Edition September 2002

Transcription

1 Civil Aviation Rules Register Information Leaflet Rule exemption petitions... 2 Director's action on external petitions for exemptions /EXE/3 Mount Cook Airline Ltd /EXE/47 Air Nelson Ltd... 2 Notice of intention to withdraw... 2 General exemption 01/EXE/25 - requirement for automatic ELTs... 2 Notification of Exemption petition received 3/EXE/6 Rotor Work Ltd... 3 Civil Aviation Rule 61.70(a)(1)... 3 Emergency Rule making activity... 3 Rule making activity... 3 Petitions for Rule making /PET/6 NZ Parachute Federation... 4 Other Rule Activity... 4 Notice of proposed rule making (NPRM)... 4 CAR Part 125 Air operations Medium aeroplanes... 4 Docket 2/CAR/3 NPRM Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS)... 4 Docket 2/CAR/8 NPRM Terrain Awareness Warning Systems (TAWS)... 4 CAR Part 137 Agricultural Aircraft Operations... 5 Docket 1/CAR/ NPRM Agricultural Aircraft Operations re-issue... 5 Notification of ordinary Rules... 5 Docket 98/CAR/ Part 71 Designation of airspace: Realignment of the Nadi/Auckland Oceanic FIR Boundary... 6 Availability of Rules... 6 CAA Website Free notification service... 6 CIRAG... 6 Summary of Rule Development Projects... 7 List of Current Rule Parts and Advisory Circulars Current Rule Parts Current Advisory Circulars File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 1

2 The Civil Aviation Rules Register Information Leaflet (CARRIL) is published by the CAA Government Relations Group generally on the first Thursday of every month. It is available on the CAA s web site [Rules and more] or in hard copy from the Docket Clerk. If you need up-to-date information, or want to make comment, or written submission on any of the Civil Aviation Rules (CAR) dockets, or other references notified please contact Jenny Walton Docket Clerk, Civil Aviation Authority, 1 Market Grove, P O Box 31441, LOWER HUTT Tel: (direct dial): Fax: : docket@caa.govt.nz Rule exemption petitions Any interested person may petition the Director to grant an exemption from any specified requirement in an ordinary Rule. Each petition for an exemption shall be submitted to the Rules Docket Clerk in accordance with Part 11 Procedures for Making Ordinary Rules and Granting Exemptions. Forms are available on the CAA web site (refer Legislation Forms). The CAA welcomes your comment in writing or by on any of the petition requests for exemptions listed. Director's action on external petitions for exemptions 3/EXE/3 Mount Cook Airline Ltd Civil Aviation Rule (f)(1) Use of aerodromes The Director granted an exemption to Mount Cook Airline Limited from requirement in Civil Aviation Rule (f)(1) that each aerodrome that is to be used by an aeroplane that has a certificated seating capacity of more than 30 passengers and is engaged on a regular air transport passenger service, shall be an aerodrome that is associated with a Part 139 certificate, only with respect to charter flights conducted to and from Gisborne aerodrome using ATR 72 aeroplanes for the carriage of NPC rugby teams. This exemption shall remain in effect from 9 August 2002 until 31 October 2002 unless withdrawn earlier in writing by the Director. Dated 7 August /EXE/47 Air Nelson Ltd Civil Aviation Rule (f)(1) Use of aerodromes The Director granted an exemption to Air Nelson Limited from requirement in Civil Aviation Rule (f)(1) that each aerodrome that is to be used by an aeroplane that has a certificated seating capacity of more than 30 passengers and is engaged on a regular air transport passenger service, shall be an aerodrome that is associated with a Part 139 certificate, only with respect to charter flights conducted to and from Gisborne aerodrome using Saab 340 aeroplanes for the carriage of NPC rugby teams. This exemption shall remain in effect from 9 August 2002 until 31 October 2002 unless withdrawn earlier in writing by the Director. Dated 7 August 2002 Notice of intention to withdraw General exemption 01/EXE/25 - requirement for automatic ELTs General exemption 01/EXE/25 was granted on 28 November 2000 to allow pilots of gliders and Pitts Special aeroplanes to operate their aircraft without the fitment of an automatic ELT as required under rule (a). File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 2

