Elevating the Upstate

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Elevating the Upstate"

Rafe Hubbard
5 years ago
Views:

Greenville-Spartanburg Int l Airport Elevating the

12, 2012 Introduction/Presentation Outline

Improvement Program Land Use Planning and Development

1 Greenville-Spartanburg Int l Airport Elevating the Upstate SC Economic Developers Association October 12, 2012 Introduction/Presentation Outline Introductions Airport Overview Air Service Terminal Improvement Program Land Use Planning and Development Study Other Development Projects Key Take-Aways Questions and Answers 1

2 Airport Overview A Few Airport Facts CY 2011 Traffic Statistics: Operations - 49,544 Passengers - 1,755,509 Land - 3,500+ acres Major Uses: Commercial Aviation Corporate Aviation General Aviation Military Runway: ,001 x 150 2

3 Economic Impact of Airports Item South Carolina (6 Airports) United States (490 Airports) Jobs 48 Thousand 10.5 Million Payroll $1.5 Billion $365 Billion Output $3.95 Billion $1.2 Trillion Note: Includes Commercial Service Airports, but not all such airports. GSP Estimated Economic Impact Based on economic impact studies conducted in 2009 and 2012, the Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport provides the following: Category 2009 Jobs 3,692 Annual Economic Impact $377,525,328 Annual Payroll $112,012, % Change 9, % $817,119, % $170,491, % Daily 137 Seat Jet Annual Impact $20,375,000 $30,875, % 3

4 Air Service Strong Air Service Market Area 4

Lauderdale Houston (Hobby) Houston (Int l) LaGuardia Nashville Newark Orlando (Int l) Orlando (Sanford) Philadelphia Punta Gorda St.

5 52 Average Daily Non-Stop Flights to 23 airport destinations Atlanta Baltimore (BWI) Charlotte Chicago (Midway) Chicago (O Hare) Cincinnati Cleveland Dallas - DFW Detroit Ft. Walton Beach Ft. Lauderdale Houston (Hobby) Houston (Int l) LaGuardia Nashville Newark Orlando (Int l) Orlando (Sanford) Philadelphia Punta Gorda St. Petersburg Washington Dulles Washington National Passenger Traffic Growth From March 2011 thru February 2012 Passenger Traffic increased by 43% 1,000, , , , , , , , , ,000 - Fiscal Years Enplanements 5

6 Monthly Enplanement Comparison on 6 commercial air carriers Market Share June % 23% US Airways 10% 15% 29% Delta American United Allegiant Southwest 5% 6

Reductions in Air Fares for the TOP 100 US Airports (USDOT-BTS) Total Passenger Traffic Up 43%

7 Top 25 Origin & Destination Markets (12 months ended 4th Quarter 2011) Some Performance Factors 12 Months Ended February 2012 Fastest Growing Small Airport in the US (Annie Award) Largest Reductions in Air Fares for the TOP 100 US Airports (USDOT-BTS) Total Passenger Traffic Up 43% Total Passenger increase of 553,000 Southwest accounted for 402,000 of the total passenger increase or 73% 7

Cargo Service Current scheduled service from: Federal Express United Parcel Service GSP has invested $750,000 in cargo equipment and freight handing training to service large line-haul cargo aircraft

8 Cargo Service Current scheduled service from: Federal Express United Parcel Service GSP has invested $750,000 in cargo equipment and freight handing training to service large line-haul cargo aircraft GSP handled /widebody freighters from Europe in 4Q of 2011 Permanent scheduled line-haul cargo service from Europe is being sought Cargo Statistics Cargo up 13.1% in 2011 and up 7.5% YTD

9 Terminal Improvement Program Terminal Improvement Program Design Capacity +/- 2 Million Enplaned Passengers (2035) Balance Terminal Program Components: Gate Capacity (18 to 20 Gates) Ticketing Checked Baggage Makeup Passenger Security Screening Concessions Holdrooms Baggage Claim 9

10 Terminal Improvement Program Objectives Correction of Current and Anticipated Future Terminal Functional Deficiencies to meet Design Capacity Sustainability/LEED Integration Terminal Architectural and Customer Service Enhancements Identified Terminal Deficiencies Insufficient Queuing and Circulation Area at Ticketing Lobby Constrained Baggage Screening Area Primary Food Service and Concessions Located Pre-Security Multiple Passenger Screening Station Locations (TSA) No Physical Connection Between A and B Concourses TERMINAL CORE AREA 10

11 Site Development Layout Plan Animated Walk-Through 11

Now Baggage Claim/South Bridge Early 2013 Major Core

12 Relocated Rental Car Facilities Current Implementation Schedule Design Process Continues into 2013 Enabling Projects Underway Now Baggage Claim/South Bridge Early 2013 Major Core Construction - Begins in January 2014 Construction Completion Early

Funding for the Terminal Project Estimated Project Cost: $115 Million Funding Sources: $30 Million in Grants (FAA, TSA, other) $85 Million Self-Funded by the Airport Commission through cash reserves

13 Funding for the Terminal Project Estimated Project Cost: $115 Million Funding Sources: $30 Million in Grants (FAA, TSA, other) $85 Million Self-Funded by the Airport Commission through cash reserves No Long-Term Debt, No Passenger Facility Charges, and No Local Tax Dollars The Airport District receives no local tax dollars and is fully self-sustaining financially WINGSPAN Elevating the Upstate 13

