NCR Trail 2004 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NCR Trail 2004 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis"

Transcription

1 NCR Trail 2004 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis April 2005

2 NCR Trail 2004 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis April 2005 Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Gunpowder Falls State Prepared by: Trail Facts 4 McCartney Road, Suite 200 New Freedom, PA carl@trailfacts.com 2

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 HISTORIC PERSPECTIVE 6 LOCATION ANALYSIS 6 NCR TRAIL MAP 8 MARYLAND DEMOGRAPHICS 9 QUALITATIVE VALUES 10 SURVEY RESULTS 12 METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS 19 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1994 AND 2004 SURVEYS 20 NORTHERN CENTRAL RAIL TRAIL USER ESTIMATES 33 ECONOMIC IMPACT 34 TRAIL MAINTENANCE, SECURITY AND CLEANLINESS 37 TRAIL USE BY GENDER 42 ANNUAL USAGE FEE 43 TALE OF TWO TRAILS 44 COMPARISON OF 2004 USER STUDIES THE NCR TRAIL MD, HERITAGE RAIL TRAIL - PA 3

4 EXECUTIVE SUMMMARY The NCR Trail has been fully opened over its 20 mile length for 20 years. The Trail, as it is commonly referred to runs from Ashland, Maryland to the Mason Dixon line (Maryland/Pennsylvania border). Along the route, the trail passes through the heart of northern Baltimore County s forests, rich farmland and historic villages. An Analysis of the Economic Impacts of the Northern Central Rail Trail was conducted in 1994 by PKF Consulting for the Maryland Greenways Commission, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Three surveys were administered throughout the course of this investigation: one for trail users, one for nearby property owners, and a third for businesses in the region that may be impacted by the presence of the trail. Surveys of trail users were distributed directly on the trail or via intercepts at parking facilities located along the trail. During the summer of 2004 a follow-up study was conducted. This study utilized many of the same questions and the same methodology as the original 1994 survey. Like the original study, the 2004 survey was designed to monitor user characteristics and determine the economic impact of the NCR Trail. It also enables a comparative analysis with the 1994 survey to measure any changes in usage behavior. Survey forms were available at all parking lots of the NCR Trail and several retailers who cater to trail users. Completed responses were placed in collection boxes or mailed to the Gunpowder Falls State Park office. Survey data was also collected with the assistance of Friends of the Trail volunteers and DNR personnel by intercepting trail users at various parking facilities. In all, 767 completed survey forms are included in this study. While the majority of trail users reside in Maryland (89.5%), the trail has attracted users from Pennsylvania (7.1%), Virginia(0.39% ), Washington, DC (1.05% ), Delaware (0.26% ). Riders from Florida, Colorado and Oregon completed survey forms as well. More than 28% of the trail users traveled more than 20 miles to reach the trail. Most frequent usage is a couple of times a month or two times a week or a few times during the year. More than 40% of the respondents reported that they were on the trail at least once a week. More than 82% of the trail users are over the age of 35. Nearly 50% are between 36 and 55 years of age. With regard to gender, men use the trail (54.6.0%) somewhat more frequently than women (45.4%). Biking is the predominant form of recreation on the rail trail. Over 60% of the respondents indicated biking as their primary activity. A trip to the trail for most users involves the investment of more than an hour of walking or biking. More than 40% of the users spend at least two hours on the trail during an outing. Another 45.3% spend between one and two hours. The section of the trail that receives the highest usage is between Paper Mill Road and Monkton (50.3%). The section of the trail that is least utilized is from Parkton to the Pennsylvania state line (22%). Morning is the most popular time of day to hit the trail for over 40% of the users. Weekends are more popular for getting on the trail than weekdays. 4

5 Respondent s knowledge of the trail came primarily from word of mouth. Driving by the trail was the second most important source of information. The Rails-to-Trail Conservancy, a national organization that promotes the development of rail trails, was the third most important source of information for the users of the NCR Trail. Less than 6.5% of the users indicated that they found out about the trail from the Maryland Department of Natural Resources. In terms of economic impact, 82% of the respondents indicated they had purchased hard goods (bikes, bike accessories, clothing, etc.) in the past year in conjunction with their use of the trail. The majority of these purchases were bicycles and bike supplies that resulted in an average purchase amount of $ While these types of purchases are not annually recurring, even with the most conservative usage estimate they amount to millions of dollars in sales. Even more significant is the purchase of soft goods (water, soda, candy, ice cream, lunches, etc.). 62% of the respondents indicated that they purchased these types of items on their most recent trail outing. The average purchase amount per person was $9.14. Considering that the average user makes several trips to the trail on an annual basis, at the minimum these types of purchases are contributing several hundred thousand dollars to the economy of northern Baltimore County. And, these types of purchases are recurring year after year. More than 57% of the respondents to this survey stated that the maintenance of the trail was excellent. More than 90% felt that safety and security along the trail was good to excellent. Over 65% of respondents felt the cleanliness of the trail environment was excellent. Only 9.33% of the survey respondents felt that the presence of park rangers along the trail wasn t important. When asked if they would be willing to pay an annual user fee to help maintain the NCR Trail, nearly 64% responded that they would. In summary, the NCR Trail is an asset for Baltimore County and the State of Maryland. It is a venue that enhances the quality of life for thousands of Marylander s. And, it makes a significant contribution to the state s economy. 5

6 HISTORIC PERSPECTIVE For 134 years, from 1838 to 1972, the Northern Central Railroad connected Baltimore, Maryland with York, Pennsylvania and points north, encouraging the growth of small Maryland communities such as Sparks, Monkton and Parkton. The railroad was a major link in the exchange of goods and passenger service between York and Baltimore. It was originally chartered as the Baltimore and Susquehanna Railroad, then the Northern Central Railroad, later the Pennsylvania Railroad and finally the Penn Central Railroad. The railroad carried Union troops during the Civil War, and President Abraham Lincoln traveled over this line to deliver the Gettysburg Address. Following the declaration of bankruptcy of the Penn Central Railroad in 1970 and major destruction along the rail line in 1972 by Hurricane Agnes, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources purchased the right-of-way and converted it into a multi-use trail for hiking biking, jogging and horseback riding. The trail officially opened in LOCATIONAL ANALYSIS Built along the abandoned Northern Central Railroad right-of-way, the NCR Trail has become one of the most popular recreational trails in Maryland. The terrain is relatively flat and the surface is a firm crushed stone making it excellent for bicycling, hiking, running, horseback riding, as well as winter sports, such as cross country skiing and snow shoeing. The trail parallels the Gunpowder Falls for most of its length runing through the Gunpowder Falls State Park. The Gunpowder Falls is a stream that provides additional recreational opportunities for fishing, it is stocked with trout, canoeing and kayaking. Facilities along the trail include benches, picnic tables and portable toilets. Communities along the trail offer more extensive facilities. There is a bike rental shop in Monkton and refreshments can be purchased from small shops in most villages along the route. For the most part, the NCR trail passes through woodlands and rural countryside. There are a few road crossings but with the exception of Paper Mill Road at the southern end of the trail and Monkton Road at the mid-point, all are lightly used by vehicular traffic The trail is marked with wooden mile markers which begin in Ashland at the southern end of the trail and end at the Pennsylvania line. Also along the way are white and black iron mile markers which mark distances along the original rail line. The grade moving from south to north is slightly up hill. The elevation at Ashland is 280 feet rising to 680 feet at Freeland. A profile of the trail can be found below. 6

7 Trail Distances from Ashland Landmark Miles Ashland 0.0 Paper Mill Road 0.5 Phoenix 2.0 Sparks 3.5 Glencoe 4.5 Monkton 7.0 White Hall 11.0 Parkton 12.5 Bentley Springs 16.0 Freeland 19.0 Pennsylvania State Line 20.0 Trailhead parking lots are provided at Paper Mill Road, Phoenix Road, Glencoe Road (Sparks), Monkton Road, White Hall, Parkton, Bentley Springs Road and Freeland Road. A map of the NCR Trail is provided on the following page. At the Pennsylvania state line, the NCR Trail joins the Heritage Rail Trail County Park managed by the York County Department of Parks and Recreation. This trail continues another 21 miles from the Maryland-Pennsylvania line (the famous Mason-Dixon Line) to the City of York. Similar in charter to the NCR Trail, the Heritage Rail Trail provides a crushed stone surface and accommodates non-motorized multi-use activities identical to the NCR Trail. New Freedom, 1.5 miles north, is the highpoint of the trail. It is all downhill from there descending from 818 feet to 400 when it reaches York. 7

8 8

9 BALTIMORE REGION DEMOGRAPHICS The Baltimore Region of Maryland is comprised of the city of Baltimore and the following counties; Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford and Howard. Baltimore Region Demographic Profile* 2000 Census Population 2,512,431 Median Household Income $49,817 Households 958,756 Persons per household 2.62 Population Growth* Baltimore Region 2,348,219 2,512,431 2,697,000 Greater Baltimore Tourism Dollars and Employment** Total Tourism Expenditures $2,800,000,000 Tourism Related Employment 43,995 *Source: Baltimore Metropolitan Council **Source: Greater Baltimore Committee 9

