Program Management Committee Meeting. September 21, 2017 RTCA

Transcription

1 Program Management Committee Meeting September 21, 2017 RTCA

2 Welcome & Introductions Chair Chris Hegarty, MITRE

3 PUBLIC MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT Read by: Designated Federal Official Lou Volchansky Program Management Committee September 21, 2017 In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this Advisory Committee meeting is OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. Notice of the meeting was published in the Federal Register on: August 18, 2017 With the approval of the Chairman, members of public may present oral or written statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present or obtain information should coordinate with RTCA PMC Secretary Karan Hofmann and the Chairman Chris Hegarty 3

4 RTCA Proprietary Reference Policy

5 RTCA Proprietary References Policy RTCA Proprietary Reference Policy covers any patented technology and copyrighted material required to comply with a RTCA Standard. The policy allows RTCA to consider proprietary technology for inclusion in an RTCA Standard -- if it provides significant technical or economic benefit over non-proprietary technology. The policy has distinct requirements: A bona fide, public interest basis for the reference and or usage. Evidence that private pecuniary interests have not driven any decision to either include or exclude a system from the market. A participant must disclose if the use of any patented, patent pending, or copyrighted technology is proposed and/or required to comply with a RTCA Standard being developed. The Chairman of a Special Committee proposing to use Propriety information will coordinate with the committee s Program Director to provide a White Paper for approval in the Special Committee s Plenary session. When approved for inclusion in a RTCA document, the proponent must sign a Commitment to License the technology under reasonable and non-discriminatory terms. RTCA policies are available upon request.

6 RTCA Membership Policy

7 Membership Policy Approved by RTCA Policy Board May 2015: Organizations with a representative participating on RTCA Committees are required to be members of RTCA. Policy applies to all Task Groups, Work Groups, etc. Workspace access vehicle for implementation Joint Cmt. Must be member of RTCA or EUROCAE 7

8 Review / Approve Meeting Summary July 13, 2017 RTCA Paper No /PMC-1636

9 Review / Approve Administrative SC TOR Revisions SC-209: RTCA Paper No /PMC-1646 New DFO

10 Review / Approve Administrative SC TOR Revisions SC-231: Sunset Committee

11 Agenda Item 3A: New Document MASPS for Synthetic Vision System for Attitude Awareness to Address CAST SE 200 Delayed until December PMC Meeting

12 Agenda Item 3B: Special Committee 225 Rechargeable Lithium Batteries and Battery Systems RTCA Paper No /PMC /21/2017

13 SC-225 Document Presentation Presentation of updated document DO-311A for approval and publication: Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries and Battery Systems 13

14 Leadership Richard Nguyen The Boeing Company Chair Stephen Diehl Consultant Secretary Norman Pereira FAA DFO Karan Hofmann RTCA Program Director

15 SC-225 Committee Status 114 Members 8 Observers 47 active participants (attended at least 5 out of 18 Plenaries) representing: Aircraft Manufacturer (8) Cell/Battery Manufacturer (9) Airline Union Association (2) Government Regulatory (2) Avionics Manufacture (6) Research & Test (3)

16 Terms of Reference Phase 1 Publish DO-347 Completed December 2013 Phase 2 Update DO-311 to DO-311A Update to include: Most current knowledge of technology, including testing & installation Guidance for all sizes of batteries (small, medium, and large) Additional requirements and guidelines (beyond those in DO-347) Send out for Final Review and Comment (FRAC) Decide if DO-347 should be canceled Coordinate guidance with FAA Support FAA in creating ACs and TSOs

17 DO-311A without Appendix C At the SC-225 plenary on 7/11/17, the DO-311A was approved without Appendix C Received dissenting opinions Committee wrote and approved response to dissenting opinions

18 DO-311A with Appendix C At the PMC Plenary of 7/13/17, the PMC directed SC-225 to add Appendix C to DO-311A for presentation at the 9/21/17 PMC Plenary Appendix C was added Received dissenting opinions to Appendix C Committee wrote and approved response to dissenting opinions Final Plenary held 8/31/2017

19 SC-225 Basis for Dissent Presented by Brett Williams (Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics) Four RTCA member companies/representatives have provided a dissenting opinion against the currently proposed RTCA/DO-311A Consent is specifically focused on the inclusion of Appendix C: Alternate Test Method for Battery Thermal Runaway Containment (BTRC) Test Appendix C is an alternate test method used to meet the requirement of The primary means of compliance to is the BTRC test as defined in The BTRC test requires that all cells of a battery be overcharged or overheated while demonstrating containment of the resulting thermal runaway The Appendix C test requires that only two cells be overcharged or overheated while demonstrating containment of the resulting thermal runaway The dissenting opinion opposes the inclusion of Appendix C for the following reasons: Appendix C provides for a reduced level of safety as compared to the BTRC test Appendix C is an inappropriate use of alternate means of compliance (AMOC) for a MOPS SC-225 approved DO-311A through the FRAC process with general consensus without the inclusion of Appendix C 19

20 SC-225 Dissent Support Details Appendix C represents a reduced level of safety in relation to the BTRC test RTCA/DO-293, DO-293A, DO-311, and DO-347 require a test equivalent to the BTRC, in which all cells are subjected to an unprotected abuse condition Appendix C prescribes analysis to demonstrate that a common mode failure could not cause all cells to experience a thermal runaway, rather than a test to validate the design and mitigate that potential event NOTE: Three field failure events of certified/installed lithium-ion batteries, leading to two ADs, resulted in more than two cells within the battery reaching a thermal runaway Lithium-ion battery technology continues to evolve, therefore the additional margin of safety provided by the BTRC test versus Appendix C is necessary to protect the public safety The requirement to demonstrate a minimum of two cells in thermal runaway per is due to variation in battery design, but still is intended to be demonstrated through an all-battery test. Appendix C documents an inappropriate AMOC within a MOPS An alternate means of compliance should be applied against a MOPS, not within it Appendix C is not an acceptable alternate to the BTRC test because it does not provide an equivalent level of safety SC-225 reached consensus on DO-311A without Appendix C The original document (without Appendix C) was approved through FRAC and reached general consensus, including Boeing, Airbus, and Saft, with 89% of the voting members approving After inclusion of Appendix C, only 78% of the voting members approved 20

21 Response to Dissent Letter Presented by James Russell (The Boeing Company) Dissent Letter raised three key points. The SC-225 Committee responses: Point 1: Reduced Level of Safety The Appendix C procedure is compliant with the Battery Thermal Runaway Containment (BTRC) requirements. Use of the Appendix C procedure must satisfy prerequisites and be pre-coordinated with the FAA or the applicable regulatory agency. The Appendix C procedure requires multiple tests as opposed to the BTRC test which is a single test. The Appendix C procedure is conservative because it provides double the heat and pressure of any single cell failing from a randomly-occurring cause. The Appendix C procedure can be performed without pre-heating the whole battery, which could compromise the validity of the test results. The Appendix C procedure provides a feasible method to test very large battery systems. Point 2: Improper Alternate Means of Compliance It is the technical opinion of the majority of the SC-225 committee that the Appendix C procedure represents an acceptable alternative means to show compliance with the BTRC requirements As stated in the SC-225 terms of reference, a key deliverable is to provide guidance to the FAA for certification of lithium-ion batteries. Therefore, it is appropriate to include an alternate test procedure within the MOPS which may be used by the FAA in an Advisory Circular. Point 3: RTCA Consensus Process The members of the SC-225 committee have all followed the RTCA procedures as set forth by RTCA representatives over the course of the multi-year MOPS development. For these reasons the majority of the SC-225 Committee endorses the inclusion of Appendix C as adding value to RTCA/DO-311A.

