Presenters. Researcher, Institute for Urban Strategies, The Mori Memorial Foundation

Transcription

1 Presenters Chiharu Hirota (Moderator) Researcher, Institute for Urban Strategies, The Mori Memorial Foundation Hiroo Ichikawa Dean, Professional Graduate School of Governance Studies, Meiji University Executive Director, the Mori Memorial Foundation Hiroo Mori Senior Managing Director, Mori Building Co., Ltd

2 Global Power City Index Rating the Global 40 Cities since 2008 Hiroo Ichikawa

3 Organization Committee Supervision of Creating Rankings Member Saskia Sassen Professor, Columbia University Chairman Heizo Takenaka Professor, Keio University The Director of the Global Security Research Institute Chairman, Institute for Urban Strategies, The Mori Memorial Foundation Member Hiroo Ichikawa Professor and Dean, Graduate School of Governance Studies, Meiji University Director of the Mori Memorial Foundation Principal Advisor Sir Peter Hall Professor, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London Member Richard Bender Professor and Dean Emeritus, University of California, Berkeley Expertise Partners Advise in Qualitative Survey Intellectuals and Professionals with International Experiences as Global Actors Peer Reviewer Review and Comment on the Ranking Allen J. Scott Distinguished Professor, University of California, Los Angeles Peter Nijkamp Professor, VU University Amsterdam Fellow, Tinbergen Institute Working Group -Fundamental Research of Cities -Analysis of Data -Creation of Draft Rankings Principal Hiroo Ichikawa Staff Institute for Urban Strategies, The Mori Memorial Foundation Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.

4 Global Power City Index 2012 Hiroo Ichikawa

5 Selected 40 Cities 17Cities in Europe/Africa 13 Cities in Asia 10 Cities in America 5 Cities added from GPCI-2011

6 Criteria for Selection 1 Cities found in the top ten of existing, influential city rankings ( The Global Financial Centres Index, Worldwide Centers of Commerce Index and Cities of Opportunity ) 2 Major cities of countries which are in the top ten in terms of competition according to influential international competiveness rankings (created by ( World Economic Forum, and IMD ) 3 Cities which do not meet the above criteria but which are deemed appropriate for inclusion by the GPCI committee or its working members.

7 Ranking Creation Method - Creation Flow for Function-based Ranking

8 5 Ranking Actors Creation in this study Method - Flow of Creation for Actor-specific Ranking Manager Researcher Artist Tourist Resident Important Factors Demanded by Each Actor Economy Function Research & Development Cultural Interaction Livability Environment Accessibility indicators 34 indicators 24 indicators 26 indicators 39 indicators Manager Score Researcher Score Artist Score Visitor Score Resident Score

9 MANAGER Demands to the City 1. Accumulation of enterprises & business deals 2. Potential of business growth 3. Ease of business (including regulations) 4. Business surroundings 5. Pool of human resources 6. Accumulation of business support industry 7. Favorable environment for business and for employees' families 8. Politics, economy, and disaster risk

10 RESEARCHER Demands to the City 1. Qualities of research institutions, researchers and directors 2. Accumulation of research institutes & researchers 3. Existence of opportunities that stimulate researchers in conducting academic activities 4. Readiness to accept researchers 5. Opportunities after graduation (job finding, etc.) 6. Living environment

11 ARTIST Demands to the City 1. Cultural stimulus 2. Pool of artists 3. Art markets 4. Environment for creative activities 5. Living environment

12 VISITOR 1. Atmosphere of cities Demands to the City 2. Public safety 3. Destinations for tourists 4. Accommodations 5. Restaurants 6. Shopping 7. Mobility

13 RESIDENT 1. Economic environment Demands to the City 2. Living environment 3. Work environment 4. Educational environment 5. Leisure activities 6. Safety and security 7. Medical environment

14 Total score and rank by Functions

15 , , , , , London(1452.5)[2 (320.6)] New York(1376.6)[1 (320.9)] Paris(1349.6)[3 (308.7)] TOKYO(1324.9)[4 (304.3)] Singapore(1118.6)[5 (255.3)] Seoul(1081.1)[7 (233.4)] Amsterdam(1068.3)[9 (226.6)] Berlin(1047.3)[6 (234.8)] Hong Kong(1027.2)[8 (231.1)] Vienna(1016.7)[12 (215.3)] Beijing(978.3)[18 (204.2)] Frankfurt(966.7)[10 (225.1)] Barcelona(964.6) Shanghai(964.5)[23 (199.3)] Sydney(962.8)[11 (215.8)] Stockholm(961.2) Osaka(942.1)[15 (205.8)] Zurich(937.9)[14 (211.4)] Brussels(931.3)[24 (199.2)] Copenhagen(929.7)[19 (203.2)] Toronto(925.6)[25 (194.6)] Madrid(908.6)[20 (202.8)] Los Angeles(890.7)[13 (212.2)] Vancouver(890.1)[22 (201.3)] Istanbul(875.4) Geneva(867.8)[17 (205.2)] Boston(858.4)[16 (205.7)] Chicago(854.1)[26 (189.4)] Milan(850.5)[27 (183.6)] 経済 Washington D.C.(836.5) 研究 開発 San Francisco(833.3)[21 (201.5)] Taipei(807.9)[29 (175.2)] 文化 交流 Fukuoka(790.3)[28 (177)] 居住 Kuala Lumpur(788.1)[31 (167.2)] 環境 Bangkok(781.4)[30 (171.8)] 交通 アクセス Mexico City(781) Moscow(760.2)[33 (160.8)] Sao Paulo(667.7)[32 (161.5)] Mumbai(608.1)[34 (142.4)] Cairo(601)[35 (139.1)]

