DEVELOPMENT OF TOE MIDFIELD TERMINAL IROJECT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION TOM FOERSTER CHAIRMAN BARBARA HAFER COMMISSIONER
|
|
- Barry Sanders
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PETE FLAHERTY COMMISSIONER TOM FOERSTER CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION BARBARA HAFER COMMISSIONER STEPHEN A. GEORGE DIRECTOR ROOM M 134, TERMINAL BUILDING GREATER PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PITTSBURGH, PA (412) DEVELOPMENT OF TOE MIDFIELD TERMINAL IROJECT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT REPORT GREATER PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE MIDFIELD TERMINAL PROJECT Greater Pittsburgh International Airport February 1987 The County of Allegheny, through its Department of Aviation, has undertaken the planning and design of a new Midfield Terminal at Greater Pittsburgh International Airport (the Airport) based on recommendations in the Airport master plan approved in The proposed Midfield Terminal consists of a landside building, a commuter terminal and central services building, an airside terminal connected to the landside terminal by an automated underground people-mover system, related airfield access, and special purpose facilities. The generalized layout plan for the Midfield Terminal is presented in Figure 1. BACKGROUND There is currently a shortage of aircraft parking positions (52 jet and 19 commuter) at the Airport. Because of this shortage, the capacity of the Airport would be constrained in future years. In addition, the terminal ramp is extremely congested during peak hours. The Midfield Terminal is designed to correct the current imbalance between airfield and terminal capacity at the Airport. In 1984, the County analyzed the aircraft taxiing and delay costs associated with the use of the existing terminal and the proposed Midfield Terminal. The main conclusion of the analysis was that, because of more efficient runway use, development of the Midfield Terminal could result in potential annual cost savings associated with aircraft taxiing times and delays of $10.5 million to $12 million. These cost savings would result from an estimated average savings of 2.3 to 2.5 minutes per aircraft, on a daily basis, in the total time spent landing, taxiing to and from a gate, and taking off. Savings for USAir would be even greater (about 3.5 minutes per aircraft) because USAir's connecting complexes at the Airport consist of periods of concentrated landings followed by periods of concentrated takeoffs. Such peak hour aircraft operations would be better served by the more efficient runway use associated with the Midfield Terminal. It was also concluded in the delay analysis that air traffic control complexity and workload requirements would decrease with the use of the Midfield Terminal.
3 J U L! O O I AUTOMOtlVI / \! : ""iwa ^r ^ TERMINAL AREA PLAN WTTIAL PHASE ^- «oo «oe Figure 1 Midfield Terminal Complex Greater Pittsburgh International Airport \ ^^ - ox. *sa v U^TTirTTTTTTTTT + '?*&= *=
4 There is also a critical shortage of curb space at the existing terminal. During 1986, the Airport accommodated 2.9 million originating passengers. The existing curb length for enplaning and deplaning passengers is about 1,900 feet. Internally, the existing terminal especially the public circulation corridors is extremely congested during peak hours. In 1985, the Airport had one of the highest ratios of enplanements (10.2) per square foot of all large hub airports, second only to Chicago O'Hare (12.9). Also, the layout of the existing terminal is inefficient and inconvenient for passengers connecting at the Airport connecting passengers totaled 4.5 million in 1986 and are growing in number and share. PLANNING AND DESIGN OF THE MIDFIELD TERMINAL A new Midfield Terminal for the Airport was recommended in the 1979 master plan as the most efficient and cost effective way to provide facilities for the projected increase in passenger activity. Four alternatives for accommodating passenger activity were reviewed, including development of the existing terminal site, the midfield site, and two other areas on the Airport. In the master plan, the Midfield Terminal was preferred over the other alternatives because of its potential for further expansion and the continuity of operations that would exist during the construction period. The Midfield site was the "least cost alternative" among those evaluated in the master plan. In examining the existing site alternative, the master plan report stated that "...continuation of terminal activities in their present location would essentially require building a new terminal and access system at the existing site. Due to the constrained facilities of this site, it would be more desirable to build a new terminal at an alternative site..." The County has been designing the Midfield project since adoption of the Airport master plan in All aspects of the design have been extensively coordinated with the airlines serving the Airport. The County intends to award the site development contract for the project this spring. Development of the Midfield Terminal will be accomplished in phases. The first phase is designed to provide 62 jet aircraft parking positions (gates) and 25 commuter aircraft parking positions