22 SC-225 recommends that the PMC approved and publish DO-311A: Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Rechargeable Lithium Battery Systems

23 SC-225 Future With document approval, recommend sunset SC

24 BACKUP SLIDES

25 Status Update Virtual Plenary 27 held on February 7 Completed dispositioning all 661 FRAC comments Accepted Rejected Duplicate - 47 Closed by originator (based on previous comments) - 10 Received dissenting opinion(s)

26 RTCA Paper No /PMC September 2017 Agenda Item 3C: SC-228 Detect and Avoid (DAA) Working Group (WG) Phase 2 White Paper Brandon Suarez, Don Walker

27 DAA Working Group Leadership Don Walker Honeywell, Aerospace Advanced Technology Brandon Suarez General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc Paul Campbell Secretary * WG1 is currently looking for a new Secretary

28 DAA and Radar MOPS Update DO-365, DAA MOPS, and DO-366 Air-to-Air Radar MOPS, issued May 31, 2017 FAA Aircraft Certification office indicated that DO-365 and DO-366 will be invoked through: TSO-c211 and TSO-c212 AC 20-TBD FAA SRM Panel completed to provide approval for operations in Class D and E Airspace using either Class 1 or Class 2 DAA equipment

29 DAA Operational Environments for Phase 1 (Blue) and 2 (Green) Terminal Operations Transit Operations Extended Operations Class A No Yes* Yes* Class B No See Note No Class C See Note See Note No Class D Yes Yes Yes Class E Yes Yes Yes Class G, off-airport Yes Yes Yes Class E above A No No No Oceanic, Class A No Yes* Yes* Note: The SC-228 TOR allows the DAA Working Group to explore optional concepts" for which the DAA equipment could be applicable. There is strong industry interest in enabling (i) take-off/landing operations at airports in Class C airspace and (ii) transit operations through Class C and Class B airspace. Therefore, the Working Group will develop these operational concepts in the OSED development, recognizing that if related MOPS development work is to be pursued, then a TOR update would be required. There may be adjustments to the deliverable dates due to additional airspace scope and related developmental MOPS work. The Working Group plans to make a decision, no later than the completion of the OSED, to provide rational to the SC-228 Leadership in order to justify a request an update to the TOR to include these operations as explicitly in scope for MOPS development. * DAA System is not explicitly design for this environment, but modeling and simulation shows its acceptability

30 Proposed DAA WG P2 Deliverables (Maintains intent of TOR while providing more granularity) Product Description Due Date Ground-based Primary Radar MOPS DAA MOPS, DO-365, Rev A MOPS for a ground-based non-cooperative radar to support the Phase Two DAA MOPS. Revision to the DAA MOPS that incorporates at least the Ground-based Non-Cooperative Radar MOPS including architectural considerations and operational concepts. September 2019 September 2019 Airborne EO/IR Sensor MOPS Air-to-Air Radar MOPS, DO-366, Rev A MOPS for an alternative sensor to detect and track non-cooperative aircraft in support of the Phase Two DAA MOPS. Revision to the Airborne Radar MOPS in support of the Phase Two DAA MOPS. September 2020 September 2020 DAA MOPS, DO-365, Rev B Revision to the DAA MOPS that incorporates at least DO-366A including architectural considerations and operational concepts and ACAS XU. September 2020 Note: ACAS XU MOPS due Sept according to SC-147 TOR, in conjunction with DO-365, Rev B WG1 is capitalizing on strong response from airborne sensor developers (EO/IR and Radar) and is planning to include both as means to enable UA with less available SWAP.

31 DAA P2 White Paper TOC

32 WG1 Organization for Phase 2 OSED Subgroup Lead: Ted Lester, MITRE Architecture Well Clear Definitions Radar Subgroup Lead: Naiel Askar, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. (GA-ASI) Ground-based Radar Other Airborne Radar Classes Display, Alerting, Guidance Subgroup Co-Leads: Lisa Fern and Tod Lewis, NASA Human Machine Interface (HMI) Algorithms EO/IR Subgroup Lead: Andy White, Defense Research Associates (DRA) Tracker Subgroup Lead: Tom Pagano, FAA Tech Center Input/Output Modeling and Simulation Subgroup Lead: Fabrice Kunzi, GA-ASI Test Vectors Data collection for Phase 2 Safety Risk Management Panel(s) (SRMP)(s) Automation Subgroup Co-Leads: Sean Calhoun and Jacob Kay, United States Air Force (USAF) Right of Way Active Surveillance Subgroup Lead: Jim Davis, Sagetech Verification and Validation Subgroup Lead: Jim Murphy, NASA C2 Interface Point of Contact Lead: Bruce Eckstein, Firebird SE ACAS Xu Interface Point of Contact Lead: Charles Leeper, JHU/APL Technical Editor Lead: Shelly O Leary, FAA Tech Center

33 DAA White Paper FRAC WG1 Reviewed all NC and High Comments Face-Face and Resolutions have been accepted Med, Low, and Editorial were resolved by Authors

34 Phase II DAA Schedule Overview Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Meetings / Deliverables DAA MOPS NASA FT5 NASA FT6 White Paper SC-228 Approval SC-228 Approval RAC Phase II OSED RAC Well Clear Update FRAC FRAC Well Clear Update Candidate(s) DO-365 Rev A DO-365 Rev B Grnd Radar MOPS EO/IR Sensor MOPS Airborne Radar MOPS RAC Draft MOPS RAC Draft MOPS RAC Draft MOPS FRAC MOPS FRAC MOPS FRAC DO-366 Rev A ACAS XU (SC- 147) RAC DAA-ACAS Subgroup FRAC MOPS

35 Discussion! 36

36 Backup

37 Agenda Item 3D: SC-228 Command & Control (C2) Working Group (WG) Phase 2 White Paper John R. Moore, Steve Van Trees RTCA Paper No PMC September 2017

38 C2 Working Group Leadership John R. Moore, Co-chair Principal Systems Engineer Rockwell Collins Stephen Van Trees, Co-chair Communications Team Lead FAA / Avionics Systems Branch, Washington, DC Stephen.Vantrees@faa.gov Lee Nguyen Secretary Aerospace Engineer FAA / Avionics Systems Branch, Washington, DC Lee.Nguyen@faa.gov

39 DO-362 C2 Data Link MOPS Update DO-362, C2 Data Link MOPS (Terrestrial) was issued 22 September 2017 FAA Aircraft Certification office indicated that DO-362 will be invoked through: TSO-cXXX AC

40 Proposed C2 WG P2 Deliverables (Maintains intent of TOR while providing better decomposition) Deliverable Document FRAC Completion C2 Link Systems MASPS December 2018 CNPC Link System MOPS (SATCOM) March 2019 C2 Link System MASPS Rev A December 2019 CNPC Link System MOPS (SATCOM) Rev A March 2020 CNPC Link System MOPS (Terrestrial) DO-362 Rev A June 2020

41 Key Changes Proposed to Current TOR Integration of the SATCOM and Network MASPS into a single, end-to-end C2 link MASPS. The allocation between CNPC Link Systems and CNPC Network Systems has many potential solutions, and this is left to the applicant to propose in the light of specific aircraft configurations, operational intent, etc. SATCOM MOPS is proposed to be broken into two deliverables. The first will focus on Ka Band spot beam systems which will have earlier verification and validation data available. The desire is to make this MOPS available as soon as possible. The Rev A version would include Ku Band regional beam systems as the associated validation and verification data becomes available.