16 Ranking Changes from GPCI-2008 to GPCI-2012

17

18 Function-specific Ranking Top 4 Cities Rank Total Score Economy R&D Cultural Interaction Livability Environment Accessibility 1 London Tokyo New York London Paris Tokyo Paris New York New York Tokyo Paris Osaka Stockholm London Paris Beijing Paris New York Fukuoka Geneva Amsterdam Tokyo London London Berlin Vancouver Zurich Seoul Singapore Hong Kong Boston Singapore Vienna Sao Paulo Hong Kong Seoul Singapore Los Angeles Barcelona Amsterdam Madrid Frankfurt Amsterdam Shanghai Seoul Tokyo Stockholm Vienna New York Berlin Zurich Singapore Los Angeles Barcelona Berlin Tokyo Hong Kong Paris Chicago 96.6 Beijing Berlin Copenhagen Singapore Vienna Washington, D.C San Francisco 80.4 Vienna Taipei Frankfurt Istanbul Beijing Geneva Hong Kong 77.7 Istanbul Tokyo Barcelona Shanghai Frankfurt Sydney Osaka 71.2 Brussels Copenhagen London Brussels Barcelona Seoul Shanghai 70.3 Sydney Milan Seoul Milan Shanghai Copenhagen Washington, D.C Milan Geneva Sydney Moscow Sydney Toronto Beijing 66.6 Seoul Brussels Singapore Barcelona Stockholm Amsterdam Berlin 64.9 Madrid Zurich Amsterdam Madrid Osaka Stockholm Amsterdam 61.8 Hong Kong Toronto Osaka Toronto Zurich Frankfurt Zurich 59.9 Amsterdam Kuala Lumpur Paris Bangkok Brussels Berlin Sydney 57.7 Moscow Frankfurt Washington, D.C Copenhagen Copenhagen Vancouver Toronto 54.3 Chicago London Los Angeles Osaka Toronto Vienna Stockholm 51.9 Bangkok Madrid Vancouver Vienna Madrid Osaka Vancouver 51.5 Shanghai Shanghai New York Boston Los Angeles San Francisco Taipei 50.5 Mexico City Mexico City Brussels Kuala Lumpur Vancouver Taipei Barcelona 49.8 Toronto 97.6 Seoul Fukuoka Berlin Istanbul Boston Vienna 47.4 Stockholm 93.5 Sydney San Francisco Taipei Geneva Chicago Moscow 46.7 San Francisco 92.5 Singapore Toronto Chicago Boston Los Angeles Geneva 45.6 Washington, D.C Beijing Milan Sydney Chicago Moscow Fukuoka 44.6 Osaka 76.2 Mumbai Boston Beijing Milan Brussels Madrid 43.8 Vancouver 74.3 Istanbul Mexico City Zurich Washington, D.C Istanbul Copenhagen 39.9 Copenhagen 71.8 Hong Kong Hong Kong Stockholm San Francisco Kuala Lumpur Istanbul 39.8 Kuala Lumpur 71.3 Bangkok Bangkok Mexico City Taipei Mexico City Brussels 35.8 Boston 70.4 New York Mumbai Vancouver Fukuoka Fukuoka Bangkok 35.6 Frankfurt 67.3 Cairo Kuala Lumpur Fukuoka Kuala Lumpur Sao Paulo Frankfurt 34.7 Cairo 55.8 San Francisco Chicago San Francisco Bangkok Madrid Milan 29.3 Zurich 47.8 Boston Shanghai Cairo Mexico City Barcelona Kuala Lumpur 23.5 Sao Paulo 43.9 Chicago Istanbul Washington, D.C Moscow Bangkok Mexico City 19.7 Mumbai 41.6 Sao Paulo Taipei Los Angeles Sao Paulo Mumbai Sao Paulo 8.4 Taipei 41.4 Moscow Cairo Geneva Mumbai Milan Mumbai 4.1 Fukuoka 33.4 Washington, D.C Beijing Mumbai Cairo Cairo Cairo 3.3 Geneva 31.0 Los Angeles Moscow 70.8 Sao Paulo 72.0

19 Indicator Group Deviation Top 4 Cities

20 Tokyo s Strengths 25 指標 15 指標 13 指標 12 指標 2 指標 1 指標 1 指標 London 未満 20~30 30~40 40~50 50~60 60~70 70~80 80~90 90 以上経済研究 開発文化 交流居住環境 London 指標 指標 指標 12 指標 指標 1 指標 1 指標 0 20 未満 20~30 30~40 40~50 50~60 60~70 70~80 80~90 90 以上経済研究 開発文化 交流居住環境 Number of Indicators by Deviation Score 30 London New York Under 20 20~30 30~40 40~50 50~60 60~70 70~80 80~90 Over indicators over indicators over Under 20 20~30 30~40 40~50 50~60 60~70 70~80 80~90 Over Paris indicators over Under 20 20~30 30~40 40~50 50~60 60~70 70~80 80~90 Over Tokyo Under 20 20~30 30~40 40~50 50~60 60~70 70~80 80~90 Over indicators over

