referred to in Attachment J, are addressed in the new paragraph Variations to the tables J-1-1 and J-1-2 : they are dealt with specifically under the SMS framework (see paragraph 2.2 above) 2.4 In addition to the amendments abovementioned which were already exposed in the previous Panel meetings, a new provision would be implemented consisting in having recommended RFFS protection levels defined for en-route alternate aerodromes ( non EDTO ) identical to those defined for EDTO en-route aerodromes. Till now, RFFS protection levels at EDTO en-route alternate aerodromes and at non-edto en-route alternate aerodromes have been addressed in two separate cells of the current table J-1. The probability that the en-route alternate aerodrome be used should be equivalent for any en-route alternate aerodrome, be it EDTO or non non EDTO. This supports the alignment of recommended RFFS protection levels in the future table J-1-2 for all en-route alternate aerodromes. The proposition would be the following: 1) If at least 30 minute notice is given to the aerodrome operator prior to the arrival of the aeroplane, the minimum acceptable Aerodrome RFFS protection level is not lower than Aerodrome RFFS Category 4 for aeroplanes with maximum certificated take-off mass of over kg or not lower than Aerodrome RFFS Category 1 for all other aeroplanes. 2) If less than 30 minute notice is given to the aerodrome operator prior to the arrival of the aeroplane, the minimum acceptable aerodrome RFFS protection level is:
4 FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/ Two categories below the Aeroplane RFFS category, or Three categories below the Aeroplane RFFS category in the case of a temporary downgrade of less than 72h. Consequently, this means that the only change would concern non EDTO en-route alternate aerodromes when at least a 30 minutes notice is given to the aerodrome operator prior to the arrival of the aeroplane. In that case the provision: Aerodrome RFFS Category 4 for aeroplanes with maximum certificated take-off mass of over kg or not lower than Aerodrome RFFS Category 1 for all other aeroplanes would replace: Two categories below the aeroplane RFFS category, but not lower than Category 4 for aeroplanes with maximum certificated take-off mass of over kg and not lower than Category 1 for other aeroplanes 2.5 Coordination with the ADOP Coordination so as to ensure that no interference existed between the amendment of Attachment J and Annex 14 was initially foressen with the Aerodrome Operations and Services Working Group. After consultation with the ADOP Chairman, members of the ADOP were eventually and directly questioned. Consultation was held by the ADOP chairman. ADOP's feedback confirmed the compatibility of the proposition with provisions of Annex ACTION BY THE FLTOPSP/WG/2 3.1 The FLTOPSP/WG/2 is invited to: a) Take note of the information of this working paper b) Check the relevance of the amendment to Attachment J providing more flexibility to aeroplane operators and recommending that acceptable RFFS protection be identical for all en-route alternate aerodromes, whether EDTO or non EDTO. c) If proposition agreed, forward to the ANC amendment to Attachment J as attached to this working paper. END
5 FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/14 to WP concerning Rescue and Fire Fighting Systems guidance material CHAPTER 4. FLIGHT OPERATIONS 4.1 Operating facilities Subject to their published conditions of use, aerodromes and their facilities shall be kept continuously available for flight operations during their published hours of operations, irrespective of weather conditions An operator shall, as part of its safety management system, assess the level of rescue and fire fighting service (RFFS) protection available at any aerodrome intended to be specified in the operational flight plan in order to ensure that an acceptable level of protection is available for the aeroplane intended to be used. Note. Annex 19 includes safety management provisions for air operators. Further guidance is contained in the Safety Management Manual (SMM) (Doc 9859) Information related to the level of RFFS protection that is deemed acceptable by the operator shall be contained in the operations manual. Note 1. Attachment J contains guidance on assessing an acceptable level of RFFS protection at aerodromes. Note 2. It is not intended that this guidance limit or regulate the operation of an aerodrome. The assessment performed by the operator does not in any way affect the RFFS requirements of Annex 14, Volume I, for aerodromes. (11 pages) FLTOPSP WG02 WP-14 AI-4.4 RFFS guidance.docx
6 FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/ ATTACHMENT J. RESCUE AND FIRE FIGHTING SERVICES (RFFS) LEVELS Supplementary to Chapter 4, Purpose and scope 1.1 Introduction The purpose of this Attachment is to provide guidance for assessing the level of RFFS deemed acceptable by aeroplane operators using aerodromes for different purposes. 1.2 Basic concepts While, for every single flight, an all aeroplane operators should aim to have the aerodrome RFFS category, as level of RFFS protection required by Annex 14, Volume I, Chapter 9, 9.2, matching or exceeding the aeroplane RFFS category, some of the aerodromes currently used do not meet these requirements. Furthermore, Annex 14, Volume I provisions relate to the level of aerodrome RFFS to be provided for aeroplanes normally using an aerodrome; hence, this level of RFFS protection does not take into account aeroplanes for which the aerodrome is selected as an alternate aerodrome If an aerodrome is exposed to a temporary reduction of its RFFS capability, Annex 14, Volume I, requires that: Changes in the level of protection normally available at an aerodrome for rescue and fire-fighting shall be notified to the appropriate air traffic services units and aeronautical information services units to enable those units to provide the necessary information to arriving and departing aircraft. When such a change has been corrected, the above units shall be advised accordingly In order to determine the acceptability of an aerodrome RFFS protection level, the operator should consider: - For a departure or destination aerodrome, the difference between aerodrome RFFS category and aeroplane RFFS category on the one hand, frequency of flights to that aerodrome on the other hand. - For an alternate aerodrome, the difference between aerodrome RFFS category and aeroplane RFFS category on the one hand, probability that this alternate aerodrome be used on the other hand The following guidance is intended to assist operators in making the assessment required by Chapter 4, with due consideration of the basic principles exposed in to It is not intended that this guidance limit or regulate the operation of an aerodrome. Assessment of the adequate RFFS protection level available at aerodromes an aeroplane operator selects highly depends upon their expected use: whereas the departure and destination aerodromes will most probably be used, the probability to use the destination alternate aerodrome(s) is extremely variable and may be extremely low. The proposed paragraph is included to reflect this significant difference. The same rationale is also the ground for implementing two different tables (tables J-1-1 and J-1-2) in paragraph 3 instead of one table mixing very different cases. These two tables would address departure/destination aerodromes on the one hand (table J-1-1) and any kind of alternate in another table (table J-1-2)