42 C2 P2 White Paper TOC

43 C2 White Paper FRAC Editorial, 303 Non- Concur, 61 High, 255 WG2 reviewed all NC, High and Medium comments in face-toface meetings and resolutions were approved by SC-228 Plenary Low, 58 Medium, 151 Low and Editorial were resolved by authors.

44 Relationship With External Entities ICAO Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) Panel. This ICAO panel requested RTCA SC-228 provide material for end-to-end C2 Link System performance requirements and technology specific solutions for terrestrial and satellite systems. This will support both their Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) development and the allocation of spectrum for CNPC Link Systems by the International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication (ITU-R). SC-222 Aeronautical Mobile Satellite (Route) System (AMS(R)S). SC- 222 is already developing standards for SATCOM systems in L Band for other aviation applications. Through ISRA coordination with SC-228, they are expected to provide MOPS as required to support a UAS C2 Link System using those L Band systems. EUROCAE Working Group 105. It is anticipated that WG-105 will develop any required MOPS for C Band SATCOM. FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center. The FAA Technical Center continues interference testing to validate acceptable interference levels for a number of legacy safety systems in L Band. The results of these studies will be captured in the updated DO-362A, C2 Data Link MOPS (Terrestrial).

45 Backup

46 Technical Approach (Overview) C2 Link System. All systems and interconnections carrying all information exchanges between the Pilot Station and the UA that support many key pilot tasks required to safely fly in the NAS. The allocation between CNPC Link Systems and CNPC Network Systems has many potential solutions, and this is left to the applicant to propose in the light of specific aircraft configurations, operational intent, etc CNPC Link System. A technology-specific solution that supports the final radio frequency (RF) connectivity between the ground and the UA. This may consist of one or more CNPC Link subsystems. Within the CNPC Link System, there may be both networking and linking functions. CNPC Link Systems are comparable to a subnetwork described in other aeronautical standards, such as DO-281B. CNPC Network System. This system consists of ground and airborne components which themselves can be composed of a collection of wired or wireless interconnections, and signal routing capabilities used to connect the Pilot Station and the UA to a CNPC Link System.

47 Agenda Item 3E: SC-235 Non-Rechargeable Lithium Batteries 21 September 2017 RTCA Paper No /PMC-1637

48 SC235 Document Presentation Presentation of updated document DO-227A for approval and publication: Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for Non-Rechargeable Lithium Batteries 53

49 SC-235 Committee Status SC-235 Leadership Chairman: John Trela, The Boeing Company Secretary: Jeff Densmore, Radiant Designated Federal Officer: Norm Pereira, FAA Program Director: Karan Hofmann, RTCA Active Industry Participation (59 members from 31 organizations) Cell Manufacturers: SAFT, Panasonic, Ultralife Equipment Manufacturers: Radiant, Instrumar, ACR Electronics, Orolia, DME Corporation, ELTA, HR Smith, Honeywell, Garmin, Mobile Power Solutions Airframers: Boeing, Airbus, Textron, Gulfstream, Embraer, Bell Helicopter Test Labs: UL, MGA Research, Intertek Government Agencies / Regulators: FAA, Transport Canada, ANAC Brazil, EASA, NASA, RTCA 9 Plenaries (2 unofficial) held since October

50 Deliverable Summary Work on updating DO-227 (MOPS for Non- Rechargeable Lithium Batteries) began in October 2015 Started FRAC in February 2017 Completed FRAC in May 2017 Approved by SC-235 in July

51 Deliverable Content This standard provides design, testing, and installation guidance for nonrechargeable lithium batteries and battery systems which are permanently installed on aircraft or used in aviation. The intent of this document is to assist equipment designers and manufacturers in the selection of non-rechargeable cells and battery systems whose safety and performance have been demonstrated as appropriate to the aviation environment. Section 1 (Purpose and Scope) discusses the scope of this document, and provides guidance, best practices, and a list of some basic terms of reference. Section 2 (Equipment Performance Requirements and Test Procedures) contains requirements and associated procedures for non-rechargeable lithium cells, batteries, and End Items powered by lithium batteries including general, performance, safety, and environmental requirements and tests. Section 3 (Aircraft Installation Considerations) provides information that may impact the design or aircraft installation of the battery system or end item. It also provides cautions and advice for the installer. This section is intended to provide installation guidance and considerations that may help applicants to meet the airworthiness regulation requirements for the installation of nonrechargeable lithium batteries on aircraft. 56

52 FRAC Process FRAC Timeline Draft was released for FRAC on 1 February 2017 All comments were due on 3 March 2017 No late arrivals were received FRAC Workspace Management Workspace comments spreadsheet supplied with release of draft notification Multiple options for submitting comments: Comments spreadsheet uploaded directly to Workspace by commenter Comments spreadsheet ed to Comment Managers by commenter, Comment Manager to upload RTCA Workspace Comments is the repository for all versions of comments and resolutions Excel Comments spreadsheets sent to Comment Managers have been archived in RTCA Workspace 57

53 Final Review And Comments (FRAC) 710 Total FRAC Comments 19 Non-concur 193 High 269 Medium 80 Low 149 Editorial 19 Non-concurs Addressed at Unofficial Plenary #7 (Working Group Meeting) 3 were accepted 8 were rejected 8 were accepted with modification

54 Summary of Non-Concurs: Rejected There was a few non-concur comments regarding the scope of the new DO-227A, particularly with regard to categorizing battery size and applicability of the requirements. Specifically, the committee discussed the 2Whr threshold. There was no consensus (or agreement) to increase the 2Whr limit and the comments were rejected. However, the FAA did indicate that they open to addressing this issue through TSO-C142b. There was a non-concur comment regarding the purpose of DO-227A. Specifically, it was stated that the MOPS should be developed to ANSI standard C18.3, Part 1 and Part 2. This comment was rejected by the committee. SC-235 s charter is to update DO-227A in accordance with the RTCA template and cannot deviate from this guidance. Three non-concur comments were withdrawn by the commenter and thus rejected by the committee. There was a non-concur comment indicating that the Fire Test from TSO-C142a, Appendix 1, Table 2 was omitted in the new DO-227A. The committee discussed and determined that the Fire test applied to equipment which must survive a fire and remain functional (e.g. ELT). This requirement does not apply to all End Items (e.g. ULD) so the Fire test was elevated from the Battery MOPS to the installation standard. There was a non-concur comment regarding the method of triggering the Thermal Runaway. The comment stated that triggering by temperature was not as consistent or reliable as other methods. This comment was rejected by the committee as the use of heat to trigger a TR is the most recognized method with consistent performance. 59

