Boeing Aircraft and the Impact on Airports
|
|
- Tyrone Horn
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 International Civil Aviation Organization on Pavement Management Systems Lima, Peru November 19-22, 2003 Boeing Aircraft and the Impact on Airports Orest Shepson Principal Engineer - Airport Technology - Boeing Commercial Airplanes Shepson
2 The Developing Boeing Airplane Family X Passengers Range, (1,000 nmi) Shepson
3 Shepson
4 General Arrangement ft (28.44 m) 36.9 ft (11.25 m) ft (37.80 m) 29.1 ft (8.87 m) 16.0 ft (4.9 m) 57.8 ft (17.6 m) ICAO Aerodrome Reference Code C/RFF Category Shepson
5 Range Capability From Lima, Peru Full Passenger Payload ,000-lb (49,890-kg) MTOW 106 passengers * 121,000-lb (54,880-kg) TOGW* 106 passengers Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Two-class seating * With 730 USG auxiliary fuel Shepson
6 Aircraft Classification Number Rigid and Flexible Pavement Subgrade codes C D Aircraft classification number (ACN) A B Legend: Flexible pavement Rigid pavement Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Gross weight, lb x 1, Shepson
7 Shepson
8 FAA Airplane Design Group III/ARFF Index B Airplane Design Group III/ARFF Index B Airplane Design Group III/ARFF Index C Airplane Design Group III/ARFF Index C General Arrangement /-700/-800/ Shepson
9 /-700/-800/-900 With Winglets ICAO Size Comparison Aerodrome Reference Code C/RFF Category Aerodrome Reference Code C/RFF Category Aerodrome Reference Code C/RFF Category Aerodrome Reference Code C/RFF Category Shepson
10 Minimum Pavement Width For 180-Deg Turn Notes: 1. Maximum effective steering angle = 75 deg 2. Typical edge clearances are 10 ft (3 m) at each side of pavement turn area Shepson Airplane model Dimension A 60.8 ft (18.5 m) 66.4 ft (20.3 m) 79.1 ft (24.1 m) 85.4 ft (26.0 m)
11 /-900 Aircraft Classification Subgrade codes C D B 40 Aircraft classification number (ACN) 30 A Legend: Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Flexible pavement Rigid pavement Gross weight, lb x 1, Shepson
12 Range Capability From Lima, Peru ,500-lb (65,099-kg) MTOW 110 passengers * 154,500-lb (70,080-kg) MTOW 126 passengers * 174,200-lb (79,010-kg) MTOW 162 passengers * 174,200-lb (79,010-kg) MTOW 177 passengers Full Passenger Payload Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Two-class seating * With optional winglets Shepson
13 Shepson
14 General Arrangement /300 The is 23 ft (7 m) longer than the ICAO Aerodrome Reference Code D/RFF Category Aerodrome Reference Code D/RFF Category Shepson
15 757 Minimum Pavement Width For 180-Deg Turn Nosegear track A Notes: 1. Maximum effective steering angle = 75 deg 2. ICAO/FAA recommends 10 ft (3 m) minimum edge safety distance at each side of pavement turn area (dimension A) between the tire face and pavement edge. Airplane model Dimension A 120 ft (36.6 m) 142 ft (43.3 m) Shepson
16 Runway Loading Comparison Aircraft classification number (ACN) / Two-class seating Flexible pavement, subgrade B Airplanes at maximum takeoff weight Number of passengers Shepson
17 Range Capability From Lima, Peru Full Passenger Payload ,000-lb (115,660-kg) MTOW 200 passengers ,000-lb (123,830-kg) MTOW 243 passengers Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Two-class seating Shepson
18 Twin-Aisle Airplanes Legend: Long-range rules In service Launched Study Passengers ER ER K K LR K 545K MD-11ER 656K ER ER ER 150 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 Range, nmi Shepson
19 Airport Compatibility /-300/-400ER Shepson
20 /-300/-400ER General Arrangement ICAO Aerodrome Reference Code D/RFF Category Aerodrome Reference Code D/RFF Category ER Aerodrome Reference Code D/RFF Category ft 4 in (61.37 m) 180 ft 3 in (54.94 m) 159 ft 2 in (48.51 m) 170 ft 4 in* (52 m) 156 ft 1 in (-200 & -300) (47.57 m) 61 ft 4 in (18.62 m) 55 ft 4 in (16.81 m) 52 ft 0 in (15.85 m) *Fully loaded is 170 ft 7 in (52 m) 30 ft 6 in (9.30 m) 74 ft 8 in (22.76 m) 85 ft 10 in (26.16 m) Shepson
