North Perry Airport Master Plan

Transcription

1 North Perry Airport Master Plan North Perry Master Plan May 30, 2007

2 TAC Invitees County Representatives Bob Bielek, Interim Director of Aviation, BCAD Nina Demeo, Airport Manager, BCAD Darlene Duecker, Assistant to Airport Manager, BCAD Mike Nonnemacher, Director of Operations, BCAD Stephen Wilson, Project Manager, BCAD Doris Enriquez, Airport Properties Manager, BCAD Marc Gambrill, Assistant Director of Planning & Development, BCAD Christine Steiner, Assistant Airport Properties Manager, BCAD Yasmi Govin, Assistant County Attorney, BCAD Allan Siegel, Community Outreach Coordinator, BCAD Norm Taylor, Director, Broward Co. Economic Development Henry Sniezek, Executive Director, Broward Co. Planning Council Deanne Von Stetina, Senior Planner, Broward Co. Planning Council FAA/FDOT Representatives Rebecca Henry, Planing Program Manager, FAA Rene Alvarez, Team Operations, FAA/FSDO Mike Keane, FAA/FSDO Neil Morris, FAA/FSDO Ken Martin, Air Traffic Manager (HWO), FAA Rebecca Mainardi, Aviation & Rail Section Leader, FDOT (Dist. 4) Dan Afghani, CFASPP, FDOT (Dist. 4) Local Government Representatives Jaye Epstein, Director of Planning, City of Hollywood Lorie Mertens-Black, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, City of Hollywood Donald Waldron, Director of Planning, City of Miramar Roberta J. Spicer, Planning, City of Miramar Joseph Yaciuk, Planning, City of Pembroke Pines Laurie Barnes-Zargo, Assistant Division Fire Chief, Pembroke Pines Fire Dept. Shawn Hallich, Assistant Division Fire Marshall, Pembroke Pines Fire Dept. Tenants/Neighbors Jan Shakespeare, Aviation Program Manager, Broward Community College Jorge Guerra, Dean, Aviation Institute, Broward Community College Jim McKeown, Assistant Manager, Air Superiority Hiam Molcho, President, Hollywood Aviation Lois Cotton, President, North Perry Aerospace Thomas McMenamin, Vice President, North Perry Aviation Brian Broderson, VP Business Operations, Van Wagner Aerial Media John Thompson, President, Boomerang Aviation Corp. Leo Holland, Florida Aero Club Terry Fensome, President, Pelican Airways Stuart Hanley, Aztec Airways Dave Reich, North Perry Airport Tenant Bob Cernuda, Crescent Helicopters 2

3 Meetings to Date Tenant Meeting #1, Wednesday, June 14, 2006 Meetings Pending Tenant Meeting #2, Wednesday, June 27, 2007: TAC Meeting #1, December 13, 2006 City of Miramar, Date Pending City of Hollywood, February 12, 2007 Public Workshop, August 2007 (tentative) City of Pembroke Pines, March 21, 2007 Commission Presentation, October 2007 (tentative) TAC Meeting #2, Wednesday, May 30,

4 Progress to Date 1 Inventory 2 Planning Guidelines 3 Forecasts 4 Demand/Capacity Analysis 5 Facility Requirements 7 Land Use Evaluation 8 Environmental Overview Tasks Pending 6 Alternatives Analysis 9 Develop ALP Set / Airport Property Map 10 Capital Improvement Program 11 Financial Feasibility 12 Airport Property Map 13 Economic Impact Analysis 14 Business Tools 15 Final Master Plan Report & ALP Set 4

5 Demand/Capacity Analysis Runway Use/Configuration One instrument approach Runway 9R (non-precision GPS) Departures Arrivals Capacity of the Airport : VFR = 195 operations/hour IFR = 24 operations/hour Weighted hourly capacity = 186 operations/hour Annual Service Volume (ASV) = 440,000 operations/year 5

6 Demand/Capacity Analysis Sources: Forecast Demand Terminal Area Forecast, March 2006 ASV estimate MCG based on FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060, Airport Capacity and Delay 6

7 Facility Requirements Runways Rehabilitate runway pavements Consider a precision instrument approach Increase the number of exit taxiways Consider adding runway pavement Use declared distances to maximize runway length Add additional run-up areas 7

8 Facility Requirements Pavement & BCAD Building Conditions Rehabilitate pavements Renovate BCAD buildings Construct Taxiway A Broward County Aviation Department Buildings 1 BCAD Administration Office 2 Vacant 3 FAA Air Traffic Control Tower 4 FAA ATCT UPS Building 5 Airfield Lighting 6 Vacant 7 Vacant (Formerly Mayday s Restaurant) 8 Vacant 9 Vacant 8