55 Summary of Non-Concurs: Accepted with Modifications There were non-concur comments regarding the criteria for determining the end of a cell and battery short circuit tests. The initial requirements stated to test until the battery reached zero volts. Because of the nature of a short circuit test, the battery voltage will quickly reach zero volts. A more suitable criteria was agreed upon using cell and battery currents. There was a non-concur comment regarding the end-item shock test levels. It was felt that the 75g shock environment was too severe for the end item test. The committee discussed and agreed to reduce this to a 20g requirement. There was a non-concur comment requesting a full battery Thermal Runaway Containment Test be included into DO-227A. After much discussion, the committee agreed that a full battery test was not required. However, it was decided that triggering of a single cell TR must be accomplished on the worst case cell location as determined and substantiated by test and analysis. 60

56 SC-235 recommends that the PMC approve and publish the: DO-227A: Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for Non-Rechargeable Lithium Batteries 61

57 SC-235 Future With document approval, recommend sunset SC

58 Agenda Item 4: ICC Report to the PMC None for September 21, 2017

59 Agenda Item 5: CCC Report to the PMC None for September 21, 2017

60 Agenda Item 6A: PMC Membership RTCA Paper No /PMC-1662 Margaret Jenny, RTCA President

61 Chairman PMC Membership Appointed by RTCA President Term of one year Members Volunteers Appointed by RTCA President Serve with Concurrence of Parent Organizations Size set by RTCA President Selected to assure an appropriate balance of government and industry perspectives and disciplines Ability to provide the requisite executive management and support of SC activities 66

62 PMC Membership August 2017 Domain Designated Federal Officer Chair Members PMC Secretary Member Lou Volchansky, Federal Aviation Administration Dr. Christopher Hegarty, The MITRE Corporation Douglas Arbuckle, Federal Aviation Administration Chris Benich, Honeywell International, Inc. Steve Brown, National Business Aviation Association Lawrence Dibble, U. S. Army CDR Joel Doane, U.S. Navy Robert Grove, Garmin Ltd. Richard Heinrich, Rockwell Collins, Inc. Jens Hennig, General Aviation Manufacturers Association Robert Ireland, Airlines for America Margaret Jenny, RTCA, Inc. Dr. George Ligler, Consultant Thomas Shields, U. S. Air Force Randy Kenagy, Air Line Pilots Association Michele Merkle, Federal Aviation Administration Al Secen, RTCA, Inc. Jessie Turner, The Boeing Company Karan Hofmann, RTCA, Inc. 67

63 PMC Membership Breakout Government: FAA 3 (DFO, Arbuckle, Merkle) DoD 3 (Air Force, Army, Navy) Industry: Airframe Manufacturer 1 (Boeing) Avionics Manufacturers 3 (Garmin, Honeywell, Rockwell Collins) Associations 4 ( NBAA, GAMA, A4A, ALPA) Independent: Consultant MITRE RTCA: President Secretary 68

64 PMC Membership Review Recommend 3 member ad-hoc review and provide recommendation to PMC at December meeting 69

65 Agenda Item 6B: NASA Security Presentation Presentation Canceled Delayed due to External Factors

66 Agenda Item 6C: Availability of RTCA Documents as Reference for EUROCAE WGs Al Secen, PMC Member

67 Agenda Item 6D: SC-209 Work Hold on ACSS IP Items Al Secen, PMC Member

68 Agenda Item 6E: ACSS CtL Summary RTCA Paper Nos /PMC-1653, 225/PMC-1654, and /PMC-1655 Al Secen, PMC Member

69 ACSS Summary ACSS submitted a CtL with Royalty Fees The PMC requested a stop work on all related material for SC-186 and SC-209 ACSS requested an example of when a technology was offered without fees Forwarded MIT-LL ADS-B Extended Squitter ACSS requested an official letter from RTCA with direction

70 Agenda Item 6F: Revisit RTCA IP Policy Wording RTCA Paper No /PMC-1657 Al Secen, PMC Member

71 Summary of Changes to IP Policy for RTCA PMC directed RTCA to review and remove ambiguity to IP Policy Updated link to the online policy document (changed with RTCA s website) Updated Committee Application Form Language update:

72 Summary of Changes (con t) Updated Language

73 Agenda Item 6G: Redirect SC-225 on Version of DO-311A to Present Covered Under Agenda Item 3B

74 Agenda Item 7A: SC-135 Terms of Reference Change PMC Meeting September 21, 2017 RTCA Paper No /PMC-1649

75 Summary of Committee Current Scope Coordinate with the FAA and Flammability Harmonization Working Group on potential new alternative flammability test methods and procedures including testing whole components instead of breaking down electronic devices into individual material samples as currently required. Chair a working group to work with industry representatives on requirements and testing of the continually changing aircraft power systems. This working group is to propose test conditions for 540 volt dc generators, and to break section 16 into multiple sections one for AC power systems and the other for DC power systems, and to break sections into emissions and susceptibility. Coordinate with the SAE AE-2, Lightning Committee, to address hybrid wire bundle testing. Chair a working group to work with industry representatives on requirements for aligning Audio Susceptibility requirements to that of MIL STD-461 and to bridge the frequency gap between audio frequency susceptibility and RF frequency susceptibility 80

76 Summary of Committee Current Scope Chair a working group to work with industry representatives on requirements for developing a proposal developing a method on a faster alternative to the current reverb chamber uniformity calibration. Chair a working group to work with industry representatives and EUROCAE WG-14 on considering requirements for volcanic ash qualification. Investigate specific aspect of carbon dust (due to its conductivity) which is now widely present in the aircraft industry. Setup a new section and a new Working Group to address Ground Reference Fluctuation which is a phenomenon aggravated by the combination of more composite structure and more electrical aircraft. Address specific aspects of testing of Integrated Modular Avionics. As being a versatile platform for which the supplier may only provide for generic hardware and firmware, with the intent that the end user will implement its own hardware configuration and application software, the hardware and software configuration issues question the ability of the supplier to claim for a DO-160/ED-14 compliance. Investigate to replace with a test procedure similar to MIL STD 461 CS

77 Committee Leadership Bradley Green SC135 Chairman Gary Smith SC135 Secretary Rebecca Morrison RTCA Director Lee Nguyen FAA DFO 82

78 Changes to TOR Add to TOR that SC135 will work with SC228 to develop a DO document that specifies ground based equipment environments and qualification procedures. Planned release of new DO document is for May of Delete work on Ground Reference Fluctuations Delete that SC135 will break section 16 into multiple sections one for AC power systems and one for DC power systems. Change release of revision H of DO160 and the User Guide from December 2019 to December

79 Agenda Item 7B: Forum on Aeronautical Software Presented by Patty Bath Esterline AVISTA, RTCA chairman RTCA Paper No: /PMC Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