21 Range Capability From Lima, Peru Full Passenger Payload ER 412,000-lb (186,880-kg) MTOW 218 passengers ER 450,000-lb (204,120-kg) MTOW 245 passengers Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Three-class seating Shepson
22 90 ACN Comparison Flexible Pavement ER A ACN A Subgrade - Code C Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1, Shepson
23 70 ACN Comparison ER Rigid Pavement A ACN A Subgrade - Code B Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1, Shepson
24 Shepson
25 General Arrangement /-300 ICAO Aerodrome Reference Code E/RFF Category Aerodrome Reference Code E/RFF Category ft 0 in (11.0 m) 199 ft 11 in (60.9 m) 70 ft 7.5 in (21.5 m) 209 ft 1 in (63.7 m) 242 ft 4 in (73.8 m) 60 ft 9 in (18.5 m) 60 ft 8 in (18.5 m) 209 ft 1 in (63.7 m) 84 ft 11 in (25.9 m) 102 ft 5 in (31.2 m) 242 ft 4 in (73.8 m) Shepson
26 Range Capability From Lima, Peru ,000-lb (247,210-kg) MTOW 305 passengers ER 656,000-lb (297,560-kg) MTOW 301 passengers LR* 766,000-lb (347,450-kg) MTOW 301 passengers ,000-lb (299,370-kg) MTOW 368 passengers ER 759,600-lb (344,540-kg) MTOW 365 passengers Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Three-class seating * With 5,500 USG auxiliary fuel Full Passenger Payload Shepson
27 777 Minimum Pavement Width For 180-Degree Turn Nosegear track A Notes: 1. Maximum effective steering angle = 64 deg 2. FAA/ICAO recommends 15 ft (4.5 m) minimum edge safety distance at each side of pavement turn area (dimension A) between the tire face and pavement edge. Airplane model Dimension A ft (47.5 m) ft (55.4 m) Shepson
28 /-300 Aircraft Classification Number (ACN) Subgrade codes Characteristics C D ACN A B 20 0 Legend: Flexible pavement Rigid pavement Shepson Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1,000
29 Airport Compatibility LR/-300ER Shepson
30 General Arrangement Longer-Range LR ICAO LR Aerodrome Reference Code E/RFF Category Shepson
31 General Arrangement Longer-Range ER ICAO ERAerodrome Reference Code E/RFF Category 9 * Wing span measured at jig position ** Tail height measured at max weight Shepson
32 Range Capability From Los Angeles ,000-lb (247,210-kg) MTOW 305 three-class passenger ER 656,000-lb (297,560-kg) MTOW 301 three-class passenger LR* 750,000-lb (340,200-kg) MTOW 301 three-class passenger ,000-lb (299,370-kg) MTOW 368 three-class passenger ER 750,000-lb (340,200-kg) MTOW 365 three-class passenger Full Passenger Payload Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowances included * Two auxiliary fuel tanks Shepson
33 100 ACN Comparison Flexible Pavement A A ACN LR ER Subgrade - Code C Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1, Shepson
34 ACN Comparison Rigid Pavement LR ER ACN A A Subgrade - Code B Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1, Shepson
35 Airport Compatibility ER Shepson
36 General Arrangement ER (910K) ICAO ERAerodrome Reference Code E/RFF Category Shepson
37 Range Capability From Lima, Peru Full Passenger Payload * 875,000-lb (396,900-kg) MTOW 416 passengers ER 910,000-lb (412,770-kg) MTOW 416 passengers Conditions: Typical mission rules 85% annual winds Airways and traffic allowance included Three-class seating * With 3,300 USG auxiliary tail fuel Shepson
38 Aircraft Classification Number ER Rigid and Flexible Pavement (MTW-913K) ACN Code A - CBR 15 (High) Code C - CBR 10 (Medium) Code C - CBR 6 (Low) Code D - CBR 3 (Ultra Low) Code D - K = 75 (Ultra Low) Code C - K = 150 (Low) Code B - K = 300 (Medium) Code A - K = 550 (High) Legend: Flexible pavement Rigid pavement Shepson Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1,000
39 The Developing Boeing Airplane Family X Passengers Range, (1,000 nmi) Shepson
40 PRELIMINARY General Arrangement X Quiet Longer Ranger Shepson PRELIMINARY
41 100 ACN Comparison Flexible Pavement X Stretch ACN Subgrade - Code C A ,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 Gross weight, kg x 1,000 Aircraft weight, lb x 1, Shepson
42 Trends in Pavement Loading Trend in ACN FB ACN Years in service Shepson
43 Trends in Pavement Loading Trend in ACN RB ACN Years in service Shepson
44 Commercial Airplanes Product Development Creating Value for the Future Flexible and Standard Airplanes Advanced Concepts Shepson