7 - 3 - FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/14 2. Glossary of terms Aerodrome RFFS category. The RFFS category for a given aerodrome, as published in the appropriate Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP). Aeroplane RFFS category. The category derived from Annex 14, Volume I, Table 9-1 for a given aeroplane type. RFFS category. Rescue and firefighting services category as defined in Annex 14, Volume I, Chapter 9. Temporary downgrade. RFFS category as notified, including by NOTAM, and resulting from the downgrade of the level of RFFS protection available at an aerodrome, for a period of time not exceeding 72 hours. RFFS category definition is not needed and is deleted. Deleting the 72 hours period in the definition of a temporary downgrade allows addressing all temporary downgrades in attachment J, whether they last less or more than 72 hours. - Downgrades of 72 hours or less are considered nominal, hence mentioned in tables J-1-1 and J Downgrades exceeding 72 hours are addressed in the new paragraph 3.1.3: they are dealt with specifically 3. Minimum acceptable aerodrome RFFS category 3.1 Planning In principle, the published RFFS category for each of the aerodromes used for a given flight should be equal to or better than the aeroplane RFFS category. However, if the aeroplane RFFS category is not available at one or more of the aerodromes required to be specified in the operational flight plan, an operator should ensure that the aerodrome has the minimum level of RFFS which is deemed acceptable for the intended use in accordance with the SMS policy and its implied instructions contained in the operations manual. When establishing acceptable levels of minimum RFFS for these situations, the operator may use the criteria in Table J-1-1 and Table J Intended operations to aerodromes with RFFS categories below the levels specified in Annex 14, Volume I, Chapter 9, 9.2, should be coordinated between the aeroplane operator and the aerodrome operator Acceptable aerodrome RFFS protection level at a departure or at a destination aerodrome The pre-flight planning stage, the aerodrome RFFS protection level acceptable at a departure or at a destination aerodrome may be as follows.
8 FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/ Table J-1-1 Minimum acceptable aerodrome category for rescue and firefighting (departure and destination aerodromes) Aerodromes Minimum acceptable Aerodrome RFFS category (Required to be specified in the (Based on published Aerodrome RFFS category) operational flight plan) (1) Departure and destination aerodromes Departure and destination aerodrome in case of temporary downgrade and Take-off alternate, destination alternate and en-route alternate aerodromes EDTO en-route alternate aerodrome RFFS category for each aerodrome should be equal to or better than the aeroplane RFFS category. One category (2) below the Aeroplane RFFS category may be accepted where provided as a remission in accordance with Annex 14, Volume I, 9.2 or Two categories below the Aeroplane RFFS Category, in the case of a temporary downgrade of 72 hours or less. but not lower than Aerodrome RFFS Category 4 for aeroplanes with maximum certificated take-off mass of over kg and not lower than Category 1 for other aeroplanes. Two categories below the aeroplane RFFS category, but not lower than Category 4 for aeroplanes with maximum certificated take-off mass of over kg and not lower than Category 1 for other aeroplanes. RFFS Category 4 for aeroplanes with maximum certificated take-off mass of over kg or not lower than Category 1 for all other aeroplanes, under the condition that at least 30 minutes notice will be given to the aerodrome operator prior to the arrival of the aeroplane.. (1) If an individual aerodrome serves more than one purpose, the highest required category corresponding to that purpose at the time of expected use applies. (2) Annex 14, Volume I, determines the aerodrome category for rescue and firefighting according to and except that, where the number of movements of the aeroplanes in the highest category normally using the aerodrome is less than 700 in the busiest consecutive three months, the category provided may be one lower than the determined category. Table J-1-1 only addresses departure and destination aerodromes. Alternate aerodromes are considered in a different table, Table J-1-2. The fact that the Aerodrome RFFS category should be equal to or better than the aeroplane RFFS category is already mentioned in paragraph The corresponding sentence is deleted (second line, second column). Concerning the remission factor : when performing the evaluation required by Annex , an operator can and shall only refer to the published information available to him. The use of a remission factor is an element the aeroplane operator is not necessarily aware of. As it may be confusing, deletion of this reference to the remission factor is proposed. Temporary downgrades addressed in this table are those downgrades of 72 hours or less as was the case before the current amendment was proposed Acceptable aerodrome RFFS protection level at alternate aerodromes
9 - 5 - FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/14 So as to comply with the operational regulations applicable to a given flight, the operator selects alternate aerodrome(s) for various purposes of use. When selecting an alternate aerodrome, many considerations may prevail over the aerodrome RFFS category, among which for instance weather conditions, runway(s) characteristics, length of diversion etc. In addition, the probability to effectively use each of the alternate aerodrome(s) is mainly linked to the exact purpose of use (e.g. destination alternate first rank, second destination alternate) and depends on other various parameters. At the pre-flight planning stage, the aerodrome RFFS protection level acceptable at an aerodrome selected as an alternate may be as follows. Table J-1-2 Minimum acceptable aerodrome category for rescue and firefighting (alternate aerodromes) Aerodromes (Required to be specified in the operational flight plan) (1) Take-off alternate and Destination alternate aerodromes Minimum acceptable Aerodrome RFFS protection level (Based on published aerodrome RFFS category) Two categories below the Aeroplane RFFS category, or Three categories below the Aeroplane RFFS category in the case of a temporary downgrade of 72 hours or less. but not lower than Aerodrome RFFS Category 4 for aeroplanes with maximum certificated take-off mass of over kg and not lower than Category 1 for other aeroplanes. En-route alternate aerodromes If at least 30 minute notice is given to the aerodrome operator prior to the arrival of the aeroplane, the minimum acceptable Aerodrome RFFS protection level is not lower than Aerodrome RFFS Category 4 for aeroplanes with maximum certificated take-off mass of over kg or not lower than Aerodrome RFFS Category 1 for all other aeroplanes. If less than 30 minute notice is given to the aerodrome operator prior to the arrival of the aeroplane, the minimum acceptable aerodrome RFFS protection level is: o or o Two categories below the Aeroplane RFFS category, Three categories below the Aeroplane RFFS category in the case of a temporary downgrade of 72 hours or less. (1) If an individual aerodrome serves more than one purpose, the highest required category corresponding to that purpose at the time of expected use applies. Take-off alternate, destination alternate and en-route alternate aerodromes RFFS protection levels are considered in a separate table, Table J-1-2.