10 QUALITATIVE VALUES OF THE NCR TRAIL The best way to evaluate the qualitative values of the NCR Trail is to let the trail users describe how they feel about the trail. The following are verbatim comments that were taken from the 2004 Trail User Survey forms. Thanks for such a wonderful trail. Don t commercialize the trail leave it as it is please!!! I feel so lucky to live relatively close by. I have been using the trail for 17 years. It is my base of solitude. The trail is a fabulous resource. I feel very lucky to have it. I left Inner Harbor, moved to Phoenix with trail as priority! I can not thank you enough for such a special trail. Good trail! This is a jewel in Baltimore County! Post storm maintenance has been fabulous! NCR Trail is a real asset beautiful scenery, long enough for a full day ride. We thoroughly enjoyed our ride from Ashland to New Freedom and back. My riding partner and I are riding various rail trails and yours is a good one. I love the trail. It is one of Maryland s greatest assets. I have lived here and have been using the trail for 15 years. It is without question one of the County s greatest resources along with the Gunpowder Falls. Awesome would like to retire to and live near the trail! The Ranger in the Sparks Nature Center is worth his weight in gold! Love the trail. Great. Thank you for this treasure! I use your trail because it is close, clean and paddle-able. During paddling I note wildlife in sight. I run back to the boat put-in for leg exercise. I work in Cockeysville and often go to the trail at lunch for some quiet and a short walk. Love the nature center. I have used the trail since it opened. The NCR is a great place to spend your day!! Beautiful and relaxing. Thank you. Been using the trail for 8 years it is a true treasure. Nature Center at Sparks is exceptionally good. Brought grandchildren. the Park staff is always pleasant and helpful. We are fortunate to have this trail. 10

11 An indication of the popularity of the NCR Trail is the diversity of organizations that have used the trail as a focal point of their activities. They include: Baltimore Road Runners Kidney Foundation Baltimore Bicycling Club Maryland national Guard Boy Scouts of America Rosedale Center School Sierra Club Maryland Mountain Club Crop Walk Club The Park School Trout Unlimited Baltimore Walking Club Maryland Ornithological Society Baltimore County Public Schools Towson State University Maryland Athletic Club Greater Baltimore Canoe Club 11

12 2004 SURVEY RESULTS Question 1. How far is your residence from the Trail? (check one) 5.12% Adjacent to the Trail 22.70% 1-5 miles from the Trail 43.96% 6-20 miles from the Trail 28.22% Greater than 20 miles from the Trail Question 2. What is your ZIP Code? 89.49% Maryland 7.10% Pennsylvania 1.05% District of Columbia 0.39% Virginia 0.26% Delaware 0.26% Florida 0.26% New York 1.18% All other areas Question 3. How did you get to the trail on your most recent visit? 85.41% Drive 8.94% Bike 3.81% Walk 1.45% Run/Jog 0.39% Horseback Question 4. How often, on average, do you use the Trail? (Check one) 2.21% Daily 13.15% Between 3 and 5 times a week 15.63% 1 or 2 times a week 9.38% Once a week 19.66% A couple of times a month 4.56% Once a month 26.30% Few times a year 7.81% First time 1.30% Never 12

13 Question 5 How many people typically use the Trail with you? (check one) 25.88% Use the Trail alone 41.61% One other person 23.28% 2-3 other people 5.85% 4 or 5 other people 2.99% More than 5 other people 0.39% Varies Question 6. Please identify your age group. (Check one) 3.56% under % 16 to % % % % % 66 or older Questions 7. What is your primary activity on the Trail? (Check one) 17.18% Walking/hiking 61.81% Biking 14.32% Jogging/running 0.72% Horseback riding 2.39% Walking your dog or pet 0.84% Cross country skiing 0.48% Snowshoeing 2.27% Other Question 8. Generally, when do you use the Trail? (check one) 36.45% Weekdays 56.34% Weekends 7.21% Both Question 9 What time of the day do you generally use the Trail? 43.49% Morning 30.59% Afternoon 11.67% Evenings 14.25% Anytime 13

14 Question 10. How much time do you generally spend on the Trail on each visit? (check one) 0.92% Less than 30 minutes 13.78% 30 minutes to 1 hour 45.28% 1 to 2 hours 40.03% More than 2 hours Question 11 Would you consider your main use of the trail to be for 38.70% Recreation 48.83% Health and Exercise 0.78% Commuting 1.73% Fishing Access 2.51% Boating/Tubing Access 5.54% Fitness Training 1.90% Other Question 12. What portion of the Trail do you use most often? (check all that apply) 15.49% Paper Mill Road to Phoenix 16.00% Phoenix to Sparks 18.83% Sparks to Monkton 17.28% Monkton to White Hall 10.42% White Hall to Parkton 8.04% Parkton to Bentley Springs 6.81% Bentley Springs to Freeland 7.13% Freeland to Pennsylvania Line Question 13. Which parking lot do you generally use when you visit the Trail? (check all that apply) 1.65% Ashland 27.15% Paper Mill 9.87% Phoenix 12.16% Sparks 19.47% Monkton 9.78% White Hall 6.95% Parkton 3.84% Bentley Springs 5.21% Freeland 1.19% Pennsylvania 2.74% Other 14

15 Question 14. Have you used the Heritage Rail Trail in Pennsylvania? 43.11% Yes 56.89% No Question 15. How did you find out about the Trail? 57.66% Word of mouth 5.11% Roadside signage 10.96% Driving past 4.23% Newspaper 6.48% Maryland Department of Natural Resources 6.97% Information from Rails to Trails Conservancy 3.86% Internet web site 3.36% Bike shop 1.37% Tourist Information Center Question 16. Has your use of the Trail influenced your purchase of? (check all that apply) 24.77% Bike 23.34% Bike supplies 11.82% Auto accessories (bike rack, etc.) 9.49% Athletic shoes 10.84% Clothing 1.51% Fishing Gear 18.22% Nothing Question 17. Approximately how much did you spend on the items above in the past year? (enter dollar amount) The average for those who indicated they had made a purchase was $ This average is influenced by the purchase of some very expensive bicycles costing as much as $3,000 each. 15

16 Question 18. In conjunction with your most recent trip to the Trail, did you purchase any of the following? (check all that apply) 29.39% Bottled water/soft drinks 15.77% Candy/snack foods 8.88% Sandwiches 9.30% Ice cream 6.95% Lunch at a restaurant along the Trail 1.41% Film 1.03% Bike Rental 0.38% Canoe Rental 1.31% Tube Rental 28.08% None of these Question 19: Approximately how much did you spend per person on the items above? (enter dollar amount) The average for those who indicated they had made a purchase was $9.14. Note that this is an average amount spent per person, per trip. Question 20. Did your visit to the Trail involve an overnight stay in one of the following types of accommodations? Of the surveys completed 0.05% indicated that their trip involved an overnight stay. The following is a breakdown by type of accommodation for those overnight visits: 39.47% Motel 7.89% Hotel 10.53% Bed and Breakfast 10.53% Mill Pond Cottage 13.16% Friend or Relatives Home 15.79% Campground 2.63% Other Question 21. Approximately how much did you spend per night on accommodations? After excluding those who stayed with a relative or friend, the average cost per night was $ Prices ranged from $5.00 per night at a campground to $135 per night at a B & B. 16

17 Question 22. In your opinion, the maintenance of the Trail is (check one) 57.43% Excellent 36.34% Good 4.91% Fair 1.33% Poor Question 23. How important is it to have park rangers patrolling the trail % Extremely 48.13% Somewhat 9.33% Not Important Question 24. In your opinion, the safety and security along the Trail is (check one) 44.93% Excellent 47.47% Good 5.60% Fair 2.00% Poor Question 25. In your opinion, the cleanliness of the Trail is (check one) 65.08% Excellent 31.08% Good 3.04% Fair 0.79% Poor Question 26. Please rank these public benefits of the Trail with 1 being not important and 7 being extremely important The figures below represent the average score for each of the benefits Preservation of open space 5.51 Health and fitness 5.42 Public recreation 3.66 Tourism and business development 4.71 Nature education 4.63 Access for disabled persons 17

18 3.25 Alternative transportation 4.54 Community pride Question 27 What is your gender? 54.56% Male 45.44% Female Question 28. Would you be willing to pay an annual usage fee to help maintain the Trail? 63.98% Yes 36.02% No 18

19 METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS The survey form was developed with input from the managers and staff of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Gunpowder Falls State Park. The sample was collected using two methods. One was self-selecting, that is trail users could pick-up survey forms that were available at each of the trail s primary parking areas and return them to collection boxes at the same locations or mail/fax them to the Gunpowder Falls State Park office. The other method was by intercepting trail users at the trailheads and requesting that they participate in the survey utilizing volunteers from the trail s friends group. Local merchants also participated in the distribution of survey forms. Survey collection was conducted from mid-may 2004 through the end of September For the purpose of this analysis, 767 survey forms were completed. Because several questions called for multiple responses and some survey respondents did not answer all of the questions, the percentages presented in this analysis are based upon the total number of responses to each individual question, not the 767 usable surveys. The following analysis will utilize the 1994 survey data, where available, and the 2004 survey data that was presented previously in this report. The analysis will compare the results of the surveys and offer commentary on changes that are significant or interesting. It must be noted that the methodologies used to collect the data differed between the two studies. Also the wording of some of the questions is not directly comparable. In some cases, categories of responses have been combined to provide a reasonable comparison. (Disclaimer: as a self-selecting survey, the findings are not absolute and no one can predict with any certainty how any trail users will act in the future. That said, the findings track very closely with similar surveys and other published reports and anecdotal evidence). 19