45 Airport Planning Manuals Available at: Selecting airport technology data will produce a pop-up window Select planning manuals from pop-up window Select model from following screen to get Adobe Acrobat file Shepson
46 Shepson
47 Shepson
48 ACN Basis Flexible pavement U.S. Corps of Engineers S-77-1 computer program Rigid pavement Portland Cement Association PDILB computer program Calculations are done for defined Standard conditions Four representative subgrade support levels (from very weak to strong) Typical pavement life (10,000 coverages for flexible pavements) Shepson
49 The Standard U.S. Corps of Engineers Flexible Pavement Design Equation t (A) Log = α Log CBR P CBR P Log CBR P The equation considers all loads as an equivalent single wheel load (P). Pavement longevity and the number of applied wheel loads are considered via the a factor Shepson
50 View of the NAPTP Test Vehicle Shepson
51 Runway Loads - Takeoff / Landing Typical Jet Aircraft 100 Runway load % max taxi LANDING TAKEOFF 20 0 Distance Runway pavements are designed for static load. The impact of landing is only about 38% of the takeoff static load Shepson
52 Runway Roughness Shepson
53 What Kind of Roughness are We Concerned About? The kind that leads to: Excessive onboard vibration Instrument visibility Rudder and steering control Maximum oleo compression Landing gear fatigue life Shepson
54 Boeing Runway Roughness Criteria Bump height, cm Unacceptable Excessive 10 Acceptable 5 L RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CRITERIA L L H H H Bump length, m Shepson
55 Airplane Load Exceedances for Fatigue Life Cumulative occurrences per 1,000 flight cycles 500,000 50,000 1, Vertical acceleration at CG (g units) Shepson
56 Shepson
57 Sample Survey Results Frost Heave 5.05 Centerline 4C South N North 3N Runway station, m 4N Shepson
58 Roughness Analysis of a Sample Runway Bump height, cm 14 N = north C = center S = south Unacceptable 1N 4S 4N 1C 4C 2N 2C Acceptable Bump length, m 3S 3C 2S 3N Excessive Shepson
59 Boeing Runway Roughness Criteria Bump height, cm Unacceptable Excessive 10 Acceptable 5 L RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CRITERIA L L H H H Bump length, m Shepson
60 Temporary Ramping Application of Boeing Criteria Bump height, in Bump height, cm /100 slope 1/200 slope Acceptable limit Bump length, m Bump length, (ft) Shepson
61 Runway Ramping Recommendations A. Ramping prior to aircraft traffic Predominant direction of traffic Overlay thickness x Ramp Milled area Old surface Overlay thickness x B. Surface preparation prior to resumption of paving Overlay thickness x y Cut area to depth y Old surface Notes 1. When overlay thickness x < = 5 cm, then ramp slope = 1.0% 2. When overlay thickness x > 5 cm, then ramp slope = 0.5% 3. Depth y should be at least 2 times the maximum aggregate size Shepson
62 Shepson
63 Conclusions Runways may become intolerably rough due to The onset of pavement structural failure Adverse environmental conditions such as freezing and thawing cycles Airport operators are not usually aware of the impact of roughness on aircraft The Boeing criteria will enable the airport operator to Determine the extent of roughness Locate the source of roughness Make rational decisions as to the best course of action Nightime paving can be accomplished with a minimum of downtime by using the Boeing criteria Shepson
64 Shepson
65 Shepson
66 Shepson
67 Shepson
68 FAA Advisory Circular 150/ Guidelines for Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements Figure A-26. Airport pavement condition index (PCI) and rating Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor Failed Shepson
69 International Civil Aviation Organization on Pavement Management Systems Lima, Peru November 19-22, Shepson
Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX
Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX Specific airport compatibility questions concerning Boeing commercial aircraft should be forwarded to: June 2017 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company.