3 Amendment 7 to Part 91 came into effect on 1 July 2002, and amongst other things, provided greater flexibility in rule regarding the requirement for aircraft to be equipped with an ELT. In the case of gliders and single seat aircraft there is the option for the pilot to carry a portable ELT and if not venturing more than 10 nm from the departure aerodrome then no ELT is required for these aircraft. This amendment to Part 91 now supersedes the need for the exemption and it can be withdrawn. The Director therefore proposes to withdraw exemption 01/EXE/25 with effect from 1 October 2002, as Civil Aviation Rule Part 91 Amendment 7 makes adequate provision for carriage of ELTs by gliders and single seat aircraft. Any comments you may wish to make should be addressed to the Docket Clerk and submitted no later than 20 September Notification of Exemption petition received 3/EXE/6 Rotor Work Ltd Civil Aviation Rule 61.70(a)(1) This petition for exemption is filed for relief from the requirement in Civil Aviation Rule (a)(1) that a pilot must have completed at least 200 hours flight time as a pilot, including at least 100 hours pilot-incommand in the appropriate category of aircraft, before commencing training for an agricultural rating. To qualify for a CPL(A) a pilot must have 200 hours flight time experience with 100 hours pilot-incommand, for a CPL(H) a pilot must have 150 hours flight time and 35 hours pilot-in-command. Therefore the holder of a CPL(A) may commence training for an agricultural rating immediately, while the holder of a CPL(H) must gain an additional 65 hours pilot-in-command flight time before commencing training for an agricultural rating. AC Appendix I suggests that training for an agricultural rating can commence on completion of the flight time experience (normal length course not an approved shortened training course) for the issue of a CPL(A) or CPL(H). However a commercial helicopter pilot is prevented from doing so by CAR (a)(1) requirements. Relief is being sought to enable a pilot who holds a CPL(H) with 160 hours flight time experience, all in helicopters, of which 40 hours in pilot-in-command, to commence training for an agricultural rating. The relief is sought on the basis that there is an inconsistency in the rule between commercial aeroplane and commercial helicopter pilot licence requirements for those pilots wishing to commence training for an agricultural rating. Comments in respect of this exemption petition are invited and are to be made in writing to the Docket Clerk: docket@caa.govt.nz. Quote reference 3/EXE/6. Closing date for comment is 30 September Emergency Rule making activity Under section 31 of the Civil Aviation Act the Director may make emergency Civil Aviation Rules as may be necessary to alleviate or minimise any risk of the death of or serious injury to any person, or of damage to any property. Nil. Rule making activity The statutory power to make Civil Aviation Rules rests with the Minister of Transport under Part 3 of the Civil Aviation Act The CAA is contracted to the Ministry of Transport to develop Rules for the Minister. Under the contract the Minister of Transport approves a programme of new Rules, and changes to existing Rules for the financial year. The programme is based on the CAA proposals and proposals from other interested parties. File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 3

4 See summary of Rule activities attached. Petitions for Rule making 2/PET/6 NZ Parachute Federation The New Zealand Parachute Federation Inc submitted a petition dated 16 May 2002 to propose the following amendment to Part 105- Proposal- amending the current wording of (3) to read all mandatory modifications or instructions issued by the manufacturer or as stated by a parachute organisation. Reason- Information contained in the NZPF submission indicates there exists a safety risk where harness manufacturers issue instructions mandating only their products (such as reserve parachutes or main parachutes) be used with their harnesses. NZPF states the Taupo Tandem fatality was contributed to by one of the manufacturer s instructions being followed. Had the instructions not been followed as now is recommended by the New Zealand Parachute Federation, this fatality may well have been avoided. The NZPF has concerns over the lack of manufacturer response to identified safety concerns when they occur in New Zealand, adopting a do what you want policy to those users outside the US. There is also the perception manufacturers will not acknowledge design deficiencies due to the possibility of legal action arising from such acknowledgements in the US. The NZPF believes that a Parachute Organisation should have the authority to determine whether a manufacturer s instruction is in fact improving safety. CAA comment-the CAA is interested in hearing from parachute users, importers and manufacturers as to the extent of this problem. Possible non-rule remedies could include a tighter control of those parachutes that are approved for use by the NZPF to the extent that manufacturers who fail to deliver meaningful ongoing technical support of their products may have their approval for use withdrawn by the NZPF. The integrity of technical information from equipment manufacturers is a vital link in the safe operation of that equipment. Such action, would be responding in a similar manner to that action that would occur if any other aviation equipment supplier fail to meet minimum standards that have a direct impact on safety. The CAA also believes that where such a rule amendment is made as proposed in this petition, there would be a need for a suitably qualified person within the organisation charged with making the required technical assessments. Such a person would need to be a senior person as described in Part 149 with responsibilities for those technical assessments. A full copy of the petition is available on request to the Docket Clerk. Comment period closed on 3 October Other Rule Activity Notice of proposed rule making (NPRM) CAR Part 125 Air operations Medium aeroplanes Docket 2/CAR/3 NPRM Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) Docket 2/CAR/8 NPRM Terrain Awareness Warning Systems (TAWS) These two proposals would require medium size (10 to 30 passenger seats, or payload capacity 3410 kg or less and MCTOW greater than 5700kg, or performing a SEIFR operation) turbine powered aeroplanes used on air transport or commercial transport operations to be equipped with ACAS and TAWS systems by various dates up to 1 January File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 4