21 Function-specific Ranking North American Cities Rank Total Score Economy R&D Cultural Interaction Livability Environment Accessibility 1 London Tokyo New York London Paris Tokyo Paris New York New York Tokyo Paris Osaka Stockholm London Paris Beijing Paris New York Fukuoka Geneva Amsterdam Tokyo London London Berlin Vancouver Zurich Seoul Singapore Hong Kong Boston Singapore Vienna Sao Paulo Hong Kong Seoul Singapore Los Angeles Barcelona Amsterdam Madrid Frankfurt Amsterdam Shanghai Seoul Tokyo Stockholm Vienna New York Berlin Zurich Singapore Los Angeles Barcelona Berlin Tokyo Hong Kong Paris Chicago 96.6 Beijing Berlin Copenhagen Singapore Vienna Washington, D.C San Francisco 80.4 Vienna Taipei Frankfurt Istanbul Beijing Geneva Hong Kong 77.7 Istanbul Tokyo Barcelona Shanghai Frankfurt Sydney Osaka 71.2 Brussels Copenhagen London Brussels Barcelona Seoul Shanghai 70.3 Sydney Milan Seoul Milan Shanghai Copenhagen Washington, D.C Milan Geneva Sydney Moscow Sydney Toronto Beijing 66.6 Seoul Brussels Singapore Barcelona Stockholm Amsterdam Berlin 64.9 Madrid Zurich Amsterdam Madrid Osaka Stockholm Amsterdam 61.8 Hong Kong Toronto Osaka Toronto Zurich Frankfurt Zurich 59.9 Amsterdam Kuala Lumpur Paris Bangkok Brussels Berlin Sydney 57.7 Moscow Frankfurt Washington, D.C Copenhagen Copenhagen Vancouver Toronto 54.3 Chicago London Los Angeles Osaka Toronto Vienna Stockholm 51.9 Bangkok Madrid Vancouver Vienna Madrid Osaka Vancouver 51.5 Shanghai Shanghai New York Boston Los Angeles San Francisco Taipei 50.5 Mexico City Mexico City Brussels Kuala Lumpur Vancouver Taipei Barcelona 49.8 Toronto 97.6 Seoul Fukuoka Berlin Istanbul Boston Vienna 47.4 Stockholm 93.5 Sydney San Francisco Taipei Geneva Chicago Moscow 46.7 San Francisco 92.5 Singapore Toronto Chicago Boston Los Angeles Geneva 45.6 Washington, D.C Beijing Milan Sydney Chicago Moscow Fukuoka 44.6 Osaka 76.2 Mumbai Boston Beijing Milan Brussels Madrid 43.8 Vancouver 74.3 Istanbul Mexico City Zurich Washington, D.C Istanbul Copenhagen 39.9 Copenhagen 71.8 Hong Kong Hong Kong Stockholm San Francisco Kuala Lumpur Istanbul 39.8 Kuala Lumpur 71.3 Bangkok Bangkok Mexico City Taipei Mexico City Brussels 35.8 Boston 70.4 New York Mumbai Vancouver Fukuoka Fukuoka Bangkok 35.6 Frankfurt 67.3 Cairo Kuala Lumpur Fukuoka Kuala Lumpur Sao Paulo Frankfurt 34.7 Cairo 55.8 San Francisco Chicago San Francisco Bangkok Madrid Milan 29.3 Zurich 47.8 Boston Shanghai Cairo Mexico City Barcelona Kuala Lumpur 23.5 Sao Paulo 43.9 Chicago Istanbul Washington, D.C Moscow Bangkok Mexico City 19.7 Mumbai 41.6 Sao Paulo Taipei Los Angeles Sao Paulo Mumbai Sao Paulo 8.4 Taipei 41.4 Moscow Cairo Geneva Mumbai Milan Mumbai 4.1 Fukuoka 33.4 Washington, D.C Beijing Mumbai Cairo Cairo Cairo 3.3 Geneva 31.0 Los Angeles Moscow 70.8 Sao Paulo 72.0