5 to serve the 9.7 million enplaned passengers forecast for The Midfield Terminal will be expanded beyond the first phase as necessary with an ultimate capacity of 100 jet gates. That ultimate capacity is consistent with the ultimate airfield configuration set forth in the Airport master plan and is forecast to be sufficient to meet Airport requirements well beyond the year The first phase of the Midfield Terminal is expected to be operational by CAPACITY ENHANCING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MIDFIELD TERMINAL The proposed Midfield Terminal would enhance the capacity of Greater Pittsburgh International Airport in the following areas: Jet aircraft gates and commuter aircraft parking positions Runways, taxiways, and apron area Passenger connections Curbside access Short-term and long-term public parking facilities Customs processing Connecting and local baggage sorting and handling Future expansion flexibility Aircraft Gate and Parking Capacity The existing terminal has been expanded to its ultimate capacity for accommodating jet aircraft parking gates (52). Additional gates would either require extensive facility costs or would have to be accommodated through the use of hardstands and associated busing. The existing terminal also does not have the flexibility to accommodate the larger aircraft that the Midfield Terminal is designed to accommodate. Currently/ all of the jet aircraft gates at the Airport are in active use by the airlines serving the Airport. During peak periods, aircraft are sometimes unable to access interior gates because of the single taxilane between the Southeast and
6 East Docks used by USAir, the Airport's primary tenant. USAir and other tenant airlines have requested additional gates at the Airport to accommodate their forecast service increases. The County has responded to this request by preparing a gate management policy whereby individual airlines would be required to share gates as needed during peak periods until the Midfield Terminal is ready for operation. Not only would the Midfield Terminal increase the number of jet aircraft gates available at the Airport, but it would also provide for the ultimate expansion to 100 gates. In addition, the commuter airlines other than USAir are scattered at gates throughout the existing terminal. The County would like to consolidate these airlines into one area, for efficiency and safety but has no space available. At the Midfield Terminal, all commuter operations would be handled in a separate terminal adjacent to the landside terminal with a separate ramp area. Airfield Capacity and Aircraft Delay In the 1984 aircraft delay analysis, it was concluded that greater runway capacity would result from the more efficient runway uses associated with the Midfield Terminal. The Midfield Terminal would allow greater use of the three parallel runways without the penalty in taxiing time that would occur for the same runway uses associated with the existing terminal. For example, with a future peak hour demand of 135 aircraft operations during VFR conditions in a westerly flow (occurring 61% of the year), a flow rate of 131 operations per hour could be achieved with the Midfield Terminal compared with a flow rate of 121 operations per hour with the existing terminal. Peak hour flow rates with the Midfield Terminal would be 2 to 7 operations greater than with the existing terminal for all other weather conditions and flow directions. Since the 1984 delay analysis was prepared, USAir has significantly increased the peaking characteristics of its Pittsburgh operation, and has provided information indicating more operations in the peak hour in future years than was used in the delay analysis. With the Midfield Terminal, more operations in the peak hour would result in even greater operating time savings over the existing terminal than reported in the delay analysis.
7 The apron capacity with the Midfield Terminal will be greater than with the existing terminal for a number of reasons. First, there is a limited area on the apron at the existing terminal for a departure queue to Runway 14. In general, any queuing at Runway 14 causes congestion on the apron. Second, there will be dual taxilanes on all sides of the Midfield airside terminal; only a single taxilane exists at many locations on the existing terminal apron. Third, the Midfield Terminal apron will have more capacity to hold aircraft waiting for a gate. There is virtually no capacity to hold aircraft on the existing terminal apron this problem would increase at the existing terminal as traffic increases. Another advantage of the Midfield Terminal is that the development of future runways crosswind and fourth parallel would tie into the Midfield Terminal system more efficiently than the existing terminal system. The existing terminal apron has 10-inch thick pavement and requires constant repairs. The Midfield Terminal apron would have 16-inch thick pavement and is designed to withstand the weight of larger aircraft. Passenger Connections In the existing terminal, USAir occupies gates on two different concourses the Southeast and East Docks. As a result, passengers connecting on USAir flights often are required to go to a gate on the other concourse to make their connections (see Figure 2). Passengers can either board a bus and be transported between concourses or walk to the other concourse through the main terminal, unnecessarily passing through security screening again. Each alternative requires more time than would be required in the facilities designed for the Midfield Terminal. Moving walkways in the Midfield Terminal will reduce the average time required to reach the gate of a connecting flight and there would be no need to pass through security again. In addition, a people mover will link the Midfield landside and airside terminals to minimize average walking distances and travel times to and from aircraft gates and the landside terminal facilities.