10 FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/ Protection levels are unchanged compared to the initial table except that temporary downgrades concerning alternate aerodromes are now included, allowing the Aerodrome RFFS protection level to be temporarily three categories below the Aeroplane RFFS category, based on the limited exposure to risk. EDTO and non-edto en-route alternate aerodromes are merged into one single category, with protection levels identical to those previously required in the initial table for EDTO en-route alternate aerodromes For all-cargo operations, further reductions might be acceptable provided that the RFFS capability is adequate to arrest fire around the flight deck area long enough for the persons on board to safely evacuate the aeroplane Variations to the tables J-1-1 and J-1-2 The operator should continuously seek the most appropriate aerodrome RFFS protection level available for the aeroplane operated, for each of the variation(s), when used. Whereas a great proportion of the flights to be performed by an operator should meet the criteria in the tables J-1-1 and J-1-2, the operator may encounter difficulties to comply with these protection levels at some airports. Notwithstanding the provisions in , an aerodrome RFFS category below the protection levels defined in tables J-1-1 and J-1-2 may be acceptable. Such variation should be based on a case by case specific risk assessment conducted by the operator as part of its Safety Management System Variations to the aerodrome RFFS category may concern, among other cases: - An occasional flight; or - Regular flights for which a same aerodrome is selected for a same purpose of use, for a given aeroplane type; or - Temporary downgrades exceeding 72 hours. Where applicable, a variation may be used for a group of aerodromes selected for a same purpose, for a given aeroplane type. A variation may be time limited. A variation may also be modified to reflect the changes of the RFFS protection level available at the concerned aerodrome(s). In accordance with Annex 6, Part I, chapter 4, the authorised variations and their validity period should be included in the operations manual Variation for a destination (departure) aerodrome The aeroplane operator s specific safety risk assessment for an aerodrome intended to be used as a destination (or departure) aerodrome may be based on the following elements: - The frequency for the flights intended by the aeroplane operator, in relation with a lowered RFFS protection level (use of a remission factor) as permitted by Annex A coordination between the aeroplane operator and the aerodrome operator. This coordination may not be practicable or necessary when the flights are extremely occasional. For regular flights the coordination should take into account the principles of Annex and which are applicable to the aerodrome operator as well as the possibilities to modulate the RFFS protection level available on a daily cycle or seasonal cycle Variation for an alternate aerodrome
11 - 7 - FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/14 The aeroplane operator s specific safety risk assessment for an aerodrome selected as a take-off alternate aerodrome, a destination alternate aerodrome or an en route alternate aerodrome may be based on the following elements: - The probability of effective use of the concerned aerodrome, in relation with - The frequency of selecting the aerodrome for the corresponding purpose of use. Whereas a great part of the flights an operator intends to fly can meet the criteria for selecting aerodromes using the two tables, a certain number of flights (or proportion of flights of a given network) might need variations to the tables. The proposed amendment is intended to address these cases. The amendment introduces the possibility for variations, where the recommended RFFS protection levels cannot be complied with. The use of a risk assessment as part of the operator s SMS is the adequate tool to analyse each individual situation and propose variations for further reduction of the protection level. The variations used by the aircraft operator s may be revised, considering the evolution of the aerodrome concerned and the feedback of the aircraft operator s SMS. 3.2 In flight The information about the aerodrome RFFS level acceptable at the pre-flight planning stage (including tables J-1-1, J-1-2 and where usable the variations under the specifications in 3.1.3), published in the operations manual according Annex , are applicable at the in-flight re-planning point. According to an ICAO basic principle, decision making process for in flight re-planning should be the same as for the planning phase In-flight, the pilot-in-command may decide to land at an aerodrome regardless of the RFFS category if, in the pilot s judgement after due consideration of all prevailing circumstances, to do so would be safer than to divert END ----
Civil Aviation Authority. Information Notice. Number: IN 2016/052
Civil Aviation Authority Information Notice Number: IN 2016/052 Issued: 9 June 2016 EASA ED Decision 2016/09/R Rescue and Firefighting Services Remission Factor, Cargo Flights, etc. This Information Notice
More informationThe text of the amendment is arranged to show deleted, new or amended text, as shown below:
Annex to Decision 2016/009/R Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Authority, Organisation and Operations Requirements for Aerodromes Amendment 1 The Annex to Decision 2014/012/R
More informationINTERNATIONAL FIRE TRAINING CENTRE
INTERNATIONAL FIRE TRAINING CENTRE RFFS SUPERVISOR INITIAL LICENSING OF AERODROMES CHAPTER 8 THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO BE MET IN THE PROVISION OF RESCUE AND FIRE FIGHTING SERVICES AT UK LICENSED AERODROMES
More informationEDTO SARPS FROM ANNEX 6 PART 1
EDTO SARPS FROM ANNE 6 PART 1 4.7.1 Requirements for operations beyond 60 minutes to an en route alternate aerodrome STATE (SRVSOP) IMPLEMENTATION YES Regulation ref. no. NO LAR 121.2581 4.7.1.1 Operators
More informationTANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 8 1. PURPOSE 1.1. This Advisory Circular provides guidance to personnel involved in construction of instrument and visual flight procedures for publication in the Aeronautical Information Publication.