22 Function-specific Ranking Asian Cities ランク 総合スコア経済研究 開発文化 交流居住 1 London Tokyo New York London Paris Tokyo Paris New York New York Tokyo Paris Osaka Stockholm London Paris Beijing Paris New York Fukuoka Geneva Amsterdam Tokyo London London Berlin Vancouver Zurich Seoul Singapore Hong Kong Boston Singapore Vienna Sao Paulo Hong Kong Seoul Singapore Los Angeles Barcelona Amsterdam Madrid Frankfurt Amsterdam Shanghai Seoul Tokyo Stockholm Vienna New York Berlin Zurich Singapore Los Angeles Barcelona Berlin Tokyo Hong Kong Paris Chicago 96.6 Beijing Berlin Copenhagen Singapore Vienna Washington, D.C San Francisco 80.4 Vienna Taipei Frankfurt Istanbul Beijing Geneva Hong Kong 77.7 Istanbul Tokyo Barcelona Shanghai Frankfurt Sydney Osaka 71.2 Brussels Copenhagen London Brussels Barcelona Seoul Shanghai 70.3 Sydney Milan Seoul Milan Shanghai Copenhagen Washington, D.C Milan Geneva Sydney Moscow Sydney Toronto Beijing 66.6 Seoul Brussels Singapore Barcelona Stockholm Amsterdam Berlin 64.9 Madrid Zurich Amsterdam Madrid Osaka Stockholm Amsterdam 61.8 Hong Kong Toronto Osaka Toronto Zurich Frankfurt Zurich 59.9 Amsterdam Kuala Lumpur Paris Bangkok Brussels Berlin Sydney 57.7 Moscow Frankfurt Washington, D.C Copenhagen Copenhagen Vancouver Toronto 54.3 Chicago London Los Angeles Osaka Toronto Vienna Stockholm 51.9 Bangkok Madrid Vancouver Vienna Madrid Osaka Vancouver 51.5 Shanghai Shanghai New York Boston Los Angeles San Francisco Taipei 50.5 Mexico City Mexico City Brussels Kuala Lumpur Vancouver Taipei Barcelona 49.8 Toronto 97.6 Seoul Fukuoka Berlin Istanbul Boston Vienna 47.4 Stockholm 93.5 Sydney San Francisco Taipei Geneva Chicago Moscow 46.7 San Francisco 92.5 Singapore Toronto Chicago Boston Los Angeles Geneva 45.6 Washington, D.C Beijing Milan Sydney Chicago Moscow Fukuoka 44.6 Osaka 76.2 Mumbai Boston Beijing Milan Brussels Madrid 43.8 Vancouver 74.3 Istanbul Mexico City Zurich Washington, D.C Istanbul Copenhagen 39.9 Copenhagen 71.8 Hong Kong Hong Kong Stockholm San Francisco Kuala Lumpur Istanbul 39.8 Kuala Lumpur 71.3 Bangkok Bangkok Mexico City Taipei Mexico City Brussels 35.8 Boston 70.4 New York Mumbai Vancouver Fukuoka Fukuoka Bangkok 35.6 Frankfurt 67.3 Cairo Kuala Lumpur Fukuoka Kuala Lumpur Sao Paulo Frankfurt 34.7 Cairo 55.8 San Francisco Chicago San Francisco Bangkok Madrid Milan 29.3 Zurich 47.8 Boston Shanghai Cairo Mexico City Barcelona Kuala Lumpur 23.5 Sao Paulo 43.9 Chicago Istanbul Washington, D.C Moscow Bangkok Mexico City 19.7 Mumbai 41.6 Sao Paulo Taipei Los Angeles Sao Paulo Mumbai Sao Paulo 8.4 Taipei 41.4 Moscow Cairo Geneva Mumbai Milan Mumbai 4.1 Fukuoka 33.4 Washington, D.C Beijing Mumbai Cairo Cairo Cairo 3.3 Geneva 31.0 Los Angeles Moscow 70.8 Sao Paulo 72.0 環境 交通 アクセス

23 Actor-specific Ranking Top 4 Cities Rank Manager Researcher Artist Visitor Resident 1 London 55.8 New York 63.5 Paris 58.0 London 58.5 Paris Singapore 54.1 Tokyo 52.5 London 57.1 New York 54.6 London Hong Kong 50.1 London 49.4 Tokyo 52.5 Paris 53.4 Tokyo New York 49.4 Paris 47.9 Berlin 50.0 Istanbul 46.1 New York Shanghai 47.8 Boston 36.1 New York 49.5 Hong Kong 45.4 Frankfurt Beijing 47.7 Seoul 34.1 Barcelona 46.6 Tokyo 45.0 Berlin Tokyo 45.0 Los Angeles 33.6 Vienna 46.5 Beijing 43.6 Zurich Paris 44.9 Singapore 32.1 Los Angeles 44.7 Barcelona 42.9 Vienna Seoul 44.4 San Francisco 31.4 Milan 43.0 Singapore 42.3 Washington, D.C Zurich 41.8 Chicago 29.0 Amsterdam 42.8 Shanghai 41.3 Vancouver Berlin 41.7 Sydney 28.9 Mexico City 40.9 Berlin 40.7 Boston Amsterdam 41.4 Washington, D.C Madrid 40.9 Seoul 40.0 Amsterdam Geneva 40.2 Beijing 28.3 Toronto 40.1 Bangkok 38.9 Osaka Vienna 40.0 Berlin 27.4 Stockholm 39.7 Vienna 37.3 Milan Stockholm 39.6 Amsterdam 26.5 Beijing 39.6 Milan 37.1 Stockholm Vancouver 39.2 Osaka 26.5 Sydney 38.1 Brussels 35.9 Copenhagen Taipei 39.2 Zurich 25.9 Osaka 37.8 Amsterdam 35.1 Geneva Sydney 38.7 Vienna 25.9 Brussels 37.7 Madrid 34.7 San Francisco Toronto 38.7 Vancouver 25.0 Vancouver 37.3 Taipei 33.9 Barcelona Copenhagen 38.4 Hong Kong 24.8 Copenhagen 37.2 Toronto 33.4 Brussels Istanbul 38.2 Stockholm 24.4 San Francisco 36.9 Osaka 33.0 Madrid Frankfurt 37.8 Copenhagen 24.3 Chicago 36.6 Sydney 32.9 Fukuoka Kuala Lumpur 37.4 Toronto 23.7 Istanbul 35.8 Kuala Lumpur 32.8 Toronto Boston 36.2 Geneva 23.7 Fukuoka 35.5 Cairo 32.1 Sydney Washington, D.C Brussels 22.7 Frankfurt 35.2 Frankfurt 31.8 Seoul Osaka 34.6 Moscow 22.0 Bangkok 35.2 Chicago 31.7 Hong Kong Chicago 33.8 Barcelona 21.1 Shanghai 35.0 Vancouver 31.4 Shanghai Barcelona 33.5 Mexico City 20.8 Moscow 33.6 Mexico City 31.4 Taipei Brussels 33.3 Madrid 20.0 Kuala Lumpur 33.6 Boston 30.1 Beijing Madrid 32.7 Shanghai 19.9 Taipei 32.5 Fukuoka 29.6 Singapore Bangkok 32.6 Taipei 19.2 Seoul 32.3 Moscow 29.6 Los Angeles Los Angeles 31.7 Milan 19.1 Cairo 31.9 Stockholm 29.6 Mexico City Fukuoka 31.2 Fukuoka 19.0 Mumbai 30.9 San Francisco 28.5 Chicago San Francisco 30.3 Frankfurt 19.0 Washington, D.C Copenhagen 27.6 Moscow Mumbai 29.5 Istanbul 17.8 Sao Paulo 30.0 Los Angeles 27.1 Istanbul Moscow 28.2 Bangkok 17.5 Zurich 29.3 Zurich 25.5 Kuala Lumpur Cairo 28.0 Kuala Lumpur 15.5 Geneva 28.7 Mumbai 24.4 Bangkok Milan 27.4 Sao Paulo 14.9 Singapore 28.0 Washington, D.C Cairo Sao Paulo 25.2 Mumbai 10.3 Boston 25.1 Geneva 21.6 Mumbai Mexico City 24.4 Cairo 9.0 Hong Kong 24.1 Sao Paulo 16.0 Sao Paulo 27.3