9 Facility Requirements Airfield Lighting, Signage, and Marking Remark all runways and taxiways as needed Add MITL and lighted signs to Taxiway A and connectors, when developed Rehabilitate the airfield lighting and signage as needed Install additional reflectors on unlit taxiways and taxilanes Rehabilitate the electrical vault as needed Light Runway 9L-27R and supporting taxiways 9

10 Facility Requirements Navigational and Visual Landing Aids Add lighted windsocks to Runways 18R, 18L, and 27R Light the windsocks near Runways 27L and 36L Consider installation of GPS-WAAS or GPS-LAAS for a precision instrument approach Upgrade REILs for 18R, 36L, and 27L through planning period Upgrade PAPI-2 s for Runways 18R, 36L, 18L, 36R, and 27L Upgrade PAPI-4 for Runway 9R Identify locations for relocated VOR 10

11 Facility Requirements Buildings Consider adding a full service FBO at airport Consider development of a GA terminal building Renovate or remove deteriorating buildings Upgrade ATCT and UPS building as needed through planning period 11

12 Facility Requirements Apron Space Rehabilitate the apron pavement Seal coat apron pavements Install high mast apron lighting on aprons Add additional apron space in long term to meet demand 12

13 Facility Requirements Access and Infrastructure Develop landscaping plan Develop facility signage plan Provide appropriate roadway lights on perimeter road Install speed limit signs on perimeter road Review emergency preparedness plans for utility providers for Airport Upgrade security fencing as appropriate throughout planning period Upgrade access control system throughout planning period Install video identification and tracking system for nighttime surveillance 13

14 Facility Requirements Other Consider highest/best use of banner towing area Purchase of avigation easements Encourage airport compatibility planning in land use and zoning ordinances Consider need for helipad(s) or operational agreement Upgrade ARFF vehicle and equipment Re-evaluate self fueling requirements for tenants in the minimum standards 14

15 Alternatives Analysis Airside Alternatives Runways Taxiways Navigational Aids Landside Alternatives Aprons Hangars New FBO/GA Terminal Customs Facility Helipad 15

16 Airside Alternatives 16

17 Runway Length Requirements for North Perry Airport SMALL AIRPLANES WITH LESS THAN 10 PASSENGER SEATS SMALL AIRPLANES WITH MORE THAN 10 PASSENGER SEATS LARGE AIRPLANES OF 60,000 POUNDS OR LESS % of these large airplanes at 60% useful load 2,450 feet 3,570 feet 4,170 feet 5,300 feet 5,500 feet % of these large airplanes at 90% useful load 7,000 feet 7,810 feet BUSINESS JET AIRCRAFT (FAA Southern Region) 6,500 feet VERY LIGHT JET (VLJ) AIRCRAFT 2,500 feet 3,400 feet RUNWAY LENGTH RANGE EXISTING RUNWAY LENGTH RANGE 3,500 6,500 feet 3,000 3,181 feet Sources: FAA Advisory Circular 150/5325-4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design; FAA Southern Region, RGL 00-1, Standard Development for Business Jet Aircraft, Revised August 28,

18 Alternative 1 No Build Alternative 2 Apply Declared Distances With Existing Pavement Alternative 3 Construct Additional Pavement & Apply Declared Distances Alternative 4 Accommodate Larger Aircraft 18

19 1 No Build 19

20 4 No Build 20

21 1 No Build Advantages Least expensive alternative Disadvantages Limits operations to smaller aircraft No runway length improvements 21

22 2 Apply Declared Distances with Existing Pavement 22

23 2 Apply Declared Distances w/ Existing Pavement Displaced Threshold RPZ RPZ 200 TORA TODA ASDA LDA TORA TODA ASDA LDA RPZ LEGEND Take-off Run Available Take-off Distance Available Accelerate Stop Distance Available Landing Distance Available Runway Protection Zone 23

24 3 Apply Declared Distances with Existing Pavement 24

25 3 Apply Declared Distances with Existing Pavement 25

26 2 Apply Declared Distances w/ Existing Pavement Declared Distances For Existing Runways at North Perry Airport Runways 9R 27L 9L 27R 18R 36L 18L 36R Existing Length 3,000 3,045 3,060 3,181 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,075 TORA (in feet) TODA (in feet) ASDA (in feet) 3,025 3,000 3,182 3,060 3,000 3,000 3,075 3,150 3,255 3,255 3,242 3,242 3,350 3,350 3,260 3,260 3,255 3,255 3,242 3,242 3,350 3,000 3,260 3,260 LDA (in feet) 3,000 3,045 3,060 3,182 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,075 Source: FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-Change 11, Airport Design, Appendix 14 26