More informationAIR NAVIGATION COMMISSION
13/2/04 AIR NAVIGATION COMMISSION ANC Task No. CNS-7901: Conflict resolution and collision avoidance systems PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ANNEX 6, PART II TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS CONCERNING
More informationWORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY. Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World
WORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World Aerodrome Manual The aim and objectives of the aerodrome manual and how it is to be used by operating
More informationFLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP)
International Civil Aviation Organization FLTOPSP/1-WP/3 7/10/14 WORKING PAPER FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP) FIRST MEETING Montréal, 27 to 31 October 2014 Agenda Item 4: Active work programme items
More informationCIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS PART 10 COMMERCIAL AIR TRANSPORT BY FOREIGN AIR OPERATORS WITHIN FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA
CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS PART 10 COMMERCIAL AIR TRANSPORT BY FOREIGN AIR OPERATORS WITHIN FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA 2001 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 10-ii
More informationAMENDMENT No. 8 TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AERODROMES ANNEX 14 TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION
AMENDMENT No. 8 TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AERODROMES ANNEX 14 TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION VOLUME I AERODROME DESIGN AND OPERATIONS The amendment to Annex 14, Volume I contained
More informationExplanatory Note to Decision 2016/009/R
Rescue and firefighting services remission factor, cargo flights, etc. RELATED NPA/CRD 2015-09 RMT.0589 23.5.2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Decision addresses safety and proportionality issues related to
More informationCertification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance for Aircraft Noise CS-36
European Aviation Safety Agency Certification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance for Aircraft Noise Amendment 3 29 January 2013 CONTENTS (general layout) AIRCRAFT NOISE PREAMBLE BOOK 1 NOISE
More informationOPS General Rules for Operations Manuals
CAR OPS 1 Subpart P (Manuals Logs and Records) Date of audit: 20 th December 2016 Audit conducted by: Stephanie Vella Gera. Audit Ref: QM_13 Compliant Reference/Question es No Comment/Remark OPS 1.1040
More informationAerodrome Safety. H.V. SUDARSHAN International Civil Aviation Organization
NPF/SIP/2010-WP/19 Aerodrome Safety H.V. SUDARSHAN International Civil Aviation Organization Workshop on the development of National Performance Framework for Air Navigation Systems (Nairobi, 6-10 December
More informationTechnical Guidance Material for Aerodromes Rescue & Fire Fighting Services Advisory Circular
Technical Guidance Material for Aerodromes Rescue & Fire Fighting Services Advisory Circular Subject: TECHNICAL GUIDANCE MATERIAL FOR RESCUE & FIRE FIGHTING SERVICES Date: 27 JULY 2011 APPLICABILITY: 1.
More informationCHAPTER 5 AEROPLANE PERFORMANCE OPERATING LIMITATIONS
CHAP 5-1 CHAPTER 5 PERFORMANCE OPERATING LIMITATIONS 5.1 GENERAL 5.1.1 Aeroplanes shall be operated in accordance with a comprehensive and detailed code of performance established by the Civil Aviation
More informationGUERNSEY ADVISORY CIRCULARS. (GACs) EXTENDED DIVERSION TIME OPERATIONS GAC 121/135-3
GUERNSEY ADVISORY CIRCULARS (GACs) GAC 121/135-3 EXTENDED DIVERSION TIME OPERATIONS Published by the Director of Civil Aviation, Guernsey First Issue August 2018 Guernsey Advisory Circulars (GACs) are
More informationSample Regulations for Water Aerodromes
Sample Regulations for Water Aerodromes First Edition (unedited version) March 2015 Notice to users: This document is an unedited version which is made available to the public for convenience. Its content
More informationAerodrome Certification Applicable provisions
Aerodrome Certification Applicable provisions ICAO CAR/SAM Seminar on Aerodrome Certification October 2017 Avner Shilo Technical Officer, Airport Operations and Infrastructure, ICAO Agenda The Chicago
More informationInternational Civil Aviation Organization. ICAO Updates. 13 th COSCAP-NA Steering Committee Meeting
International Civil Aviation Organization ICAO Updates 13 th COSCAP-NA Steering Committee Meeting ICAO Updates Airworthiness Manual DOC 9760 Annex 1 Pilot Upper Age Annex 2 Remotely Piloted Aircraft Annex
More informationNPF/SIP/2011 NPF/SIP/2011--WP/20 WP/20
NPF/SIP/2011-WP/20 Aerodrome Safety Saulo Da Silva International Civil Aviation Organization Workshop on the development of National Performance Framework for Air Navigation Systems (Nadi, Fiji, 28 March-1
More informationAFI Plan Aerodromes Certification Project Workshop for ESAF Region (Nairobi, Kenya, August 2016)
AFI Plan Aerodromes Certification Project Workshop for ESAF Region (Nairobi, Kenya, 23-26 August 2016) Aerodromes Certification- ICAO Requirements Arthemon Ndikumana RO/AGA, Nairobi 08/09/2016 AFI Plan
More informationATC PROCEDURES WORKING GROUP. Transition Level
SAFETY & AIRSPACE REGULATION GROUP ATC PROCEDURES WORKING GROUP Transition Introduction 1 In 2013, ICAO adopted a proposal by the European Air Navigation Planning Group to amend the method of determining
More information1. Purpose and scope. a) the necessity to limit flight duty periods with the aim of preventing both kinds of fatigue;