5 The proposals affect all such aeroplanes added to the New Zealand register after the effective date of the rules (expected to be March 2003) and some aeroplanes currently on the New Zealand register. The TAWS proposals, which are only applicable for operations under IFR, also affect piston powered aeroplanes over 5700kg or with 10 or more passenger seats. The specifications of the ACAS and TAWS systems proposed are consistent with ICAO standards. The CAA consider the fitting of this equipment to Part 125 aeroplanes will significantly reduce the risk of mid-air collision or controlled flight into terrain accidents involving these aeroplanes. Both NPRM have been subject to industry consultation through CIRAG Technical Study Group (TSG) meetings since January NPRM and are available on the CAA Web site and on request from the Docket Clerk. Comments on these NPRM are invited and should be sent to the Docket Clerk by 14 October 2002 CAR Part 137 Agricultural Aircraft Operations Docket 1/CAR/ NPRM Agricultural Aircraft Operations re-issue The purpose of this notice of proposed rule making is to provide an opportunity for comment on the proposed changes to the Civil Aviation Rules with respect to agricultural aircraft operations in the New Zealand aviation system. The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) received two petitions for rule change from the New Zealand Agricultural Aircraft Association (NZAAA). Petition 98/PET/74 sought changes to the jettison requirements contained in Part 137 as the wording implied that each agricultural material s dump time must be tested and recorded. Petition 0/PET/18 sought clarification of the word hazard in rule with respect to agricultural operations over non-populous areas. A technical study group (TSG) comprised of representatives of the CAA and NZAAA was formed in March 2000 to discuss the changes proposed by the two petitions and went on to consider other issues that arose from the meetings. The TSG considered various options to clarify hazard in rule including seeking external legal opinion and Ministry advice. This has resulted in the wording of rule (2) remaining substantially unchanged as it was considered that the rule was drafted appropriately and should pose no interpretation problems. The following is a summary of the changes to Part 137 proposed by NPRM 03-04: (a) Clarification of the criteria for a senior person acting as Chief Pilot for an agricultural aircraft operation. (b) Removal of the inference that jettison capability and associated dump times need to be tested and recorded for each agricultural material dispensed during agricultural aircraft operations. (c) Minor editorial changes to ensure wording is consistent with the current legislative drafting style and to simplify and clarify the rule intent where appropriate. This NPRM also proposes a consequential amendment to Part 1 Definitions and Abbreviations, to amend the definition of an agricultural aircraft operation to exclude activities which are commercial in nature and do not require an agricultural rating. NPRM is available on the CAA Web site and on request from the Docket Clerk. Comments on this NPRM are invited and should be sent to the Docket Clerk by 14 October Notification of ordinary Rules The following Rule Development project has been completed with the Acting Minister of Transport signing the Rule amendments that came into effect on 8 August File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 5