20 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1994 AND 2004 SURVEYS Question 1. How far is your residence from the Trail? (check one) % Adjacent to the Trail 5.12% 20.75% Less than 1 mile Not available 49.93% 1-5 miles from the Trail 22.70% 25.11% Greater than 6 miles 72.18% The significant change in the distance that users travel to get to the trail is that those surveyed in 2004 were more willing to travel a greater distance in order to enjoy the benefits that the trail provides. This is further evidenced by users that came from as far way as Oregon, Florida, New Hampshire and New York. Some of this change may also be attributed to the differences in data collection methodology between the 1994 study and the 2004 study. Question 2. What is your ZIP Code? % Maryland 89.49% 2.56% Pennsylvania 7.10% 0.00% District of Columbia 1.05% 0.00% Virginia 0.39% 0.00% Delaware 0.26% 0.00% Florida 0.26% 0.00% New York 0.26% 0.00% All other areas 1.18% In the 1994 survey, 184 Trail Users completed the survey. Of these 156 provide their zip code. Only 4 of the trail users were not from Maryland. The four were from Pennsylvania, three from New Freedom and one from York. Again, part of the variation can be contributed to the difference in data collection methodology. More importantly, it must be kept in mind that the Heritage Rail Trail in Pennsylvania had only completed the first mile from the borough of New Freedom to the Maryland state line at the time that the 1994 NCR Trail study was conducted. 20

21 Question 3. How did you get to the trail on your most recent visit? % Drive 85.41% 14.13% Bike 8.94% 12.90% Walk 3.81% Not available Run/Jog 1.45% 1.54% Horseback 0.39% In the 1994 survey a large number of adjacent property owners were interviewed. They are included in the above percentages (there is not a separate breakout for the trail user segment of the study). The way the vast majority of trail users get to a trail head is by automobile. Adequate parking, especially at Monkton, is still an on-going problem for the management of the NCR Trail. Even the large parking lot on Paper Mill Road is inadequate on some weekends. Question 4. How often, on average, do you use the Trail? (Check one) % Daily 2.21% 19.58% Between 3 and 5 times a week 13.15% 27.51% 1-3 times a week Not available Not available 1 or 2 times a week 15.63% 24.87% Once a week 9.38% Not available A couple of times a month 19.66% 20.63% Once a month 4.56% Not available Few times a year 19.63% Not available First time 14.33% Not available Average Trips Per Year 7.4 From this comparison it would appear that the 1994 survey respondents were much more frequent users of the NCR Trail than users are today. The methodology under which the data was collected may account for some of the differences. It must also be remembered that 1994 was very early in the trails movement and those who were users of the NCR Trail in those days were pioneers in a way. Lifestyles in 2004 are also probably different than they were a decade ago. Longer work hours, more family commitments, reduction in leisure time. 21

22 Question 5. How many people typically use the Trail with you? (check one) people per group 2.1 average per group There is a significant difference here between the 1994 data and the new survey. The 2.1 per person average group size is reasonable considering that more than 66% of the respondents stated they either used the trail alone or with one other person. Many times the trail is used by an individual before or after work in the Hunt Valley area. The 25.88% of respondents that state that they use the NCR Trail alone in considerably higher than the 20% single users on the Heritage Rail Trail in Pennsylvania. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR GROUP < Question 6. Please identify your age group. (Check one) % under % 3.21% 16 to % 17.09% % 28.34% % 27.41% % 12.69% % or older 11.82% In both studies, the vast majority of trail users are over the age of 35. This demographic is also true for other trail user studies conducted across the country. Of particular interest is the nearly 22

23 10% increase in the respondents in the age category. This may have to do with older citizens being more active than they were a decade ago. The percentage in the age category has remained nearly constant over the decade. Usage by those between 26 and 35 has decreased significantly. Again, this may be due to lifestyle changes with longer hours at work and kids to cart off to soccer games and lacrosse practice. WHAT IS YOUR PRIMARY ACTIVITY ON THE TRAIL? Walk/Hike Bike Run/Jog Other Questions 7. What is your primary activity on the Trail? (Check one) % Walking/hiking 17.18% 40.86% Biking 61.81% 10.34% Jogging/running 14.32% 0.52% Horseback riding 0.72% 0.17% Commuting Not available 0.34% Picnicking Not available 1.03% Fishing Not available Not available Walking dog or pet 2.39% 0.17% Cross country skiing 0.84% Not available Snow shoeing 0.48% Not available Other 2.27% From the 1994 study there has been a significant shift from walking and hiking to cycling. As has been stated previously, part of this change can be attributed to a change in the data collection methodology. The 1994 study took a large sample of adjacent property owners. This group would be more likely to walk on the trail due to close proximity. Also, cycling as a sport, has seen significant growth over the past decade. According to research conducted by the Bicycle Dealers Association Enthusiast riders tripled in number during the 1990s and about 24.6 million U.S. adults own a bicycle they bought new. And, according to the National Sporting Goods 23

24 Association 41.4 million Americans age seven and older were estimated to have ridden a bicycle six times or more in 2002 (the most recent data available). GENERALLY, WHEN DO YOU USE THE TRAIL? Weekdays Weekends Both Question 8. Generally, when do you use the Trail? (check one) % Weekdays 36.45% 43.63% Weekends 56.34% Not available Both 7.21% The weekday and weekend usage of the NCR Trail have reversed over the past decade. Some of this shift may be a result of differences in data collection methodology. But as stated previously, changes in lifestyle may contribute to less time for exercise and recreation during the work week. 24

25 WHAT TIME OF DAY DO YOU GENERALLY USE THE TRAIL? Morning Afternoon Evening Anytime Question 9. What time of the day do you generally use the Trail? % Morning 43.49% 32.12% Afternoon 30.59% 4.69% Evenings % Anytime 14.25% Respondents to the 2004 survey were more likely to use the trail in the morning and evening than those in The 1994 respondents were much more likely to respond to this question with an anytime response. The data collection for the 2004 study was from May until the end of September. During the summer months more trail users may have sought the relative coolness of the morning for their trail excursion. The time of year that the 1994 survey was conducted is not available from the methodology section of that report. 25

26 HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU GENERALLY SPEND ON THE TRAIL ON EACH VISIT? <30 min min About 1 hr >1 hr 1-2 hr >2 hr Question 10. How much time do you generally spend on the Trail on each visit? (check one) % Less than 30 minutes 0.92% Not available 30 minutes to 1 hour 13.78% 43.51% About an hour Not available 52.10% More than an hour Not available Not available 1 to 2 hours % Not available More than 2 hours 40.03% Over 85% of the 2004 respondents spend more than an hour on the trail each time they make a trip. While the data is not directly comparable to the 1994 study, it appears that an hour or more was the norm for most users even a decade before. Considering that most users drive some distance to arrive at a trailhead points to a trail experience as a planned destination where the time on the trail needs to exceed the time it took to get there. 26

27 WOULD YOU CONSIDER YOUR USE OF THE TRAIL TO BE Rec Health Com Fish Boat Train Other 2004 Question 11 Would you consider your use of the trail to be for 2004 Recreation 38.70% Health and Exercise 48.83% Commuting 0.78% Fishing Access 1.73% Boating/Tubing Access 2.51% Fitness Training 5.54% Other 1.90% There is no comparable data for this question from the 1994 study. While much of the literature regarding rail trails refers to them as recreational corridors from the results of this survey more users consider health and fitness as the primary reason they are on the trail. The use of the NCR Trail by older citizens (Question 6) is another indicator that a walk or ride on the trail is more than a recreational experience for many users. 27

28 WHAT PORTION OF THE TRAIL DO YOU USE MOST OFTEN? PM- PH PH- SK SK- MK MK- WH WH- PK PK- BS BS- FR FR- PA 2004 Key to chart above: Question 12. PM = Paper Mill Road PH = Phoenix SK = Sparks MK = Monkton WH = White Hall PK = Parkton BS = Bentley Springs FR = Freeland Road PA = Pennsylvania Line What portion of the Trail do you use most often? (check all that apply) 2004 Paper Mill Road to Phoenix 15.49% Phoenix to Sparks 16.00% Sparks to Monkton 18.83% Monkton to White Hall 17.28% White Hall to Parkton 10.42% Parkton to Bentley Springs 8.04% Bentley Springs to Freeland 6.81% Freeland to Pennsylvania Line 7.13% Usage of the NCR Trail south of White Hall is fairly consistent over all sections. Usage of the northern end of the trail, from White Hall to the Pennsylvania line is considerably less. In part this can be attributed to the distance that a trail user must drive to get to the northern section. It takes more time to reach these sections from the southern trailheads and only cyclists or distance runners could cover the mileage in a typical outing to reach some of the northern sections. Communicating the less crowded nature of the northern portion of the trail may be a benefit that some users would want to take advantage of, even if it does entail additional travel time. 28