24 Actor-specific Ranking North American Cities Rank Manager Researcher Artist Visitor Resident 1 London 55.8 New York 63.5 Paris 58.0 London 58.5 Paris Singapore 54.1 Tokyo 52.5 London 57.1 New York 54.6 London Hong Kong 50.1 London 49.4 Tokyo 52.5 Paris 53.4 Tokyo New York 49.4 Paris 47.9 Berlin 50.0 Istanbul 46.1 New York Shanghai 47.8 Boston 36.1 New York 49.5 Hong Kong 45.4 Frankfurt Beijing 47.7 Seoul 34.1 Barcelona 46.6 Tokyo 45.0 Berlin Tokyo 45.0 Los Angeles 33.6 Vienna 46.5 Beijing 43.6 Zurich Paris 44.9 Singapore 32.1 Los Angeles 44.7 Barcelona 42.9 Vienna Seoul 44.4 San Francisco 31.4 Milan 43.0 Singapore 42.3 Washington, D.C Zurich 41.8 Chicago 29.0 Amsterdam 42.8 Shanghai 41.3 Vancouver Berlin 41.7 Sydney 28.9 Mexico City 40.9 Berlin 40.7 Boston Amsterdam 41.4 Washington, D.C Madrid 40.9 Seoul 40.0 Amsterdam Geneva 40.2 Beijing 28.3 Toronto 40.1 Bangkok 38.9 Osaka Vienna 40.0 Berlin 27.4 Stockholm 39.7 Vienna 37.3 Milan Stockholm 39.6 Amsterdam 26.5 Beijing 39.6 Milan 37.1 Stockholm Vancouver 39.2 Osaka 26.5 Sydney 38.1 Brussels 35.9 Copenhagen Taipei 39.2 Zurich 25.9 Osaka 37.8 Amsterdam 35.1 Geneva Sydney 38.7 Vienna 25.9 Brussels 37.7 Madrid 34.7 San Francisco Toronto 38.7 Vancouver 25.0 Vancouver 37.3 Taipei 33.9 Barcelona Copenhagen 38.4 Hong Kong 24.8 Copenhagen 37.2 Toronto 33.4 Brussels Istanbul 38.2 Stockholm 24.4 San Francisco 36.9 Osaka 33.0 Madrid Frankfurt 37.8 Copenhagen 24.3 Chicago 36.6 Sydney 32.9 Fukuoka Kuala Lumpur 37.4 Toronto 23.7 Istanbul 35.8 Kuala Lumpur 32.8 Toronto Boston 36.2 Geneva 23.7 Fukuoka 35.5 Cairo 32.1 Sydney Washington, D.C Brussels 22.7 Frankfurt 35.2 Frankfurt 31.8 Seoul Osaka 34.6 Moscow 22.0 Bangkok 35.2 Chicago 31.7 Hong Kong Chicago 33.8 Barcelona 21.1 Shanghai 35.0 Vancouver 31.4 Shanghai Barcelona 33.5 Mexico City 20.8 Moscow 33.6 Mexico City 31.4 Taipei Brussels 33.3 Madrid 20.0 Kuala Lumpur 33.6 Boston 30.1 Beijing Madrid 32.7 Shanghai 19.9 Taipei 32.5 Fukuoka 29.6 Singapore Bangkok 32.6 Taipei 19.2 Seoul 32.3 Moscow 29.6 Los Angeles Los Angeles 31.7 Milan 19.1 Cairo 31.9 Stockholm 29.6 Mexico City Fukuoka 31.2 Fukuoka 19.0 Mumbai 30.9 San Francisco 28.5 Chicago San Francisco 30.3 Frankfurt 19.0 Washington, D.C Copenhagen 27.6 Moscow Mumbai 29.5 Istanbul 17.8 Sao Paulo 30.0 Los Angeles 27.1 Istanbul Moscow 28.2 Bangkok 17.5 Zurich 29.3 Zurich 25.5 Kuala Lumpur Cairo 28.0 Kuala Lumpur 15.5 Geneva 28.7 Mumbai 24.4 Bangkok Milan 27.4 Sao Paulo 14.9 Singapore 28.0 Washington, D.C Cairo Sao Paulo 25.2 Mumbai 10.3 Boston 25.1 Geneva 21.6 Mumbai Mexico City 24.4 Cairo 9.0 Hong Kong 24.1 Sao Paulo 16.0 Sao Paulo 27.3