6 Docket 98/CAR/ Part 71 Designation of airspace: Realignment of the Nadi/Auckland Oceanic FIR Boundary The following Rule amendments came into force on 8 August 2002: Part 71 Amendment 1 and Part 172 Amendment 3. These amended Rules update Part 71 with the amended boundary of the Auckland Oceanic FIR and clarify New Zealand's obligations when an ICAO Contracting State other than New Zealand may be providing an air traffic service in this airspace. These Rule amendments result from the November 2001 ICAO Council approved amendment to the ICAO Air Navigation Plan-Asia and Pacific Region. Availability of Rules Ordinary Rules are available for inspection at the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand, 1 Market Grove (P O Box ), Lower Hutt. Printed copies of the Rules may be purchased by calling free on 0800 GET RULES ( ). CAA Website Free notification service If you have an interest in the Rules system, we encourage you to register with our FREE notification service that will automatically alert you, via , to changes in legislation and other important safety information. While it is your responsibility to make sure all your legislation is up-to-date, this new service should assist. The system will alert you to Civil Aviation Rule and Advisory Circular amendments, informal drafts and Notices of Proposed Rule Making, as well as to Airworthiness Directives, changes to the CAA fees and charges, changes to the Air Navigation Register and to the Civil Aviation Act. You can choose to be sent only the information that is relevant to you. CIRAG CIRAG is the acronym for the joint Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and Industry Rules Advisory Group. It is part of the Rule making process to involve industry representation in the development of new or amended Rules. CIRAG s prime objective is to assess and recommend potential regulatory changes through cooperative Rule making activities. Details about CIRAG s structure and mechanism are available on the CAA web site under the Rules & more heading, or from the Docket Clerk. The CIRAG Executive consists of three AIA/industry members Greg Barrow, Geoff Eban and John Funnell; and three CAA members, Steve Douglas, Peter Blackler and the relevant General Managers of Airlines, General Aviation or Personal Licensing and Aviation Services Groups. The CIRAG Executive last met on 25 July 2002 to review the progress of the various Technical Study Group (TSG) projects. The Minutes of the 14 th Meeting of the CIRAG Executive held 25 July 2002 are available on the CAA Web site. The CIRAG Executive next meets 24 October The CAA CIRAG Web site is continually updated with information on the TSG s projects. Industry members are encouraged to contact their representative on the TSG. Contact details are on the website. Check the web for updated papers including meeting Minutes. File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 6

7 Summary of Rule Development Projects Note: Shaded rows indicate projects for which a CIRAG TSG has been formed. 1. Part 21 Certification of aircraft Engine and noise emissions Project No: 99/CAR/1342 Additional Rules to implement the ICAO environmental standards for the certification of aircraft regarding engine emissions (formerly Part 34) and noise emissions (formerly Part 36). The ICAO standards will be incorporated by reference into the Rule. Bill Wilson With the elapse in time since publication of the NPRM, the Draft Final rule has been circulated to aviation organisations with explanatory comments, and seeking views especially from members of those organisations who are new to the industry. Receive comments from industry by 27 September, assess prior to determining next step. 2. Parts 91, 121, 129 Aircraft operating Rules ACAS Project No 2/CAR/2 Rule amendments to prescribe requirements for the installation of airborne collision avoidance systems (ACAS/TCAS) in aircraft operating under Part 121 and Part 129. Final Rule development from project 98/SDP/2. 98/PET/14, 98/PET/15, 0/PET/8, 0/PET/18 Dave Park Part 121 ACAS : Final Draft Rules completed for CAA sign-off following circulation to TSG for feedback on inclusion of piston powered aeroplanes, and the no exemption provision. Priority has been applied to the additional cost benefit information for the Part 125 proposals. Final Draft Rules for MOT review late September Parts 121 Aircraft operating Rules TAWS Project No 2/CAR/4 Rule amendments to update the standards for aircraft equipment for terrain awareness warning systems (TAWS). Final Rule development from project 0/SDP/7. 0/PET/11, 98/PET/5, 98/PET/16, 98/PET/17, 99/PET/12 Dave Park Final Draft Rules completed for CAA sign-off following circulation to TSG for feedback on inclusion of piston powered aeroplanes, and the no exemption provision. Priority has been applied to the additional cost benefit information for the Part 125 proposals. Final Draft Rules for MOT review late September Part 67 Medical Standards and Certification Project No: Input required from CAA into MOT project to re-write Part 67 consequential to amendments to CA Act. File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 7