8 Southeast Dock N Greater Pittsburgh International Figure 2 &l Airport
9 8 Curbside Access As mentioned earlier, there is inadequate curbside at the existing terminal for enplaning and deplaning passengers, resulting in significant congestion and delays in pickups and dropoffs. The County has determined that expanding the curb length of the existing terminal would require extensive roadway and terminal reconstruction, reconfiguration, and expense. In comparison, the Midfield Terminal would provide greatly expanded curb length for enplaning and deplaning passengers about 50% more linear footage than at the existing terminal. Public Parking Facilities Public parking facilities at the existing terminal site have been developed to the greatest extent possible. There are 636 short-term and 4,428 long-term parking spaces at the existing terminal. Current demand exceeds supply for on- Airport parking. In fact, the Airport currently accommodates about 50% of the total demand for parking spaces. The remaining demand is being accommodated by independent off- Airport operators, with a total of about 4,800 spaces. Currently, there is no parking garage at the Airport. Construction of a garage at the existing terminal would displace far too many spaces to justify such construction. The Midfield Terminal includes a parking structure with about 2,300 public parking spaces and a rental car ready and return facility encompassing 850 equivalent public parking spaces. In addition, there will be 6,000 surface spaces for long-term parking in the first phase of the Midfield Terminal development. Customs Processing The Midfield Terminal would provide a significantly expanded and more efficient federal inspection services (FIS) area for international passengers. The current international facilities consist of 6,917 square feet compared with the proposed Midfield Terminal facilities consisting of 43,150 square feet. The Midfield FIS facility is designed to process 480 passengers per hour in a two-stop design.
10 Baggage Sorting and Handling As part of the Midfield Terminal development, the Airport's primary tenant, OSAir, is considering the construction of an automated baggage sorting and handling facility. The mechanized sorting systems under consideration would greatly reduce the average processing times required with the manual system in use at the existing terminal. The manual baggage handling and sorting process has caused numerous flight delays and lost bags for USAir passengers. Future Expansion Flexibility The County intends to prepare the entire Midfield Terminal site in the first phase of development. Therefore, future expansion can proceed without disruption to operations, and would be less costly. UNPRECEDENTED PUBLIC INVESTMENT The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the County together have committed $127.5 million to the project (on a two-for-one matching basis). A public investment of this magnitude for a major expansion project at a hub airport is unprecedented in the airport industry. The County and the State have made this commitment in recognition of the economic development potential of the Midfield Terminal for Western Pennsylvania. In addition, the County would like to provide adequate and convenient service to the traveling residents of the region and to other passengers using Pittsburgh who are connecting on flights to more distant locations throughout the country. PROPOSAL FOR FEDERAL GRANTS-IN-AID The estimated construction.cost of the Midfield Terminal is $503.1 million in escalated dollars. The primary sources of project funding will be Airport revenue bonds and public investment. Federal grants-in-aid are projected to be the third largest source of project funding. Because of the magnitude of the project and its associated costs, the County and the airlines serving the Airport are relying heavily on federal grants-inaid.
11 10 The table on the following page sets forth the project elements and costs (stated in millions of escalated dollars) which are considered to be eligible for federal funding under the parameters of the current Airport Improvement Program (AIP). As shown, all of these costs, except the public portions of the terminal building and the people mover system, would be eligible for 75% funding under the current AIP. The public portions of the terminal building and the people mover system would be eligible for 60% of the Airport's appropriated entitlements. In total, about $129 million in federal grantsin-aid could be awarded to the County for the Midfield Terminal project. For large hub airports, the current federal/local grant participation ratio is 75/25. The County is requesting the Federal Aviation Administration to consider a 50/50 match of the local public investment ($127.5 million) pledged for the project. A federal grant of $127.5 million would be less than the amount which could be awarded to the County for the Midfield project under the current AIP funding parameters. The assurance of such federal grants-in-aid would greatly enhance the feasibility of the project. The Midfield Terminal project is one of the few major expansion projects being proposed in the nation that not only will enhance the capacity of the Airport and the national airport system, but also is ready for immediate construction. The County intends to award site development bids in May or June Site development is one of the major elements of the project eligible for AIP funding. It would be advantageous for the County to secure a grant commitment from the Federal Aviation Administration for the Midfield Terminal project prior to the award of the site development contract.
12 11 PROJECT COST ELIGIBILITY Midfield Terminal Project (in millions of dollars) Project costs With 5% Base Contingency Eligible costs 75% Entitlement participation participation Site development Basic terminal building (public portions only) People mover system Terminal apron Access roadways/structures Airport surveillance radar Funding eligibility AIP award potential $ 43 $ 45 $ 45 x 75% $112 $ $89 _a $17 a. Eligible for 60% of the Airport's appropriated entitlements estimated to total $28 million over the FY 1987-FY 1992 period, or $17 million.
CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES
MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Update Metropolitan Airports Commission 4.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES Several alternatives were developed and evaluated based on their capability to meet the
More informationExisting Conditions AIRPORT PROFILE Passenger Terminal Complex 57 air carrier gates 11,500 structured parking stalls Airfield Operations Area 9,000 North Runway 9L-27R 6,905 Crosswind Runway 13-31 5,276
More informationTERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
5.0 TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.0 TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Key points The development plan in the Master Plan includes the expansion of terminal infrastructure, creating integrated terminals for international,
More informationBirmingham Airport 2033
Over the next 15 years, we will expand and improve the Airport to maximise our potential as a single runway airport by investing 500 million in new development. Our plans take account of our forecasted
More informationYakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Airport Master Plan Update
Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Airport Master Plan Update City of Yakima Work Session July 9, 2013 Meeting Goals Summarize the master plan recommendations. Discuss the decision-making process used
More informationFORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Eagle County Regional Airport (EGE) is known as a gateway into the heart of the Colorado Rocky Mountains, providing access to some of the nation s top ski resort towns (Vail, Beaver
More informationBNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5
A Six Sigma Organization BNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5 September 19, 2012 Introductions MNAA Staff RW Armstrong Team Albersman & Armstrong, Ltd. Atkins North America,
More informationAppendix F International Terminal Building Main Terminal Departures Level and Boarding Areas A and G Alternatives Analysis
Appendix F International Terminal Building Main Terminal Departures Level and Boarding Areas A and G Alternatives Analysis ITB MAIN TERMINAL DEPARTURES LEVEL & BOARDING AREAS A & G ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
More informationAirport Master Plan. Rapid City Regional Airport. October 2015 FAA Submittal
Airport Master Plan Rapid City Regional Airport October 2015 FAA Submittal Rapid City Regional Airport Master Plan Update Table of Contents Executive Summary... i Scope & Timeline... i Forecasts... i Preferred
More informationPITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM
PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS September 2017 Master Plan Update: 1. What is a Master Plan Update? The objective of a Master Plan Update (MPU)
More informationPunta Gorda Airport Master Plan Update
Punta Gorda Airport Master Plan Update Draft Executive Summary Prepared for: The Charlotte County Airport Authority January 2018 Charlotte County Airport Authority James Herston, Chair Robert D. Hancik,
More informationBNA Master Plan Update Public Meeting No. 2
A Six Sigma Organization BNA Master Plan Update Public Meeting No. 2 September 18, 2012 Agenda BNA Master Plan Update Consultants Status of the BNA Master Plan Update Workstation Boards Forecasts of Aviation
More informationChapter 2 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS
Chapter 2 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS 2.01 GENERAL Dutchess County acquired the airport facility in 1947 by deed from the War Assets Administration. Following the acquisition, several individuals who pursued
More informationAIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE PENSACOLA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 June 20, 2017 Agenda» Introduction» Facility Requirements Airside Terminal Landside General Aviation Cargo
More informationSouthwestFloridaInternational Airport
SouthwestFloridaInternational Airport SouthwestFloridaInternationalAirportislocatedinLee CountyalongtheGulfCoastofSouthFlorida,tenmiles southeastofthefortmyerscentralbusinessdistrict. Theprimaryhighwayaccesstotheairportfrom
More informationForecast and Overview
Forecast and Overview DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Overall goals of the (MPR): Work with DEN to refine the preferred airport development plan to guide the development over an approximate 25-year planning
More informationFLL Master Plan Update BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BRIEFING
(PRELIMINARY DRAFT) WORK IN PROGRESS - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY FLL Master Plan Update BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BRIEFING May 15, 2018 Master Plan Schedule Overview Progress Since Last Master Plan
More information14 C.F.R. Part 158. Passenger Facility Charge Program Logan International Airport. Public Notice
14 C.F.R. Part 158 Passenger Facility Charge Program Logan International Airport Public Notice Summary of Proposed 2018 PFC Application PFC Project Descriptions and Justifications PFC Financial Plan Class
More informationSAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
SAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NEAR-TERM TERMINAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS AIRPORT COMMISSION AUGUST 14, 2017 August 14, 2017 AGENDA 1. Forecast Review (with 14 MAP High Case) 2. Gate Requirements and Aircraft
More informationNOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE Posted March 25, 2019
NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE Posted March 25, 2019 The City of Atlanta is providing an opportunity for public comment until April 25, 2019 related to the
More informationExecutive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport
Executive Summary MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport As a general aviation and commercial service airport, Fort Collins- Loveland Municipal Airport serves as an important niche
More informationTampa International Airport Master Plan Update. December 12, 2012
Tampa International Airport Master Plan Update December 12, 2012 1 Prior Presentation Consolidated rental car and people mover Decongest curbsides and roadways Enable rental car growth Gain long term parking
More informationWestover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update