27 2 Apply Declared Distances w/ Existing Pavement Advantages Inexpensive since no pavement or markings will be altered Maximizes usable runway for take-offs and landings Disadvantages Declared distances can be confusing to pilots Does not accommodate 100% of small airplanes requiring 3,570 feet of runway 27

28 3 Construct Additional Pavement & Apply Declared Distances 28

29 29

30 30

31 31

32 32

33 3 Construct Additional Pavement & Apply Declared Distances Take-off Run and Landing Distances For North Perry Airport Runways 9R 27L 9L 27R 18R 36L 18L 36R Existing Length Added Length (in feet) 3,000 3,045 3,060 3,181 3,000 3,000 3,150 3, TORA (in feet) 3,745 3,915 3,717 3,910 3,390 3,840 3,800 3,745 LDA (in feet) 3,915 3,745 3,910 3,717 3,840 3,390 3,745 3,800 Source: FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-Change 11, Airport Design, Appendix 14 33

34 3 Construct Additional Pavement & Apply Declared Distances Advantages Maximizes runway lengths Accommodates 100% of small airplanes requiring 3,570 feet of runway Accommodates 95% of VLJ fleet Provides opportunities for further airport development Disadvantages Additional costs of new pavement for airfield Runway operations closer to residential area Declared distances can be confusing to pilots 34

35 4 Accommodate Larger Aircraft 35

36 36

37 37

38 4 Accommodate Larger Aircraft Advantages Facilitates HWO as General Aviation reliever to FLL Accommodates business jet aircraft Increases opportunities for FBO, corporate hangars & industrial parks Potential increase of airport revenues Disadvantages Major impacts to community Major impacts to residential and commercial Major capital cost Significant impacts to on-airport tenants due to relocation Requires preparation of Environmental Impact Statement Increases runway dimensional criteria This alternative is not recommended 38

39 Taxiway A & the Highest/Best Use of the Northwest Quadrant 39

40 Taxiways 40

41 Taxiway A & the Highest/Best Use of the Northwest Quadrant Advantages Enhances operational capacity of Runway 18R-36L Parallel taxiway provides development opportunities on west side of Runway 18R-36L Disadvantages Construction cost Impacts banner towing operations 41

42 Navigational Aids 42

43 Establish Precision Instrument Approach Navigational Aids Alternative 1 Runway 9R-27L Alternative 2 Runway 9L-27R Alternative 3 Runway 18R-36L Alternative 4 Runway 18L-36R Very High Frequency Omni-Directional Range (VOR) Alternative 1 Southwest Quadrant Alternative 2 Southeast Quadrant 43

44 Navigational Aids Establish Precision Instrument Approach 44

45 Navigational Aids Advantages Increases approach capability for airport Provides navigational training for student pilots Enhances business aircraft operations Satisfies criteria for on-demand charter services Disadvantages Major impacts to community Major capital costs: runway, taxiway & residential/commercial property acquisition (FAA recommends 4,200 feet of runway length for reliever airport designation) Obstructions must be removed from 50:1 approach Significant impact to airport tenants due to required relocation Requires preparation of Environmental Impact Statement 45

46 Navigational Aids Relocation of Very High Frequency Omni-Directional Range (VOR) 46

47 Navigational Aids Advantages Meets VOR siting criteria Provides VOR training for pilots Provides enhancement to navigational aids at HWO Disadvantages Alternative 1: ASOS, wind measuring equipment, relocate windsocks, VOR located in Runway Visibility Zone; potential site for helipad Alternative 2: Prohibits future airport development in this area 47

48 Landside Alternatives 48

49 Aprons 6 potential sites Hangars 8 potential sites New FBO/GA Terminal 8 potential sites Customs Facility Helipad 4 potential sites 49

50 Aprons 50

51 Aprons Site Advantages Existing Access to Runway/Taxiway Ability to Expand Beyond Planning Period Can Accommodate other GA Facilities Road Access via Perimeter Road Adjacent to Existing FBO & Corporate/Thangars

52 Aprons Site Disadvantages 1 Banner Towing operations impacted in this area Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of parallel Taxiway A 2 Access to primary runway and GA facilities is not as convenient 3 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of parallel Taxiway A 4 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of access/perimeter road 5 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities 6 Can not be expanded beyond planning horizon 52

53 Hangars 53

54 Hangars Site Advantages Existing Access to Runway/Taxiway Ability to Expand Beyond Planning Period Can Accommodate other GA Facilities Road Access via Perimeter Road 1 Adjacent to Existing FBO & Corporate/Thangars