80 Outline What is FAS? What FAS is not FAS Goals & Products FAS Organization FAS Progress and Documents How You Can Contribute Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

81 What is FAS? Based on the recommendation of RTCA SC-205 chairman Jim Krodel & EUROCAE WG-71 chairman Gérard Ladier Forum on Aeronautical Software (FAS) Launched in late 2012 by RTCA & EUROCAE Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

82 What is FAS? In recognizing the need for - Monitoring and exchanging information on the effectiveness of DO-178C/ED-12C and related documents that comprise the Document Suite - Discussing practices on - Software Aspects of Certification Issues - Experiences - Document Clarity - Providing Information Papers regarding the DO-178C/ED- 12C Document Suite (including document suite errata) On a trial basis: created a user forum on the DO-178C/ED- 12C Document Suite to aid RTCA and EUROCAE understanding of the industry s technology needs Trial period was considered over Dec 2015 Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

83 What is FAS? - The Document Suite RTCA publishes the documents electronically as PDF files in addition to publishing hard copy paper documents EUROCAE publishes these documents in electronic form as PDFs DO-178C/ED-12C: Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification DO-278A/ED-109A: Software Integrity Assurance Considerations for Communication, Navigation, Surveillance and Air Traffic Management (CNS/ATM) Systems DO-248C/ED-94C: Supporting Information for DO-178C/ED-12C and DO-278A/ED-109A DO-330/ED-215: Software Tool Qualification Considerations DO-331/ED-218: Model-Based development and verification supplement to DO-178C/ED- 12C and DO-278A/ED-109A DO-332/ED-217: Object-Oriented Technology and Related Techniques Supplement to DO- 178C/ED-12C and DO-278AED-109A DO-333/ED-216: Formal Methods supplement to DO-178C/ED-12C and DO-278AED-109A Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

84 What FAS IS NOT FTAC/EUROCAE s FAS Is NOT a recognized special committee (SC) by RTCA nor as a working group (WG) for EUROCAE Products are NOT approved by RTCA s PMC nor the Council of EUROCAE Products are NOT recognized by the Certification Authorities No Terms of Reference (scope of work) from RTCA/EUROCAE However, scope of operations established in agreement with RTCA and EUROCAE Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

85 FAS Goals & Products To share lessons learned in the use of the RTCA/EUROCAE software document suite and to encourage good practices and promote the effective use of RTCA s and EUROCAE s publications. To identify and record any issues or errata showing the need for clarifications or modifications to the software document suite To develop and revise FAS Topic Papers (FTPs) relative to RTCA s and EUROCAE s publications or related other aeronautical software industry topics. Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

86 FAS Products Usage Statement FAS Products Do not constitute official policy or position from RTCA/EUROCAE or any regulatory agency or authority Documents are made available for educational and informational purposes only Documents are the exclusive intellectual property of RTCA and EUROCAE Document material may be used without prior written permission in an unaltered form with proper acknowledgement of the source Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

87 FAA Goal - Technology Watch When FAS identifies the need For significant changes to the software document suite or for a new technology supplement Then the FAS Executive Management Committee will identify to RTCA/EUROCAE and FAA/EASA, as appropriate, the need to create a new SC/WG If a new SC/WG is formed by RTCA/EUROCAE, documentation from FAS will be made available to the leadership of the new SC/WG for their consideration Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

88 FAS Organization FAS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Ross Hannan Sigma Associates (Aerospace) Co-secretary Hervé Gérard Delseny Ladier Aerospace Airbus Valley Co-chair Patty M Bath Esterline AVISTA Co-chair Leslie Alford APT Research Co-secretary Anna Von Groote EUROCAE Liaison Guillaume Soudain EASA Representative Barbara Lingberg FAA Representative Rebecca Morrison RTCA Liaison FAS EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE TECHNICAL PAPER DEVELOPMENT ASSIGNMENTS 40+ MEMBERS TOTAL Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

89 Operations Summary Move from Information Paper (IP) to FAS Topic Papers (FTPs) with two parts: Internal: (FAS and future committee use only) Contains information for future committee, e.g. proposal for text changes Watermark : FAS Internal paper only External (published information) Contains clarification without the proposal of any changes to the existing text of the Document Suite Watermark : FAS information for educational and informational purposes Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

90 Operations Summary FAS normal operation is within virtual space with Video Conferencing, WebExs etc. Identification of Issues in the Document Suite FAS Members and the General Public can submit issues FAS Executive Committee screens submittals for real issues FAS Members volunteer to author FTPs to address identified issues Members deliberate over draft FAS Topic Papers When current comments are addressed on the FTP a ballot is taken Editorial check is performed on FTPs passing their ballot FTP is then published on the RTCA/EUROCAE websites Membership is open to RTCA/EUROCAE member organizations with an expectation that one person would represent one organization Observer role is available when more than one person from an organization has requested membership Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

91 FAS Progress Meetings Virtual meetings: 1 per month Physical meetings: 1 per year Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

92 Document Progress Three papers are published IP 1002 Model Based Development : Annex Table A-3 and A-4 Item Clarification IP 1000 ED-12/DO-178 : Parameter Data Item Clarifications IP 1003 Tool Qualification : Tool Operational Requirements Validation Move to new FTP format is in progress 9 new papers are under editorial review for publication FTP 1004 Tool Qualification : Developer-TOR clarification FTP 1007 Tool Qualification : Consistency between Table 11-2 on COTS tools and SQA FTP 1008 Tool Qualification : Consistency between SQA Objs and TQL-5 Objs FTP 1009 Tool Qualification : Qualification of tools used to develop or verify a tool FTP 1011 DO-178C/ED-12C: Derived Rqts definition consistent fortrace Data FTP 1014 Tool Qualification : Table T-0 and T-2 Consistency with CC1/CC2 FTP 1016 Tool Qualification : Clarification on Developer TQP FTP 1018 Tool Qualification : Clarify section 11.5 on Dissimilar Tool FTP 1028 DO-178C/ED-12C: Clarify that Activities are not guidance Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

93 Document Progress cont. Further Status: 4 Papers Ballot Approved and Ready for Editorial Check 7 Papers In Progress 2 Papers On Hold awaiting advancement of regulatory guidance releases (e.g., ACs, etc.) and other initiatives 9 Papers Withdrawn after topic investigation Errata List completed for known issues at this time Currently being ported into RTCA and EUROCAE publishing templates Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

94 Access via RTCA Website Committees FAS Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

95 Access via EUROCAE Website Working Groups Active Groups Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

96 Forum on Aeronautical Software????????? Forum on Aeronautical Software RTCA PMC

97 Acronyms AMC AC ED-12C Acceptable Means of Compliance Advisory Circular Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification ED-109A Software Integrity Assurance Considerations for Communication, Navigation, Surveillance and Air Traffic Management (CNS/ATM) Systems ED-94C Supporting Information ED-215 Software Tool Qualification Considerations ED-218 Model Based Development & Verification Supplement ED-217 Object Oriented Technology and Related Techniques Supplement ED-215 Formal Methods Supplement EUROCAE European Organisation for Civil Aviation Equipment (publishes ED-12C) FAS Forum on Aeronautical Software IP Information Paper OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer RTCA RTCA, Inc. (publishes /DO-178C) SC Special Committee (RTCA) WG Working Group (EUROCAE) Forum on Aeronautical 102 Software RTCA PMC 2017