More information7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement
7.0 PAVEMENT DATA 7.1 General Information 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement 7.5 Flexible Pavement Requirements - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Method
More informationAirport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX. March 2014 PRELIMINARY
Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX March 2014 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright 2013 Boeing. All rights reserved. PRELIMINARY Specific airport compatibility questions concerning
More information7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement
7.0 PAVEMENT DATA 7.1 General Information 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement 7.5 Flexible Pavement Requirements - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Method
More informationAirport Compatibility
747X Quiet Longer Range Family Airport Compatibility April, 2002 Specific airport compatibility questions concerning commercial aircraft should be forwarded to: Airport Technology Boeing (Seattle, WA)
More information7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement
7.0 PAVEMENT DATA 7.1 General Information 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement 7.5 Flexible Pavement Requirements - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Method
More informationBoeing Airplane Overview
Boeing Airplane Overview Yonglian Ding, PE Boeing Airport Compatibility Engineering Nov 29, 2016 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright 2016 Boeing. All rights reserved. Agenda Aircraft
More informationThe offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10
The 747 8 offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. 14 aero quarterly qtr_03 10 Operating the 747 8 at Existing Airports Today s major airports are
More informationManufacturer s Perspective- Airport Pavement Needs and Maintenance Issues
Manufacturer s Perspective- Airport Pavement Needs and Maintenance Issues Michael Roginski, PE Principal Engineer Boeing Airport Technology VII ALACPA Airport Pavement Seminar Miami, FL December 6-9, 21
More informationAirport Compatibility
Presented by Dan COHEN-NIR Programs Director Airbus Americas Holdings Inc. www.airbusamericas.com Airport Compatibility Opportunities and Challenges Airport Challenges & Aircraft Design Challenge: Prepare
More informationRunway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology
FLIGHT SERVICES Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology Michael Roginski, PE, Principal Engineer Boeing Airport Compatibility Engineering ALACPA XI Seminar, Santiago, Chile September 1-5,
More informationRunway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology
FLIGHT SERVICES Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology Michael Roginski, PE, Principal Engineer Boeing Airport Compatibility Engineering ALACPA X Seminar, Mexico City, Mexico September 30-
More informationRunway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology
FLIGHT SERVICES Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology Michael Roginski, PE, Principal Engineer Boeing Airport Compatibility Engineering ALACPA X Seminar, Mexico City, Mexico September 3-
More information737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning
737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning Boeing Commercial Airplanes OCTOBER 2005 i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1.0 SCOPE AND INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope 2 1.2 Introduction 3 1.3 A Brief
More informationBearing Strength Assessment PLR & PCN
1 LEISMER AIRPORT (Airport code CET2, Canada) Bearing Strength Assessment PLR & PCN Report APMS-111021 October 21, 2011 APMS Stationsweg 51, Velsen-Zuid 1981 BA, the Netherlands Phone: + 31 (0) 255 524
More informationPCN Reporting- Current Problems and Future Research Plans
PCN Reporting- Current Problems and Future Research Plans Michael J. Roginski, P.E. Principal Engineer Boeing Airport Compatibility Engineering, Pavement Lead October 1-4, 2013 Mexico City, Mexico BOEING
More informationThe Aircraft Classification Rating Pavement Classification Rating ACR-PCR
XIV Seminario ALACPA de Pavimentos Aeroportuarios XII Taller Federal Aviation Administration VII Curso Rápido de Mantenimiento de Pavimentos de Aeródromos 28/05 al 01/06 2018 Ciudad de Quito - Ecuador
More information/300 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning
757-200/300 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning Boeing Commercial Airplanes AUGUST 2002 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii AUGUST 2002 757 AIRPLANE CHARACTERISTICS LIST OF ACTIVE PAGES Page
More information/300 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning
777-200/300 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning Boeing Commercial Airplanes OCTOBER 2004 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii OCTOBER 2002 777 AIRPLANE CHARACTERISTICS LIST OF ACTIVE PAGES
More informationTires Versus Pavement: Pilots, mechanics, and airport managers on the same page
Tires Versus Pavement: Pilots, mechanics, and airport managers on the same page Pilots often think tire pressure and condition are a mechanic s worry, not theirs. Similarly, the pavement strength of the
More informationAssignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2014 Solution! Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design Instructor: Trani Problem 1 A new airport to be constructed near Mexico City airport would like to
More informationCOMFAA. Acknowledgments. Demonstration and. Rapol, FAA. Ken DeBord and Mike Roginski, Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. Federal Aviation Administration
COMFAA Demonstration and Hands-On Training Presented to: VII ALACPA Airport Pavement Seminar & V FAA Airport Pavement Workshop By: David R. Brill, P.E., Ph.D. Date: Acknowledgments Gordon Hayhoe, Rodney
More information777-9 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning
CAGE Code 81205 777-9 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning DOCUMENT NUMBER: REVISION: REVISION DATE: REV A March 2018 CONTENT OWNER: Boeing Commercial Airplanes All revisions to this document
More informationRunway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport
APPENDIX 2 Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport May 11, 2009 Version 2 (draft) Table of Contents Introduction... 1-1 Section 1 Purpose & Need... 1-2 Section 2 Design Standards...1-3 Section
More informationProgram Update Dan Cohen-Nir - Airbus Americas
ACI-NA Airports@Work New Orleans March 15, 2018 Program Update Dan Cohen-Nir - Airbus Americas An Airbus takes off or lands every 1.4 seconds 18,234 Orders 10,991 Deliveries 7,333 Backlog End December
More informationBoeing Product Update
Boeing Product Update Agenda Market Outlook Boeing Product Impact to Airports 777X Folding Wingtip Boeing Airport Compatibility Group 2 Regulatory Effort Market Outlook (Latin America) Boeing Product
More information737 MAX Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning
CAGE Code 81205 737 MAX Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning DOCUMENT NUMBER: REVISION: REVISION DATE: REV NEW July 2015 CONTENT OWNER: Boeing Commercial Airplanes All revisions to this document
More informationBudapest, Hungary 2015
Budapest, Hungary 2015 Runway Pavement Roughness Considering Pavement Surface Drainage and Boeing Bump Index Injun Song, Ph.D., P.E. SRA International, Inc. Acknowledgement Jeffrey Gagnon, P.E., FAA Airport
More informationTaxiway Pavement Evaluation to Support the Operational of Terminal 2 Juanda Airport
Regional Conference in Civil Engineering (RCCE) 634 Taxiway Pavement Evaluation to Support the Operational of Terminal 2 Juanda Airport Istiar 1*, Indrasurya B. Mochtar 1, Wahyu Herijanto 1, Catur Arif
More information767 Airplane Characteristics for. Airport Planning. Boeing Commercial Airplanes. D SEPTEMBER 2005 i
767 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning Boeing Commercial Airplanes SEPTEMBER 2005 i 767 AIRPLANE CHARACTERISTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING LIST OF ACTIVE PAGES Page Date Page Date Page Date Original
More informationAdvisory Circular (AC)
Advisory Circular (AC) Certification of Transport Category Aeroplanes On Narrow Runways File No. 5009-6-525 AC No. 525-014 RDIMS No. 528471-V3 Issue No. 01 Issuing Branch Aircraft Certification Effective
More informationUSE OF TAKEOFF CHARTS [B737]
USE OF TAKEOFF CHARTS [B737] 1. Introducton This documentation presents an example of takeoff performance calculations for Boeing 737. It is called self-dispatch, primarily used by airline crew if that
More informationAirplane Performance. Introduction. Copyright 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved.
Introduction Airplane Performance The statements contained herein are based on good faith assumptions and provided for general information purposes only. These statements do not constitute an offer, promise,
More informationAccording to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:
4.1 INTRODUCTION The previous chapters have described the existing facilities and provided planning guidelines as well as a forecast of demand for aviation activity at North Perry Airport. The demand/capacity
More informationIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Related content PAPER OPEN ACCESS
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering PAPER OPEN ACCESS Comparison study on flexible pavement design using FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) and LCN (Load Classification Number)
More information717 Aeroplane JAA Data Sheet
The Following Content of this Data Sheet is Complete In Accordance With the Concurrent and Cooperative Certification Process (CCC) Working Procedure, Draft Issue 8 dated 17-May-1994 and JAA Administrative
More informationCEE Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications. January 2018
CEE 5614 Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering January 2018 1 Material Presented The aircraft and its impact operations in the NAS
More informationAirfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni
Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni Istanbul Technical University Air Transportation Management M.Sc. Program Air Transportation Systems and Infrastructure Module 5 May 25, 2015 Objective and
More informationTallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016
Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016 Agenda Welcome / Introductions Master Plan Process and Project Status Forecast of Aviation Demand
More informationFORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT
D.3 RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS Appendix D Purpose and Need THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Appendix D Purpose and Need APPENDIX D.3 AIRFIELD GEOMETRIC REQUIREMENTS This information provided in this appendix
More informationAirport/Aircraft Compatibility Challenges on the Apron
Airport/Aircraft Compatibility Challenges on the Apron 2009 ACI-NA Operations and Technical Affairs Conference Karen Dix-Colony Boeing Airport Technology BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company.
More informationWorldwide Aircraft Services, Inc
Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc. Springfield / Branson Regional Airport 2755 N. General Aviation Ave., Springfield, Missouri 65803 (417) 865-1879 # 0r Fax (417) 865-6884
More informationTAKEOFF SAFETY ISSUE 2-11/2001. Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance
TAKEOFF SAFETY T R A I N I N G A I D ISSUE 2-11/2001 Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance Introduction The purpose of this brochure is to provide the
More informationAirfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni
Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni Istanbul Technical University Air Transporta5on Management M.Sc. Program Air Transporta5on Systems and Infrastructure Module 4 28 April 2014 Objective and Outline!