Westover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update June 2008 INTRODUCTION Westover Metropolitan Airport (CEF) comprises the civilian portion of a joint-use facility located in Chicopee, Massachusetts. The
More informationNOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PROPOSED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION NOVEMBER 9 TH, 2018
NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PROPOSED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION NOVEMBER 9 TH, 2018 LAWTON-FORT SILL REGIONAL AIRPORT LAWTON, OKLAHOMA PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE PROPOSED
More informationCHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION William R. Fairchild International Airport (CLM) is located approximately three miles west of the city of Port Angeles, Washington. The airport
More informationFort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 1 2 ATLANTA, GEORGIA Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport Master Plan to Master Plan Implementation Jamie McCluskie Director of Aviation Planning & Environmental Broward County
More informationFUTURE PASSENGER PROCESSING. ACRP New Concepts for Airport Terminal Landside Facilities
FUTURE PASSENGER PROCESSING ACRP 07-01 New Concepts for Airport Terminal Landside Facilities In association with: Ricondo & Associates, TransSolutions, TranSecure RESEARCH Background Research Objective
More informationSavannah / Hilton Head International Airport Master Plan Update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Savannah / Hilton Head International Airport Master Plan Update Prepared for: The Savannah Airport Commission Prepared by: URS Corporation In Association With: RS&H and Ruth and Associates,
More informationDestination Lindbergh
Technical Appendix 16 Destination Lindbergh Appendix Contents Destination Lindbergh... TA 16-2 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Destination Lindbergh Destination Lindbergh is a comprehensive planning
More informationCurrent and Forecast Demand
Existing Facilities Jacksonville International Airport (JIA) is served by a number of airside and landside facilities. There are two runways that serve the airport in an open V configuration. The Annual
More informationGREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITY
GREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITY Amendment to PFC Applications #7, 8, and 16 and New PFC Application #18 PUBLIC NOTICE June 7, 2016 1 P age Table of Contents PUBLIC NOTICE... 3 PROPOSED ACTIONS... 3
More informationNotice and Opportunity to Comment on New Proposed Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) New Application
July 3, 2018 Notice and Opportunity to Comment on New Proposed Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) New Application The City of Kansas City (City), Missouri through its Aviation Department ( the Department
More informationAIRPORT WITH NO RUNWAYS IS A MALL
RUNWAY EXTENSION INITIATIVE AT FT. LAUDERDALE HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ISMAEL IZZY BONILLA DEPUTY DIRECTOR BROWARD COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT WITH NO RUNWAYS IS A MALL Runway Business Case
More informationThe CLE Master Plan Includes:
The CLE Master Plan Includes: An inventory of existing conditions Forecasting future demand and analyzing future needs Evaluating alternative development scenarios Preparing the Airport Layout Plan Preparing
More informationSTUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 4. July 12, 2017
STUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 4 July 12, 2017 Agenda Welcome and introductions Update of project schedule Brief overview of previous SWG meeting Introduction to airport development alternatives Comments,
More informationMaster Plan Phase 2 Workshop
Master Plan Phase 2 Workshop Tampa Airport: A Legacy of Innovation and Convenience Tampa Airport: A legacy of Innovation and Convenience The world s first airport people mover Tampa Airport: A legacy of
More informationPublic Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Los Angeles World Airports Passenger Facility Charge Application at Los Angeles International Airport
Re: Public Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Los Angeles World Airports Passenger Facility Charge Application at Los Angeles International Airport Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) intends to submit
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (FLL) MASTER PLAN UPDATE PHASE 1
Workshop Briefing Package Airport Master Plan Update, Phase I Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport October 18, 2005 Leigh Fisher Associates A Division of Jacobs Consultancy Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
More informationKansas City International Airport Airport Terminal Advisory Group Airport Benchmarking. February 11, 2014
Kansas City International Airport Airport Terminal Advisory Group Airport Benchmarking February 11, 2014 Presentation Agenda 1. Overview of Findings 2. Definitions 3. Airport Benchmarking Caveats 4. Benchmark
More informationDraft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005
Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005 Section 3 - Refinement of the Ultimate Airfield Concept Using the Base Concept identified in Section 2, IDOT re-examined
More informationBrief Recap of Project to Date
CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA Rocky Gutierrez Airport (SIT) Terminal Improvements Project Brief Recap of Project to Date Schematic Design: Design Development Meetings June 26 & 27, 2018 Project Description
More informationMASTER PLAN UPDATE. Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) FRESNO YOSEMITE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. Meeting #4
MASTER PLAN UPDATE Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) FRESNO YOSEMITE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Meeting #4 December 14, 2017 Today s Agenda o Welcome o Introductions o Progress update o Alternatives analysis
More informationCHAPTER 5: Landside Facility Requirements and Development Concepts
CHAPTER 5: Landside Facility Requirements and Development Concepts Overview Implementation of the preferred intermediate-term (10-year) and long-term (20-year) airside alternatives will have a significant
More informationChapter 8.0 Implementation Plan
Chapter 8.0 Implementation Plan 8.1 Introduction This chapter is the culmination of the analytical work accomplished in the previous chapters. The result is a prioritized list of the essential projects.