98 Agenda Item 7C: NextGen Advisory Committee RTCA Paper No /PMC-1639 Andy Cebula, RTCA VP Strategy and Programs September 21, 2017

99 NextGen Advisory Committee Chair: Dave Bronczek, FedEx DFO: Dan Elwell, Deputy Administrator October 4 th meeting Agenda: Northeast Corridor Implementations <18mths, 18-36mths, +3yrs Benefits & Measurement Analysis of Optimized Profile Descent Boston & DataComm Benefits Assessment Regional Equipage impacts on PBN implementation NextGen Integration Working Group implementation DataComm, Multiple Runaway Operations, PBN, Surface & Data Sharing 104

100 Agenda Item 7D: Update on the Tactical Operations Committee RTCA Paper No /PMC-1640 Trin Mitra, RTCA Program Director September 21, 2017

101 Current TOC Status Official meeting held August 22, 2017 Approved recommendations on PBN Route System Approved recommendations on AIMM Segment 3 (provision of near real-time SAA status and digitized LOA/SOPs) Two ongoing tasks: impacts of intentional GPS interference and flight plan feedback Recent Change in Leadership Co Chairs: Bart Roberts (JetBlue) & Jeff Woods (NATCA) Aug 22 final meeting for Lynn Ray as DFO; Jodi McCarthy transitioning in 106

102 Current TOC Task: Impacts of Intentional GPS Interference Six Aspects to Tasking Evaluate GNSS interference events and quantify the NAS impact Tracking and metrics to assess impact of GNSS interference events, including economic impact on airports Recommend way to define and depict interference based on likelihood of interference, level of impact Standard minimum weather requirement/criteria for airfields that have only GNSS approach procedures and/or radar/wam coverage Evaluate effectiveness of alerting process, including NOTAMs used by air traffic and the notification process for pilots Recommend guidance/training material for controllers & pilots 107

103 Current TOC Task: Impacts of Intentional GPS Interference Task Group working to validate impacts of GPS interference based on Field experience/reports Operator experience/reports Impacts expected by OEMs Actual measurements from ADS-B towers or other sources Task Group working to understand OEM perspective on expected equipment impacts from intentional interference events Rockwell Collins, Garmin volunteer to populate following matrix as 1st step Next step distribute to appropriate OEMs and/or SCs/WGs for additional input and validation 108

104 What are expected impacts from GPS interference? Aircraft Nav Terminal Ops Nav En Route Ops Surveillance Flight Control Flight Operation All GPS unreliable compromise RNAV/RNP approach? Lose nav display Helos Uncommanded turns Compromised ADS-B reporting Procedural separation in ADS-B only GA Ag/photo business rely GPS unable to operate Large risk area - GA pilots not fly Business Av Regionals SKW lose all RNAV SIDs/STARs Mainline False EGPWS go around ANP > RNP, unable RNP Degrade GLS? Lose GLS autoland? Phenoms flight system reliance on GPS 787 2ndary speed measure Unable RNP takeoff restricted Impacts to primary system? Secondary? Redundant systems? Non-redundant systems? 109

105 Next Meeting Dates TBD: November 2017 March

106 Agenda Item 7E: Drone Advisory Committee RTCA Paper No /PMC-1641 Al Secen, RTCA VP Aviation Technology and Standards September 21, 2017

107 Drone Advisory Committee Status The Drone Advisory Committee (DAC) met on July 21, 2017 First meeting with new DFO (Dan Elwell) Virtual DAC Meeting held to receive and approve an interim report from TG3 Roles and Responsibilities of the Local/State/Federal Government Analyze State or Local Government Interests Provide Recommendations on relative roles & responsibilities for making and enforcing rules and regulations Access to Airspace Provide Recommendations on UAS Operations/Missions Beyond Those Currently Permitted; Define Procedures for Access to the Airspace Funding of UAS Integration Analyze Potential Mechanisms Funding the Activities and Services Required Provide Recommendations on Preferred Method for funding Federal Activities and Services

108 Task Groups Status Expecting updated tasking in September 2017 New TG formed based upon the tasking Current Status TG1: Roles and Responsibilities of the Local/State/Federal Government Interim report due for November DAC New local/county/state representatives added TG2: Access to Airspace Final report due for November DAC TG3: Funding of UAS Integration Status only at November DAC Begun work on Long-term (greater than 24 months) recommendations

109 Upcoming Meeting Details Next DAC Meeting November 8, 2017 Location Seattle, WA Hosted by Amazon Prime Final Recommendations of TG1, TG2 Status update for TG3

110 Agenda Item 7F: Discussion FAA Actions on Previously Published Documents RTCA Paper No /PMC-1642 Lou Volchansky, PMC DFO September 21, 2017

111 FAA Published Guidance (Since Previous PMC) RTCA Document DO-346, MOPS for Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communication System (AeroMACS) Change 1 to DO- 300A; Change 2 to DO-300 Developed By FAA Guidance Approval Date SC-223 TSO-C207a August 2017 SC-147 AC C July 2017 Comment Revise AeroMACS TSO to be used by ATS Airworthiness installation guidance DO-367, MOPS for Terrain Awareness and Warning System (TAWS) SC-231 TSO-C151d August 2017 Updates TSO design standard (new MOPS documentation)

112 RTCA Published Documents FAA Pending Guidance RTCA Document Developed By FAA Guidance Planned Release Date Comment DO-362, Command and Control Data Link MOPS DO-362, Command and Control Data Link MOPS DO-363, Guidance for the Development of Portable Electronic Devices (PED) Tolerance for Civil Aircraft DO-262C, MOPS for Avionics Supporting Next Generation Satellite Systems SC-228 TSO-CNPC December 2017 SC-228 AC February 2018 SC-234 AC D, Use of Portable Electronic Devices Aboard Aircraft October 2017 SC-222 TSO-C159d TBD UAS C2 Equipment design standard Airworthiness installation guidance. (Delay from May 2017 to align with proposed TSO.) Provides aircraft operators with guidance for compliance to Title 14 CFR part 91, section Portable Electronic Devices Includes improvements to test cases for Iridium Next Short Burst Data testing

113 RTCA Published Documents FAA Pending Guidance (2) DO-343A MASPS for AMS(R)S Data and Voice Communications Supporting Required Communications Performance and Required Surveillance Performance SC-222 None at this time N/A Includes Swift Broad Band ground gateway-to-aircraft VPN tunneling. Needed for engineering/ scoping purposes DO-368, MOPS for GPS/GLONASS (FDMA + Antenna) L1-only Airborne Equipment SC-159 Under review DO-246E, GNSS-Based Precision Approach Local Area Augmentation System Signal-in-Space Interface Control Document SC-159 None This document is a reference for DO-253D. It is published by RTCA for the convenience of avionics OEMs. DO-365, Detect and Avoid MOPS Phase I SC-228 TSO-C212 September 2017 Design standard AC January 2018 Airworthiness installation of a UAS DAA system DO-366, Air-to-Air Radar Detect and Avoid MOPS Phase I SC-228 TSO-C211 September 2017 Design standard DO-253D, MOPS for GPS Local Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment SC-159 New TSOs and/or modifications to TSO-C161 and TSO C162 January 2018 New design standard to support Category II/III operations; maintenance updates to legacy standards