8 MOT managing project 5. Part 61 Pilot licences and ratings Review Project No. 0/SDP/1 This Rule Part has been in effect since 1992 and requires a complete review and update to reflect current requirements for pilot licensing. New requirements for the issuing of licences for helicopters requiring two pilots are also required. 0/PET/19, 98/PET3, 98/PET/26, 98/PET/51, 98/PET/52, 98/PET/53, 99/PET/8, 99/PET/28, 99/PET/30, 99/PET/35 1/PET/7 Bill Wilson Michael Young The draft NPRM is being finalised. Draft NPRM for MOT review late September Parts 91, 121, 125, 135 Aircraft operating Rules ACAS Project No 98/SDP/2 Rule amendments to prescribe requirements for the installation of airborne collision avoidance systems (ACAS/TCAS) in aircraft operating in circumstances where passenger safety can be enhanced by early detection of aircraft conflicts. 98/PET/14, 98/PET/15, 0/PET/8, 0/PET/18 Dave Park Part 125 ACAS: MOT comments on draft NPRM received 19 June with follow up meeting to discuss CBA assumptions. MOT agreement to publication of NPRM received. Final drafting of NPRM being completed. NPRM to be published 12 September Parts 91, 121, 125, 135 Aircraft operating Rules TAWS Project No 0/SDP/7 Rule amendments to update the standards for aircraft equipment for terrain awareness warning systems (TAWS). Passenger safety can be significantly enhanced with improved early warning of ground proximity. 0/PET/11, 98/PET/5, 98/PET/16, 98/PET/17, 99/PET/12 Dave Park Part 125 TAWS: MOT agreement to publication of NPRM received. Final drafting of NPRM being completed. NPRM to be published 12 September Part 95/173 Instrument procedure design and navigation service organisation certification Project No: 99/CAR/ /CAR/1334 New Rule Parts to prescribe the standards for the design of visual and instrument procedures for IFR flight (Part 95), and the certification requirements for organisations to be authorised to design and certify the visual and instrument procedures (Part 173). File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 8

9 Peter Blackler Draft final Rule awaiting completion and CAA sign-off. Other priorities have delayed progress on this Rule. Draft final Rule for MOT review expected Oct Parts 137 Agricultural aircraft operations Operations over non-populous areas Project No: 1/CAR/1358 Review of operations over non-populus areas and general editorial amendments. 0/PET/18, 98/PET/6, 98/PET/74 Pauline Leech MoT comments received 11 June 2002, publication of NPRM delayed until after the general election and formation of new Government. NPRM to be published 12 September Part 43 General airworthiness amendment Project No. 1/CAR/1357 A number of Rules dealing with the airworthiness and maintenance of aircraft have been reviewed. Rule amendment packages for Parts 1, 12, 21, 26, 43, 66, 91, 103, 104, 119, 121/125/133/135, 145, 146 and 148 have been developed to provide various improvements. 98/PET/50, 98/EXE/72, 98/PET/77, 99/PET/10, 1/PET/6 and 1/PET/8 Mike Woods John Bushell Draft NPRMs complete and undergoing final CAA signoff. Draft NPRM expected to MoT for review end September Parts 121, 125, 135 Aircraft operating Rules Passenger, crew and baggage weights Project No 0/SDP/9 12. Part 139 Aerodromes Certification, operation and use RESA Project No: 98/SDP/8 Rule amendments to update requirements regarding, crew, passenger and baggage weights. A survey of passengers has shown that standard weights should be increased. Flexibility is also required in the Rules for crew and interline baggage weights. 99/PET/27 Bill Wilson Draft final rule circulated to TSG members for viewing and comment. Draft final rule for MOT review. Amendments to implement the ICAO requirements for runway end safety areas (RESA) for those aerodromes serving regular international operations. 99/PET/2 Doug Watson Garry Goodman TSG member comments on draft CBA report collated for referral to Consultant to finalise CBA. File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 9

10 Finalisation of CBA report mid September Part 71/73 Airspace designation and classification General amendments Project No: 98/CAR/1304 General amendments to review and update Parts 71 and Part 91 Aviation Events Project No: Peter E Williams Incorporating additional consequential amendments in draft NPRM Rules section arising from internal review. Complete draft NPRM Rules and narrative sections. Draft NPRM for MoT review in September Amendments are required to clarify requirements and responsibilities regarding the conduct of aviation events. Minor Rule without high safety priority but desirable for air show programme. Not started NPRM scheduled late Part 109 Air Cargo Security Project No: A new Rule Part to prescribe the security requirements relating to the carriage of cargo on air transport operations. Required to implement ICAO security requirements. 16. Part 108 Air Operator Security Programme Project No: Initial draft proposals developed. NPRM scheduled late 2002 Various amendments required regarding screening of domestic passengers, courier parcels, and hold-stow baggage. Needed to address national and international security requirements. Not started. NPRM scheduled late Part 140 Aviation Security Service Organisations - Certification File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 10