ATTACHMENT A. GUIDANCE MATERIAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF PRESCRIPTIVE FATIGUE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS Supplementary to Chapter 4, 4.2.10.2, Chapter 9, 9.6 and Chapter 12, 12.5 1. Purpose and scope 1.1 Flight
More informationAeronautical Studies (Safety Risk Assessment)
Advisory Circular Aeronautical Studies (Safety Risk Assessment) FIRST EDITION GEORGIAN CIVIL AVIATION AGENCY Chapter LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Pages Amend. No Date of Issue List of effective pages 2 0.00
More informationRUNWAY SAFETY AN ANNEX 14 PERSPECTIVE. Joseph K W CHEONG, P.E. Dubai, UAE - 2 to 4 June 2014
RUNWAY SAFETY AN ANNEX 14 PERSPECTIVE Joseph K W CHEONG, P.E. Dubai, UAE - 2 to 4 June 2014 ..THIS MORNING THE BIG and now the small picture. TOPICS CURRENT : ANNEX 14 VOL 1 PROVISIONS RELATED TO RUNWAY
More informationAERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG)
AMOFSG/8-IP/6 23/12/09 AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG) EIGHTH MEETING Melbourne, Australia, 15 to 18 February 2010 Agenda Item 5: Observing and forecasting at the
More informationICAO Annex 14 Standards and Aerodrome Certification
ICAO Annex 14 Standards and Aerodrome Certification Punya Raj Shakya Regional Officer Aerodromes and Ground Aids, ICAO Asia/Pacific Regional Office (Bangkok) ICAO Workshop for Pacific Island States, 12-15
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ANNEX III
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ANNEX III Common technical requirements and administrative procedures applicable to commercial transportation by aircraft EU-OPS: Commercial Air Transportation (Aeroplanes)
More informationSECURITY OVERSIGHT AGENCY May 2017 EXTENDED DIVERSION TIME OPERATIONS (EDTO)
ADVISORY CIRCULAR CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AND CAA-AC-OPS031A SECURITY OVERSIGHT AGENCY May 2017 1.0 PURPOSE EXTENDED DIVERSION TIME OPERATIONS (EDTO) 1.1 This advisory circular (AC) provides guidance to
More informationOVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)
OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs) Part 171 AERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES Published by Air Safety Support International Ltd Air Safety Support International Limited 2005 First
More informationGENERAL ADVISORY CIRCULAR
GENERAL CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF BOTSWANA ADVISORY CIRCULAR CAAB Document GAC-002 ACCEPTABLE FLIGHT SAFETY DOCUMENTS SYSTEM GAC-002 Revision: Original August 2012 PAGE 1 Intentionally left blank GAC-002
More informationSafety Management 1st edition
Annex 19 Safety Management 1st edition ISM Integrated Safety Management 10 June 2013 initial version Page 1 Why a new Annex? Page 2 Why a New Annex? The ICAO High-level Safety Conference (HLSC) held in
More informationProcedures for Approval of Master Minimum Equipment List
Circular No. 1-009 Procedures for Approval of Master Minimum Equipment List October 3, 2000 First issue (KOKU-KU-KI-1193) April 8, 2011 Amended (KOKU-KU-KOU-1399, KOKU-KU-KI-1209) June 30, 2011 Amended
More informationAERODROME SAFETY COORDINATION
AERODROME SAFETY COORDINATION Julio Garriga, RO/TA International Civil Aviation Organization North American, Central American and Caribbean Office ICAO NACC Regional Office Page 1 Coordination of the aerodrome
More informationTEXT OF AMENDMENT 36 TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT
3 TEXT OF AMENDMENT 36 TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT ANNEX 6 TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION PART I INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL AIR TRANSPORT
More informationOVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)
OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs) Part 173 FLIGHT CHECKING ORGANISATION APPROVAL Published by Air Safety Support International Ltd Air Safety Support International Limited 2005 ISBN 0-11790-410-4
More informationHONDURAS AGENCY of CIVIL AERONAUTICS (AHAC) RAC-OPS-1 SUBPART Q FLIGHT / DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS AND REST REQUIREMENTS. 01-Jun-2012
HONDURAS AGENCY of CIVIL AERONAUTICS (AHAC) RAC-OPS-1 SUBPART Q FLIGHT / DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS AND REST REQUIREMENTS 01-Jun-2012 Contents Contents... 2 RAC OPS.1.1080 General provisions... 3 RAC OPS.1.1085
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management
L 80/10 Official Journal of the European Union 26.3.2010 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN
More informationSecurity Provisions for Corporate Aviation
Aviation Security Panel (AVSECP) Fourteenth Meeting Montreal, September 3 to 6, 2002 Agenda Item 4: Security Provisions for Corporate Aviation (Presented by the International Business Aviation Council)
More informationAzerbaijan AAR-OPS-1 SUBPART Q. 21-Nov-2014
Azerbaijan AAR-OPS-1 SUBPART Q FLIGHT AND DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS AND REST REQUIREMENTS Contents Contents... 2 AAR-OPS 1.1075 GENERAL... 3 AAR-OPS 1.1080 Terminology... 4 AAR-OPS 1.1085 Limitations Flight
More informationStandards Document - Aerodromes
SD AD Civil Aviation Authority of Fiji Standards Document - Aerodromes 2 nd Edition 01 April 2013 Published by: Private Mail Bag, NAP 0354 Nadi International Airport Fiji www.caaf.org.fj Copyright 2013
More informationGUYANA CIVIL AVIATION REGULATION PART X- FOREIGN OPERATORS.