29 The 1994 survey collapsed the portions of the trail into three categories: Ashland to Monkton, Monkton to Freeland and Entire length. In order to make a comparison, the 2004 data has been collapsed in a similar manner. The results are seen in the chart and table below. WHAT PORTION OF THE TRAIL DO YOU USE MOST OFTEN? Ashland-Monkton Monkton- Freeland Entire Trail % Ashland to Monkton 50.32% 26.22% Monkton to Freeland 42.55% 16.43% Entire length Not available It would appear that over the past decade, more NCR trail users have migrated to the northern end of the trail. In part this may be attributed to the over crowding on the southern end of the trail. It may also be a result of the opening of the Heritage Rail Trail in Pennsylvania. Use of one of the northern NCR trailheads would enable someone to venture into Pennsylvania on the Heritage Rail Trail. From Question 14 we know that 43% of NCR Trail users have been on the Heritage Rail Trail in Pennsylvania. 29

30 WHICH PARKING LOT DO YOU GENERALLY USE WHEN YOU VISIT THE TRAIL? AS PM PH SK MK WH PK BS FR PA OT Key to chart above: AS = Ashland PM = Paper Mill Road PH = Phoenix SK = Sparks MK = Monkton WH = White Hall PK = Parkton BS = Bentley Springs FR = Freeland Road PA = Pennsylvania OT = Other Question 13. Which parking lot do you generally use when you visit the Trail? (check all that apply) % Ashland 1.65% 13.29% Paper Mill 27.15% 15.21% Phoenix 9.87% 12.70% Sparks 12.16% 21.27% Monkton 19.47% 7.39% White Hall 9.78% 4.73% Parkton 6.95% 3.25% Bentley Springs 3.84% 3.84% Freeland 5.21% Not available Pennsylvania 1.19% Not available Other 2.74% Due to the development of a parking facility on Paper Mill Road and the incomplete Heritage Rail Trail in Pennsylvania it is difficult to make a comparison between the two studies. In 1994 parking for trail access at Paper Mill Road was along the shoulders of the road, a dangerous situation to say the least. It would appear that the development of the Paper Mill Road trailhead, relived the pressure on the Ashland and Monkton facilities. Utilization of some of the northern trailhead parking facilities has increased slightly. 30

31 Question 14. Have you used the Heritage Rail Trail in Pennsylvania? 2004 Yes 43.11% No 56.89% There is no comparable data for this question because only the first mile of the Heritage Rail Trail (from the Maryland line to New Freedom) was completed in The chart below compares the usage of the Heritage Rail Trail (HRT) by NCR Trail users with the usage of the NCR Trail by Heritage Rail Trail users (this data is from a user study conducted on the Heritage Rail Trail during the same time period during the summer of 2004). COMPARISON OF CROSS TRAIL USAGE HRT NCR 0 Yes No A significantly higher percentage of Heritage Rail Trail users also use the NCR Trail than NCR Trail users venture into Pennsylvania. This may be attributed to two factors. One is that NCR Trail users favor the southern trailheads and it is a 15 to 20 mile trip one way to get to the Heritage Rail Trail. Secondly, the Heritage Rail Trail was developed from the Maryland line north. Trail users had to drive to southern York County to access the trail. For a good two hour bike ride they had to head south into Maryland. Many still take the ride south. 31

32 Question 15. How did you find out about the Trail? % Word of mouth 57.66% Not Available Roadside signage 5.11% 14.57% Driving past 10.96% 9.17% Newspaper 4.23% 3.96% Road map Not available Not available Maryland Department of Natural Resources 6.48% Not available Information from Rails to Trails Conservancy 6.97% Not available Internet web site 3.86% Not available Bike shop 3.36% Not available Tourist Information Center 1.37% Word of month is the single greatest source of information regarding the NCR Trail just as it was a decade ago. Newspaper has slipped a bit as a source of information but that is probably due to the fact that the NCR Trail is a mature facility and doesn t get as much press now as it did in the late 1980 s and early 1990 s. The past decade has seen a significant change in the way people can gather information. The internet, which was in its infancy in 1994, now provides a wealth of information on recreational opportunities. Web sites have been created by Maryland s Department of Natural Resources that provide detailed information on the NCR Trail. The Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Trail Link site provides information on the NCR Trail as well. The following are some of the web sites where NCR Trail information is available: central_maryland/baltimore_county.html 32

33 NORTHERN CENTRAL RAIL TRAIL USER ESTIMATES The Maryland Department of Natural Resources has been estimating the number of annual users on the NCR Trail since the trail opened. Few other trails across the country have such a robust history of trail user volume. NORTHERN CENTRAL RAIL TRAIL USER ESTIMATES BY YEAR YEAR ATTENDANCE , , , , Not available , , , , , , , , ,892* ,820* , , , ,522** , ,725 * The methodology used in 1997 was changed and this lead to a much lower figure. The 1997 result was used as a base for the 1998 estimate. In 1999 the Department noticed the aberration and returned to the original methodology. There are no other indicators (concession sales, parking, etc.) that would point to much lower usage in 1997 or A DNR spokesperson believes that the 1999 estimate is also low. ** The methodology did not change in Visitation simply did not receive priority attention, and as a result, it was left to one individual to estimate. The individual was given little instruction and there were no real standards to ensure consistency from one year to the next in how estimates were obtained. In 2004, Maryland DNR set out to correct that, and have broadened the counting responsibility to a larger number of staff, so that one person is not responsible for an entire area of the park but rather collects those numbers from others and compiles a report. This smaller area of responsibility per employee makes the counts more reliable, as well as the addition of traffic counters at busy trail entrances. 33

34 ECONOMIC IMPACT The economic impact of the NCR Trail is comprised of a number of elements. From the survey, the percentage of respondents that have purchased hard goods (bikes, bike equipment, running/walking shoes, etc.) was determined. Many of these respondents also revealed how much they spent on these types of purchases over the past 12 months. Also from the survey, it was determined what trail users spent on soft goods (water, soda, snacks, ice cream, lunches, etc.) while using the trail. Again, the percentage of respondents who made these types of purchases is also an important aspect for determining the economic impact. Some trail users travel a great distance in order to sample the flavor of the NCR Trail. These visitors spend a night or two in local accommodations ranging from high-end bed and breakfast inns to campgrounds to the home of a friend or relative. The trail has also fostered new business enterprises that have added employment in northern Baltimore County. From the bicycle rental businesses near the Paper Mill Road trailhead and in Monkton to numerous refreshment stands along its length, the trail has ignited an entrepreneurial spirit along its course. Estimates of the overall economic impact of the NCR Trail are presented in the form of a table representing a range of annual usage estimates. Hard Goods Question 16. Has your use of the Trail influenced your purchase of? (check all that apply) % Bike 24.77% 24.25% Bike supplies 23.34% Not available Auto accessories 11.28% 22.40% Running/walking/hiking shoes 9.49% 14.12% Clothing 10.84% 7.42% Film Not available Not Available Fishing gear 1.51% Not available Nothing 18.22% Question 17. Approximately how much did you spend on the items above in the past year? (enter dollar amount) $ Average hard goods purchase $ This average is influenced by the purchase of some very expensive bicycles costing as much as $3,000 each. 34

35 Soft Goods Question 18. In conjunction with your most recent trip to the Trail, did you purchase any of the following? (check all that apply) 2004 Bottled water/soft drinks 29.39% Candy/snack foods 15.77% Sandwiches 6.38% Ice cream 9.30% Lunch at a restaurant along the Trail 6.95% Film 1.41% Bike Rental 1.03% Canoe Rental 0.38% Tube Rental 1.31% None of these 28.08% The percentage breakdown by type of spending was not published in the 1994 study report. Question 19. Approximately how much did you spend per person on the items above? (enter dollar amount) $6.30 Average soft goods purchase $9.14 Note that this is an average amount spent per person, per trip. Overnight Accommodations Question 20. Did your visit to the Trail involve an overnight stay in one of the following types of accommodations? Of the surveys completed 0.05% indicated that their trip involved an overnight stay. The following is a breakdown by type of accommodation for those overnight visits: 2004 Motel 39.47% Hotel 7.89% Bed and Breakfast 10.53% Mill Pond Cottage 10.53% Friend or Relatives Home 13.16% Campground 15.79% Other 2.63% There is no comparable data from the 1994 study. Trail related tourism is increasing across the country. As more trails are developed and linked together overnight stays will increase. 35