55 Hangars Site Disadvantages 1 Banner Towing operations impacted in this area Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of parallel Taxiway A 2 Access to primary runway and GA facilities not as convenient 3 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of parallel Taxiway A 4 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of access/perimeter road 5 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities 6 Requires paved access/perimeter road; BCAD lighting bldg. & ATCT/equipment, portion part of Hollywood Aviation leasehold 7 Property contained in existing tenant leaseholds 8 Property contained in existing tenant leaseholds 55

56 New FBO/GA Terminal Minimum facility requirements for an FBO are outlined in BCAD s Minimum Standards for General Aviation at County Airports, March 28, HWO FBO must: Lease at least a six acre site Construct 2,000 ft 2 administration building Provide 15 aircraft tie-down positions Construct 5,000 ft 2 maintenance hangar and 10,000 ft 2 hangar and/or T-Hangars Construct 60,000 ft 2 apron Provide paved automobile parking Provide for 10,000 gal. fuel storage and one 250 gal. truck Provide electric security gate to restrict unauthorized access to ramp 56

57 New FBO/GA Terminal 57

58 New FBO/GA Terminal Site Advantages Provides Access from Perimeter Road Does Not Interfere with Banner Towing Adjacent to Taxiway/Runway/Cor porate/hangar Development Has 6 Acres of Developable Land

59 New FBO/GA Terminal Site Disadvantages 1 Not located near primary runway 2 Not located near primary runway; Banner Towing operations impacted in this area; requires construction of parallel Taxiway A 3 Banner Towing operations impacted in this area; requires construction of parallel Taxiway A 4 Requires construction of access road 5 Requires construction of parallel Taxiway A ; limited by building restriction line 6 BCAD (Aviation Lighting) and ATCT located in area; significant portion of area is part of Hollywood Aviation s leasehold 7 Does not provide required 6 acres for FBO 8 Does not provide required 6 acres for FBO 59

60 U.S. Customs Facility South Florida General Aviation airports currently with customs facilities: Opa-locka Executive Airport Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport Kendall-Tamiami Executive Airport St. Lucie County International Airport Need for a 5,000 square foot secure building Preferred location is adjacent to FBO 60

61 U.S. Customs Facility U.S. Customs and Border Protection User Fee Airport (UFA) applicant requirements: Volume or value of business at airport is insufficient to justify the availability of inspectional services on a non-reimbursable basis Governor supports designation in writing to the Commissioner of CBP County agrees to reimburse CBP for all costs associated with the services, including expenses of staffing at least one full-time inspector County completes an Agriculture Compliance Agreement with FBOs and refuse haulers for handling international refuse Basic steps required in considering an application for designation as a UFA include: Receipt of a letter from the Governor supporting the user fee airport designation Successful site visit in which CBP officials discuss workload and services and verify that facilities are adequate for inspectional services to be provided Completing a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with CBP, which states the responsibilities, fees and hours of service Completing an Agriculture Compliance Agreement with CBP for handling international refuse 61

62 U.S. Customs Facility An approved UFA receiving CBP services is responsible for payment of the following fees: Per Inspector: $140,000 + (1 st year) $124,000 + (succeeding years) Additional costs per inspector: $17,000 + (1 st year) $14,000 + (succeeding years) Other associated costs (i.e., overtime) 62

63 U.S. Customs Facility Advantages Possibility for increased operations from tourism to/from the Bahamas, U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, and other islands Possibility for increased revenue from fuel sales Increased charter activities Good for airport businesses Disadvantages County would incur additional costs to build County would incur additional costs to operate County unlikely to recover costs through leasehold revenue 63

64 Helipad 64

65 Helipad Advantages Sites 1 and 2 provide adequate area for helipad; adjacent to Helicopters, Inc. Site 3 provides adequate area for a helipad; recommended area in 1996 Master Plan; near Crescent Helicopters; aligned with primary Runway 9R-27L Site 4 provides adequate area for a helipad and is near Crescent Helicopters; aligned with primary Runway 9R-27L Disadvantages Site 1 approach and departure path aligned to Runway 18R-36L; potential noise impacts; not convenient for helicopter operations on the south side of airfield Site 2 approach and departure path aligned to Runway 18R-36L; Banner Towing operations impacted in this area; not convenient for helicopter operations on the south side of airfield Site 3 located within the Runway Visibility Zone; area may be site for future VOR Site 4 area may be site for future VOR 65

66 Next Steps Evaluation of Alternatives Recommended Capital Improvement Plan Financial Analysis Update Airport Layout Plan (ALP) 66

67 Questions/Comments/Suggestions Please Contact Monty Gettys at 67