Civil Aviation 1 GUYANA CIVIL AVIATION REGULATION PART X- FOREIGN OPERATORS. REGULATIONS ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS 1. Citation. 2. Interpretation. 3. Applicability of Regulations. PART A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
More informationRef.: AN 4/ /27 15 April 2015
International Civil Aviation Organization Organisation de l aviation civile internationale Organización de Aviación Civil Internacional Международная организация гражданской авиации Tel.: +1 514-954-6717
More informationTraining and licensing of flight information service officers
1 (12) Issued: 16 August 2013 Enters into force: 1 September 2013 Validity: Indefinitely Legal basis: This Aviation Regulation has been issued by virtue of Section 45, 46, 119 and 120 of the Aviation Act
More informationADQ Regulators Working Group
ADQ Regulators Working Group Common Understanding 01/2013 Application of the provisions of Commission Regulation (EU) 73/2010 to NOTAM Edition: 1.4 Date: 20 October 2016 Reference: ARWG CU 01/2013 ARWG
More informationMALDIVIAN CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS MCAR-OPS 1. Amendment July 2010 SUBPART Q REQUIREMENTS
CIVIL AVIATION DEPARTMENT Republic of Maldives MALDIVIAN CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS MCAR-OPS 1 Commercial Air Transportation (Aeroplanes) Amendment 2 01 July 2010 SUBPART Q FLIGHT AND DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS
More informationAERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG)
17/8/11 AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG) NINTH MEETING Montréal, 26 to 30 September 2011 Agenda Item 5: Observing and forecasting at the aerodrome and in the terminal
More informationRMT.0464 ATS Requirements The NPA
RMT.0464 ATS Requirements The NPA Fabio GRASSO EASA ATM/ANS Regulations Officer IFISA - FISO Seminar #7 08.09.2016 TE.GEN.00409-001 ATM/ANS CRs Regulation 2016/1377 Main objectives are to: implement Essential
More informationREGULATION No. 10/2011 ON APPROVAL OF FLIGHT PROCEDURES INCLUDING SID-s AND STAR-s. Article 1 Scope of Application
Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosovo Republic of Kosovo Autoriteti i Aviacionit Civil i Kosovës Autoritet Civilnog Vazduhoplovstva Kosova Civil Aviation Authority of Kosovo Director General of Civil Aviation
More informationDIRECTIVE 2002/30/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
L 85/40 DIRECTIVE 2002/30/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 26 March 2002 on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions
More informationInternational Civil Aviation Organization. Aerodrome Certification Implementation Task Force (ADCI TF)
International Civil Aviation Organization Aerodrome Certification Implementation Task Force (ADCI TF) Second Meeting (Doha, Qatar, 12 14 May 2013) Agenda Item 3: Aerodromes Certification Requirement REQUIREMENTS
More informationINTERNATIONAL FIRE TRAINING CENTRE
INTERNATIONAL FIRE TRAINING CENTRE LOW CATEGORY AERODROME SUPERVISOR INITIAL AERODROME CATEGORISATION Throughout this note he means he/she and his means his/hers. It is considered that all of the document
More informationREGULATIONS (10) FOREIGN AIR OPERATORS
Republic of Iraq Ministry of Transport Iraq Civil Aviation Authority REGULATIONS (10) FOREIGN AIR OPERATORS Legal Notice No. REPUBLIC OF IRAQ THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT, NO.148 REGULATIONS THE CIVIL AVIATION
More informationEASA Safety Information Bulletin
EASA Safety Information Bulletin EASA SIB No: 2014-29 SIB No.: 2014-29 Issued: 24 October 2014 Subject: Minimum Cabin Crew for Twin Aisle Aeroplanes Ref. Publications: Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012
More informationAssessment of Flight and Duty Time Schemes Procedure
Assessment of Flight and Duty Time Schemes Procedure Purpose Fatigue is a major human factors hazard because it affects a crew member s ability to perform their tasks safely. Operator fatigue management
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /2010
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX Draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /2010 of [ ] on safety oversight in air traffic management and air navigation services (Text with EEA relevance)
More informationFLIGHT CREW LICENSING AND TRAINING PANEL (FCLTP) SECOND MEETING. Montreal, 31 January to 11 February 2005 AGENDA ITEM 5
10/2/05 FLIGHT CREW LICENSING AND TRAINING PANEL (FCLTP) SECOND MEETING Montreal, 31 January to 11 February 2005 AGENDA ITEM 5 The attached constitutes the report on Agenda Item 5 and should be inserted
More informationINTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS 48 th ANNUAL CONFERENCE - Dubrovnik, 20 th to 24 th April 2009 Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94 Study Go Around Procedures When on
More informationCAR Section II Series I Part VIII is proposed to be amended. The proposed amendments are shown in subsequent affect paragraphs.