25 Actor-specific Ranking Asian Cities Rank Manager Researcher Artist Visitor Resident 1 London 55.8 New York 63.5 Paris 58.0 London 58.5 Paris Singapore 54.1 Tokyo 52.5 London 57.1 New York 54.6 London Hong Kong 50.1 London 49.4 Tokyo 52.5 Paris 53.4 Tokyo New York 49.4 Paris 47.9 Berlin 50.0 Istanbul 46.1 New York Shanghai 47.8 Boston 36.1 New York 49.5 Hong Kong 45.4 Frankfurt Beijing 47.7 Seoul 34.1 Barcelona 46.6 Tokyo 45.0 Berlin Tokyo 45.0 Los Angeles 33.6 Vienna 46.5 Beijing 43.6 Zurich Paris 44.9 Singapore 32.1 Los Angeles 44.7 Barcelona 42.9 Vienna Seoul 44.4 San Francisco 31.4 Milan 43.0 Singapore 42.3 Washington, D.C Zurich 41.8 Chicago 29.0 Amsterdam 42.8 Shanghai 41.3 Vancouver Berlin 41.7 Sydney 28.9 Mexico City 40.9 Berlin 40.7 Boston Amsterdam 41.4 Washington, D.C Madrid 40.9 Seoul 40.0 Amsterdam Geneva 40.2 Beijing 28.3 Toronto 40.1 Bangkok 38.9 Osaka Vienna 40.0 Berlin 27.4 Stockholm 39.7 Vienna 37.3 Milan Stockholm 39.6 Amsterdam 26.5 Beijing 39.6 Milan 37.1 Stockholm Vancouver 39.2 Osaka 26.5 Sydney 38.1 Brussels 35.9 Copenhagen Taipei 39.2 Zurich 25.9 Osaka 37.8 Amsterdam 35.1 Geneva Sydney 38.7 Vienna 25.9 Brussels 37.7 Madrid 34.7 San Francisco Toronto 38.7 Vancouver 25.0 Vancouver 37.3 Taipei 33.9 Barcelona Copenhagen 38.4 Hong Kong 24.8 Copenhagen 37.2 Toronto 33.4 Brussels Istanbul 38.2 Stockholm 24.4 San Francisco 36.9 Osaka 33.0 Madrid Frankfurt 37.8 Copenhagen 24.3 Chicago 36.6 Sydney 32.9 Fukuoka Kuala Lumpur 37.4 Toronto 23.7 Istanbul 35.8 Kuala Lumpur 32.8 Toronto Boston 36.2 Geneva 23.7 Fukuoka 35.5 Cairo 32.1 Sydney Washington, D.C Brussels 22.7 Frankfurt 35.2 Frankfurt 31.8 Seoul Osaka 34.6 Moscow 22.0 Bangkok 35.2 Chicago 31.7 Hong Kong Chicago 33.8 Barcelona 21.1 Shanghai 35.0 Vancouver 31.4 Shanghai Barcelona 33.5 Mexico City 20.8 Moscow 33.6 Mexico City 31.4 Taipei Brussels 33.3 Madrid 20.0 Kuala Lumpur 33.6 Boston 30.1 Beijing Madrid 32.7 Shanghai 19.9 Taipei 32.5 Fukuoka 29.6 Singapore Bangkok 32.6 Taipei 19.2 Seoul 32.3 Moscow 29.6 Los Angeles Los Angeles 31.7 Milan 19.1 Cairo 31.9 Stockholm 29.6 Mexico City Fukuoka 31.2 Fukuoka 19.0 Mumbai 30.9 San Francisco 28.5 Chicago San Francisco 30.3 Frankfurt 19.0 Washington, D.C Copenhagen 27.6 Moscow Mumbai 29.5 Istanbul 17.8 Sao Paulo 30.0 Los Angeles 27.1 Istanbul Moscow 28.2 Bangkok 17.5 Zurich 29.3 Zurich 25.5 Kuala Lumpur Cairo 28.0 Kuala Lumpur 15.5 Geneva 28.7 Mumbai 24.4 Bangkok Milan 27.4 Sao Paulo 14.9 Singapore 28.0 Washington, D.C Cairo Sao Paulo 25.2 Mumbai 10.3 Boston 25.1 Geneva 21.6 Mumbai Mexico City 24.4 Cairo 9.0 Hong Kong 24.1 Sao Paulo 16.0 Sao Paulo 27.3