More informationFort Wayne International Airport Master Plan Study. Executive Summary
Fort Wayne International Airport Master Plan Study Executive Summary March 2012 Introduction Airport Background Forecast of Aviation Activity Development Plans Recommended Airfield & Access Development
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Airport Master Plan Update Manchester-Boston Regional Airport. W:\ _Manchester\MPU\Final\Executive Summary.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Purpose of an... 1 1.2 Goals and Objectives... 1 1.3 Mission Statement... 2 1.4 Stakeholder/Public Involvement... 2 1.5 Major Deliverables...
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved
TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page Number LIST OF ACRONYMS... a CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION General... 1-1 Study Objectives... 1-1 Public Involvement... 1-2 Issues to Be Resolved... 1-2 CHAPTER TWO EXISTING
More informationFinance and Implementation
5 Finance and Implementation IMPLEMENTATION The previous chapters have presented discussions and plans for development of the airfield, terminal, and building areas at Sonoma County Airport. This chapter
More informationPENSACOLA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE WORKING PAPER 8 FINANCIAL PLAN
PENSACOLA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE WORKING PAPER 8 FINANCIAL PLAN OCTOBER 2018 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Table of Contents Chapter 8 Financial Plan 8.1 Introduction... 8-1 8.2 Enplanement
More informationRNO Master Plan Approved Alternatives, Financial Analysis, and Facilities Implementation Plan
RNO Master Plan Approved Alternatives, Financial Analysis, and Facilities Implementation Plan Project Schedule Today Slide 40 Project Vision To provide an achievable, flexible, fiscally, and environmentally
More informationCASE STUDY The New Guayaquil International Airport
www.jacobs.com worldwide CASE STUDY The New Guayaquil International Airport Prepared for ICAO Airport Planning Seminar for the SAM Region Lima, Peru 10-14 Sep. 2018 September 11, 2018 Outline Existing
More informationMaster Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
Nashville International Airport Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting February 14, 2019 Agenda Welcome and Introductions Aviation Activity Forecast Facility Requirements Alternatives
More informationIDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 7 7.1 GENERAL The primary objective of this chapter is to evaluate potential development alternatives and identify
More informationGerald R. Ford International Airport Authority Master Plan Update A World Class Gateway
Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority Master Plan Update A World Class Gateway Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Alternatives September 28, 2017 AGENDA Review of Previous Work Ultimate Land
More informationAirport Systems: Planning, Design, and Management
Airport Systems: Planning, Design, and Management Richard de Neufville AmedeoR. Odoni McGraw-Hill New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore
More informationRegular Board Meeting August 4, 2015
Regular Board Meeting August 4, 2015 1616 Airport Circle Hailey, ID 83333 208.788.4956 PUBLIC COMMENT FY 16 Rates & Charges FY 16 Budget Approval Rates & Charges will provide the Board the ability to operate
More informationCity of Kansas City AIRPORT COMMITTEE BRIEFING. Major Renovation Evaluation for Kansas City International Airport.