More information2.1 General Characteristics. 2.2 General Dimensions. 2.3 Ground Clearances. 2.4 Interior Arrangements. 2.5 Cabin Cross Sections
2.0 AIRPLANE DESCRIPTION 2.1 General Characteristics 2.2 General Dimensions 2.3 Ground Clearances 2.4 Interior Arrangements 2.5 Cabin Cross Sections 2.6 Lower Cargo Compartments 2.7 Door Clearances JUNE
More informationThe Boeing Next-Generation 737 Family Productive, Progressive, Flexible, Familiar
Backgrounder Boeing Commercial Airplanes P.O. Box 3707 MC 21-70 Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 www.boeing.com The Boeing Next-Generation 737 Family Productive, Progressive, Flexible, Familiar The members
More informationFOR. Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Aircraft Classification & Airport Pavement Design Curves Prof. Dr. Shafik Jendia 2009/2010 1 A-1 BOEING 747-200 AIRPLANE CHARACTERSTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN BOEING Boeing Commercial Airplanes
More informationDemonstration and. 4. Contact List. Federal Aviation Administration. Administration
Demonstration and Hands-On Training Presented to: VII ALACPA Airport Pavement Seminar & V FAA Airport Pavement Workshop By: David R. Brill, P.E., Ph.D. Date: Information on Disk 1. FAA Computer Programs
More informationADVISORY CIRCULAR ON CALCULATION OF DECLARED DISTANCES
Page 1 of 6 1. PURPOSE This Advisory circular (AC) provides guidance to operators to calculated declared distances at aerodrome for safe use of runway and promulgation of aeronautical data to the aeronautical
More informationConsideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.
Advisory Circular AC 139-11 Revision 2 Use of day-vfr aerodromes 27 April 2007 General Civil Aviation Authority advisory circulars (AC) contain information about standards, practices and procedures that
More informationAssignment 2: Runway Length Analysis
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2018 Date Due: February 2, 2018 (Ground Hog Day) Assignment 2: Runway Length Analysis Instructor: Trani Reading Assignment: Review Chapters 1 through 3 of the
More informationCATCODE ] CATCODE
Runways. FAC: 1111 CATCODE: 111111 OPR: AFCEC/COS OCR: AF/A3O-A 1.1. Description. The runway is the paved surface provided for normal aircraft landings and take offs. Runways are classified as either Class
More informationPavement Strength Analysis Prepared by Molzen Corbin September 2016
Pavement Strength Analysis Prepared by Molzen Corbin September 2016 The Santa Fe Municipal Airport was originally constructed in 1941. It was constructed by the military as a B-24 bomber training base.
More informationChapter 14. Design of Flexible Airport Pavements AC 150/5320-6D
Chapter 14 Design of Flexible Airport Pavements AC 150/5320-6D AIRCRAFT CONSIDERATIONS. a. Load. maximum anticipated takeoff weight of the aircraft. The design procedure assumes 95 percent of the gross
More informationConference JERI Agressivité du trafic pour les chaussées, les atterrisseurs d avions. FABRE CYRIL, Head of Airfield Pavement November 2017
Conference JERI 2017 Agressivité du trafic pour les chaussées, les atterrisseurs d avions FABRE CYRIL, Head of Airfield Pavement November 2017 CONTENTS Airfield pavement specificities Pavement design and
More informationAirport Obstruction Standards
Airport Obstruction Standards Dr. Antonio Trani Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Virginia Tech Outline of this Presentation Obstructions to navigation around airports Discussion of Federal
More information/-400ER Freighters
s 64.44 m (211 ft 5 in ) 22.17 m (72 ft 9 in) 70.66 m (231 ft 10 in ) 19.40 m (63 ft 8 in) 11.00 m (36 ft 1 in ) Part of a complete Boeing freighter solution Revenue payload, 1,000 kg (1,000 lb) (330)
More informationAircraft Classifications. Dr. Antonio Trani and Julio Roa Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Aircraft Classifications Dr. Antonio Trani and Julio Roa Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. January 2018 1 Material Presented The aircraft and the airport Aircraft classifications Aircraft
More informationAIRPORT PAVEMENT DESIGNS Consideration of New Guidelines
AIRPORT PAVEMENT DESIGNS Consideration of New Guidelines Ricardo Amaral Cabral Vieira ricardvieira@hotmail.com Department of Civil Engineering, Arquitecture and Georesources, Instituto Superior Técnico,
More informationFlexible Pavement Design
Flexible Pavement Design FAARFIELD 1.3 Workshop Starting Screen No Job Files Created Click on New Job Presented to: VI ALACPA Airport Pavements Seminar & IV FAA Workshop By: David R. Brill, P.E., Ph.D.