36 Question 21. Approximately how much did you spend per night on accommodations? 2004 Average expenditure on overnight accommodations $61.09 The following chart takes the data provided above and extrapolates the purchases over a range of annual usage. While hard good purchases may not be made on an annual basis they represent a significant expenditure figure. The purchase of soft goods does represent an annual expenditure because these purchases are made on a trip basis by users. Category % Usage NCR Trail Economic Impact Analysis Avg. $ Avg. Life Avg. # of Trips Annual Users 300, , ,000 Hard Goods* 81.78% $ $1,840,713 $3,067,855 $4,908,568 years Soft Goods 71.92% $9.14 $1,972,046 $3,286,744 $5,258,790 Overnight Accommodations 0.05% $ $ 12,383 $ 20,639 $ 33,022 Hard Goods = (% Usage X (Avg. $/Avg. Life)X # Users/Avg. Number of Trips)* In the above example the calculation would look like this: ((.8178 X ($333.12/6)) X (300,000/7.4) = $1,840,713 Soft Goods = (% Usage X Users Avg. $ X # Users) In the above example the calculation would look like this: (.7192 X $9.14 X 300,000) = $1,972,046 Overnight Accommodations = (% Usage X Users Avg. $ X # Users/Avg. Number of Trips) In the above example the calculation would look like this: (.005 X $61.09 X 300,000/7.4) = $12,383 * Major hard good purchases such as a bike may be replaced every 5 to 10 years. Running shoes may be replaced every couple of months. For the purpose of this analysis it is assumed an average life of 6 years. To get a figure that is usable on an annual user basis, the hard goods needs to be broken down to a per trip figure. What this amounts to is working the average spending on a hard good down to a per use depreciation amount. 36

37 TRAIL MAINTENANCE, SECURITY AND CLEANLINESS The 1994 survey was conducted ten years after the NCR Trail was opened and established a benchmark for how users perceived the trail in terms of maintenance, security and cleanliness. The 2004 survey included these questions to provide feedback to the Maryland Department of Natural Resources on how they were doing, form a user s perspective, in keeping the facility up to the standards that the users expect. How the NCR Trail is maintained has a significant impact on the economic contributions it makes to the northern Baltimore County. IN YOUR OPINION, THE MAINTENANCE OF THE TRAIL IS Excellent Good Fair Poor Question 22. In your opinion, the maintenance of the Trail is (check one) % Excellent 57.43% 40.62% Good 36.34% 4.11% Fair 4.91% 1.32% Poor 1.33% Over the past 10 years, the Maryland Department of Natural resources has done an excellent job of maintaining the NCR Trail. The number of users that rated trail maintenance as excellent has actually increased. This exceptional rating comes during a summer in which several major thunderstorms and hurricanes flooded parking lots and washed out sections of the trail. A well maintained trail adds to the enjoyment of the user experience, brings regular users back and attracts new users. 37

38 HOW IMPORTANT IS IT TO HAVE RANGERS PATROLLING THE TRAIL Extremely Somewhat Not Important 2004 Question 23. How important is it to have park rangers patrolling the trail Extremely 42.53% Somewhat 48.13% Not Important 9.33% More than 90% of the survey respondents thought that it was extremely or somewhat important to have Maryland DNR rangers patrolling the trail. Women and older survey respondents were more likely to feel that it was extremely important to have ranger patrols. 38

39 IN YOUR OPINION, THE SAFETY AND SECURITYALONG THE TRAIL IS Excellent Good Fair Poor Question 24. In your opinion, the safety and security along the Trail is (check one) % Excellent 44.93% 47.82% Good 47.47% 9.56% Fair 5.60% 1.68% Poor 2.00% Over the past decade the safety and security of the NCR Trail has actually improved in the minds of the trail users surveyed. Two factors can contribute to the feeling of safety. One is the regular patrols by DNR rangers. The other is the fact that the more users a trail has the more secure all users feel. The old saying there is strength in numbers applies to helping prevent negative incidents along the trail. 39

40 IN YOUR OPINION, THE CLEANLINESS OF THE TRAIL IS Excellent Good Fair Poor Question 25. In your opinion, the cleanliness of the Trail is (check one) % Excellent 65.08% 36.32% Good 31.08% 4.64% Fair 3.04% 0.50% Poor 0.79% Users of the trail rate its cleanliness very high. This is as much a credit to the users of the trail as to any other factor. Generally trail users respect the park and the open space through which they travel. Often users can be seen picking up after someone who was not as respectful of the environment as they should have been. The decision to make the trail a pack out what you pack in facility has resulted in a much cleaner environment. The major complaint from the comments section of the survey forms was the horse manure on the trail (this same complaint is also the number one gripe on the Heritage Rail Trail in Pennsylvania). Some survey respondents asked for the placement of more trash cans. The pack out what you pack in message should be more prominently explained. 40

41 Question 26. Please rank these public benefits of the Trail with 1 being not important and 7 being extremely important The figures below represent the average score for each of the benefits Preservation of open space 5.74 Health and fitness 5.51 Public recreation 5.42 Tourism and business development 3.66 Nature education 4.71 Access for disabled persons 4.63 Alternative transportation 3.25 Community pride 4.54 There is no comparative data from the 1994 study. This question was included in an effort to determine the benefits that users associate with a facility such as the NCR trail and which of those benefits were most important to them. By a slight margin, the survey respondents feel that the NCR Trail helps to preserve open space. They also feel that the trail provides a venue to help improve their health and fitness levels. A source of public recreation is also a benefit that the survey respondents regarded highly. Due primarily to its location in a state park in northern Baltimore County not many respondents feel that the NCR Trail provides a viable transportation alternative (a trail along the Jones Falls running to downtown Baltimore may be more highly perceived as an alternative transportation route). 41

42 WHAT IS YOUR GENDER? % 60% Male 45% Male Female 55% Female Question 27: What is your gender? % Male 54.56% 39.91% Female 45.44% Slightly more men use the trail (or at least complete the survey forms) than women. There has been an increase in the percentage of female trail users that may be attributed to changes in lifestyle, a trail that offers a clean/secure environment and the increased emphasis of health. 42

43 WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO PAY AN ANNUAL USAGE FEE TO HELP MAINTAIN THE Yes No 2004 Question 28. Would you be willing to pay an annual usage fee to help maintain the Trail? 2004 Yes 63.98% No 36.02% There is no comparable data from the 1994 study. From the user comments the fee needs to be small, under $ Most objections were voiced as that s what I pay state taxes for. Most users would be willing to pay a small fee. The questions are how to implement it and to what degree is it enforced. One suggestion is a small tag like a dog license that could be attached to the seat post of a bike, carried in a wallet or hung from a pack. 43

44 Tale of Two Trails A Comparison of 2004 User Surveys on the Maryland NCR Trail and the York County, PA Heritage Rail Trail Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Gunpowder Falls State Park and York County Department of Parks and Recreation Prepared by: Trail Facts 4 McCartney Road New Freedom, PA carl@trailfacts.com 44

45 The Trails 45

46 METHODOLOGY During the spring and summer of 2004, user surveys were conducted on the Maryland Department of Natural Recourses NCR Trail and the York County, PA Heritage Rail Trail County Park. These two trails utilize the right of way of the former Northern Central Railroad (NCR). The trails connect at the state line between Freeland, Maryland and New Freedom, Pennsylvania. The Maryland trail, which consists of 20 miles, was opened in The Pennsylvania trail, which is 21 miles in length, was developed from south to north in phases and officially opened in August The survey form was developed with input from the managers and staff of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Gunpowder Falls State Park and the York County Department of Parks and Recreation. In many cases the questions in each survey were worded identically or were very similar in terms of the available responses. This was done so that the following comparison between the two trails would be possible. The sample was collected using two methods. One was self-selecting, that is trail users could pick-up survey forms that were available at each of the trail s primary parking areas and return them to collection boxes at the same locations or mail/fax them to the Gunpowder Falls State Park office or the York County Parks Department office. The other method was by intercepting trail users at the trailheads or trail museums and requesting that they participate in the survey utilizing volunteers from the trails friends groups. Local merchants also participated in the distribution of survey forms. Survey collection was conducted from mid-may 2004 through the end of September On the NCR Trail, 767 survey forms were completed. The average number of trips per user was calculated from the data to be 7.4. Maryland Department of Natural Resources estimates that there were more than 867,000 user visits to the NCR Trail in Dividing the estimated annual user visits by the average number of trips we can estimate a trail user population of 117,260. On the Heritage Rail Trail, 445 survey forms were completed. The average number of trips per user was calculated from the data to be York County Department of Parks and Recreation estimates that there are approximately 300,000 user visits annually to the Heritage Rail Trail County Park. Dividing the estimated annual user visits by the average number of trips we can estimate a trail user population of 37,641. The following pages provide a head-to-head comparison of the data from the 2004 user studies on the NCR Trail and the Heritage Rail Trail. In some cases not all of the available responses were provided on each survey. In these cases, an NA will appear when a response was not included on one survey or the other. 46

Heritage Rail Trail County Park 2001 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis

Heritage Rail Trail County Park 2001 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis Heritage Rail Trail County Park 2001 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis June 2002 Heritage Rail Trail County Park 2001 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis June 2002 Prepared for: York County

More information

The methodology and sample surveys have been developed through a partnership of: DCNR and the Secretary's Greenways Program Advisory Committee