CAR Section II Series I Part VIII is proposed to be amended. The proposed amendments are shown in subsequent affect paragraphs. The text of the amendment is arranged to show deleted text, new or amended
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
L 133/12 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 452/2014 of 29 April 2014 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations of third
More informationInternational Civil Aviation Organization REVIEW OF STATE CONTINGENCY PLANNING REQUIREMENTS. (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY
BBACG/16 WP/4 31/01/05 International Civil Aviation Organization The Special Coordination Meeting for the Bay of Bengal area (SCM/BOB) and The Sixteenth Meeting of the Bay of Bengal ATS Coordination Group
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO PANS-AERODROMES (Doc 9981)
AN INTRODUCTION TO PANS-AERODROMES (Doc 9981) ADCI TF/1-PPT/5 Joseph CHEONG, Technical Officer, Aerodromes Section, ICAO Montreal REFERENCES: PANS - AERODROMES ANWP-8322 ANWP-8379 ANWP-8669 (not available)
More informationNew ICAO Runway Safety Provisions
New ICAO Runway Safety Provisions Yong Wang Chief, Airport Operations and Infrastructure, ANB/ICAO Flight Plan Assembly Resolution on Runway Safety Overview of ICAO Documentation New ICAO Provisions Ongoing
More informationCivil Instrument Flight Rules at Military Aerodromes or in Military Controlled Airspace
Federal Departement of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office of Civil Aviation FOCA Safety Division - Flight Operations FOCA GM/INFO Guidance Material / Information
More informationWORKSHOP 1 ICAO RPAS Panel Working Group 1 Airworthiness
REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS SYMPOSIUM 23-25 March 2015 WORKSHOP 1 ICAO RPAS Panel Working Group 1 Airworthiness Stephen George Bruno Moitre Rapporteurs WG1 Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS)
More informationOrganización de Aviación Civil Internacional. Международная организация гражданской авиации
International Civil Aviation Organization Organisation de l aviation civile internationale Organización de Aviación Civil Internacional Международная организация гражданской авиации Tel.: +1 514 954-6141
More informationANA Traffic Growth Incentives Programme Terms and Conditions
ANA Traffic Growth s Programme Terms and Conditions 1. Introduction The ANA Traffic Growth s Programme (hereinafter referred to as the Programme) aims to stimulate the growth of commercial air traffic
More informationSUMMARY REPORT ON THE SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT FOLLOW-UP OF THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION OF KUWAIT
ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme SUMMARY REPORT ON THE SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT FOLLOW-UP OF THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION OF KUWAIT (Kuwait, 17 to 20 September 2003) International
More informationAIS-AIM Study Group Working Status
International Civil Aviation Organization AIS-AIM Study Group Working Status Roberta Luccioli TO/AIM Seminario de la OACI sobre la Transicion al AIM Fases1 3 Outline Development and Implementation of AIS
More informationOverview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Safeguarding
Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Safeguarding References The Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention) ICAO SARPS Annex 14 Vol. I, 7 th Edition, July
More informationAccept, Sir/Madam, the assurances of my highest consideration.
Tel.: +1 514-954-8219 ext. 6107 Ref.: SP 73/1 IND/15/7 6 March 2015 Subject: Invitation to the First Meeting of the Meteorology Panel (METP/1), to be held from 20 to 24 April 2015 Action Required: Confirm
More informationPart 121, Amendment 26. Air Operations Large Aeroplanes. Docket 14/CAR/3
Docket 14/CAR/3 Contents Rule objective... 3 Extent of consultation... 3 Summary of submissions... 3 Examination of submissions... 3 Insertion of Amendments... 3 Effective date of rule... 4 Availability
More informationCOMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)
18.10.2011 Official Journal of the European Union L 271/15 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1034/2011 of 17 October 2011 on safety oversight in air traffic management and air navigation services
More informationICAO. Doc Aerodromes. First Edition, 2015 INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION PROCEDURES FOR AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
ICAO Doc 9981 PROCEDURES FOR AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES Aerodromes First Edition, 2015 This first edition of Doc 9981 was approved by the President of the Council on behalf of the Council on 20 October 2014
More informationConsideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.
Advisory Circular AC 139-10 Revision 1 Control of Obstacles 27 April 2007 General Civil Aviation Authority advisory circulars (AC) contain information about standards, practices and procedures that the
More informationTHE CIVIL AVIATION ACT (No. 21 of 2013 THE CIVIL AVIATION (OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2015
LEGAL NOTICE. THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT (No. 21 of 2013 THE CIVIL AVIATION (OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2015 Citation GN. No. of 20 Citation 1. These Regulations may be cited as the Civil
More informationParticipant Presentations (Topics of Interest to the Meeting) GASP SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. (Presented by the Secretariat) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PA RAST/31 WP/03 19/02/18 Thirty First Pan America Regional Aviation Safety Team Meeting (PA RAST/31) of the Regional Aviation Safety Group Pan America (RASG PA) South Florida, United States, 20 to 22
More informationPart 171. Aeronautical Telecommunication Services - Operation and Certification. CAA Consolidation. 10 March 2017
Part 171 CAA Consolidation 10 March 2017 Aeronautical Telecommunication Services - Operation and Certification Published by the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand DESCRIPTION Part 171 provides the
More informationGUIDANCE MATERIAL CONCERNING FLIGHT TIME AND FLIGHT DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS AND REST PERIODS
GUIDANCE MATERIAL CONCERNING FLIGHT TIME AND FLIGHT DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS AND REST PERIODS PREAMBLE: Guidance material is provided for any regulation or standard when: (a) (b) The subject area is complex