114 RTCA Documents Pending PMC Approval RTCA Document DO-311A, MOPS for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries and Battery Systems DO-227A, MOPS for Non- Rechargeable Lithium Batteries Develop ed By SC-225 SC-235 Planned FAA Guidance Planned Release Date TSO-C179a March 2018 AC A June 2018 TSO-C142b June 2018 AC September 2018 Comment Updates design standard for rechargeable lithium batteries Update installation standard for rechargeable lithium batteries Updates design std nonrechargeable lithium batteries Updates installation std for nonrechargeable lithium batteries

115 DISCUSSION

116 Agenda Item 7G: Discussion Special Committee Chair Reports RTCA Paper No /PMC-1643 Rebecca Morrison, RTCA Program Director September 21, 2017

117 Agenda Item 7H: Discussion Report on RTCA / EUROCAE Cooperation RTCA Paper No /PMC-1644 Rebecca Morrison, RTCA Program Director September 21, 2017

118 New Documents Released by EUROCAE since Last PMC Standard Title Working Group Date of Publication ED-246 ED-242 Process Specification for Wireless On-board Avionics Networks Minimum Aviation System Performance Standard For AMS(R)S Data and Voice Communications Supporting Required Communications Performance (RCP) and Required Surveillance Performance (RSP) WG-96 21/07/2017 WG-82/SC /06/2017 ED-243 Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Avionics Supporting Next Generation Satellite Systems (NGSS) WG-82/SC /07/2017 ED-245 MASPS for Installation of Fuel Cell Systems on Large Civil Aircraft WG-80/AE-7 07/06/2017 ED-147A ATM Validation Platforms Interoperability Specification WG-81 23/05/2017 ED-137/1C Interoperability Standards for VoIP ATM Components - Volume 1: Radio WG-67 23/05/2017 ED-238 ED-244 ED-241 Operational Services and Environment Definition (OSED) for Traffic Awareness and Collision Avoidance in Class A, B and C Airspace under Instrument Flight Rules UAS / RPAS Flight Crew Licensing Skill Test and Proficiency Check Report Form Minimum Operational Performance Specification For Altimetry Function WG-73 18/05/2017 WG-73/WG-93 14/03/2017 WG-68 04/04/

119 New Working Groups WG-107: WG RNP Reversion based on DME/DME Kickoff in November 2017 SC-227 Amending their TOR to monitor WG-107 s activities 124

120 Joint Committees: SC-213/WG-79 SC-214/WG-78 SC-214/WG-92 SC-216/WG-72 SC-217/WG-44 SC-222/WG-82 SC-229/WG-98 SC-236/WG-96 Current Joint SCs/WGs Special Relationships: SC-186/SC-209/WG-51/WG-59 SC-135/WG-14* SC-159/WG-62** SC-223/WG-82** SC-227/WG-107*** SC-228/WG-105*** FAS *Publishes technically equivalent documents but does not meet jointly **Pending future joint work ***Monitoring progress 125

121 International Civil Aviation Organization Update RPASP 9 Plenary (Oct 30 th -Nov 3 rd ) Final coordination with/endorsement by other experts groups by Aug 2017 (for the candidate SARPS) Final drafts presented Second Global Air Navigation Industry Symposium (GANIS/2) and First Safety and Air Navigation Implementation Symposium (SANIS/1) Dec 11 th -15 th Al Secen attending meetings and coordinating ICAO for RTCA

122 TAC Meetings in 2017 TAC#70: October 2017 TAC#71: January 2018 TAC#72: May

123 DISCUSSION 128

124 Agenda Item 8: Documents for FRAC None for September 21, 2017

125 Agenda Agenda Item 9A: SC-186 Terms of Reference Rev. 18 Update Jessie Turner The Boeing Company SC-186 Co-chair RTCA Paper No /PMC-1645 RTCA PMC September 21, 2017 Copyright 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

126 SC-186 Terms of Reference Rev. 18 Changes SC LEADERSHIP - Gregg Nesemeier replaces Don Walker as DFO. Many thanks to Don for his years of service as the DFO! DELIVERABLES Advanced Flight-deck based Interval Management (FIM) SPR, Interop (DO- 328B). Change from 2018 to Dec The 2018 was only an initial estimate made back in Advanced Flight-deck based Interval Management (FIM) MOPS. Identified initial FIM MOPS release (DO-361). Change DO-361A update from 2018 to Dec The 2018 was only an initial estimate made back in MHz ADS-B MOPS update (DO-260C). Change from 2019 to Dec The 2019 was only an initial estimate made back in Split out the Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) MOPS update (DO-282C) from the 1090 MHz MOPS (DO-260C) deliverable line, since it is a separate deliverable getting worked under a separate task within SC-186 WG-3 (recognizing that many of the changes made in DO-260C will likely get folded into DO-282C). Current plan is to complete DO-282C by Dec Copyright 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

127 SC-186 Terms of Reference Rev. 18 Changes ENVISIONED USE OF DELIVERABLE(S) - EUROCAE WG-51 is not currently working with RTCA SC-186 on Advanced FIM. The wording in this section is revised to reflect this. SPECIFIC GUIDANCE (specific line items were updated) #1 EUROCAE WG-51 is not currently working with RTCA SC-186 on Advanced FIM. Also, ADS-B In ARC is deleted (it was completed in 2012). #2 Add that we are working jointly with EUROCAE WG-51 on the DO-260C MOPS update. #5 Editorial change: DO-185A DO-185[ ] #6 EUROCAE WG-51 is not currently working with RTCA SC-186 on Advanced FIM. #10 Entire line is deleted. SC-186 is not working on CDTI-Assisted Pilot Procedures (CAPP). Paired Approach is covered under the current WG-4 Advanced FIM work. Pairwise Trajectory Management (PTM) research was terminated by NASA before it was sufficiently mature, therefore, it is deleted. #11 (re-numbered #10) Add coordination with SC-228 (UAS) as appropriate. Copyright 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

128 SC-186 Terms of Reference Rev. 18 Changes ACRONYMS - Update list of Acronyms ALL PROPOSED TOR CHANGES WERE APPROVED TO MOVE FORWARD TO THE PMC AT THE 67 TH SC-186 PLENARY HELD AUGUST 22, 2017 Copyright 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

129 Agenda Item 9B: ICAO Interaction: PMC Direction Margaret Jenny, RTCA President

130 Agenda Item 9C: SC-227 Terms of Reference Change PMC Meeting September 21, 2017 RTCA Paper No /PMC-1652

131 Summary of Committee Current Scope The committee will update DO-257A consistent with DO-236C and Change 1, and Revision to DO -283B to ensure its minimum standards for display of navigation information on electronic maps further facilitate the implementation of PBN. The committee will also remove outdated requirements and update the document with newer, more appropriate guidance material and regulatory document references. 136