More informationDr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Spring 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia
CEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design Runway Length Calculations Addendum 1 Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Spring 2015 Blacksburg,
More informationAPPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS
APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS Purpose For this Airport Master Plan study, the FAA has requested a runway length analysis to be completed to current FAA AC 150/5325-4B, Runway Length Requirements for
More informationINCREASING AIRPORT OPERATION SAFETY BASED ON UPDATED OR ENHANCED AIRPORT PAVEMENT MARKINGS: A CASE STUDY PAPER
INCREASING AIRPORT OPERATION SAFETY BASED ON UPDATED OR ENHANCED AIRPORT PAVEMENT MARKINGS: A CASE STUDY PAPER 09-2020 By Chun-Hsing Ho, Dwight D. Eisenhower Fellow Department of Civil and Environmental
More informationB GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:
2014 GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD B + RECOMMENDATIONS Plan and Fund for the Future: While the system continues to enjoy excess capacity and increased accessibility it still needs continued focus
More informationCEE 5614 and CEE Aircraft Classifications. Spring 2013
CEE 5614 and CEE 4674 Aircraft Classifications Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering Spring 2013 1 Material Presented The aircraft and the airport Aircraft classifications
More informationAirplane takeoff speeds are designed to ensure the liftoff speed does not exceed the tire speed rating.
Airplane takeoff speeds are designed to ensure the liftoff speed does not exceed the tire speed rating. 14 aero quarterly qtr_02 09 Exceeding Tire Speed Rating During Takeoff Airplane tires are designed
More informationFACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW
FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW This summary is intended to provide a brief overview of the key issues associated with conformance to FAA standards at Methow Valley State Airport.
More informationREPORT IN-038/2010 DATA SUMMARY
REPORT IN-038/2010 DATA SUMMARY LOCATION Date and time Friday, 3 December 2010; 09:46 h UTC 1 Site Sabadell Airport (LELL) (Barcelona) AIRCRAFT Registration Type and model Operator EC-KJN TECNAM P2002-JF
More informationSpecial Conditions: The Boeing Company Model and Airplanes;
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/18/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-10576, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationCHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 3.0 ALTERNATIVES The 2010 Stevensville Airport Master Plan contained five (5) airside development options designed to meet projected demands. Each of the options from
More informationPROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAYOUT FILLET DESIGN FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAYS
PROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAYOUT FILLET DESIGN FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAYS INTRODUCTION The Zelienople Airport Authority (ZAA) has commenced engineering activities for the rehabilitation of Runway 17-35 to a
More informationAnalysis of Air Transportation Systems. The Aircraft and the System
Analysis of Air Transportation Systems The Aircraft and the System Dr. Antonio A. Trani Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Falls
More information@AIRBUS A /-600 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING
@AIRBUS A340-500/-600 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING AC The content of this document is the property of Airbus. It is supplied in confidence and commercial security on its contents
More informationAIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS This Section investigates the capacity of the airport, its ability to meet current demand, and the facilities required to meet forecasted needs as established
More information1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION
1.1.3 Taxiways EWN has an extensive network of taxiways and taxilanes connecting the terminal, air cargo, and general aviation areas with the runways as listed in Figure 1-15. A 50-foot wide parallel taxiway
More informationAppendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis
Appendix B ULTIMATE AIRPORT CAPACITY & DELAY SIMULATION MODELING ANALYSIS B TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS TABLES B.1 Introduction... 1 B.2 Simulation Modeling Assumption and Methodology... 4 B.2.1 Runway
More informationRUNWAY ARRESTING SYSTEMS
MINIMIZING THE IMPACT OF RUNWAY ARRESTING SYSTEMS ON COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE OPERATIONS Many airports throughout the world have joint commercial-military operations. Runways at these airports often are equipped
More informationCHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
CHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS This chapter identifies the requirements for airfield and landside facilities to accommodate the forecast demand level. Facility requirements have been developed for the
More informationFLIGHT AND OPERATING MANUAL SUPPLEMENT FMS305902, REVISION 1 SEAPLANES WEST INC.