14 Wingspan Economic Impact It is forecasted that Wingspan will have the following positive economic impacts ( ) for the Upstate: Impact Type Jobs Local Output Payroll Total 1,397 $164,193,911 $59,613,756 Land Use Planning and Development Study 14

15 Land Use Planning and Development Study Schedule Start date October 2011 Target substantial completion date October 31, 2012 Target Airport Commission approval November 19, 2012 Study Phases Market Analysis Highest & Best Use Master Land Use Plan Development Concepts Implementation Plan, Financial Analysis & Marketing Campaign 15

16 Real Estate Market Analysis Market Analysis comprised of 3 phases: 1. Real Estate Inventory 2. GSP MarketView Analysis 3. Current Conditions of Internal & External Real Estate Markets Phase 1 - Real Estate Inventory 46 percent of the area within 1 mile of the property is undeveloped 16

17 Phase 2 GSP MarketView Assembled list of 30 comparable airports based on long-term passenger and cargo projections or other pertinent reasons Collected data for each comparable airport market Interviewed local contacts for each comparable airport market Analyzed and summarized the results based on each product type: Office, Industrial, Retail and Hospitality Phase 3 - Current Conditions of Internal & External Real Estate Markets Summary Manufacturing presence is unique Local economy is slightly ahead of national economy Small market financing Ease of access & multi-modal capability important assets Early development is critical and will set the stage 17

restrictions, and current market conditions

18 Highest and Best Use (HBU) Analysis Determine highest and best use of the 9 tracts of land at GSP Analysis based on; physical characteristics, legal restrictions, and current market conditions Identify demand and most probable property users HBU Site Description 18

19 HBU Summary of Recommendations Planning Guidelines & Assumptions Overall Product Guided by market demand, HBU, and physical site conditions Unique, high quality product not currently available in Upstate Plan for short- to mid-term use of future runway location Maintain larger flexible parcels where possible Incorporate buffers/green space to maintain natural beauty 19

20 Planning Guidelines & Assumptions Aviation Uses Maximize when runway access available/planned Group V design standards Maximize efficiency (clusters/modules) Include plans for future Runway, taxiways and ATCT Plan for future aviation activity/growth (cargo, terminal bldg., etc.) Evaluate TW extension north of Hwy 101 Planning Guidelines & Assumptions Roadways & Access Maintain ease of access/use (Airport entrance) Standard roadway, signage, landscape design (campus feel) Minimize any increase in congestion Minimize traffic interaction by incompatible uses (industrial vs. office) 20

21 Constraint Mapping Operational Constraints Constraint Mapping Buffer Zone Locations 21

22 Constraint Mapping Buffer Sections Constraint Mapping Site Topography 22

Constraint Mapping Slope Constraints Master Land Use Plan Concepts Land Use Types Aviation

access required Industrial larger footprint warehousing, distribution & light manufacturing

23 Constraint Mapping Slope Constraints Master Land Use Plan Concepts Land Use Types Aviation direct airfield access required Aviation Support aviation related with no direct airfield access required Industrial larger footprint warehousing, distribution & light manufacturing Light Industrial/Service smaller footprint industrial and service uses Retail shops, storefronts, etc. Hospitality hotels, restaurants, convention/conference center Office professional or business office space Flex / Research & Development office/showroom, office/technology lab 23

24 Master Land Use Plan Concept Areas Further Refined 24

25 Tract A Industrial Tract A Sample 25

26 Tract B Light Industrial Tract B Sample 26

27 Tract F Aviation Tract F Sample 27

28 Track B Existing/Proposed Utility Infrastructure Track B - Field Investigation Wetlands Several likely wetland areas located on the site Streams would require Army Corp permit for impacts Development should focus on limiting impacts 28

29 Track B - Proposed Roadway Infrastructure Illustrative Renderings 29

30 Illustrative Renderings Remaining Items to be Completed Task 4 - Financial Feasibility Task 5 - Implementation Plan Task 6 - Marketing Campaign / Materials 30

31 Other Development Projects Other Projects Loading Bridge Replacements and Installation of Pre-Conditioned Air ad Fixed Ground Power Completed Economy Lot Expansion October 2012 South Cargo Building Rehabilitation 2013 Facilities Building Administration Building

Key Take-Aways GSP is essential to economic development in the Upstate GSP does not use any local tax dollars for its development and operation Southwest is critical to competitive air fares for the

32 Key Take-Aways GSP is essential to economic development in the Upstate GSP does not use any local tax dollars for its development and operation Southwest is critical to competitive air fares for the Upstate Properly planned and developed GSP property will have positive benefits for the Upstate Thank You! Dave Edwards President/CEO Greenville-Spartanburg Airport District 2000 GSP Drive, Suite 1 Greer, SC dedwards@gspairport.com 32

Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport WINGSPAN Project. ACI-NA Airport Capital Projects Showcase Presentation. September 18, 2017

Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport WINGSPAN Project ACI-NA Airport Capital Projects Showcase Presentation September 18, 2017 Introduction/Presentation Outline Airport Facts Old Terminal Facilities