132 Current Committee Leadership Chair Mike Cramer (MITRE) DFO Barry Miller (AIR) WG-3 Chair Sam Miller (MITRE) 137

133 Changes to TOR Update to DO-257A remains targeted for completion December 2017 Additional Tasking to Monitor EUROCAE WG- 107 per the following: Interested committee members will participate as needed and review draft materials produced by WG- 107 throughout its work on DME/DME as a reversionary mode for RNP operations. 138

134 Agenda Item 9D: FAA AIR and AFS Reorganization PMC Meeting September 21, 2017

135 FAA Aircraft Certification Service (AIR) Transformation Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: By: RTCA Dave Hempe, Deputy Executive Director, AIR Date: 21 September, 2017 RTCA Paper No /PMC-1663

136 Drivers of Change Industry growth Industry expands and contracts much faster than the FAA in its current structure can manage Globalization of aviation Industry is made up of an international web of networks and complex business arrangements that are challenging our traditional regulatory model Heightened expectations The public, industry and government entities continue to increase their expectations of us to do things faster and without error Velocity of change Technological advances and business model changes are precipitating higher rates of change and increasing the need for organizational agility and adaptability as our environment changes Federal Aviation Administration

137 AIR Transformation Improving Efficiency and Effectiveness Additional information can be found on the AIR Transformation website: Federal Aviation Administration

138 Benefits of AIR Transformation Encourages early industry engagement and risk-based system surveillance to eliminate barriers from unnecessary FAA involvement during certification Systems Oversight AIR s Past Focus Improves consistency and standardization by establishing single functional lines for 1) certification, 2) standards and 3) system oversight Standards Compliance Fosters innovation by engaging industry applicants early to understand new concepts and ensure viable path to compliance AIR s Current Focus Provides agility and adaptability to meet the challenges of the dynamic global aviation industry Systems Oversight Compliance Standards Establishes business practices for utilizing metrics for determining efficacy of Industry/FAA associated with compliance/safety and time to market Federal Aviation Administration

139 Strategy for AIR Transformation Collaboration with stakeholders to identify requirements, including actions & timeframes Federal Aviation Administration

140 The Blueprint AIR s Vision for the Transformed state Vision: an image of the future Organizational Vision: describes the system in the future. A source of inspiration and decision making criteria Published March 1, Federal Aviation Administration

141 Industry / AIR Collaboration Proposed Safety Oversight and Certification Aviation Rulemaking Committee* AIR-1 Stakeholder Collaboration Team (SCT) Accountability Framework Risk Based Decision Making International Partnerships Fostering Innovation SCT Workgroups: FAA, Industry, Labor Air-Industry Relationships Information Management Strategy Learning Organization Collaborative Work Environment Internal Workgroups : FAA, Labor *Final Approval of SOC-ARC pending Federal Aviation Administration

142 Improving Our Organization Former State Aircraft Certification Service AIR-1, Director AIR-2, Deputy Director Executive Support Staff (AIR-10) Fuels Program Staff (AIR-20) Design, Manufacturing & Airworthiness Division (AIR-100) International Division (AIR-400) Planning & Program Management Division (AIR-500) Transport Directorate (ANM-100) Small Airplane Directorate (ACE-100) Engine and Propeller Directorate (ANE-100) Rotorcraft Directorate (ASW-100) Policy Admin Policy Foreign Affairs Technical Training Budget Staffing Policy ACO s MIDO s Admin Policy ACO s MIDO s Admin Policy ACO s MIDO s Admin Policy ACO s MIDO s Admin Federal Aviation Administration

143 Improving our Organization Realignment (As of July 23) Executive Technical Support Staff (AIR-10) Brian Morris Alternative Fuels Program Staff (AIR-20) Peter White AIR-2, Deputy Executive Director, Regulatory Operations David Hempe Aircraft Certification Service AIR-1, Executive Director Dorenda Baker AIR-3, Deputy Executive Director, Strategic Initiatives Chris Carter, Acting Organizational Performance Division (AIR-300) Colleen D Alessandro AIR-300 Staff (Stood up on October 30, 2016) International Division (AIR-400) Sarbhpreet Sawhney, Acting Policy Foreign Affairs Policy & Innovation Division (AIR- 600) Mike Kaszycki, Acting Compliance & Airworthiness Division (AIR- 700) 1Lance Gant 4 Policy ACOs 8 DSCO System Oversight Division (AIR-800) Jeff Duven MIDOs MIOs BASOO Enterprise Operations Division (AIR-900) Mike Linegang, Acting Enterprise-wide Technical and Administrative Support Federal Aviation Administration

144 Find More Information Learn more on the public AIR Transformation website: Federal Aviation Administration

145 Questions? Federal Aviation Administration

146 Flight Standards New Structure Federal Aviation Administration Prepared for: External Stakeholder By: Date: August 2017 RTCA Paper No /PMC-1664

147 Consistency and Standardization ARC History of Change Future of Flight Standards (FFS) Executive Team (developed functional model) FFS Work Group (validated a need for change) 110+ around Cultural Changes 60+ around Organizational Changes FFS Implementation Team (proposed structural model) Enable a small group of leaders to manage AFS Increase the functional focus for each leader Reduce functional duplication and overlap Move from Regional Model to Functional Model No Geographic Boundaries Employ and model interdependence and critical thinking Align standards and assurance Improve consistency Address 60+ improvement areas identified Future of Flight Standards 2017 Federal Aviation Administration

148 Awareness: What Does Flight Standards Need to Do Better? We need to position Flight Standards culturally and structurally for: Accountability to Flying Public, Stakeholders Meet the needs of a constantly & rapidly changing industry Fix/prevent issues (real and perceived) with consistency and standardization in regulatory interpretation Budget Constraints Balance allocation of resources Increase efficient use of personnel and travel funds Reduce redundancy in regions Change Readiness to Meet Constant Stream of New Challenges Operational efficiency & effectiveness Organizational agility Consistent service and performance Decision-Making e.g., Risk-Based Decision-Making Strategic Initiative Culture must be ready to understand and implement all aspects of risk-based decision-making, including Compliance Philosophy Future of Flight Standards 2017 Federal Aviation Administration

149 Awareness: What Does Flight Standards Service Need to Do Better? Future of Flight Standards 2017 Federal Aviation Administration

150 Flight Standards New Structure =Organizational Change in Two Key Areas Cultural Change Management Change Develop individual competencies in: Interdependence, Critical Thinking - Consistency Mindset / Skillset / Toolset + Develop enterprise competencies in: Leadership Development Change Management Coach Approach Mutual Learning + Streamline AFS structure to: Enable a small group of leaders to manage AFS Increase functional focus for each leader Reduce functional duplication/overlap Align standards and implementation Individual Change Enterprise Change Result = Organizational Health: Agility, Efficiency, Consistency to meet challenges of: Structural Change Accountability, Budget, Change-Readiness, Decision-Making (e.g., compliance) Future of Flight Standards 2017 Federal Aviation Administration

151 Case for Change: Past Organizational Model 6

152 Flight Standards Service New Structure Future of Flight Standards 2017 Federal Aviation Administration

153 Questions?