The methodology and sample surveys have been developed through a partnership of: DCNR and the Secretary's Greenways Program Advisory Committee Trail User Survey Workbook How to conduct a survey and win support for your trail Sample Surveys and Methods 2005 Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Northeast Regional Field Office 2133 Market St, #222 Camp Hill,

More information

Perkiomen Trail 2008 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis

Perkiomen Trail 2008 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis Perkiomen Trail 2008 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis Contents Executive Summary...2 Historical Perspective...4 Location Analysis...5 Perkiomen Trail Map...6 Perkiomen Trail Area Demographics...8

More information

Paulinskill Valley Trail 2010 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis

Paulinskill Valley Trail 2010 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis Paulinskill Valley Trail 21 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis Contents Executive Summary...2. Historical Perspective...4 Location Analysis...5 Paulinskill Valley Trail Area Demographics...7 Paulinskill

More information

Pine Creek Rail Trail 2006 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis

Pine Creek Rail Trail 2006 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis Pine Creek Rail Trail 2006 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis Financed in part by a grant from: Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation,

More information

State Park Visitor Survey

State Park Visitor Survey State Park Visitor Survey Methods, Findings and Conclusions State s Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Management surveyed state park visitor and trip characteristics, and collected evaluations

More information

2015 General Trail User Survey February 2016

2015 General Trail User Survey February 2016 2015 General Trail User Survey February 2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Project Background 2 Trail Town Program Background 2 Survey Background 2 Methods: 3 2015 General Trail User Survey 3 2015

More information

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018 Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report May 2018 This report has been prepared by Enterprise Marketing and Research Services 60 Main Road, Moonah TAS 7009 All enquiries

More information

D & L Trail User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis

D & L Trail User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis D & L Trail 212 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis Contents Executive Summary...2 Historical Perspective...5 Locational Analysis...7 D & L Trail Map...1 D & L Trail Regional Demographics...11 Survey

More information

Recreationists on the Gifford Pinchot National Forest: A Survey of User Characteristics, Behaviors, and Attitudes

Recreationists on the Gifford Pinchot National Forest: A Survey of User Characteristics, Behaviors, and Attitudes Recreationists on the Gifford Pinchot National Forest: A Survey of User Characteristics, Behaviors, and Attitudes by Alan R. Graefe The Pennsylvania State University Robert C. Burns University of Florida

More information

2015 Business Survey Report Erie to Pittsburgh Trail March 2015

2015 Business Survey Report Erie to Pittsburgh Trail March 2015 2015 Business Survey Report Erie to Pittsburgh Trail March 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 2013 EPT Trail User Survey and Impact Analysis 3 Overview 3 Results 3 2014 2015 Erie to Pittsburgh

More information

Estimating Tourism Expenditures for the Burlington Waterfront Path and the Island Line Trail

Estimating Tourism Expenditures for the Burlington Waterfront Path and the Island Line Trail A report by the University of Vermont Transportation Research Center Estimating Tourism Expenditures for the Burlington Waterfront Path and the Island Line Trail Report # 10-003 February 2010 Estimating

More information

Trail User Survey and Business Survey Report. Great Allegheny Passage March 2015

Trail User Survey and Business Survey Report. Great Allegheny Passage March 2015 Trail User Survey and Business Survey Report Great Allegheny Passage March 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Methods: Study 1 Trail User Survey 3 2014 Great Allegheny Passage Trail User Survey

More information

2006 RENO-SPARKS VISITOR PROFILE STUDY

2006 RENO-SPARKS VISITOR PROFILE STUDY 2006 RENO-SPARKS VISITOR PROFILE STUDY PREPARED FOR RENO-SPARKS CONVENTION & VISITOR AUTHORITY Study Conducted and Reported by 475 Hill Street, Suite 2 Reno, Nevada 89501 (775) 323-7677 www.infosearchintl.com

More information

Cedar Rapids Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Visitor Study

Cedar Rapids Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Visitor Study Cedar Rapids Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Visitor Study 2003-2004 University of Northern Iowa Sustainable Tourism & The Environment Program www.uni.edu/step Project Directors: Sam Lankford, Ph.D.

More information

AVSP 7 Summer Section 7: Visitor Profile - Demographics and Spending

AVSP 7 Summer Section 7: Visitor Profile - Demographics and Spending AVSP 7 Summer 2016 Section 7: Visitor Profile - Demographics and Spending Demographics Origin Visitors were asked what state, country, or province they were visiting from. The chart below shows results

More information

RESULTS FROM WYOMING SNOWMOBILE SURVEY: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

RESULTS FROM WYOMING SNOWMOBILE SURVEY: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RESULTS FROM 2000-2001 WYOMING SNOWMOBILE SURVEY: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared for the Wyoming Department of State Parks and Historic Sites, Wyoming State Trails Program. Prepared By: Chelsey McManus, Roger

More information

Predictive Economic Impact Study for the Mount Dora to Seminole Wekiva Trail

Predictive Economic Impact Study for the Mount Dora to Seminole Wekiva Trail Predictive Economic Impact Study for the Mount Dora to Seminole Wekiva Trail Prepared By: Valerie Seidel vseidel@balmoralgroup.us 341 N. Maitland Ave., Suite 100 Maitland, FL 32751 Phone (407) 629-2185

More information

Trail Use in the N.C. Museum of Art Park:

Trail Use in the N.C. Museum of Art Park: Trail Use in the N.C. Museum of Art Park: New Connections, New Visitors Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson, PhD Daniel Rodriguez, PhD Taylor Dennerlein, MSEE, MCRP, EIT Jill Mead, MPH Evan Comen University of

More information

Juneau Household Waterfront Opinion Survey

Juneau Household Waterfront Opinion Survey Juneau Household Waterfront Opinion Survey Prepared for: City and Borough of Juneau Prepared by: April 13, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1 Introduction and Methodology...6 Survey Results...7

More information

2014 NOVEMBER ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND VISITOR PROFILE. Prepared By:

2014 NOVEMBER ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND VISITOR PROFILE. Prepared By: 2014 NOVEMBER ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND VISITOR PROFILE Prepared By: Sisters Folk Festival Economic Impacts and Visitor Profile September 5-7, 2014 November 2014 Prepared for Sisters Folk Festival, Inc. Sisters,

More information

Highlights of the 2008 Virginia Equestrian Tourism Survey Results

Highlights of the 2008 Virginia Equestrian Tourism Survey Results Highlights of the 2008 Virginia Equestrian Tourism Survey Results Conducted by Carol Kline, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Hospitality and Tourism Administration, North Carolina Central University Sally Aungier,

More information

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT The City has been successful in establishing dedicated local funding sources as well as applying for grants to develop the City s trail system, having received nearly $2.4

More information

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure Survey Results: A1 Cambridge to Royston June 17 cambridgeshire.gov.uk Contents 1. Introduction... 3. About you... 3.1 Age... 3. What is your gender?... 3.3 Do

More information

CHAPTER ONE LITERATURE REVIEW

CHAPTER ONE LITERATURE REVIEW CHAPTER ONE LITERATURE REVIEW LITERATURE REVIEW This chapter summarizes the most recently published community impact studies and articles that relate to multiuse trails. The review focuses on publications

More information

The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia The University of Georgia Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Georgia Agritourism Overview: Results from a 2005 Business Survey Center Report:

More information

2014 West Virginia Image & Advertising Accountability Research

2014 West Virginia Image & Advertising Accountability Research 2014 West Virginia Image & Advertising Accountability Research November 2014 Table of Contents Introduction....... 3 Purpose... 4 Methodology.. 5 Executive Summary...... 7 Conclusions and Recommendations.....

More information

Royal Parks Stakeholder Research Programme 2014

Royal Parks Stakeholder Research Programme 2014 1 Royal Parks Stakeholder Research Programme 2014 Park profile: Greenwich Park (Waves 1-3) January 2015 Technical note 2 This slide deck presents findings from three waves of survey research conducted

More information

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report Research prepared for Visit Napa Valley by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents S E C T I O N 1 Introduction 2 S E C T I O N 2 Executive

More information

AVSP 7 Summer Section 1: Executive Summary

AVSP 7 Summer Section 1: Executive Summary AVSP 7 Summer 2016 Section 1: Executive Summary Introduction AVSP Overview The Alaska Visitor Statistics Program (AVSP) is a statewide visitor study periodically commissioned by the Alaska Department of

More information

CHAPTER XII: ECONOMIC IMPACT Of the Virginia Coal Heritage Trail

CHAPTER XII: ECONOMIC IMPACT Of the Virginia Coal Heritage Trail As noted earlier in this document, studies have determined that over 80% (118 million) of traveling U.S. adults are considered cultural heritage travelers. These tourists tend to stay multiple nights,

More information

Northeast Regional Office 2133 Market St, #222 Camp Hill, PA Patricia Tomes Program Coordinator

Northeast Regional Office 2133 Market St, #222 Camp Hill, PA Patricia Tomes Program Coordinator Northeast Regional Office 2133 Market St, #222 Camp Hill, PA 17011 717-238-1717 Patricia Tomes Program Coordinator Economic Impact of Rail-Trails Trail User Surveys Results and Comparison 2006 The Trails