26 Findings of the GPCI London now ranks top overall, having overtaken New York. 2. Tokyo remains at No. 4, despite the effects of the Great Eastern Earthquake on some of the indicators. 3. Among the second tier group of cities, Asian cities such as Beijing and Shanghai show continuing progress and are closing the gap between themselves and the top four cities. We also see that North American cities seem to be suffering from a downward trend and are slipping down the rankings.

27 1. London now ranks top overall Olympic Bidding and the Comprehensive Power of Cities <Source>

28 1. London now ranks top overall The Effects of Securing Global Events on the Comprehensive Power of Cities

29 Comparison between London and NY 7.0% GDP Growth Rate 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% -1.0% -2.0% 百万ドル 800, , ,000 London New York Paris Tokyo GDP( トップ 4 都市 ) GPCI-2009 GPCI-2010 GPCI-2011 GPCI ,000

30 London VISITOR Visitor London(1st) New York(2nd) Paris(3rd) Tokyo(4th) Atmosphere of cities Public safety Destinations for tourists Accommodations Restaurants Shopping Mobility Visitor

31 Key Message (Finding 1) 1. London now ranks top overall, having overtaken New York. <Analysis from the data> Result of Olympic Effect The indicators with score increased from GPCI-2011 to GPCI-2012 Number of Large World- Class Cultural Events Held Number of Guest Rooms of Luxury Hotels GPCI-2011 GPCI ,400 16,100 Number of Hotels Number of Stadiums London vs New York Comparison of the number of Increase and decrease of scores in each indicator from GPCI-2011 to GPCI-2012 London New York Over 10 point increase 7 indicators 5 indicators Over 10 point decrease 4 indicators 4 indicators

32 2. Tokyo remains at No. 4 Despite the effects of the Great Eastern Earthquake on 3.11

33 Great Eastern Earthquake Simulation estimated in 2011 Nominal GDP GDP per Capita GDP Growth Rate Number of Passengers on International Flights Accessibility Score Rank Score ± 0 Rank Environment Economy Score Rank Total Score Rank Score ± 0 Rank Livability R&D Score ± 0 Rank Score -1.3 Rank Cultural Interaction Legend Number of International Conferences Held Number of Foreign Residents Number of Visitors from Abroad Number of International Students No Changes Rank Drops Affected Indicator by 3.11(Estimated) We estimated that the Tokyo s major influence was International interaction in comparison to the Top 3 cities.

34 Estimated Change 6 Months after Mar 11

35 Changes from the Great Eastern Earthquake Simulation in 2011 Accessibility Score Rank Score Rank Environment Economy Score -2.9 Rank Total Score +9.7 Rank Score Rank Livability R&D Score Rank Score +9.0 Rank Cultural Interaction Legend No Changes Rank Drops Rank Rises

36 Key Message (Finding 2) 2. Tokyo remains at No. 4, despite the effects of the Great Eastern Earthquake on some of the indicators. 6 month after the disaster, we estimated 12 indicators will be declined. However, the following indicator increased its score in fact. Economy Cultural Interaction Accessibility Nominal GDP Number of International Number of Passengers on Conferences Held International Flights GDP per Capita Total Unemployment Rate

37 3. Asia Cities Upwards, North American Cities Downwards

38 Comprehensive Ranking 2012: Changes since GPCI-2008 GPCI-2009 GPCI-2010 GPCI-2011 GPCI-2012 North American Cities New York Toronto Los Angeles Vancouver Boston Chicago Washington,D.C. 40 San Francisco

39 Comprehensive Ranking 2012: Changes since GPCI-2008 GPCI-2009 GPCI-2010 GPCI-2011 GPCI-2012 North American Cities New York Toronto Los Angeles Vancouver 20 Boston 25 Chicago 30 Washington,D.C. 35 San Francisco 40

40 Comprehensive Ranking 2012: Changes since GPCI-2008 GPCI-2009 GPCI-2010 GPCI-2011 GPCI-2012 Asian Cities Tokyo Singapore Seoul Hong Kong Beijing Shanghai Osaka Taipei Fukuoka Kuala Lumpur Bangkok

41 GDP Forecast of Major Asian Cities ( 年 ) ( 千億 US ドル ) ( USD million) 1,200, ,000, ,000 8 Tokyo 東京 Shanghai 上海 北京 Beijing シンガポール Singapore 600,000 6 Hong Kong 香港 400, , 台北 Taipei ソウル Seoul

42 Key Message (Finding 3) 3. Among the second tier group of cities, Asian cities such as Beijing and Shanghai show continuing progress and are closing the gap between themselves and the top four cities. We also see that North American cities seem to be suffering from a downward trend and are slipping down the rankings. Beijing Rapid growing indicator Shanghai Rapid growing indicator GPCI-2011 GPCI-2012 GPCI-2011 GPCI-2012 World s Top 300 Companies (Score) Number of Hotels Number of Visitors from Abroad 3.43mil 4.22mil World s Top 300 Companies (Score) Number of Hotels Number of Visitors from Abroad 4.90mil 6.66mil