More informationAIRWORTHINESS PROCEDURES MANUAL CHAPTER 26. Modifications and Repairs
November 2017 Page 1 of 10 CHAPTER 26 1. Introduction Modifications and Repairs 1.1 CAR M states that a person or organisation repairing an aircraft or component should assess the damage against published
More information2018 Annex Amendments
2018 Annex Amendments TOPICS Introduction of remote pilot licence and the provision for the regulation of RPAS licensing to support international flights operating under IFR Amendment as a result of proposed
More informationEuropean Aviation Safety Agency 1 Sep 2008 OPINION NO 03/2008. of 1 September 2008
European Aviation Safety Agency 1 Sep 2008 OPINION NO 03/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY of 1 September 2008 for a Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European
More informationSUMMARY AUDIT REPORT OF THE DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL AVIATION OF BURKINA FASO
ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT OF THE DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL AVIATION OF BURKINA FASO (Ouagadougou, 11 to 15 October 1999) INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION
More informationTerms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Requirements for Air Traffic Services (ATS)
Rulemaking Directorate Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task Requirements for Air Traffic Services (ATS) ISSUE 1 9.7.2014 Applicability Process map Affected regulations and decisions: Affected stakeholders:
More informationICAO Aerodrome s Manual. AERODROME S INSPECTOR WORKSHOP St. Maarten, MAHO June 2012
ICAO Aerodrome s Manual AERODROME S INSPECTOR WORKSHOP St. Maarten, MAHO 11-15 June 2012 Objectives - Identify the requirements listed in Annex 14 regarding the development and maintenance of an aerodrome
More informationRef.: AN 4/25-15/33 8 May 2015
International Civil Aviation Organization Organisation de l aviation civile internationale Organización de Aviación Civil Internacional Международная организация гражданской авиации Tel.: +1 (514) 954-8219
More informationCOURTESY TRANSLATION ORDINANCE (PORTARIA) 303-A / 2004
COURTESY TRANSLATION ORDINANCE (PORTARIA) 303-A / 2004 Council Regulation (EEC) Nº 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-community air routes lays down, in articles 8 and
More informationTerms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Implementation of Evidence-Based Training within the European regulatory framework RMT.0696 ISSUE
Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task Implementation of Evidence-Based Training within the European regulatory framework ISSUE 1 3.9.2015 Applicability Process map Affected regulations and decisions:
More informationJordan Civil Aviation Requlatory Commission (CARC) JCAR-OPS-1 - SUBPART- Q. FLIGHT AND DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS AND REST REQUIREMENTS 01-Jun-2014
Jordan Civil Aviation Requlatory Commission (CARC) JCAR-OPS-1 - SUBPART- Q FLIGHT AND DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS AND REST REQUIREMENTS 01-Jun-2014 CONTENTS CONTENTS... 2 OPS 1.1090 Objective and scope... 3
More informationThis Section 1 contains the requirements for the approval of Master Minimum Equipment Lists and Minimum Equipment Lists.
SECTION 1 JAR-MMEL/MEL SECTION 1 - REQUIREMENTS 1 GENERAL This Section 1 contains the requirements for the approval of Master Minimum Equipment Lists and Minimum Equipment Lists. 2 PRESENTATION 2.1 The
More informationICAO. Doc Aerodromes. Second Edition, 2016 INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION PROCEDURES FOR AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
ICAO Doc 9981 PROCEDURES FOR AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES Aerodromes Second Edition, 2016 This edition supersedes, on 10 November 2016, all previous editions of Doc 9981. INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION
More informationCertification Memorandum. Large Aeroplane Evacuation Certification Specifications Cabin Crew Members Assumed to be On Board
Certification Memorandum Large Aeroplane Evacuation Certification Specifications Cabin Crew Members Assumed to be On Board EASA CM No.: CM CS-008 Issue 01 issued 03 July 2017 Regulatory requirement(s):
More informationCAR AIR CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS (GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS)
CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS (GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS) FOREWORD CONTENTS REVISION RECORD LIST of EFFECTIVE PAGES This Page Intentionally Left Blank FOREWORD The Civil Aviation and Maritime Navigation Authority
More informationPriority Definitions within Annex 10 and the Relationship to the ATN SARPs
Aeronautical Telecommunication Network Panel Working Group 2 5th Meeting Rome, Italy, July 17-21, 1995 ATNP WG2-WP/ 29 June Revison Priority Definitions within Annex 10 and the Relationship to the ATN
More informationCombined ASIOACG and INSPIRE Working Group Meeting, 2013 Dubai, UAE, 11 th to 14 th December 2013
IP/2 Combined ASIOACG and INSPIRE Working Group Meeting, 2013 Dubai, UAE, 11 th to 14 th December 2013 Agenda Item 2: Action Item from ASIOACG/7 Indian Ocean RNP4 (Presented by Airservices Australia) SUMMARY
More informationBetter regulation for general aviation (update July 2010) July 2010 Better regulation for General Aviation 1
Better regulation for general aviation (update July 2010) July 2010 Better regulation for General Aviation 1 Table of contents The background behind the Better regulation for GA Where are we now? What
More informationCIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS
CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN Air Navigation Order No. : 91-0004 Date : 7 th April, 2010 Issue : Two OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS SECTIONS 1. Authority 2. Purpose 3. Scope 4. Operational Control
More informationComparison. Annex 1 to the ICAO Convention JAR-FCL 1
Comparison to the ICAO Convention JAR-FCL 1 Used Versions :» to the ICAO Convention - up to Amendment 166» JAR-FCL 1 Amendment 3 and NPA-FCL 19 18 May 2005 Comparison to the ICAO Convention JAR-FCL Used
More informationCanada CAR s FTDT. Part VII - Commercial Air Services Subpart 0 - General Division III. Flight Time and Flight Duty Time Limitations and Rest Periods
Canada CAR s FTDT Part VII - Commercial Air Services Subpart 0 - General Division III Flight Time and Flight Duty Time Limitations and Rest Periods Gazette - 1 Contents Contents... 2 DIVISION I GENERAL...
More information