More information

2013 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report

2013 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report 2013 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report Research prepared for the Irving Convention & Visitors Bureau by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents SECTION 1 Introduction 2 SECTION 2 Executive

More information

Downtown Boulder User Survey November 2012

Downtown Boulder User Survey November 2012 Downtown Boulder User Survey 2012 November 2012 Presentation Overview o Methodology o Key findings and highlights o Visitor Profile o Marketing & Media o Spending Patters o Transportation & Parking o Impact

More information

Outreach: Terrestrial Invasive Species And Recreational Pathways S U S A N B U R K S M N D N R I N V A S I V E S P P P R O G C O O R D

Outreach: Terrestrial Invasive Species And Recreational Pathways S U S A N B U R K S M N D N R I N V A S I V E S P P P R O G C O O R D Outreach: Terrestrial Invasive Species And Recreational Pathways S U S A N B U R K S M N D N R I N V A S I V E S P P P R O G C O O R D Education Project Funded by USFS State & Private Forestry Describe

More information

NATURE-BASED OUTDOOR RECREATION

NATURE-BASED OUTDOOR RECREATION NATURE-BASED OUTDOOR RECREATION Wild Rivers Coast December 4, 2013 DATA & TRENDS Outdoor Recreation Product Image Oregon has a strong outdoor recreation story to tell Source: 2006 Longwoods Overnight

More information

2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results

2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results 2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results Completed by Juneau Economic Development Council in partnership with The Alaska Committee August 2013 JEDC research efforts are supported

More information

Silver Lake Park An Environmental Jewel for the Citizens of Prince William County

Silver Lake Park An Environmental Jewel for the Citizens of Prince William County Silver Lake Park An Environmental Jewel for the Citizens of Prince William County The Prince William Park Authority Mission Statement states: The Prince William County Park Authority will create quality

More information

Planning Future Directions. For BC Parks: BC Residents' Views

Planning Future Directions. For BC Parks: BC Residents' Views Planning Future Directions For BC Parks: BC Residents' Views Summary Report Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection Province of British Columbia April, 2002 National Library of Canada Cataloguing in

More information

Sacramento Placerville Transportation Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Sacramento Placerville Transportation Corridor Alternatives Analysis Sacramento Placerville Transportation Corridor Alternatives Analysis EL DORADO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1 Sacramento Placerville Transportation Corridor 2 Goal of the Project To give public officials

More information

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report Join Visit Napa Valley NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report Research prepared for Visit Napa Valley by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents SECTION 1 Introduction 2 SECTION

More information

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2012 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes and Mountains

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2012 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes and Mountains Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2012 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes and Mountains Prepared by April 2013 1 Introduction and Methodology 2 The Maine Office

More information

JUNEAU BUSINESS VISITOR SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

JUNEAU BUSINESS VISITOR SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS 2018 JUNEAU BUSINESS VISITOR SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Completed by the Juneau Economic Development Council in partnership with the Alaska Committee. JEDC research efforts are supported by core funding

More information

AMERICAN S PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION: Results From NSRE 2000 (With weighted data) (Round 1)

AMERICAN S PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION: Results From NSRE 2000 (With weighted data) (Round 1) AMERICAN S PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION: Results From NSRE 2000 (With weighted data) (Round 1) The emphasis of this report is on participation patterns across activities and segments of our society.

More information

Minnesota River Valley Area Survey Summary Report

Minnesota River Valley Area Survey Summary Report Minnesota River Valley Area Survey Summary Report Report prepared by: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Office of Management and Budget Services May 2002 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A number of organizations

More information

1999 Wakonda State Park Visitor Survey

1999 Wakonda State Park Visitor Survey Missouri Department of Natural Resources Division of State Parks 800-334-6946 1999 Wakonda State Park Visitor Survey Project Completion Report Submitted to Missouri Department of Natural Resources Division

More information

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure Survey Results: Huntingdon Road, Cambridge June 217 cambridgeshire.gov.uk Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. About you... 3 2.1 Age... 3 2.2 What is your gender?...

More information

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report Research prepared for Visit Napa Valley by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents SECTION 1 Introduction 2 SECTION 2 Executive Summary 5 SECTION

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove 2013 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2

More information

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005 The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005 INTRODUCTION GENERAL November, 2006 This 2005 update of the original

More information

Sevierville, TN. Technical Appendices

Sevierville, TN. Technical Appendices Sevierville, TN Technical Appendices 2017 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780 Contents

More information

Appendix D ( Rock Climbing Survey) Scroll Down

Appendix D ( Rock Climbing Survey) Scroll Down Appendix D (E-mail Rock Climbing Survey) Scroll Down 51 2006 Coopers Rock Recreation Study West Virginia University Dear Recreationist: The Department of Recreation, Parks, and Tourism Resources at West

More information

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure Survey Results: Hills Road, Cambridge June 2017 0 cambridgeshire.gov.uk Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. About you... 3 2.1 Age... 3 2.2 What is your gender?...

More information

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area. RECREATION Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area. OPPORTUNITIES FOR SOLITUDE / QUIET TRAILS. One attraction

More information

West Virginia 2011 Overnight Visitor Final Report

West Virginia 2011 Overnight Visitor Final Report West Virginia 011 Overnight Visitor Final Report June, 01 Table of Contents Introduction...... Methodology.. Travel Market Size & Structure... 5 Overnight Expenditures.. 11 Overnight Trip Characteristics...

More information

Risk Assessment in Winter Backcountry Travel

Risk Assessment in Winter Backcountry Travel Wilderness and Environmental Medicine, 20, 269 274 (2009) ORIGINAL RESEARCH Risk Assessment in Winter Backcountry Travel Natalie A. Silverton, MD; Scott E. McIntosh, MD; Han S. Kim, PhD, MSPH From the

More information

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW The following pages are excerpts from a DRAFT-version Fare Analysis report conducted by Nelson\Nygaard

More information

Clarion-Little Toby Trail 2015 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis

Clarion-Little Toby Trail 2015 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis Clarion-Little Toby Trail 2015 User Survey and Economic Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Historical Perspective 4 Locational Analysis 5 About the Trail 6 Clarion-Little Toby Trail

More information

Georgetown-Lewes Rail/Trail Study. Rail/Trail Study: Cool Spring to Cape Henlopen State Park New Road Extension (House Resolution No.

Georgetown-Lewes Rail/Trail Study. Rail/Trail Study: Cool Spring to Cape Henlopen State Park New Road Extension (House Resolution No. Georgetown-Lewes Rail/Trail Study Rail/Trail Study: Cool Spring to Cape Henlopen State Park New Road Extension (House Resolution No. 47) August 22, 2011 Presentation Outline Background Benefits Statewide

More information

Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project

Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project Scoping Document Forest Service Allegheny National Forest Bradford Ranger District McKean, County, Pennsylvania In accordance with Federal civil

More information

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Travel Decision Survey 2012

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Travel Decision Survey 2012 Note: The weighting used in this report is not consistent with Travel Decision Surveys (TDS) 2013 and 2014, and findings from this report should not be compared with findings from TDS 2013 and TDS 2014.

More information

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Canadian Visitors

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Canadian Visitors Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Prepared by May 2016 1 1 Table of Contents Research Objectives and Methodology 4 Canadian Overnight Visitors: Traveler

More information

Trail User Surveys and Economic Impact

Trail User Surveys and Economic Impact Trail User Surveys and Economic Impact A Comparison of Trail User Expenditures 2009 Contents Introduction...2 The Rail-Trails...4 The Importance of Conducting a Trail User Survey...6 Trail Type...7 Demographics...8

More information

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study Maryland House Bill 300 Table of Contents Page 2 Executive Summary Slide 3 Notes Slide 4 Metro Systemwide Fact Sheet Slide 5 How

More information

2000 Roaring River State Park Visitor Survey

2000 Roaring River State Park Visitor Survey Missouri Department of Natural Resources Division of State Parks 800-334-6946 2000 Roaring River State Park Visitor Survey Project Completion Report Submitted to Missouri Department of Natural Resources

More information

West Virginia 2009 Visitor Report December, 2010

West Virginia 2009 Visitor Report December, 2010 West Virginia 009 Visitor Report December, 010 Table of Contents Introduction...... Methodology.. 4 Travel Market Size & Structure... 6 Overnight Expenditures.. 1 Overnight Trip Characteristics... 16 Demographic

More information

10/25/2013. What is the SCORP?! 2013 Local Government Survey 2013 Statewide Public Survey Advisory Group Priority Areas Your Suggestions!

