International Civil Aviation Organization. Second Meeting (AIM SG/2) (Kish Island, Iran, 31 August-2 September 2015)

Transcription

1 International Civil Aviation Organization SG/2WP/4 08/07/2015 MIDANPIRG SubGroup Second Meeting ( SG/2) (Kish Island, Iran, 31 August2 September 2015) Agenda Item 4: Performance Framework for implementation in the MID Region NATIONAL PLANS/ROADMAPS FOR THE TRANSITION FROM AIS TO (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY The aim of this paper is to review the status of development/update of national plans/roadmaps for the. Action by the meeting is at paragraph 3. REFERENCES SG/1 Report MIDANPIRG/15 Report MSG/4 Report SL Ref.: ME 3/115/034 dated 1 February INTRODUCTION 1.1 In order to keep pace with the /SWIM developments, MIDANPIRG/14 through Conclusion 14/19 urged States to develop/update their National Plans for the with a view to support seamless ATM in a SWIM environment. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 The meeting may wish to recall that, the SG/1 reviewed the survey which was carried out by the ICAO MID Regional Office in April 2014, to identify difficulties faced by States for the development/update of their AIS National Plans; and highlighted the following: the development of a National Plan/Roadmap is an important prerequisite for a successful ; the lack of qualified staff is the main reason for the delay in the development/update of the National Plan in many States; and the timely implementation of. In this respect, the need for training is underlined;

2 SG/2WP/4 2 many States confirmed the need for support/assistance for the development/update of their National Plans/Roadmaps and for the implementation of, interalia, through seminars, workshops, missions to States, exchange of experience and sharing of expertise, etc. 2.2 The meeting may wish to note that, the SG/1 meeting, as a followup to the MIDANPIRG Conclusion 14/19, discussed ways and means to assist States in developing/updating their Implementation Roadmap/National Plan and how to foster the in the MID Region and accordingly developed the National Implementation Roadmap Template at Appendix A. 2.3 The meeting may wish to recall that, the MSG/4 meeting (Cairo, Egypt, 2426 November 2014) agreed that the focus should be on the implementation of phase II of the Roadmap for the and endorsed the MID Region implementation Roadmap at Appendix B. Accordingly, the meeting agreed to the following MSG Conclusion: MSG CONCLUSION 4/17: NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP TEMPLATE That, States: a) be invited to take into consideration the MID Region implementation Roadmap at Appendix 4L in planning for the in a prioritized manner; and b) that have not yet done so, be urged to provide the ICAO MID Regional Office with their National Implementation Roadmap using the Template at Appendix 4K, before 1 March The ICAO MID Regional Office, as a followup action to the MSG Conclusion 4/17, issued State Letter Ref: ME 3/115/034 dated 1 February It is to be highlighted that, twelve (12) States have provided their National Plans and/or Roadmap to the ICAO MID Regional Office. Status of the States in developing/updating the National Plans and/or Roadmap is as follow:

3 3 SG/2WP/4 State 1 Bahrain 2 Egypt 3 Iran National Plan First Edition Updates Current/Last Version Roadmap and Strategy 2020 Ver /04/2009 National Roadmap for the transition from AIS to Jan 2015 Iran National Plan Edition SEP /12/ /9/ /6/ /11/2011 Roadmap and Strategy 2020 Ver /01/2014 (07/05/2014) National Roadmap for the Jan 2015 Iran National Plan 15 SEP 2009 National Roadmap Yes2015 No Yes Iraq Yes Jordan Yes2014 Kuwait DGCA AIS to Kuwait DGCA AIS to Yes Kuwait Roadmap 31/08/2009 Roadmap 31/08/ Lebanon Yes Libya No 9 Oman Roadmap & Strategy V /08/2015 Yes Qatar Qatar Roadmap for the Yes2015 Roadmap and Ver /10/2012 Strategy 2020 Ver /12/2013 Ver /02/2010 Ver /02/ Saudi Arabia 12 Sudan Roadmap steps for the 10/01/2012 Sudan National Implementation Plan Ver /02/2014 Ver /01/2015 Roadmap for the 18/02/2014 Sudan National Implementation Plan Version April 2014 Yes2014 Yes Syria No Transition from AIS to Transition from AIS to Yes UAE First Edition July 2011 First Edition July Yemen No 9 11 Total (60%) (73%) 3. ACTION BY THE MEETING 3.1 The meeting is invited to urge States to: a) implement the MSG Conclusion 4/17; b) review and update, as necessary, the MID Region Implementation Roadmap; and c) provide, on an annual basis, update on their National Implementation Plan/Roadmap, as deemed necessary.

4 APPENDIX A SG/2WP/4 APPENDIX A NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP TEMPLATE Phase/Step Phase I Step No. Timeline Start End Remarks AIRAC adherence P03 WGS84 implementation P05 QMS P17 Phase II Data Quality Data Integrity P01 P02 AIXM P06 Unique identifiers P07 Aeronautical information conceptual model P08 eaip P11 Terrain A1 P13 Obstacle A1 P14 Terrain A4 P13 Obstacle A4 P14 Terrain A2 P13 Please specify implementation of Area 2a, 2b, 2c and/or 2d Obstacle A2 P14 Please specify implementation of Area 2a, 2b, 2c and/or 2d

5 SG/2WP/4 APPENDIX A A2 Phase/Step Step No. Terrain A3 P13 Obstacle A3 P14 AD Mapping P15 Timeline Start End Remarks Phase III Aeronautical data exchange Communication networks Aeronautical information briefing P09 P10 P12 Training P16 Agreement with data originators Interoperability with meteorological products Electronic aeronautical charts P18 P19 P20 Digital NOTAM P21

6 APPENDIX B MID REGION IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP FOR THE TRANSITION FROM AIS TO SG/2WP/4 APPENDIX B Priority Remarks AIXM 1 The target is to have 60% by 2015, 80% by 2017 and 100% by 2019 eaip 1 The target is to have 60% by 2016, 70% by and 100% by 2020 Terrain A1 2 The target is to have 50% by 2015, 70% by Obstacle A1 2 The target is to have 40% by 2015, 60% by Terrain A4 2 The target is to have 50% by 2015, 100% by Obstacle A4 2 The target is to have 50% by 2015, 100% by Terrain A2a 3 The target is to have 30% by 2017, 50% by Obstacle A2a 3 The target is to have 30% by 2017, 50% by Data Quality Data Integrity Agreement with data originators Terrain and Obstacle for Areas 2b, 2c, 2d and 3 Aerodrome Mapping 3 Target for : To be implemented by 50% of the States that have implemented QMS at least for the segment originatorais 3 (excluding the segment AISEnd user) 3 Target for : 50% of the States that have implemented QMS 4 Optional based on the States decision to be reflected in the States national Regulations and National Plans, in accordance with operational needs 4 Optional based on the States decision to be reflected in the States national Regulations and National Plans, in accordance with operational needs White: Not started Yellow: Initial Target Orange: Intermediate Target Green: Target for full implementation END