- Establish criteria and procedures providing for the creation and use of adjustable lateral and vertical limits of the airspace

Transcription

1

2 - Establish criteria and procedures providing for the creation and use of adjustable lateral and vertical limits of the airspace ot yet, however planned. Criteria and procedures for the creation and use of adjustable lateral and vertical limits of the airspace will be established before end 2010 as part of the phased - Assess the national airspace structures and route network with the aim of planning for flexible airspace structures and procedures ot yet, however planned. Assessment of the national airspace structures and route network with the aim of planning for flexible airspace structures and procedures will be introduced before end 2010 as part of the phased extension of tasks of the AFMU - Define specific conditions under which the responsibility for separation between civil and military flights rests on the ATS units or on the controlling military units Procedures are laid down in Regeling Luchtverkeersdienstverlening 1507 (the Air avigation Services Regulation), articles 11, 12, 13, 15 and Establish mechanisms to assess performance of FUA operations ot yet, however planned. Mechanisms to assess performance of FUA operations will be established before end 2010 as part of the phased extension of tasks of the AFMU - Based on the outcome of this assessment, periodically review and revise as necessary, airspace procedures ot yet, however planned. The periodic review and revision, as necessary, of the airspace procedures will be part of the phased extension of tasks as mentioned above. - Establish mechanisms to archive data on the requests, allocation and actual use of airspace structures for further analysis and planning activities Currently, data on the requests, allocation and actual use of airspace structures are archived manually. Extension/ upgrading of these mechanisms is foreseen to be introduced as part of the phased extension of tasks before end The State has abandoned application of permanent airspace restrictions: Within Amsterdam FIR, TSAs are defined (level 1) and can be activated by submitting a reservation request to the AFMU the day before use (level 2) o significant changes At Pre-tactical Airspace Management Level 2 FUA Level 2 Implemented: Airspace Management Cell AMC: Joint Civil- Military Cell: A joint civil military Airspace and Flow Management Unit is established and operated from LVL Schiphol. The airspace is allocated in accordance with the conditions and procedures defined in Article 4.1: The established AMC (referred to above) is provided with adequate supporting systems to perform and communicate the pre-tactical airspace management tasks: Direct communications with all relevant stakeholders and direct computer links with CFMU are established A joint civil military Airspace and Flow Management Unit is established since April 2008 and is operated from LVL Schiphol At Tactical Airspace Management Level 3 FUA Level 3 Implemented: In the responsibility of the Centre Supervisors of ACC Amsterdam, MUAC and MilATCC ieuw Milligen. The State has ensured that the relevant ATS Units and controlling military units: - establish coordination procedures and communication facilities to allow the real-time activation, deactivation or reallocation of airspace allocated at pre-tactical level: Direct communication is established between Centre Supervisors of ACC Amsterdam, MUAC and MilATCC ieuw Milligen allowing for real-time activation, de-activation or re-allocation of airspace allocated at pre-tactical level. Procedures are laid down in the relevant LoAs. LCIP the etherlands Chapter 7-2 Released Issue

3 - establish coordination procedures to ensure the timely and effective exchange of any modification of planned airspace reservations and the adequate notification to all affected users: Direct communication is established between Centre Supervisors of ACC Amsterdam, MUAC and MilATCC ieuw Milligen ensuring timely and effective exchange of any modification of planned airspace reservations and adequate notification to the affected users. Coordination procedures are laid down in the relevant LoAs. - establish coordination procedures and supporting systems to ensure safety when managing interactions between civil and military flights: System co-ordination between civil and military ATM systems and direct co-ordination lines between civil and military controllers. Procedures are laid down in the LoAs. - establish coordination procedures to permit direct communication of relevant information to resolve specific traffic situations where civil and military controllers are providing services in the same airspace: Specifically: - Position of aircraft System co-ordination between civil and military ATM systems and direct co-ordination lines between civil and military controllers are established. Coordination procedures are laid down in the relevant LoAs. - Flight intention of aircraft All relevant civil flight data are send to the military ATM system; all relevant military flight data are exchanged by verbal flight notifications All airspace reservations are released as soon as activities having caused their establishment cease: By verbal co-ordination between the Centre Supervisors o significant changes. 7.2 Cooperation between Member States at the 3 levels of FUA At Strategic Airspace Management Level 1 The State coordinates its airspace management policy with the respective States to jointly address the use of crossborder airspace structures: Type(s) of cross-border airspace use is applied in the State: Cross-border area With Germany Shared reserved airspace (TRA and TSA) Conditional routes With Germany The State has established with neighbouring States one common set of standards for separations between civil and military flights for cross-border activities: The AFMU the etherlands is lead AMC for the routes UL7, (U) 852 (BE), UP603 (DK and DE), UZ702 (DE), UZ703 (DE), UZ704 (DK and O), UZ705 (DK and O)) and KZ02, KZ07, KZ08, KZ40. The States involved are: Belgium (BE), Germany (DE), Denmark (DK and orway (O) ot yet applicable; this is now part of the FABEC study. o significant changes. For the CBA-Sea, a common set of rules is established and applied. LCIP the etherlands Chapter 7-3 Released Issue

4 7.2.2 At Pre-tactical Airspace Management Level 2 The State has established a joint or multinational AMC with neighbouring States: o significant changes. ot yet, however this is planned to be achieved after 2010 (as part of the phased extension of tasks of the AFMU and the FABEC project) At Tactical Airspace Management Level 3 The State has established a common set of procedures to manage specific traffic situations and/or to enhance the realtime airspace management between civil and military units involved in or concerned with cross-border activities: The common set of procedures applied with Germany are laid down in the respective LoAs one. 7.3 Safety assessment The State has established a safety management process to conduct all safety assessment activities before the introduction of any changes to the operations of the FUA: The respective safety management process is part of the LVL SMS system. 7.4 Performance assessment Evaluation of the functioning of agreements, procedures and supporting systems established at the 3 levels Safety Criteria and procedures for safety evaluation will be established before end 2010 as part of the phased Airspace capacity Criteria and procedures for airspace capacity evaluation will be established before end 2010 as part of the phased Efficiency Criteria and procedures for safety evaluation will be established before end 2010 as part of the phased Flexibility of aircraft operations of all users Criteria and procedures for the evaluation of flexibility of aircraft operations of all users will be established before end 2010 as part of the phased extension of tasks of the AFMU LCIP the etherlands Chapter 7-4 Released Issue

5 7.5 Compliance monitoring The State is fully compliant with the FUA Regulation (EC Regulation 2150/2005): The State has established the following FUA compliance monitoring processes: Inspections Periodicity Outcome sent to EC Surveys Periodicity Outcome sent to EC Safety Audits Periodicity Outcome sent to EC Additional comments: 7.6 Problems encountered and need for changes Problems encountered in the implementation of the FUA regulation and need for changes LCIP the etherlands Chapter 7-5 Released Issue