10/25/2013. What is the SCORP?! 2013 Local Government Survey 2013 Statewide Public Survey Advisory Group Priority Areas Your Suggestions! COLORADO OUTDOOR RECREATION TRENDS RESULTS FROM THE SCORP AND STATEWIDE Colorado Outdoor Recreation Resource Partnership September 2013 PRESENTATION What is the SCORP?! 2013 Local Government Survey 2013

More information

1999 Reservations Northwest Users Survey Methodology and Results November 1999

1999 Reservations Northwest Users Survey Methodology and Results November 1999 1999 Reservations Northwest Users Survey Methodology and Results November 1999 Oregon Survey Research Laboratory University of Oregon Eugene OR 97403-5245 541-346-0822 Fax: 541-346-5026 Internet: OSRL@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU

More information

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Coastal Counties: A Sustainable Approach

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Coastal Counties: A Sustainable Approach Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Coastal Counties: A Sustainable Approach Brunswick, Currituck and Pender Counties, North Carolina (Funded by North Carolina Sea Grant) Center for Sustainable

More information

Maryland State Parks Diversity and Inclusion Efforts: Staff Perspectives and Media Reporting

Maryland State Parks Diversity and Inclusion Efforts: Staff Perspectives and Media Reporting Maryland State Parks Diversity and Inclusion Efforts: Staff Perspectives and Media Reporting Natalia Buta, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Frostburg State University University System of Maryland Objectives

More information

Travel Decision Survey Summary Report. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

Travel Decision Survey Summary Report. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Note: The weighting used in this report is not consistent with Travel Decision Surveys (TDS) 2013 and 2014, and findings from this report should not be compared with findings from TDS 2013 and TDS 2014.

More information

2014 North Carolina Image & Advertising Accountability Research

2014 North Carolina Image & Advertising Accountability Research 2014 North Carolina Image & Advertising Accountability Research January 2015 Table of Contents Introduction........ 3 Purpose.. 4 Methodology.. 5 Destination Past Visitation and Interest.......... 7 Travel

More information

CEREDIGION VISITOR SURVEY 2011 TOTAL SAMPLE. November 2011

CEREDIGION VISITOR SURVEY 2011 TOTAL SAMPLE. November 2011 CEREDIGION VISITOR SURVEY 2011 TOTAL SAMPLE November 2011 TERMS OF CONTRACT Unless otherwise agreed, the findings of this study remain the copyright of Beaufort Research Ltd and may not be quoted, published

More information

Salt Lake Downtown Alliance. June 2018

Salt Lake Downtown Alliance. June 2018 Salt Lake Downtown Alliance June 2018 2 SURVEY DETAILS Short telephone survey updating previous benchmark data around key topics 609 respondents ±4% margin of error Trending is provided for all questions

More information

2015 British Columbia Parks. Visitor Survey. Juan De Fuca Park. China Beach

2015 British Columbia Parks. Visitor Survey. Juan De Fuca Park. China Beach 2015 British Columbia Parks Visitor Survey Juan De Fuca Park China Beach 1 Contents Introduction 3 Methodology 3 Limitations 3 How this report is organized 3 Part 1 - Visitor Satisfaction 4 Part 2 - Visitor

More information

Economic And Social Values of Vermont State Parks 2002

Economic And Social Values of Vermont State Parks 2002 Economic And Social Values of Vermont State Parks 2002 Executive Summary Prepared for Vermont State Parks Department of Forest and Parks and Recreation Prepared by: Alphonse H. Gilbert Robert E. Manning

More information

Manassas National Battlefield Park. Visitor Study. Summer Kristin FitzGerald Margaret Littlejohn. VSP Report 80. April 1996

Manassas National Battlefield Park. Visitor Study. Summer Kristin FitzGerald Margaret Littlejohn. VSP Report 80. April 1996 Manassas National Battlefield Park Visitor Study Summer 1995 Kristin FitzGerald Margaret Littlejohn VSP Report 80 April 1996 Margaret Littlejohn is VSP Coordinator, National Park Service based at the Cooperative

More information

2009 North Carolina Visitor Profile

2009 North Carolina Visitor Profile 2009 Visitor Profile A publication of the Division of Tourism, Film & Sports Development August 2010 Division of Tourism, Film and Sports Development 2009 Visitor Profile 2009 Visitor Profile The Division

More information

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document

More information

Visitor Profile - Central Island Region

Visitor Profile - Central Island Region TOURISM LABOUR MARKET RESEARCH PROJECT 2003 The Project The Tourism Labour Market Research Project, was designed to study the tourism labour market throughout the Vancouver Island region. The Visitor Survey

More information

2015 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report

2015 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report 2015 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report Research prepared for the Irving Convention & Visitors Bureau by Destination Analysts, Inc. Table of Contents S E C T I O N 1 Introduction 2 S E C T

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove 2014 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2

More information

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document

More information

Business Growth (as of mid 2002)

Business Growth (as of mid 2002) Page 1 of 6 Planning FHWA > HEP > Planning > Econ Dev < Previous Contents Next > Business Growth (as of mid 2002) Data from two business directories was used to analyze the change in the number of businesses

More information

Tourism Kelowna Visitor Intercept Survey Findings FINAL DRAFT REPORT

Tourism Kelowna Visitor Intercept Survey Findings FINAL DRAFT REPORT Tourism Kelowna Visitor Intercept Survey Findings FINAL DRAFT REPORT January 17, 2017 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Methodology.. 7 Visitor Intercept Survey Findings.. 9 Visitor Profile. 9

More information

LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL. Wandsworth borough report

LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL. Wandsworth borough report LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL Wandsworth borough report London Development Agency May 2008 CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 3 2. Tourism in London and the UK: recent trends... 4 3. The LATI model: a brief

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015 MD tourism economy reaches new peaks The Maryland visitor economy continued to grow in 2015; tourism industry sales

More information

An outdoor waterpark is a facility offering three or more waterslides and other aquatic facilities.

An outdoor waterpark is a facility offering three or more waterslides and other aquatic facilities. Methodology for Feasibility Studies for Waterparks By David J. Sangree, MAI, CPA, ISHC Before a developer or an organization considers constructing a new indoor or outdoor waterpark at a resort or standalone,

More information

RESEARCH AND PLANNING FORT STEELE HERITAGE TOWN VISITOR STUDY 2007 RESULTS. May 2008

RESEARCH AND PLANNING FORT STEELE HERITAGE TOWN VISITOR STUDY 2007 RESULTS. May 2008 RESEARCH AND PLANNING FORT STEELE HERITAGE TOWN VISITOR STUDY 2007 RESULTS May 2008 Research and Planning Tourism British Columbia 300-1803 Douglas St. Box 9830 Stn. Prov. Gov t. Victoria, BC V8W 9W5 Web:

More information

FINAL REPORT. Prepared For. Prepared by

FINAL REPORT. Prepared For. Prepared by INDEPENDENCE LAKE 2010 RECREATION USER SURVEY FINAL REPORT Prepared For The Nature Conservancy Reno, Nevada Prepared by Chuck Nozicka Consulting Tourism and Recreation Planning Sacramento, California INDEPENDENCE

More information

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Greater Portland & Casco Bay

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Greater Portland & Casco Bay Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Prepared by April 2016 1 1 Table of Contents Research Objectives and Methodology 3 Overnight Visitors:

More information

MONTEREY COUNTY TRAVEL IMPACTS P

MONTEREY COUNTY TRAVEL IMPACTS P MONTEREY COUNTY TRAVEL IMPACTS 1992-2015P April 2016 Prepared for the Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau MONTEREY COUNTY TRAVEL IMPACTS, 1992-2015P Prepared for the Monterey County Convention

More information

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: The Maine Beaches

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: The Maine Beaches Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Prepared by May 2014 1 1 Table of Contents Research Objectives and Methodology 3 Overnight Visitors:

More information

2007 RENO-TAHOE VISITOR PROFILE STUDY

2007 RENO-TAHOE VISITOR PROFILE STUDY 2007 RENO-TAHOE VISITOR PROFILE STUDY PREPARED FOR RENO-SPARKS CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY Study Conducted and Reported by 475 Hill Street, Suite 2 Reno, Nevada 89501 (775) 323-7677 www.infosearchintl.com

More information

Deer, People and Parks

Deer, People and Parks APPENDIX A: Survey instrument Deer, People and Parks A Survey of Residents Living Near Fire Island National Seashore Research conducted by National Park Service Biological Resource Management Division

More information

3.0 LEARNING FROM CHATHAM-KENT S CITIZENS

3.0 LEARNING FROM CHATHAM-KENT S CITIZENS 3.0 LEARNING FROM CHATHAM-KENT S CITIZENS An important aspect in developing the Chatham-Kent Trails Master Plan was to obtain input from stakeholders and the general public. Throughout the course of the

More information

Economic Impacts of Campgrounds in New York State

Economic Impacts of Campgrounds in New York State Economic Impacts of Campgrounds in New York State June 2017 Report Submitted to: Executive Summary Executive Summary New York State is home to approximately 350 privately owned campgrounds with 30,000

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest 2008 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS Glossary of terms 1 1. Summary of Results 4 2. Table

More information

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Downeast & Acadia

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Downeast & Acadia Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Prepared by May 2014 1 1 Table of Contents Research Objectives and Methodology 3 Overnight Visitors:

More information

Eastern Lake Ontario Beach User Survey 2003/2004.

Eastern Lake Ontario Beach User Survey 2003/2004. Eastern Lake Ontario Beach User Survey 2003/2004. Introduction The eastern shore of Lake Ontario is a Biodiversity Investment Area that features a 17-mile long barrier beach of Great Lakes dunes and a

More information