City of Kansas City AIRPORT COMMITTEE BRIEFING Major Renovation Evaluation for Kansas City International Airport February 2, 2016 1 Agenda Briefly review Exhibit K Process to establish Program Requirements
More informationSTUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
INTRODUCTION An Airport Master Plan provides an evalua on of the airport s avia on demand and an overview of the systema c airport development that will best meet those demands. The Master Plan establishes
More informationChapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL
Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL This chapter delineates the recommended 2005 2024 Sussex County Airport Capital Improvement Program (CIP). It further identifies probable construction
More informationLAX Specific Plan Amendment Study (SPAS) Final EIR and Related Actions. Board of Airport Commissioners February 5, 2013
LAX Specific Plan Amendment Study (SPAS) Final EIR and Related Actions Board of Airport Commissioners February 5, 2013 1 Background The LAX Master Plan Program serves as the airport s long range development
More informationLove Field Modernization Program Update: Master Planning Recommendations
Love Field Modernization Program Update: Master Planning Recommendations Briefing to the Council Transportation and Environment Committee April 28, 2008 1 1 Briefing Objective Discuss the background and
More informationSTAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 7D
STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: 7D STAFF CONTACT: Peter Imhof, Andrew Orfila RECOMMENDATION: Adopt findings
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE. Table 1 Projects Proposed by Amendment
PUBLIC NOTICE The Dallas Department of Aviation (the Department) intends to file an amendment application to increase the PFC amount of one previously approved project at Dallas Love Field Airport (the
More informationNorfolk International Airport
Norfolk International Airport Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1 Community Advisory Committee Meeting #1 January 24, 2018 Agenda Project Background Introductions Overview of Airport
More informationChapter 4 Terminal Facility Requirements and Alternatives
Chapter 4 Terminal Facility Requirements and Alternatives I. Terminal Facility Requirements Introduction This chapter of the master plan converts the forecasted passenger demand levels that were identified
More informationTable of Contents. List of Tables. Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport 2035 Master Plan Update
Table of Contents 7.1. Airport Layout Plan (Existing Conditions)... 2 7.2. Airport Layout Plan (Future Conditions)... 3 7.3. Technical Data Sheet... 5 7.4. Commercial Terminal Area Drawing... 5 7.5. East
More informationGreater Orlando Aviation Authority
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Orlando International Airport & Orlando Executive Airport Budgets Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Orlando, Florida Greater Orlando Aviation Authority
More informationJuly 21, Mayor & City Council Business Session KCI Development Program Process Update
July 21, 2015 Mayor & City Council Business Session KCI Development Program Process Update History of KCI 2 Airport Funding KCI Improvements are Funded by Airlines & Travelers City tax revenues do not,
More informationThe presentation was approximately 25 minutes The presentation is part of Working Group Meeting 3
This is the presentation for the third Master Plan Update Working Group Meeting being conducted for the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport Master Plan Update. It was given on Thursday March 7
More informationB GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:
2014 GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD B + RECOMMENDATIONS Plan and Fund for the Future: While the system continues to enjoy excess capacity and increased accessibility it still needs continued focus
More informationCity of Austin Department of Aviation Austin Bergstrom International Airport 2040 Master Plan. Public Workshop #2 April 19, 2018
City of Austin Department of Aviation Austin Bergstrom International Airport 2040 Master Plan Public Workshop #2 April 19, 2018 DISCUSSION TOPICS Introduction About the Master Plan Public Workshop #1 Recap
More informationAIRPORT CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
AIRPORT CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT NEEDS 2013-2017 January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND... 1 RESULTS IN BRIEF... 2 ACI-NA ESTIMATE OF CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT NEEDS... 4 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS BY LOCATION
More informationGSP TERMINAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRESS KIT
About GSP MISSION STATEMENT At Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport (GSP), we begin each day fully committed to finding new ways to achieve our mission to provide the citizens of Upstate South
More informationSECTION 5 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ANALYSES
SECTION 5 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ANALYSES 5.1 INTRODUCTION This section investigates Airfield Development Alternatives, generalized Land Use Alternatives, and more detailed General Aviation Alternatives.