11 Project No: Amendments required regarding certifying screening personnel. Required to address additional national and international security requirements. Not started NPRM scheduled late Part 141 Aviation Training Organisations Certification Project No: Amendments to strengthen aviation training organisation requirements to meet the new requirements arising from the review of Part 61 for pilot training to be a certificated activity. High safety priority as a follow up to the review of Part 61. Follow on from Part 61 review. NPRM scheduled late File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 11

12 List of Current Rule Parts and Advisory Circulars These Rules and Advisory Circulars are available on the CAA web site under the Rules and more heading, Paper copies are available call 0800 GET RULES ( ) Current Rule Parts Changes since the previous publication of the CARRIL are shown in bold. Part Amendment status Effective date Part Amendment status Effective date Part Amendment status Effective date 1 A21 1 Jul Jan Apr A1 8 Feb Apr A10 1 Jul A1 30 Apr A7 1 Jul A2 1 Apr A4 1 Jul A1 1 Apr A2 1 Jul A5 25 Dec A1 30 Apr Jun Apr Apr Feb Mar A4 1 Apr A6 25 Dec A3 25 Dec A2 1 Jul Apr Re-issue 24 Jan A1 1 Apr A1 25 Dec A6 1 Apr Apr Apr A1 1 Apr A1 1 Jul A1 8 Feb A1 1 Apr A5 24 Jan Re-issue 24 Jan A1 30 Apr A8 1 Jul A3 8 Aug A1 1 Apr A3 24 Jan A1 8 Feb A1 8 Aug A1 21 Oct A2 1 Apr 97 Current Advisory Circulars AC12 01, Rev 1 1 Apr 02 AC Oct 98 AC Sep 97 AC Apr 00 AC Feb 02 AC91 7, Rev 1 18 Mar 99 AC20 2A 25 Dec 97 AC Oct 98 AC91 8, Rev 1 18 Mar 99 AC Dec 97 AC A 16 Mar 99 AC Sep 95 AC /11/01 AC Dec 95 AC Sep 95 AC21 1A 25 Aug 97 AC Apr 01 AC92 3A 8 Jul 96 AC Aug 98 AC Apr 01 AC103-1, Rev 2 9-May-00 AC21 2B 25 Dec 97 AC Apr 01 AC May 97 AC21 3A 25 Aug 97 AC Apr 01 AC119 1, Rev 2 1 Aug 00 AC21 80A 25 Dec 97 AC Apr 01 AC119 2, Rev 1 4 Oct 00 AC43 1B 25 Dec 97 AC Apr 01 AC119-3, Rev 1 20 Jul 01 AC Dec 97 AC Apr 01 AC120 01A 30 Sep 96 AC43 3, Rev 1* 19 Feb 01 AC Apr 01 AC121-1, 4-May-00 AC Dec 97 AC Apr 01 AC Jun 93 AC43 5A 3 Mar 99 AC Apr 02 AC Dec 92 AC Dec 97 AC Apr 02 AC139 3A 1 May 94 AC43 7, Rev 1 21 Dec 00 AC Apr 01 AC139 4, Rev 1 13 Sep 99 AC43 9A 25 Dec 97 AC Apr 01 AC Sep 93 AC43 10, Rev 6 15 Feb 02 AC Apr 01 AC139 6A 1 May 93 AC Mar 97 AC Apr 01 AC139 7A 15 Sep 93 AC Mar 97 AC Apr 97 AC139 8A 3 May 93 AC Nov 98 AC66 2.1A 25 Dec 97 AC139 9A 3 May 93 AC Dec 97 AC Jun 97 AC Aug 93 AC47 1, Rev 2 24 Jan 02 AC Jun 97 AC139 11A 1 Jul 94 AC Oct 98 AC Jun 97 AC Jul 02 AC Oct 98 AC Jun 97 AC Jan 99 AC Apr 02 AC Jun 97 AC141 1, Rev 1 16 May 00 AC61 1.5, Rev 5 29 May 02 AC Jun 97 AC145 1A 25 Dec 97 AC61 1.7, Rev 2 1 Mar 02 AC Dec 97 AC Mar 97 AC Oct 98 AC Apr 97 AC148 1A 25 Dec 97 AC , Rev 1 10 May 99 AC Apr 97 AC157 1A 15 Jan 99 AC Oct 98 AC Apr 97 AC Apr 93 AC Oct 98 AC91 4, Rev 1 24 Jan 00 AC Feb 94 AC Oct 98 AC Apr 97 AC May 94 File Ref. 180 C03 (HMK) 12