FLIGHT AND OPERATING MANUAL SUPPLEMENT FMS305902, REVISION 1 AEROCET 3500/3500L FLOAT INSTALLATION ON CESSNA 182E THROUGH 182N AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT MODEL: AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION: AIRCRAFT SERIAL NUMBER: TRANSPORT
More information1.0 SCOPE AND INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Scope. 1.2 Introduction. 1.3 A Brief Description of the
1.0 SCOPE AND INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope 1.2 Introduction 1.3 A Brief Description of the 747-400 DECEMBER 2002 1 1.0 SCOPE AND INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope This document provides, in a standardized format, airplane
More informationTransportation Engineering -II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee
Transportation Engineering -II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee Lecture - 36 Aprons & Aircraft Parking Dear students, today s lecture we are going
More informationKey Purpose & Need Issues
Key Purpose & Need Issues Efficiently meet demand through the 2025 planning horizon 864,000+ annual operations 180-200 operations during peak daytime hours Balance peak hour arrival/departure capability
More informationF. StartupBoeing. Copyright 2007 Boeing. All rights reserved.
757-200F Boeing standard-body freighters Payload, tons 60 DC-8-63F 40 757-200F 707-320C 727-200F 20 727-100F 0 0 1 2 3 4 Range, 1,000 nmi 757-200F General arrangement 757-200F 124 ft 10 in (38.0 m) 49
More informationFAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance
FAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance Presentation to: CAAC Engine-out Procedures Seminar Name: Chuck Friesenhahn Date: 11/29/2005 Flight Standards Senior Advisor, Advanced
More informationDr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. January 27, 2009 Blacksburg, Virginia
Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University January 27, 2009 Blacksburg, Virginia 1 Runway Design Assumptions (FAA 150/5325-4b) Applicable to
More informationWorst-case analysis of wake vortex induced risk of 700ft vertical separation. Gerben van Baren
Worst-case analysis of wake vortex induced risk of 700ft vertical separation Gerben van Baren Contents Incentive Objective Approach Results Conclusions NLR Air Transport Safety Institute 15-1-2009 2 Incentive
More informationChallenges to Airport Ramp & Runway Debris Control
BASIC AIRPORT SAFETY & OPERATIONS SCHOOL FAA/AAAE Challenges to Airport Ramp & Runway Debris Control Airport Technology Boeing Commercial Airplanes October 2010 Airport Ramp & Runway Debris Control What
More informationHARD. Preventing. Nosegear Touchdowns
Preventing HARD Nosegear Touchdowns In recent years, there has been an increase in the incidence of significant structural damage to commercial airplanes from hard nosegear touchdowns. In most cases, the
More informationAIRPORT PLANNING MANUAL TRANSMITTAL LETTER REVISION 8
TRANSMITTAL LETTER REVISION 8 This package contains the CRJ100/200/440 Airport Planning Manual, CSP A 020, Revision 8, dated Jan 10/2016. TRANSMITTAL LETTER Page 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REMOVE:
More informationPLU Airport Master Plan. Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #4 March 19, 2018
PLU Airport Master Plan Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #4 March 19, 2018 Meeting Agenda 1. Master Plan Status [5 Minutes] 2. Preferred Forecasts [15 Minutes] 3. Runway Length Options [45
More informationREPORT A-024/2012 DATA SUMMARY
REPORT A-024/2012 DATA SUMMARY LOCATION Date and time Sunday, 1 July 2012; 08:45 UTC 1 Site La Juliana Aerodrome (Seville, Spain) AIRCRAFT Registration Type and model Operator HA-NAH SMG-92 Turbo Finist
More informationBilly Bishop Toronto City Airport; Porter Airlines Proposal Review; Interim Results/Findings, Airbiz, 26 June 2013
Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport - Outstanding Questions for Transport Canada EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Transport Action has reviewed the reports published by Airbiz and LPS Avia Consulting and found that they
More informationNOTE: DATA PRELIMINARY
2.0 AIRPLANE DESCRIPTION 2.1 General Characteristics 2.2 General Dimensions 2.3 Ground Clearances 2.4 Interior Arrangements 2.5 Cabin Cross Sections 2.6 Lower Cargo Compartments 2.7 Door Clearances REV
More informationInternational Industry Working Group Fifth Edition R1, 2007
International Industry Working Group Fifth Edition R1, 2007 COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS - TRENDS AND GROWTH PROJECTIONS NOTICE OF REVISION The original document was released in March 1969
More informationFacility Requirements
4. This chapter presents the airside and landside facility requirements necessary to accommodate existing and forecasted demand at Erie International Airport (ERI or the Airport) in accordance with Federal
More informationAERODROME OPERATING MINIMA
Title: Determination of Aerodrome Operating Minima Page 1 of 8 AERODROME OPERATING MINIMA 1. PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this Advisory Circular is to provide methods to be adopted by operators in determining
More informationD.1 Introduction. Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport
Appendix D. Alternatives D.1 Introduction Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Orders 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, and 5050.4B, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing
More information