More informationPFC Quarterly Status Report September 30, 2016
PFC Quarterly Status Report September 0, 06 Public Agency: Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Use Airport: Orlando International Airport (MCO) Charge Expiration Date: $4.50 8//08 Total Collection Authority
More informationMaster Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Kick-off Meeting
Nashville International Airport Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Kick-off Meeting September 13, 2018 Agenda Welcome and Introductions Master Plan Objectives Master Plan Process BNA Vision
More informationAirport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35
Runway 17-35 Airport Master Plan Runway 12-30 Brookings Regional Airport Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1: Master Plan Goals... 1-1 1.1. Introduction... 1 1.2. Objective 1 Identify improvements
More informationDraft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005
Section 10 Preferred Inaugural Airport Concept 10.0 Introduction The Preferred Inaugural Airport Concept for SSA was developed by adding the preferred support/ancillary facilities selected in Section 9
More informationLand Use Policy Considerations
Land Use Policy Considerations Challenges to Implementing Successful Land Use Strategies at Airports ACRP Insight Event: Washington DC Stephen D. Van Beek, Ph.D. April 11, 2018 Land Use Policy Considerations
More informationFLL Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Briefing #1. September 28, 2016
FLL Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Briefing #1 September 28, 2016 TAC Committee Role: Internal Stakeholders To provide input on the master planning analysis from the technical and
More informationAddendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)
Bowers Field Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6) This addendum to the Airport Development Alternatives chapter includes the preferred airside development alternative and the preliminary
More informationAlternatives Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Alternatives Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alternative development plans were created as part of the Master Plan for Harrisburg International Airport. The aim is to provide sufficient capacity for projected
More informationDALLAS LOVE FIELD MAY 2015 DRAFT
8. Funding Plan This section presents a potential funding plan for implementing the CIP projects recommended in the Master Plan Update, along with an assessment of the ability of the Airport sponsor (i.e.,
More informationAirport Simulation Technology in Airport Planning, Design and Operating Management
Applied and Computational Mathematics 2018; 7(3): 130-138 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/acm doi: 10.11648/j.acm.20180703.18 ISSN: 2328-5605 (Print); ISSN: 2328-5613 (Online) Airport Simulation
More informationTable E-3 Phased Capital Improvement Program...E - 11
Ni ag ar af r ont i e rt r ans por t at i onaut hor i t y Buffa l oni a ga r ai nt e r na t i ona l Ai r por t Execut i vesummar y AI P#33600097010 NF T APr oj ec t#30bg0916 NYS DOTPI N#5913 11 Ma y2013
More informationTransportation Research Board. Session Lessons Learned from Large Airport Development. Orlando Airport Experience
Transportation Research Board Session 513 - Lessons Learned from Large Airport Development Orlando Airport Experience Agenda Airport Statistics and Background Capital Improvement Plan Lessons Learned Planning
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Master Plan Update Phase 2/3 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1. INTRODUCTION 2.
MASTER PLAN UPDATE Phase 2/3 Draft Final Summary Report Report Issued 2010 in association with Prepared for Broward County Aviation Department Main Office 555 Airport Blvd., Suite 300 Burlingame, CA 94010
More information6.0 Capital Improvement Program. 6.1 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
6.0 The addresses the phased scheduling of projects identified in this Master Plan and their financial implications on the resources of the Airport and the City of Prescott. The phased Capital Improvement
More informationAirport Planning and Terminal Design
Airport Planning and Terminal Design Major Terminal Design Considerations Passenger Terminal Configuration Passenger Terminal Concepts Major Design Considerations 1 Terminal Configuration Centralised processing
More informationThe demand/capacity analysis was performed utilizing Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) publications, including the following:
Chapter Three To properly plan for the future of Monterey Regional Airport, it is necessary to examine the capacities of the key airport systems. This chapter uses the results of the forecasts prepared
More informationNotice of Intent to File an Application to Impose and Use a Passenger Facility Charge at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport
Notice of Intent to File an Application to Impose and Use a Passenger Facility Charge at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 158.24(a) (1) (III), the Broward County
More informationPrepared By: Mead & Hunt, Inc Port Lansing Road Lansing, MI 48906
Master Plan The preparation of this document was financed in part through a planning grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as provided under Section 505 of the Airport and Airway Improvement
More informationJUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM. April 10 th 2017
JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM April 10 th 2017 1 Agenda Recap Potential Mitigation Response to Stakeholder Questions Next Steps 2 Recap 3 Background Master Plan considered the runway
More informationJOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012
1. Introduction The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends that airport master plans be updated every 5 years or as necessary to keep them current. The Master Plan for Joslin Field, Magic Valley
More informationTechnical Advisory Committee Briefing #3
(PRELIMINARY DRAFT) WORK IN PROGRESS - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Technical Advisory Committee Briefing #3 June 22, 2018 Master Plan Schedule Overview Coordination Review Recommended Remote 5-Gate Facility
More informationDraft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005
Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005 Section 1 - Introduction This report describes the development and analysis of concept alternatives that would accommodate
More informationGreater Orlando Aviation Authority Orlando International Airport One Jeff Fuqua Boulevard Orlando, Florida Memorandum TO: FROM:
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority One Jeff Fuqua Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32827-4399 Memorandum TO: FROM: Participating Airlines Phil Brown, Executive Director DATE: SUBJECT: Rate Methodology for FY
More informationChapter 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Chapter 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Contents Page Aviation Growth Scenarios................................................ 3 Airport Capacity Alternatives.............................................. 4 Air Traffic
More informationTed Stevens Anchorage International Airport
Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport 2014 MASTER PLAN UPDATE Executive Summary IN ASSOCIATION WITH: HDR DOWL HKM RIM Architects ATAC Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport is planning for the
More informationOctober 2014 BELLINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION
October 2014 BELLINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION The Master Plan Process Inventory Of Existing Conditions Complete. Forecasts Of Aviation Demand Complete. Facility Requirements Complete.
More information