43 Revitalization of Tokyo Hiroo Mori Senior Managing Director, Mori Building Co., Ltd. 18 October 2012

44 1. City of Tokyo Among the World s Leading Cities 2. Revitalization of Tokyo 3. Actions by Public Sector 4. Actions by Private Sector

45 1. City of Tokyo Among the World s Leading Cities 2. Revitalization of Tokyo 3. Actions by Public Sectors 4. Actions by Private Sectors

46 Summary of Tokyo s Status Strengths Weaknesses - Safety, Cleanliness - Diversity - High Efficiency, Accuracy - Hospitality - Lack of Urban Policies - Earthquakes Risks - Less Proximity to the Rest of the World

47 Compact City Model Super High-Rise Buildings Create Open Space 3ha 800 m2 50F 75% = 30,000 m2 = 3ha 3ha 100 m2 300 units = 30,000 m2 = 3ha

48 Vertical Garden City Vertical Garden City - Compact city including spaces for working, living and enjoying Creation of open space throughout the site by intelligent integrated land use Application of Vertical thinking to space over roads Greening of rooftops, walls, etc. Integrated complex space with diverse uses realized by multidimensional development Underground plaza shrinks the sense of distance from the openness of the above ground environment

49 1. City of Tokyo Among the World s Leading Cities 2. Revitalization of Tokyo 3. Actions by Public Sectors 4. Actions by Private Sectors

50 For Revitalization of Tokyo The Future of Central Tokyo Key Words International and Innovative Highly skilled people, intelligence and cultural diversity Source: the Association for Tokyo Urban-Core Rejuvenation. Creation of international, innovative, leading city of Asia.

51 For Revitalization of Tokyo To Achieve the Vision 6 Key Items: Internationalization Earthquake-resistance, Energy-sufficiency Greenery, Watersides, and Promenades Interaction with Talent Accumulation and Mixture of Functions Updating while Preserving History Source: the Association for Tokyo Urban-Core Rejuvenation. Creation of international, innovative, leading city of Asia.

52 Image of Urban Space and Activities in 2025 Vertically-integrated podiums for mixed-use with ground level differences

53 Image of Urban Space and Activities in 2025 Harvesting in rice paddy Observation of natural environment Open space for education connected to neighborhood Interactive classroom in collaboration with foreign schools

54 Image of Urban Space and Activities in 2025 Fresh market with locally-harvested foods Performances and music on bustling street LRT together with pedestrians Bike lanes running throughout neighborhoods

55 Image of Urban Space and Activities in 2025 Landscape incorporating natural ground Visitors enjoying a play after international convention World-famous theater with large space underground

56 1. City of Tokyo Among the World s Leading Cities 2. Revitalization of Tokyo 3. Actions by Public Sector 4. Actions by Private Sectors

57 Developing International Competitiveness as a National Strategy Special Priority Development Areas for Urban Renaissance (Jan. 2012) Support for Hardware Comprehensive Special Zones for International Competitiveness Development (Dec. 2011) Support for Software

58 Special Priority Development Areas for Urban Renaissance 11 areas across the country

59 Special Priority Development Areas for Urban Renaissance 4 areas in Tokyo

60 Special Priority Development Areas for Urban Renaissance Planning with Public-Private Partnerships Regulations regarding Air Rights over Roads Permit Process for Development Projects Tax Benefits for Development Projects

61 Comprehensive Special Zones for International Competitiveness Development 7 areas across the country Special Zone for Asian Headquarters in Tokyo Special Zone for Food Complex in Hokkaido Special Zone of Life Innovation in Kanagawa Special Zone promoting Life and Green Innovation in Tsukuba Special Zone to Create Asia s No.1 Aerospace Industry in Aichi and Gifu Special Zone for Innovation in Kansai Special Zone for Green Asia in Kyushu

62 Tokyo s Special Zone for Asian Headquarters

63 Tokyo s Special Zone for Asian Headquarters 1. Approaches / Business Exchange 2. Business Support 3. Living Environment Development 4. Business Environment to Secure BCP By 2016, an additional 50 Asian regional headquarters and 500 operations of foreign companies

64 1. City of Tokyo Among the World s Leading Cities 2. Revitalization of Tokyo 3. Actions by Public Sectors 4. Actions by Private Sector

65 Grand Design of Akasaka, Roppongi, Toranomon and Shinbashi Areas Tokyo Station Center of life and culture Center of work and culture Center of international culture

66 Actual Projects in Akasaka, Roppongi, Toranomon and Shinbashi Areas

67 Marunouchi and Nihonbashi Marunouchi Nihonbashi Source: Tokyo Metropolitan Government Your Base for New Innovation

68 Ginza, Shimbashi, Toranomon Shimbashi Toranomon Source: Tokyo Metropolitan Government Your Base for New Innovation

69 Shibuya, Roppongi, Shinagawa Roppongi Shibuya Shinagawa Source: Tokyo Metropolitan Government Your Base for New Innovation

70 We look forward to welcoming you to Tokyo soon

71 Thank you